Jose M. El-Amm

Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors

BACKGROUND A report from a high-volume single center indicated a survival benefit of receiving a kidney transplant from an HLA-incompatible live donor as compared with remaining on the waiting list, whether or not a kidney from a deceased donor was received. The generalizability of that finding is unclear. METHODS In a 22-center study, we estimated the survival benefit for 1025 recipients of kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors who were matched with controls who remained on the waiting list or received a transplant from a deceased donor (waiting-list-or-transplant control group) and controls who remained on the waiting list but did not receive a transplant (waiting-list-only control group). We analyzed the data with and without patients from the highest-volume center in the study. RESULTS Recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors had a higher survival rate than either control group at 1 year (95.0%, vs. 94.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 89.6% for the waiting-list-only control group), 3 years (91.7% vs. 83.6% and 72.7%, respectively), 5 years (86.0% vs. 74.4% and 59.2%), and 8 years (76.5% vs. 62.9% and 43.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with the two control groups). The survival benefit was significant at 8 years across all levels of donor-specific antibody: 89.2% for recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors who had a positive Luminex assay for anti-HLA antibody but a negative flow-cytometric cross-match versus 65.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 47.1% for the waiting-list-only control group; 76.3% for recipients with a positive flow-cytometric cross-match but a negative cytotoxic cross-match versus 63.3% and 43.0% in the two control groups, respectively; and 71.0% for recipients with a positive cytotoxic cross-match versus 61.5% and 43.7%, respectively. The findings did not change when patients from the highest-volume center were excluded. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter study validated single-center evidence that patients who received kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors had a substantial survival benefit as compared with patients who did not undergo transplantation and those who waited for transplants from deceased donors. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).

Quantifying the Risk of Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Study

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti‐HLA donor‐specific antibody (DSA). Program‐specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71–6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28–3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98–7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKTs effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal‐quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19‐, 1.33‐ and 1.73‐fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22‐, 4.09‐ and 10.72‐fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKTs increased risk places centers providing this life‐saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.

Sirolimus‐Induced Angioedema

Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has gained widespread use in organ transplantation. Its full spectrum of side‐effects is yet to be defined. We describe herein three cases of SRL‐induced angioedema (AE) in African‐American (AA) primary renal allograft recipients who received SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. In two cases, AE manifested after SRL was restarted after a period of discontinuation. The third case presented upon initial exposure to the drug. None of the patients was receiving any drug that has been previously associated with AE. Complete resolution occurred only after SRL was withdrawn. AE has not recurred in any of the patients during a follow‐up period of up to 21 months. We conclude that AE is a previously unrecognized adverse event associated with SRL use. Close monitoring for this side‐effect, especially in AA patients, is warranted.

Sirolimus exposure during the early post‐transplant period reduces the risk of CMV infection relative to tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients

Abstract:  Introduction:  There are limited data regarding the role of individual maintenance immunosuppressive agents in the development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We examined the association between exposure to sirolimus (SRL) and risk of CMV infection after kidney transplantation when compared with tacrolimus (TCL).

West Nile virus encephalitis: an emerging disease in renal transplant recipients.

Abstract:  West Nile virus (WNV) has emerged as an important cause of several outbreaks of febrile illness and encephalitis in North America over the past few years. The most common manifestation in symptomatic patients is a transient febrile illness. Neuroinvasive disease, that can be fatal, occurs most often in elderly and immunocompromised hosts. The role of this virus as a cause of meninoencephalitis in organ transplant recipients is becoming better recognized. We describe herein the clinical course of two renal allograft recipients who developed WNV encephalitis. One patient developed status epilepticus and eventually died, while the other had a full recovery. In both cases, the diagnosis was confirmed by detection of WNV‐specific IgM in CSF or serum, with a delayed antibody response in one patient. This viral infection should be considered in all renal transplant recipients who present with a febrile illness associated with neurological symptoms.

Predictive value of human leucocyte antigen epitope matching using HLAMatchmaker for graft outcomes in a predominantly African-American renal transplant cohort.

Abstract: The HLAMatchmaker program is based on the donor/recipient comparison of the polymorphic triplet amino‐acid sequences of the antibody‐accessible regions on the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) molecule. The previous reports on its predictive value for renal allograft outcomes are conflicting. We conducted a retrospective study in a predominantly African‐American (AA) cohort (N=101, 94% AA). HLA typing was performed by molecular methods and triplet matching using HLAMatchmaker. Study end points included graft survival and incidence of acute rejection. The relationship between the number of triplet mismatches (TMM) and the degree of HLA antigen MM was evaluated using Pearsons correlation coefficient. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between triplet matching and the study end points. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for graft survival analysis. The strongest relationship between the number of TMM and HLA antigen MM was observed for HLA‐DQ (r=0.88). The association between triplet matching at HLA‐A, ‐B, ‐DR and ‐DRw HLA loci and the study end points was not statistically significant. However, after grouping, the unadjusted estimates of graft survival for those with more than 10 Class I TMM were significantly worse than the others (p=0.03). Adjusting for the effect of donor source, recipient characteristics and the immunosuppressive regimen did not change this association (hazard ratio=0.2, confidence interval=0.04–1.1). We conclude that triplet matching using HLAMatchmaker can provide useful prognostic information in kidney transplantation and that more than 10 donor/recipient Class I HLA TMM is predictive of worse graft outcome.

The Incremental Cost of Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Analysis

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end‐stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA‐incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource‐intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell‐depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor‐specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments (

Hospital readmissions following HLA-incompatible live donor kidney transplantation: A multi-center study

91 330 vs.

Intermediate-term outcomes with early steroid withdrawal in African-American renal transplant recipients undergoing surveillance biopsy

63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.

Preliminary results with early corticosteroid withdrawal in African American renal allograft recipients

Thirty percent of kidney transplant recipients are readmitted in the first month posttransplantation. Those with donor‐specific antibody requiring desensitization and incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) constitute a unique subpopulation that might be at higher readmission risk. Drawing on a 22‐center cohort, 379 ILDKTs with Medicare primary insurance were matched to compatible transplant‐matched controls and to waitlist‐only matched controls on panel reactive antibody, age, blood group, renal replacement time, prior kidney transplantation, race, gender, diabetes, and transplant date/waitlisting date. Readmission risk was determined using multilevel, mixed‐effects Poisson regression. In the first month, ILDKTs had a 1.28‐fold higher readmission risk than compatible controls (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‐1.46; P < .001). Risk peaked at 6‐12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.49‐1.87; P < .001), attenuating by 24‐36 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10‐1.40; P < .001). ILDKTs had a 5.86‐fold higher readmission risk (95% CI 4.96‐6.92; P < .001) in the first month compared to waitlist‐only controls. At 12‐24 (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77‐0.95; P = .002) and 24‐36 months (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66‐0.84; P < .001), ILDKTs had a lower risk than waitlist‐only controls. These findings of ILDKTs having a higher readmission risk than compatible controls, but a lower readmission risk after the first year than waitlist‐only controls should be considered in regulatory/payment schemas and planning clinical care.