José Manuel Entrena

Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential of Sigma1 Receptor Ligands

Sigma (σ) receptors, initially described as a subtype of opioid receptors, are now considered unique receptors. Pharmacological studies have distinguished two types of σ receptors, termed σ1 and σ2. Of these two subtypes, the σ1 receptor has been cloned in humans and rodents, and its amino acid sequence shows no homology with other mammalian proteins. Several psychoactive drugs show high to moderate affinity for σ1 receptors, including the antipsychotic haloperidol, the antidepressant drugs fluvoxamine and sertraline, and the psychostimulants cocaine and methamphetamine; in addition, the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin allosterically modulates σ1 receptors. Certain neurosteroids are known to interact with σ1 receptors, and have been proposed to be their endogenous ligands. These receptors are located in the plasma membrane and in subcellular membranes, particularly in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they play a modulatory role in intracellular Ca2+ signaling. Sigma1 receptors also play a modulatory role in the activity of some ion channels and in several neurotransmitter systems, mainly in glutamatergic neurotransmission. In accordance with their widespread modulatory role, σ1 receptor ligands have been proposed to be useful in several therapeutic fields such as amnesic and cognitive deficits, depression and anxiety, schizophrenia, analgesia, and against some effects of drugs of abuse (such as cocaine and methamphetamine). In this review we provide an overview of the present knowledge of σ1 receptors, focussing on σ1 ligand neuropharmacology and the role of σ1 receptors in behavioral animal studies, which have contributed greatly to the potential therapeutic applications of σ1 ligands.

Decreased Nociceptive Sensitization in Mice Lacking the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein: Role of mGluR1/5 and mTOR

Fragile X mental retardation is caused by silencing of the gene (FMR1) that encodes the RNA-binding protein (FMRP) that influences translation in neurons. A prominent feature of the human disorder is self-injurious behavior, suggesting an abnormality in pain processing. Moreover, FMRP regulates group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1/5)-dependent plasticity, which is known to contribute to nociceptive sensitization. We demonstrate here, using the Fmr1 knock-out (KO) mouse, that FMRP plays an important role in pain processing because Fmr1 KO mice showed (1) decreased (∼50%) responses to ongoing nociception (phase 2, formalin test), (2) a 3 week delay in the development of peripheral nerve injury-induced allodynia, and (3) a near absence of wind-up responses in ascending sensory fibers after repetitive C-fiber stimulation. We provide evidence that the behavioral deficits are related to a mGluR1/5- and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated mechanism because (1) spinal mGluR5 antagonism failed to inhibit the second phase of the formalin test, and we observed a marked reduction in nociceptive response to an intrathecal injection of an mGluR1/5 agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) in Fmr1 KO mice; (2) peripheral DHPG injection had no effect in KO mice yet evoked thermal hyperalgesia in wild types; and (3) the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin inhibited formalin- and DHPG-induced nociception in wild-type but not Fmr1 KO mice. These experiments show that translation regulation via FMRP and mTOR is an important feature of nociceptive plasticity. These observations also support the hypothesis that the persistence of self-injurious behavior observed in fragile X mental retardation patients could be related to deficits in nociceptive sensitization.

Sigma-1 receptors regulate activity-induced spinal sensitization and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury

ABSTRACT Sigma‐1 receptor (σ1R) is expressed in key CNS areas involved in nociceptive processing but only limited information is available about its functional role. In the present study we investigated the relevance of σ1R in modulating nerve injury‐evoked pain. For this purpose, wild‐type mice and mice lacking the σ1R gene were exposed to partial sciatic nerve ligation and neuropathic pain‐related behaviors were investigated. To explore underlying mechanisms, spinal processing of repetitive nociceptive stimulation and expression of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) were also investigated. Sensitivity to noxious heat of homozygous σ1R knockout mice did not differ from wild‐type mice. Baseline values obtained in σ1R knockout mice before nerve injury in the plantar, cold‐plate and von Frey tests were also indistinguishable from those obtained in wild‐type mice. However, cold and mechanical allodynia did not develop in σ1R null mice exposed to partial sciatic nerve injury. Using isolated spinal cords we found that mice lacking σ1R showed reduced wind‐up responses respect to wild‐type mice, as evidenced by a reduced number of action potentials induced by trains of C‐fiber intensity stimuli. In addition, in contrast to wild‐type mice, σ1R knockout mice did not show increased phosphorylation of ERK in the spinal cord after sciatic nerve injury. Both wind‐up and ERK activation have been related to mechanisms of spinal cord sensitization. Our findings identify σ1R as a constituent of the mechanisms modulating activity‐induced sensitization in pain pathways and point to σ1R as a new potential target for drugs designed to alleviate neuropathic pain.

Sigma-1 receptors are essential for capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity: Studies with selective sigma-1 ligands and sigma-1 knockout mice

ABSTRACT We evaluated the role of σ1 receptors on capsaicin‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity and on nociceptive pain induced by punctate mechanical stimuli, using wild‐type and σ1 receptor knockout (σ1‐KO) mice and selective σ1 receptor‐acting drugs. Mutation in σ1‐KO mice was confirmed by PCR analysis of genomic DNA and, at the protein level, by [3H](+)‐pentazocine binding assays. Both wild‐type and σ1‐KO mice not treated with capsaicin showed similar responses to different intensities of mechanical stimuli (0.05–8 g force), ranging from innocuous to noxious, applied to the hind paw. This indicates that σ1 gene inactivation does not modify the perception of punctate mechanical stimuli. The intraplantar (i.pl.) administration of capsaicin induced dose‐dependent mechanical allodynia in wild‐type mice (markedly reducing both the threshold force necessary to induce paw withdrawal and the latency to paw withdrawal induced by a given force). In contrast, capsaicin was completely unable to induce mechanical hypersensitivity in σ1‐KO mice. The high‐affinity and selective σ1 antagonists BD‐1063, BD‐1047 and NE‐100, administered subcutaneously (s.c.), dose‐dependently inhibited mechanical allodynia induced by capsaicin (1 μg,i.pl.), yielding ED50 (mg/kg) values of 15.80 ± 0.93, 29.31 ± 1.65 and 40.74 ± 7.20, respectively. The effects of the σ1 antagonists were reversed by the σ1 agonist PRE‐084 (32 mg/kg, s.c.). None of the drugs tested modified the responses induced by a painful mechanical punctate stimulus (4 g force) in nonsensitized animals. These results suggest that σ1 receptors are essential for capsaicin‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity, but are not involved in mechanical nociceptive pain.

Tetrodotoxin inhibits the development and expression of neuropathic pain induced by paclitaxel in mice

&NA; We evaluated the effect of low doses of systemically administered tetrodotoxin (TTX) on the development and expression of neuropathic pain induced by paclitaxel in mice. Treatment with paclitaxel (2 mg/kg, i.p., once daily during 5 days) produced long‐lasting (2–4 weeks) heat hyperalgesia (plantar test), mechanical allodynia (electronic Von Frey test) and cold allodynia (acetone drop method), with maximum effects observed on days 7, 10 and 10–14, respectively. Acute subcutaneous treatment with 1 or 3 μg/kg of TTX reduced the expression of mechanical allodynia, whereas higher doses (3 or 6 μg/kg) were required to reduce the expression of cold allodynia and heat hyperalgesia. In contrast, TTX (3 or 6 μg/kg, s.c.) did not affect the response to the same thermal and mechanical stimuli in control animals, which indicates that the antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects of TTX were not due to unspecific inhibition of the perception of these stimuli. Administration of TTX (6 μg/kg, s.c.) 30 min before each of the 5 doses of paclitaxel did not modify the development of heat hyperalgesia produced by the antineoplastic, but abolished the development of mechanical and cold allodynia. Coadministration of a lower dose of TTX (3 μg/kg) also prevented the development of mechanical allodynia. No signs of TTX‐induced toxicity or motor incoordination were observed. These data suggest that low doses of TTX can be useful to prevent and treat paclitaxel‐induced neuropathic pain, and that TTX‐sensitive subtypes of sodium channels play a role in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy‐induced neuropathic pain.

Role of Sigma-1 Receptors in Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Mice

UNLABELLED Sigma-1 (σ(1)) receptors play a role in different types of pain and in central sensitization mechanisms; however, it is unknown whether they are involved in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. We compared the ability of paclitaxel to induce cold (acetone test) and mechanical (electronic Von Frey test) allodynia in wild-type (WT) and σ(1) receptor knockout (σ(1)-KO) mice. We also tested the effect on paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy of BD-1063 (16-64 mg/kg, subcutaneously) and S1RA (32-128 mg/kg, subcutaneously), 2 selective σ(1) receptor antagonists that bind to the σ(1) receptor with high affinity and competitively. The responses to cold and mechanical stimuli were similar in WT and σ(1)-KO mice not treated with paclitaxel; however, treatment with paclitaxel (2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, once per day during 5 consecutive days) produced cold and mechanical allodynia and an increase in spinal cord diphosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) in WT but not in σ(1)-KO mice. The administration of BD-1063 or S1RA 30 minutes before each paclitaxel dose prevented the development of cold and mechanical allodynia in WT mice. Moreover, the acute administration of both σ(1) receptor antagonists dose dependently reversed both types of paclitaxel-induced allodynia after they had fully developed. These results suggest that σ(1) receptors play a key role in paclitaxel-induced painful neuropathy. PERSPECTIVE Antagonists of the σ(1) receptor may have therapeutic value for the treatment and/or prevention of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. This possibility is especially interesting in the context of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, where the onset of nerve damage is predictable and preventive treatment could be administered.

Spinal NKCC1 blockade inhibits TRPV1-dependent referred allodynia

BackgroundThe Na+, K+, 2Cl- type I cotransporter (NKCC1) and TRPV1 receptors, at the level of the dorsal horn, have been implicated in mediating allodynia in response to an inflammatory insult. The NKCC1 cotransporter regulates intracellular [Cl-] and thus the magnitude and polarity of GABAA receptor responses in neurons. TRPV1 receptors transduce diverse chemical and natural stimuli in nociceptors and are critical for inflammatory hyperalgesia.ResultsHere we have tested the role of spinal NKCC1 cotransporters and TRPV1 receptors in referred allodynia in a model of visceral hyperalgesia in mice. Intrathecal (IT) injection of the NKCC1 inhibitor bumetanide (BUM, 1 nmol) inhibited referred, abdominal allodynia evoked by an intracolonic capsaicin injection. BUM was effective when injected IT either before or up to 4 hrs after the establishment of referred allodynia. The TRPV1 antagonist AMG 9810 (1 nmol) also inhibited referred allodynia in this model suggesting the involvement of an endogenous TRPV1 agonist in the dorsal horn in referred allodynia. In support of this suggestion, the endovanilloid TRPV1 agonist, narachidonoyl- dopamine (NADA, 1 or 10 nmol, IT) evoked stroking allodynia in the hindpaw that was blocked by co-treatment with AMG 9810 (1 nmol). The TRPV1-dependent stroking allodynia caused by NADA appeared to be functionally linked to NKCC1 because BUM (1 nmol) also inhibited NADA-evoked stroking allodynia.ConclusionOur findings indicate that spinal NKCC1 and TRPV1 are critical for referred allodynia mediated by a painful visceral stimulus. Moreover, they suggest that endogenous TRPV1 agonists, released in the CNS in painful conditions, might stimulate TRPV1 receptors on primary afferents that, in turn, play a role in increasing NKCC1 activity leading to allodynia.

Potentiation of morphine-induced mechanical antinociception by σ1 receptor inhibition: Role of peripheral σ1 receptors

We studied the modulation of morphine-induced mechanical antinociception and side effects by σ₁ receptor inhibition. Both wild-type (WT) and σ₁ receptor knockout (σ₁-KO) mice showed similar responses to paw pressure (100-600 g). The systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intraplantar) administration of σ₁ antagonists (BD-1063, BD-1047, NE-100 and S1RA) was devoid of antinociceptive effects in WT mice. However, σ₁-KO mice exhibited an enhanced mechanical antinociception in response to systemic morphine (1-16 mg/kg). Similarly, systemic treatment of WT mice with σ₁ antagonists markedly potentiated morphine-induced antinociception, and its effects were reversed by the selective σ₁ agonist PRE-084. Although the local administration of morphine (50-200 μg) was devoid of antinociceptive effects in WT mice, it induced dose-dependent antinociception in σ₁-KO mice. This effect was limited to the injected paw. Enhancement of peripheral morphine antinociception was replicated in WT mice locally co-administered with σ₁ antagonists and the opioid. None of the σ₁ antagonists tested enhanced morphine-antinociception in σ₁-KO mice, confirming a σ₁-mediated action. Morphine-induced side-effects (hyperlocomotion and inhibition of gastrointestinal transit) were unaltered in σ₁-KO mice. These results cannot be explained by a direct interaction of σ₁ ligands with μ-opioid receptors or adaptive changes of μ-receptors in σ₁-KO mice, given that [(3)H]DAMGO binding in forebrain, spinal cord, and hind-paw skin membranes was unaltered in mutant mice, and none of the σ₁ drugs tested bound to μ-opioid receptors. These results show that σ₁ receptor inhibition potentiates morphine-induced mechanical analgesia but not its acute side effects, and that this enhanced analgesia can be induced at peripheral level.

Modulation of Peripheral μ-Opioid Analgesia by σ1 Receptors

We evaluated the effects of σ1-receptor inhibition on μ-opioid–induced mechanical antinociception and constipation. σ1-Knockout mice exhibited marked mechanical antinociception in response to several μ-opioid analgesics (fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine, buprenorphine, and tramadol) at systemic (subcutaneous) doses that were inactive in wild-type mice and even unmasked the antinociceptive effects of the peripheral μ-opioid agonist loperamide. Likewise, systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intraplantar) treatment of wild-type mice with the selective σ1 antagonists BD-1063 [1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-4-methylpiperazine dihydrochloride] or S1RA [4-[2-[[5-methyl-1-(2-naphthalenyl)1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy]ethyl] morpholine hydrochloride] potentiated μ-opioid antinociception; these effects were fully reversed by the σ1 agonist PRE-084 [2-(4-morpholinethyl)1-phenylcyclohexanecarboxylate) hydrochloride], showing the selectivity of the pharmacological approach. The μ-opioid antinociception potentiated by σ1 inhibition (by σ1-receptor knockout or σ1-pharmacological antagonism) was more sensitive to the peripherally restricted opioid antagonist naloxone methiodide than opioid antinociception under normal conditions, indicating a key role for peripheral opioid receptors in the enhanced antinociception. Direct interaction between the opioid drugs and σ1 receptor cannot account for our results, since the former lacked affinity for σ1 receptors (labeled with [3H](+)-pentazocine). A peripheral role for σ1 receptors was also supported by their higher density (Western blot results) in peripheral nervous tissue (dorsal root ganglia) than in several central areas involved in opioid antinociception (dorsal spinal cord, basolateral amygdala, periaqueductal gray, and rostroventral medulla). In contrast to its effects on nociception, σ1-receptor inhibition did not alter fentanyl- or loperamide-induced constipation, a peripherally mediated nonanalgesic opioid effect. Therefore, σ1-receptor inhibition may be used as a systemic or local adjuvant to enhance peripheral μ-opioid analgesia without affecting opioid-induced constipation.

Sigma-1 receptor inhibition reverses acute inflammatory hyperalgesia in mice: role of peripheral sigma-1 receptors

RationaleSigma-1 (σ1) receptor inhibition ameliorates neuropathic pain by inhibiting central sensitization. However, it is unknown whether σ1 receptor inhibition also decreases inflammatory hyperalgesia, or whether peripheral σ1 receptors are involved in this process.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the role of σ1 receptors in carrageenan-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia, particularly at the inflammation site.ResultsThe subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of the selective σ1 antagonists BD-1063 and S1RA to wild-type mice dose-dependently and fully reversed inflammatory mechanical (paw pressure) and thermal (radiant heat) hyperalgesia. These antihyperalgesic effects were abolished by the s.c. administration of the σ1 agonist PRE-084 and also by the intraplantar (i.pl.) administration of this compound in the inflamed paw, suggesting that blockade of peripheral σ1 receptors in the inflamed site is involved in the antihyperalgesic effects induced by σ1 antagonists. In fact, the i.pl. administration of σ1 antagonists in the inflamed paw (but not in the contralateral paw) was sufficient to completely reverse inflammatory hyperalgesia. σ1 knockout (σ1-KO) mice did not develop mechanical hyperalgesia but developed thermal hypersensitivity; however, the s.c. administration of BD-1063 or S1RA had no effect on thermal hyperalgesia in σ1-KO mice, supporting on-target mechanisms for the effects of both drugs. The antiedematous effects of σ1 inhibition do not account for the decreased hyperalgesia, since carrageenan-induced edema was unaffected by σ1 knockout or systemic σ1 pharmacological antagonism.Conclusionsσ1 receptors play a major role in inflammatory hyperalgesia. Targeting σ1 receptors in the inflamed tissue may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory pain.