José M. Serratosa

Randomized phase III study 306: adjunctive perampanel for refractory partial-onset seizures.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day added to 1–3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Methods: During this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with persisting seizures on 1–3 AEDs were randomized to perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day or placebo following a 6-week baseline phase. Perampanel was titrated weekly by 2 mg/day and maintained at the dose achieved for 13 weeks. Primary endpoints were median percent change in seizure frequency and 50% responder rate. Analysis of covariance was performed on all treated patients with any seizure data (recorded in daily diaries) in the double-blind phase. Results: A total of 706 patients were randomized and received trial medication; 623 completed the trial. Median percent change in seizure frequency—the primary efficacy endpoint—was −10.7%, −13.6%, −23.3%, and −30.8% for placebo, perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day, respectively. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0026) and 8 mg/day (p < 0.0001). The corresponding 50% responder rates were 17.9%, 20.6%, 28.5%, and 34.9%. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0132) and 8 mg/day (p = 0.0003). An apparent dose response was suggested for dizziness, which was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated that adjunctive perampanel effectively reduced seizure frequency and possessed a favorable tolerability profile in patients ≥12 years with partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalization), with a minimum effective dose of 4 mg/day. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that 4 and 8 mg/day doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective and tolerated in reducing partial-onset seizures.

Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes

Idiopathic focal epilepsy (IFE) with rolandic spikes is the most common childhood epilepsy, comprising a phenotypic spectrum from rolandic epilepsy (also benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, BECTS) to atypical benign partial epilepsy (ABPE), Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS) and epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike and waves during slow-wave sleep (CSWS). The genetic basis is largely unknown. We detected new heterozygous mutations in GRIN2A in 27 of 359 affected individuals from 2 independent cohorts with IFE (7.5%; P = 4.83 × 10−18, Fishers exact test). Mutations occurred significantly more frequently in the more severe phenotypes, with mutation detection rates ranging from 12/245 (4.9%) in individuals with BECTS to 9/51 (17.6%) in individuals with CSWS (P = 0.009, Cochran-Armitage test for trend). In addition, exon-disrupting microdeletions were found in 3 of 286 individuals (1.0%; P = 0.004, Fishers exact test). These results establish alterations of the gene encoding the NMDA receptor NR2A subunit as a major genetic risk factor for IFE.

Mutations in DEPDC5 cause familial focal epilepsy with variable foci

The majority of epilepsies are focal in origin, with seizures emanating from one brain region. Although focal epilepsies often arise from structural brain lesions, many affected individuals have normal brain imaging. The etiology is unknown in the majority of individuals, although genetic factors are increasingly recognized. Autosomal dominant familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (FFEVF) is notable because family members have seizures originating from different cortical regions. Using exome sequencing, we detected DEPDC5 mutations in two affected families. We subsequently identified mutations in five of six additional published large families with FFEVF. Study of families with focal epilepsy that were too small for conventional clinical diagnosis with FFEVF identified DEPDC5 mutations in approximately 12% of families (10/82). This high frequency establishes DEPDC5 mutations as a common cause of familial focal epilepsies. Shared homology with G protein signaling molecules and localization in human neurons suggest a role of DEPDC5 in neuronal signal transduction.

Fever, genes, and epilepsy

About 13% of patients with epilepsy have a history of febrile seizures (FS). Studies of familial forms suggest a genetic component to the epidemiological link. Indeed, in certain monogenic forms of FS, for which several loci have been reported, some patients develop epilepsy with a higher risk than in the general population. Patients with generalised epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) can have typical and isolated FS, FS lasting more beyond age 6 years, and subsequent afebrile (typically generalised) seizures. Mutations associated with GEFS+ were identified in genes for subunits of the voltage-gated sodium channel and the gamma2 subunit of the ligand-gated GABAA receptor. Screening for these genes in patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy showed de novo mutations of the alpha1 subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel. Antecedent FS are commonly observed in temporal-lobe epilepsy (TLE). In sporadic mesial TLE-characterised by the sequence of complex FS in childhood, hippocampal sclerosis, and refractory temporal-lobe seizures-association studies suggested the role of several susceptibility genes. Work on some large pedigrees also suggests that FS and temporal-lobe seizures may have a common genetic basis, whether hippocampus sclerosis is present or not. The molecular defects identified in the genetic associations of FS and epileptic seizures are very attractive models to aid our understanding of epileptogenesis and susceptibility to seizure-provoking factors, especially fever.

Genetic testing in the epilepsies—Report of the ILAE Genetics Commission

In this report, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Genetics Commission discusses essential issues to be considered with regard to clinical genetic testing in the epilepsies. Genetic research on the epilepsies has led to the identification of more than 20 genes with a major effect on susceptibility to idiopathic epilepsies. The most important potential clinical application of these discoveries is genetic testing: the use of genetic information, either to clarify the diagnosis in people already known or suspected to have epilepsy (diagnostic testing), or to predict onset of epilepsy in people at risk because of a family history (predictive testing). Although genetic testing has many potential benefits, it also has potential harms, and assessment of these potential benefits and harms in particular situations is complex. Moreover, many treating clinicians are unfamiliar with the types of tests available, how to access them, how to decide whether they should be offered, and what measures should be used to maximize benefit and minimize harm to their patients. Because the field is moving rapidly, with new information emerging practically every day, we present a framework for considering the clinical utility of genetic testing that can be applied to many different syndromes and clinical contexts. Given the current state of knowledge, genetic testing has high clinical utility in few clinical contexts, but in some of these it carries implications for daily clinical practice.

Childhood absence epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures and electroencephalogram 3-4-Hz spike and multispike-slow wave complexes: linkage to chromosome 8q24.

Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), a common form of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, accounts for 5%-15% of childhood epilepsies. To map the chromosomal locus of persisting CAE, we studied the clinical and electroencephalographic traits of 78 members of a five-generation family from Bombay, India. The model-free affected-pedigree member method was used during initial screening with chromosome 6p, 8q, and 1p microsatellites, and only individuals with absence seizures and/or electroencephalogram 3-4-Hz spike- and multispike-slow wave complexes were considered to be affected. Significant P values of .00000-.02 for several markers on 8q were obtained. Two-point linkage analysis, assuming autosomal dominant inheritance with 50% penetrance, yielded a maximum LOD score (Zmax) of 3.6 for D8S502. No other locus in the genome achieved a significant Zmax. For five smaller multiplex families, summed Zmax was 2.4 for D8S537 and 1.7 for D8S1761. Haplotypes composed of the same 8q24 microsatellites segregated with affected members of the large family from India and with all five smaller families. Recombinations positioned the CAE gene in a 3.2-cM interval.

De novo loss- or gain-of-function mutations in KCNA2 cause epileptic encephalopathy.

Epileptic encephalopathies are a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous group of severe epilepsies accompanied by intellectual disability and other neurodevelopmental features. Using next-generation sequencing, we identified four different de novo mutations in KCNA2, encoding the potassium channel KV1.2, in six isolated patients with epileptic encephalopathy (one mutation recurred three times independently). Four individuals presented with febrile and multiple afebrile, often focal seizure types, multifocal epileptiform discharges strongly activated by sleep, mild to moderate intellectual disability, delayed speech development and sometimes ataxia. Functional studies of the two mutations associated with this phenotype showed almost complete loss of function with a dominant-negative effect. Two further individuals presented with a different and more severe epileptic encephalopathy phenotype. They carried mutations inducing a drastic gain-of-function effect leading to permanently open channels. These results establish KCNA2 as a new gene involved in human neurodevelopmental disorders through two different mechanisms, predicting either hyperexcitability or electrical silencing of KV1.2-expressing neurons.

Genome-wide association analysis of genetic generalized epilepsies implicates susceptibility loci at 1q43, 2p16.1, 2q22.3 and 17q21.32

Genetic generalized epilepsies (GGEs) have a lifetime prevalence of 0.3% and account for 20-30% of all epilepsies. Despite their high heritability of 80%, the genetic factors predisposing to GGEs remain elusive. To identify susceptibility variants shared across common GGE syndromes, we carried out a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 3020 patients with GGEs and 3954 controls of European ancestry. To dissect out syndrome-related variants, we also explored two distinct GGE subgroups comprising 1434 patients with genetic absence epilepsies (GAEs) and 1134 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Joint Stage-1 and 2 analyses revealed genome-wide significant associations for GGEs at 2p16.1 (rs13026414, P(meta) = 2.5 × 10(-9), OR[T] = 0.81) and 17q21.32 (rs72823592, P(meta) = 9.3 × 10(-9), OR[A] = 0.77). The search for syndrome-related susceptibility alleles identified significant associations for GAEs at 2q22.3 (rs10496964, P(meta) = 9.1 × 10(-9), OR[T] = 0.68) and at 1q43 for JME (rs12059546, P(meta) = 4.1 × 10(-8), OR[G] = 1.42). Suggestive evidence for an association with GGEs was found in the region 2q24.3 (rs11890028, P(meta) = 4.0 × 10(-6)) nearby the SCN1A gene, which is currently the gene with the largest number of known epilepsy-related mutations. The associated regions harbor high-ranking candidate genes: CHRM3 at 1q43, VRK2 at 2p16.1, ZEB2 at 2q22.3, SCN1A at 2q24.3 and PNPO at 17q21.32. Further replication efforts are necessary to elucidate whether these positional candidate genes contribute to the heritability of the common GGE syndromes.

Is Refractory Epilepsy Preventable

Summary: About a third of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will not be fully controlled with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and many of them will have frequent and disabling seizures. These patients will undergo multiple drug trials, most often without complete seizure remission. Moreover, refractory epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity (from seizures and medications), social isolation, unemployment, and overall reduced quality of life. There is evidence that refractory epilepsy can be a progressive disorder, which, if controlled early, might never develop into a full syndrome with all of its associated sequelae. The difficulty lies in identifying at an early stage patients who are likely to progress to intractability. No currently known markers enable clinicians to make this identification with confidence. Advances in pharmacogenomics and our understanding of pharmacologic responsiveness in epilepsy may change this situation. Even now, we are able to identify many patients with a poor prognosis earlier than before, particularly in the pediatric population, in which syndromic classification may provide an approach to predict intractability. The early initiation of aggressive therapy may improve outcome and overall quality of life.

Lafora disease due to EPM2B mutations A clinical and genetic study

Objective: To study EPM2B gene mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with Lafora disease. Methods: The authors performed a clinical and mutational analysis of 25 patients, from 23 families, diagnosed with Lafora disease who had not shown mutations in the EPM2A gene. Results: The authors identified 18 mutations in EPM2B, including 12 novel mutations: 4 nonsense mutations (R265X, C26X, W219X, and E67X), a 6-base pair (bp) microdeletion resulting in a two amino acid deletion (V294_K295del), a 4-bp insertion resulting in a frameshift mutation (S339fs12), and 6 missense mutations (D308A, I198N, C68Y, E67Q, P264H, and D233A). In our data set of 77 families with Lafora disease, 54 (70.1%) tested probands have mutations in EPM2A, 21 (27.3%) in EPM2B, and 2 (2.6%) have no mutations in either gene. The course of the disease was longer in patients with EPM2B mutations vs patients with EPM2A mutations. Conclusions: Genetic allelic heterogeneity is present in Lafora disease associated with mutations in EPM2B. Patients with mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B express similar clinical manifestation, although patients with EPM2B-associated Lafora disease seem to have a slightly milder clinical course. The lack of mutations in EPM2A and EPM2B in two families could be because of the presence of mutations in noncoding, nontested regions or the existence of an additional gene associated with Lafora disease.