Jose Luis Calleja

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Treatment options are limited for patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) with advanced liver disease. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 and advanced liver disease. METHODS We did an open-label study at 34 sites in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Cohort A included patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B (CTP-B) or CTP-C cirrhosis who had not undergone liver transplantation. Cohort B included post-transplantation patients who had either no cirrhosis; CTP-A, CTP-B, or CTP-C cirrhosis; or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Patients in each group were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive 12 or 24 weeks of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) once daily (combination tablet), plus ribavirin (600-1200 mg daily). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis and all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment were included in the efficacy analyses. Estimates of SVR12 and relapse rates and their two-sided 90% CI (Clopper-Pearson method) were provided. This exploratory phase 2 study was not powered for formal comparisons among treatment groups; no statistical hypothesis testing was planned or conducted. The trial is registered with EudraCT (number 2013-002802-30) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02010255). FINDINGS Between Jan 14, 2014, and Aug 19, 2014, 398 patients were screened. Of 333 patients who received treatment, 296 had genotype 1 HCV and 37 had genotype 4 HCV. In cohort A, among patients with genotype 1 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 20 (87%, 90% CI 70-96) of 23 CTP-B patients with 12 weeks of treatment; 22 (96%, 81-100) of 23 CTP-B patients with 24 weeks of treatment; 17 (85%, 66-96) of 20 CTP-C patients (12 weeks treatment); and 18 (78%, 60-91) of 23 CTP-C patients (24 weeks treatment). In cohort B, among patients with genotype 1 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 42 (93%, 84-98) of 45 patients without cirrhosis (12 weeks treatment); 44 (100%, 93-100) of 44 patients without cirrhosis (24 weeks treatment); 30 (100%, 91-100) of 30 CTP-A patients (12 weeks treatment); 27 (96%, 84-100) of 28 CTP-A patients (24 weeks treatment); 19 (95%, 78-100) of 20 CTP-B patients (12 weeks treatment); 20 (100%, 86-100) of 20 CTP-B patients (24 weeks treatment); one (50%, 3-98) of two CTP-C patients (12 weeks treatment); and four (80%, 34-99) of five CTP-C patients (24 weeks treatment). All five patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved SVR12 (100%, 90% CI 55-100). Among all patients with genotype 4 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 14 (78%, 56-92) of 18 patients (12 weeks treatment) and 16 (94%, 75-100) of 17 patients (24 weeks treatment). Seven patients (2%) discontinued ledipasvir-sofosbuvir prematurely due to adverse events. 17 patients died, mainly from complications of hepatic decompensation. INTERPRETATION Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin provided high rates of SVR12 for patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before or after liver transplantation. FUNDING Gilead Sciences.

Historical epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in selected countries

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading indicator for liver disease. New treatment options are becoming available, and there is a need to characterize the epidemiology and disease burden of HCV. Data for prevalence, viremia, genotype, diagnosis and treatment were obtained through literature searches and expert consensus for 16 countries. For some countries, data from centralized registries were used to estimate diagnosis and treatment rates. Data for the number of liver transplants and the proportion attributable to HCV were obtained from centralized databases. Viremic prevalence estimates varied widely between countries, ranging from 0.3% in Austria, England and Germany to 8.5% in Egypt. The largest viremic populations were in Egypt, with 6 358 000 cases in 2008 and Brazil with 2 106 000 cases in 2007. The age distribution of cases differed between countries. In most countries, prevalence rates were higher among males, reflecting higher rates of injection drug use. Diagnosis, treatment and transplant levels also differed considerably between countries. Reliable estimates characterizing HCV‐infected populations are critical for addressing HCV‐related morbidity and mortality. There is a need to quantify the burden of chronic HCV infection at the national level.

Treatment of insulin resistance with metformin in naïve genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients receiving peginterferon alfa‐2a plus ribavirin

Insulin resistance affects sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C. To know whether adding metformin to standard antiviral treatment improves SVR, we conducted a prospective, multicentered, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial in 19 Spanish hospitals, including 123 consecutive patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C and insulin resistance. Patients were randomized to receive either metformin (arm A; n = 59) or placebo (arm B; n = 64) in addition to peginterferon alfa‐2a (180 μg/week) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day). The primary end point was SVR, and secondary endpoints were viral clearance at weeks 12, 24, and 48, and changes in the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index over the first 24 weeks. There were no differences between arms at baseline. In the intent‐to‐treat analysis, SVR was observed in 53% versus 42% in arm A and arm B, respectively (P = NS). In the subgroup analyses, SVR was higher in females (n = 54) receiving metformin: arm A, 58% (15/26) versus 29% (8/28) arm B (P = 0.03). In the per protocol analysis (PPA; n = 101), SVR was 67% in arm A and 49% in arm B (P = 0.06). Viral decline during the first 12 weeks was greater in females receiving metformin: −4.88 (1.18) versus −4.0 (1.44) (P = 0.021), whereas no differences were seen in males. The triple therapy was well tolerated, but diarrhea was more often seen in arm A (34% versus 11%; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Adding metformin to peginterferon and ribavirin was safe and improved insulin sensitivity. Although the study failed to show a statistically significant difference between arms, it did show an improved SVR in females. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.)

Strategies to manage hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden

The number of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections is projected to decline while those with advanced liver disease will increase. A modeling approach was used to forecast two treatment scenarios: (i) the impact of increased treatment efficacy while keeping the number of treated patients constant and (ii) increasing efficacy and treatment rate. This analysis suggests that successful diagnosis and treatment of a small proportion of patients can contribute significantly to the reduction of disease burden in the countries studied. The largest reduction in HCV‐related morbidity and mortality occurs when increased treatment is combined with higher efficacy therapies, generally in combination with increased diagnosis. With a treatment rate of approximately 10%, this analysis suggests it is possible to achieve elimination of HCV (defined as a >90% decline in total infections by 2030). However, for most countries presented, this will require a 3–5 fold increase in diagnosis and/or treatment. Thus, building the public health and clinical provider capacity for improved diagnosis and treatment will be critical.

Potency, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the NS3/4A protease inhibitor BI201335 in patients with chronic HCV genotype-1 infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS BI201335 is a highly specific and potent HCV protease inhibitor. This multiple rising dose trial evaluated antiviral activity and safety in chronic HCV genotype-1 patients. METHODS Thirty-four treatment-naïve patients were randomized to monotherapy with placebo or BI201335 at 20-240 mg once-daily for 14 days, followed by combination with pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) through Day 28. Nineteen treatment-experienced patients received 48-240 mg BI201335 once-daily with PegIFN/RBV for 28 days. HCV-RNA was measured with Roche COBAS TaqMan. RESULTS In treatment-naïve patients, median maximal viral load (VL) reductions during 14-day monotherapy were -3.0, -3.6, -3.7, and -4.2 log(10) for the 20, 48, 120, and 240 mg groups. VL breakthroughs (≥1 log(10) from nadir) were seen in most patients on monotherapy and were caused by NS3/4A variants (R155K, D168V) conferring in vitro resistance to BI201335. Adding PegIFN/RBV at Days 15-28 led to continuous viral load reductions in most patients. In treatment-experienced patients, treatment with BI201335 and PegIFN/RBV achieved VL<25 IU/ml at Day 28 in 3/6, 4/7, and 5/6 patients in the 48, 120, and 240 mg dose groups. VL breakthroughs were observed during triple combination in only 3/19 patients. BI201335 was generally well tolerated. Mild rash or photosensitivity was detected in four patients. Mild unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia was the only dose-dependent laboratory abnormality of BI201335. BI201335 elimination half-life supports once-daily dosing. CONCLUSIONS BI201335 combined with PegIFN/RBV was well tolerated and induced strong antiviral responses. These results support further development of BI201335 in HCV genotype-1 patients.

Propranolol plus prazosin compared with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the treatment of portal hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS The association of prazosin to propranolol enhances the decrease in portal pressure but may cause hypotension and sodium retention. The aim of this study was to compare the portal pressure reduction and safety of the combination of propranolol plus prazosin with that of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN). METHODS Fifty-six portal-hypertensive cirrhotics received randomly propranolol plus prazosin (n = 28) or propranolol plus ISMN (n = 28) orally for 3 months. Hemodynamics and liver and renal function were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS Propranolol plus prazosin caused a greater reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than propranolol plus ISMN (-24.2% +/- 11% vs. -16.1% +/- 11%; P < 0.01). A reduction in HVPG of > 20% was significantly more frequent in the propranolol plus prazosin group than in the propranolol plus ISMN group (85% vs. 53%; P < 0.05). Neither treatment modified hepatic blood flow, quantitative liver function test results, glomerular filtration rate, plasma renin activity, or plasma aldosterone level. Side effects occurred in 13 patients receiving propranolol plus prazosin compared with 7 receiving propranolol plus ISMN (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS Propranolol plus prazosin has a greater portal pressure-lowering effect than propranolol plus ISMN. Both therapies were safe for liver and renal function. However, the combination of propranolol plus prazosin caused a greater decrease in arterial pressure and was less well tolerated than propranolol plus ISMN.

Portal Hypertension–Related Complications After Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis: Impact of Early Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND & AIMS Acute portal vein thrombosis (APVT) is a rare disorder that causes chronic portal hypertension if recanalization is not obtained. However, response to anticoagulation and long-term prognosis of APVT are not well-defined. METHODS Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with APVT between 1995 and 2003 from 5 Spanish referral hospitals, in whom cirrhosis and malignancy were specifically excluded, were included in this retrospective study. The response to anticoagulation therapy and development of portal hypertension-related complications during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 43 months (range, 6-112 months). Recanalization occurred in 12 of 27 patients receiving anticoagulation versus 0 of 11 patients who did not receive anticoagulation (P = .008). Rates of recanalization were influenced by the precocity of heparin administration and the number of underlying prothrombotic conditions. Follow-up upper endoscopy performed in 29 patients disclosed gastroesophageal varices in 16 (55%). Varices appeared as early as 1 month after APVT. However, in most patients varices were detected in successive endoscopies, mainly during the first year. Two-year actuarial probability of variceal bleeding was 12% and for ascites 16%. Five-year survival was 87%. Mortality was related to the APVT episode in 2 cases and to an underlying hematologic disorder in one. CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation achieved recanalization in about 40% of patients. Most patients not achieving recanalization will develop gastroesophageal varices during follow-up. However, development of variceal bleeding and ascites is infrequent, and survival is satisfactory.

Grazoprevir and elbasvir plus ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype-1 infection after failure of combination therapy containing a direct-acting antiviral agent

BACKGROUND & AIMS The Phase-2 C-SALVAGE study evaluated an investigational interferon-free combination of grazoprevir (a NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and elbasvir (a NS5A inhibitor) with ribavirin for patients with chronic HCV genotype-1 infection who had failed licensed DAA-containing therapy. METHODS C-SALVAGE was an open-label study of grazoprevir 100 mg and elbasvir 50 mg QD with weight-based ribavirin BID for 12 weeks in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with chronic HCV genotype-1 infection who had not attained SVR after ⩾4 weeks of peginterferon and ribavirin plus either boceprevir, telaprevir, or simeprevir. Exclusion criteria included decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and HIV or HBV co-infection. The primary efficacy outcome was SVR12 defined as a HCV RNA level below the assay limit of quantification 12 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS Of the 79 patients treated with ⩾1 dose of study drug, 66 (84%) patients had a history of virologic failure on a regimen containing a NS3/4A protease inhibitor; 12 of the other 13 patients discontinued prior treatment because of adverse experiences. At entry, 34 (43.6%) of 78 evaluable patients harbored NS3 RAVs. SVR12 rates were 76/79 (96.2%) overall, including 28/30 (93.3%) patients with genotype 1a infection, 63/66 (95.5%) patients with prior virologic failure, 43/43 (100%) patients without baseline RAVs, 31/34 (91.2%) patients with baseline NS3 RAVs, 6/8 (75.0%) patients with baseline NS5A RAVs, 4/6 (66.7%) patients with both baseline NS3 and RAVs, and 32/34 (94.1%) cirrhotic patients. None of the five reported serious adverse events were considered drug-related. CONCLUSIONS Grazoprevir and elbasvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks provides a promising new treatment option for patients after failure of triple therapy containing an earlier-generation protease inhibitor.

Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND ERCP can be associated with serious complications. Difficulty in common bile duct (CBD) cannulation is one of the main risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. The double-guidewire technique (DGT) has been considered a promising alternative approach in difficult cannulation situations. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of DGT with the standard cannulation technique (SCT) in patients in whom CBD cannulation is difficult to perform. DESIGN Multicenter randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Six tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS A total of 188 patients with difficult CBD cannulation defined by completion of 5 unsuccessful cannulation attempts were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS Ninety-seven patients were assigned to the DGT group and 91 to the SCT group. Both techniques were compared for an extra 10 cannulation attempts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS CBD cannulation rate, number of attempts required to cannulate, and ERCP-related complications. RESULTS Successful CBD cannulation was achieved in 46 of 97 (47%) patients in the DGT group compared with 51 of 91 (56%) in the SCT group (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64-1.12). The median number of attempts required for each group was 9 and 7, respectively (P = .128). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 17% in the DGT group and 8% in the SCT group (OR 2.13; 95% CI, 0.89-5.05). LIMITATIONS Reduced number of enrolled subjects and a lack of detailed information regarding the number and extent of pancreatic duct contrast injections. CONCLUSIONS In patients with difficult CBD cannulation, DGT was not superior to SCT in achieving CBD cannulation. DGT might be associated with a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Octreotide prevents postprandial splanchnic hyperemia in patients with portal hypertension

An increase in splanchnic blood flow is a physiological response to food intake. In patients with cirrhosis whose hepatic vascular resistance is already high, this increase in flow leads to marked increases in portal pressure. This study investigates whether octreotide prevents the increases in hepatic flow and portal pressure that follow the ingestion of a meal in patients with cirrhosis. Twenty-two patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were randomized to receive a mixed liquid meal (520 kcal) plus a single subcutaneous injection of either placebo or octreotide (200 micrograms). In the placebo group the ingestion of a meal was followed by an increase in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (+ 19.4 +/- 4.3%, p < 0.01) and hepatic blood flow (+ 38.2 +/- 14.6%, p < 0.05) at 30 min. In contrast, in the octreotide group eating caused no significant change in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (-2.8 +/- 3.6%, NS), while hepatic flow was decreased (-6.08 +/- 5.4%, p < 0.05). Octreotide blunted the postprandial increase in serum insulin and glucagon levels observed in the placebo group. In conclusion, in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, octreotide prevents the postprandial increase in hepatic blood flow, and consequently also in portal pressure. These findings suggest that this drug could play a role in the long-term management of portal hypertension.