José Luis Llisterri

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns in Hypertensive Patients

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has become useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive individuals. In addition to 24-hour values, the circadian variation of BP adds prognostic significance in predicting cardiovascular outcome. However, the magnitude of circadian BP patterns in large studies has hardly been noticed. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of circadian BP patterns and to assess clinical conditions associated with the nondipping status in groups of both treated and untreated hypertensive subjects, studied separately. Clinical data and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring were obtained from 42 947 hypertensive patients included in the Spanish Society of Hypertension Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry. They were 8384 previously untreated and 34 563 treated hypertensives. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed with an oscillometric device (SpaceLabs 90207). A nondipping pattern was defined when nocturnal systolic BP dip was <10% of daytime systolic BP. The prevalence of nondipping was 41% in the untreated group and 53% in treated patients. In both groups, advanced age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and overt cardiovascular or renal disease were associated with a blunted nocturnal BP decline (P<0.001). In treated patients, nondipping was associated with the use of a higher number of antihypertensive drugs but not with the time of the day at which antihypertensive drugs were administered. In conclusion, a blunted nocturnal BP dip (the nondipping pattern) is common in hypertensive patients. A clinical pattern of high cardiovascular risk is associated with nondipping, suggesting that the blunted nocturnal BP dip may be merely a marker of high cardiovascular risk.

Prevalencia de fibrilación auricular en la población española de 60 o más años de edad. Estudio PREV-ICTUS

Introduction and objectives. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in individuals aged 60 years or more in Spain using a random sample of the population and to identify associated factors. Methods. An analysis of the PREV-ICTUS study, a randomized cross-sectional population-based study of individuals aged 60 years or more, was carried out. Data on demographic variables, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiovascular disease were obtained from medical records. The diagnosis of atrial fibrillation was based on the patient’s medical history and an electrocardiogram performed during the study. Results. In the 7108 individuals studied (mean age, 71.9 [7.1] years, 53.6% female), the prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.99.2%). It was higher in males (9.3% vs 7.9% in females; P=.036) and increased from 4.2% in individuals aged 6064 years to 16.5% in those aged 85 years or more (χ 2 test for linear trend, P<.001). Multivariate analysis showed that existing cardiovascular disease, hypertension, age, and left ventricular hypertrophy had the strongest associations with atrial fibrillation. Although there was a strong relationship between hypertension and atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.60-4.01), no association was found between poor blood pressure control and atrial fibrillation. A weak association with diabetes mellitus was found only when arterial pressure was included in the model, but not when a diagnosis of hypertension was included.

Differences in Blood Pressure Control and Stroke Mortality Across Spain The Prevención de Riesgo de Ictus (PREV-ICTUS) Study

The objective was to assess the stroke risk and prevalence of the cardiovascular risk factors and to analyze their relationship with the specific stroke rates of mortality in each of the autonomic communities of Spain. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study of population >60 years old in Spanish primary care centers. In all of the subjects, clinical, biochemical, and electrocardiographic data were obtained, and the 10-year stroke risk was calculated using the Framingham score. Mortality rates of stroke, age and sex adjusted, were obtained for each of the autonomic communities from the Ministry of Health. A total of 7343 subjects (mean age: 71.6 years, 53.4% women, 34.4% obese, and 27.1% diabetic subjects) were analyzed. A total of 73% were already diagnosed with hypertension. Among hypertensive subjects, 29.1% had blood pressure on therapeutic objective, and, of the total population, 35.7% had blood pressure under control. ECG–left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 12.9% of the subjects. The estimated stroke risk was 19.6%. Stroke mortality rates were significantly related to the estimated 10-year stroke risk (r=0.41; P<0.05) in each autonomic community. Poor hypertension control (P=−0.42; P<0.05) and prevalence of ECG–left ventricular hypertrophy (P=0.52; P<0.05) were the main factors related to the stroke mortality rates after controlling by age, sex, obesity, diabetes, and urban setting. Differences in stroke mortality throughout the autonomic communities of Spain were associated with indexes of worse blood pressure handling, low control rates, and high left-ventricular hypertrophy.

Independent impact of obesity and fat distribution in hypertension prevalence and control in the elderly

Background Studies on the impact of weight excess and fat distribution on blood pressure are usually limited to young and middle-aged population, and data on the elderly are scarce. Methods and results We performed an analysis of the Prevencion de Riesgo de Ictus, a population-based study on individuals aged 60 years or more in Spain, to assess the impact of weight excess, stratified by body mass index (normal <25; overweight 25–29.9; obesity ≥30 kg/m2), and waist circumference [increased if ≥88 cm (women) or ≥102 (men)] on the prevalence on hypertension and lack of blood pressure control. In 6263 individuals (mean age 71.9 years old, 53.3% women; 73.0% with diagnosed hypertension), prevalence of obesity was 35.0%, and 65.6% showed an increased waist circumference. Body mass index and waist circumference showed an independent impact on the prevalence and absence of hypertension control. In a multivariate model including age, sex, body mass index, and waist circumference, prevalence of hypertension was higher in the overweight and obesity groups (odds ratio 1.41 and 1.96, respectively, compared to normal weight), and in those with increased waist circumference (odds ratio 1.25) compared with normal waist circumference. After further adjustment for antihypertensive therapy, overweight, and obesity (odds ratio 1.40 and 1.59, respectively) as well as increased waist circumference (odds ratio 1.39) were independently related to absence of blood pressure control. The impact of waist circumference on hypertension and blood pressure control was shown in each category of body mass index. Conclusion In this cross-sectional study in an elderly population, body mass index and waist circumference showed an independent and direct impact on the prevalence of hypertension and on the absence of blood pressure control.

Prevalencia de fibrilación auricular y uso de fármacos antitrombóticos en el paciente hipertenso ≥ 65 años. El registro FAPRES

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Age and arterial hypertension are two of the main factors associated with atrial fibrillation and an increased risk of embolism. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the extent of antithrombotic use in hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years in the Spanish region of Valencia. METHODS Each study investigator enrolled the first three hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years who came for a consultation on the first day of each week for 5 weeks. Each patients risk factors, history of cardiovascular disease, CHADS(2) score and medical treatment were noted and an ECG was recorded. Data were analyzed centrally. A patient was regarded as having atrial fibrillation if it was observable on the ECG or reported in medical records. RESULTS The study included 1,028 hypertensive patients with a mean age of 72.8 years. Overall, 10.3% had atrial fibrillation: in 6.7%, it was observable on the ECG while 3.6% were in sinus rhythm but had a history of the condition. Factors associated with atrial fibrillation were age, alcohol intake, structural heart disease and glomerular filtration rate. In total, 76.2% of patients with ECG evidence of atrial fibrillation and a CHADS(2) score >1 were taking anticoagulants compared with 41.7% of those who had a history of the condition but were currently in sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in our group of hypertensives was 10.3%; in 1.7%, it was previously undiagnosed. Antithrombotic use was high in patients with current atrial fibrillation, but lower in those who had experienced an episode previously.

Hipertensión arterial y política de salud en España

José R. Banegas a,b, , Albert Jovell , Benjamı́n Abarca , Manuel Aguilar Diosdado , Luis Aguilera , Pedro Aranda , Vicente Bertoméu , Pedro Capilla , Pedro Conthe , Fernando De Álvaro , Antonio Fernández-Pro , Xavier Formiguera , Jesús Frı́as , Lucı́a Guerrero , José L. Llisterri , José M. Lobos , Juan F. Macı́as , Ángel L. Martı́n De Francisco , Jesús Millán , Juan C. Morales , Vicente Palomo , Alex Roca-Cusachs , Javier Román , Carlos Sanchis , Antonio Sarriá , Julián Segura , Álex De La Sierra , Luis Verde , Julio Zarco n y Luis M. Ruilope a,u a Asociación de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión y Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial b Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CIBERESP (CIBER de Epidemiologı́a y Salud Pública), Madrid c Foro Español de Pacientes d Sociedad Española de Medicina General e Sociedad Española de Diabetes f Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria g Sociedad Española de Cardiologı́a h Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos i Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna j Sociedad Española de Nefrologı́a en el Comité Español Interdisciplinario para la Prevención Cardiovascular k Sociedad Española para el Estudio de la Obesidad l Departamento de Farmacologı́a y Terapéutica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid m Asociación de Enfermerı́a de Hipertensión y Riesgo Cardiovascular (EHRICA) n Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria o Comité Español Interdisciplinar de Prevención Cardiovascular (CEIP) p Sociedad Española de Geriatrı́a y Gerontologı́a q Sociedad Española de Nefrologı́a r Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis s Sociedad Española de Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria t Ibermutuamur-Corporación Mutua-Proyectos Sanitarios u Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologı́as Sanitarias. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid v Asociación para la Prevención del Riesgo Cardiovascular (PRECAR) x Sociedad Española de Directivos de Atención Primaria, España

Blood Pressure and Lipid Goal Attainment in the Hypertensive Population in the Primary Care Setting in Spain

Although blood pressure (BP) control is crucial in hypertensive patients, clinical practice guidelines agree that the goal of treatment should be aimed at not only decreasing BP but reducing global cardiovascular risk. The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to evaluate BP, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), and composite control rates in a hypertensive population in a primary care setting in Spain. Good BP control was defined as <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg for diabetics).LDL‐C control rate was established according to the third report of the National Cholestrol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel criteria. A total of 12,954 patients (49.9% women, aged 62.1±10.7 years) were included. BP was controlled in 24.8% of patients, LDL‐C in 26% of patients and, when combined, in only 8.6%. The rates of control were significantly worse in high‐risk subgroups, such as high‐coronary‐risk, diabetic, or metabolic syndrome patients. The BP and LDL‐C control rates in the hypertensive population attended to daily in primary care settings in Spain are low.

Abnormalities in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with diabetes

Our aim was to assess the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) characteristics or patterns in hypertensive patients with diabetes compared with non-diabetic hypertensives. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a 68 045 patient database from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry, a nation-wide network of >1200 primary-care physicians performing ABPM under standardized conditions in daily practice. We identified 12 600 (18.5%) hypertensive patients with diabetes. When compared with patients without diabetes, diabetic hypertensives exhibited higher systolic blood pressure (BP) levels in every ABPM period (daytime 135.4 vs. 131.8, and nighttime 126.0 vs. 121.0 mm Hg, P<0.001 for both) despite they were receiving more antihypertensive drugs (mean number 1.71 vs. 1.23, P<0.001). Consequently, diabetic patients suffered from lack of control of BP more frequently than non-diabetic subjects particularly during the night (65.5% vs. 57.4%, P<0.001). Prevalence of a non-dipping BP profile (64.2% vs. 51.6%, P<0.001) was higher in diabetic patients. In the other hand, prevalence of ‘white-coat’ hypertension in diabetic patients was 33.0%. We conclude that there was a remarkably high prevalence of alterations in ABPM in patients with diabetes. Abnormalities in systolic BP, particularly during the night, and in circadian BP pattern could be linked with the excess of BP-related cardiovascular risk of diabetes. A wider use of ABPM in diabetic patients should be considered.

Diferencias entre el control clínico y ambulatorio de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes muy ancianos. Proyecto CARDIORISC–MAPAPRES

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Hypertension is highly prevalent in the very elderly. We studied control rates of hypertension according to clinic blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in treated hypertensives aged > or =80 years. PATIENTS AND METHOD Data came from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry (CARDIORISC - MAPAPRES project), which comprises a nation-wide network of more than 1,000 physicians sending standardized ABPM registries via web. Between June 2004 and April 2007 we obtained a 33.829-patient database. Control of hypertension was defined at the clinic when office BP was <140/90mmHg and at the ABPM when mean BP during the 24-h period was <130/80mmHg. RESULTS We identified 2,311 patients (6.8%) aged > or =80 years. Mean age (SD) was 83.1 (3.2) years and 63% were women. Control of clinic BP was observed in 21.5% of cases (95%CI: 19.1-23.9) and control of 24-h BP in ABPM was 42.1% (95%CI: 39.7-45.3). Prevalence of masked hypertension was 7.0% (95%CI: 6.0-8.0) and prevalence of office-resistant control (white coat) was 27.6% (95% CI: 25.7-29.4). Diabetes, kidney disease, and duration of hypertension were associated with lack of control in ABPM. CONCLUSIONS In very old hypertensives, control of clinic BP was 21.5% but ambulatory-based hypertension control was 42.1%. Physicians should be aware that the likelihood of misestimating BP control is high in these subjects. A wider use of ABPM in the elderly with hypertension should be considered.

Evolution of therapy inertia in primary care setting in Spain during 2002-2010.

Objective: To determine the therapeutic behavior of primary care physicians in uncontrolled hypertensive patients in Spain during the last decade. Methods: Data were taken from three cross-sectional surveys aimed to determine the blood pressure (BP) control rates in treated hypertensive patients followed in a setting of primary care in Spain during 2002, 2006, and 2010, respectively. Adequate BP control was globally defined as BP lower than 140/90 mmHg for the hypertensive population in the three studies. In patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or cardiovascular disease, BP control was established as lower than 130/85 mmHg in PRESión arterial en la población Española en los Centros de Atención Primaria (PRESCAP) 2002 and lower than 130/80 mmHg in PRESCAP 2006 and 2010. Results: A total of 12 754, 10 520, and 12 961 patients were included in PRESCAP 2002, 2006, and 2010 studies. Of them, 36.1, 41.4, and 46.3%, respectively, achieved BP targets. In those patients with uncontrolled BP, physicians modified the treatment in 18.3, 30.4, and 41.4% of the cases, respectively (P = 0.0001). The most frequent action taken was the change to another drug in PRESCAP 2002 (47.0%), and the addition of other antihypertensive agent in PRESCAP 2006 and 2010 (46.3 and 55.6%, respectively). Predictors of therapeutic inertia were the physicians’ perception of BP control, being on treatment with combined therapy, and the absence of risk factors or cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: Although therapeutic inertia has decreased in the last years in primary care setting in Spain, nowadays in nearly 60% of patients with uncontrolled BP, no therapeutic action is actually taken. Therefore, despite a significant improvement, therapeutic inertia still remains a relevant clinical problem in hypertension general practice.