José Miguel León Blanco

Increased risk of pre-eclampsia and fetal death in Hiv-infected pregnant women receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy

Background:Pre-eclampsia and/or fetal death have increased sharply in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving HAART. Methods:The occurrence of pre-eclampsia or fetal death was analysed in women who delivered after at least 22 weeks of gestation for all women (January 2001 until July 2003) and for HIV-infected women (November 1985 until July 2003). Results:In 2001, 2002 and 2003, the rates per 1000 deliveries of pre-eclampsia and fetal death, respectively, remained stable in all pregnant women at 25.4, 31.9 and 27.7 (P = 0.48) and 4.8, 5.8, and 5.0 (P = 0.89) (n = 8768). In 1985–2000 (n = 390) to 2001–2003 (n = 82), rates per 1000 deliveries in HIV-infected women rose from 0.0 to 109.8 (P < 0.001) for pre-eclampsia and from 7.7 to 61.0 (P < 0.001) for fetal death. In all pregnant women, factors associated with pre-eclampsia or fetal death were multiple gestation [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3–5.6; P < 0.001], HIV infection (adjusted OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.4–10.1; P < 0.001), multiparity (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–0.98; P = 0.040) and tobacco smoking (adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46–0.90; P = 0.010). The use of HAART prior to pregnancy (adjusted OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7–18.1; P = 0.004) and tobacco smoking (adjusted OR, 0.183; 95% CI, 0.054–0.627; P = 0.007) were risk factors in HIV-infected women. Conclusions:HIV infection treated with HAART prior to pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher risk for pre-eclampsia and fetal death.

Incidence and causes of death in HIV-infected persons receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy compared with estimates for the general population of similar age and from the same geographical area

Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the incidence of death in HIV‐infected patients has dramatically decreased, and causes of death other than those related to HIV infection have increased, although it is unclear how these parameters compare with those in the age‐matched general population living in the same geographical region.

A simplification trial switching from nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to once-daily fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients with virological suppression.

Background:Data comparing abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive patients are controversial. We compared 48-week efficacy and safety of these combinations as substitutes of nucleosides in patients with virological suppression. Methods:We randomly assigned 333 HIV-1-infected patients on lamivudine-containing triple regimens with <200 copies per milliliter for at least 6 months to switch their nucleosides to either abacavir/lamivudine (n = 167) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (n = 166). The primary outcome was treatment failure [“switching = failure” intention to treat (ITT) analysis, noninferiority margin 12.5%]. Secondary outcomes were time to treatment failure, virological failure, adverse events, and changes in CD4 count, fasting plasma lipids, lipodystrophy, body fat, bone mineral density, and renal function. Results:Treatment failure occurred in 32 patients (19%) on abacavir/lamivudine and 22 patients (13%) on tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference 5.9%; (95% confidence interval −2.1% to 14.0%), P = 0.06]. Four patients in the abacavir/lamivudine group versus none in the tenofovir/emtricitabine group developed virological failure [difference 2.4; (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 6.0), P = 0.04]. Twenty-three patients (14%) assigned to abacavir/lamivudine and 10 (6%) to tenofovir/lamivudine experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse effects (P = 0.03). CD4 counts and plasma lipids showed higher increments in the abacavir/lamivudine group than in the tenofovir/emtricitabine group. Conclusions:In HIV-1-infected patients with virological suppression, abacavir/lamivudine did not meet the noninferiority outcome for treatment efficacy compared with tenofovir/emtricitabine.

Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virological suppression receiving a LPV/r-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study.

Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) to boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients versus continuing LPV/r. Methods:Forty-eight weeks analysis of a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial including patients with virological suppression (≤200 copies/mL for ≥6 months) on LPV/r-containing triple highly active antiretroviral therapy. Patients (n = 248) were randomized 1:1 either to continue LPV/r twice a day (n = 127) or to switch to ATV/r every day (ATV/r; n = 121), with no change in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. Those known to have >4 protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations and/or who had failed >2 PI-containing regimens were excluded. Results:Baseline characteristics were balanced. 30% harboured ≥1 PI-associated mutation (10% harboured ≥1 major mutation). Treatment failure at 48 weeks (primary end point) occurred in 20% (25 of 127) of the LPV/r arm and in 17% (21 of 121) of the ATV/r arm (difference −2.3%; 95% confidence interval: −12.0 to 8.0; P = 0.0018). Virological failure occurred in 7% (9 of 127) of the LPV/r arm and in 5% (6 of 121) of the ATV/r arm (difference −2.1%; 95% confidence interval: −8.7% to 4.2%, P < 0.0001 for noninferiorating). CD4+ changes from baseline were similar in each arm (approximately 40 cells/mm3). Adverse event rate leading to study drug discontinuation was 5% in both arms. Median fasting triglycerides and total cholesterol decreased significantly in the ATV/r arm (−53 and −19 mg/dL, respectively versus −4 and −4 mg/dL in the LPV/r arm; P < 0.001 in both comparisons). Alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase hepatic abnormalities were similar in the 2 arms. Conclusions:Switching to ATV/r in virologically suppressed patients who were receiving a LPV/r-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy provided comparable (noninferior) efficacy and a safety profile with improved lipid parameters [ISRCTN24813210].

Influence of Method of Preparation on Inclusion Complexes of Naproxen with Different Cyclodextrins

AbstractThe aim of this study is to increase the solubility of naproxen by inclusion complex formation with α, β, γ, hydroxypropylbeta and dimethylbetacyclodextrin. The apparent stability constants were calculated from the slope and intercept of the AL-solubility diagrams. The solid inclusion complexes of naproxen with cyclodextrins in 1:1 molar ratio were prepared by the kneaded-mix, spray-drying and freeze-drying method. The formation of inclusion complexes in the solid state were confirmed by X-Ray diffractometry I.R. spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The dissolution rate of naproxen from the inclusion complexes was much more rapid than naproxen alone. The best results were obtained with β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex prepared by the spray-drying method.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampicin and ritonavir‐boosted atazanavir in HIV‐infected patients*

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection among HIV‐infected people, and rifampicin is an important drug for the treatment of TB. However, administration of rifampicin in combination with antiretroviral therapy, particularly protease inhibitors, is difficult because of drug–drug interactions.

Clinical Utility of Maraviroc

Maraviroc belongs to the family of chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonists that prevent the entry of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) into host CD4+ T cells by blocking the CCR5 co-receptor R5. Maraviroc is currently the only CC5R co-receptor inhibitor that has been approved for clinical use in HIV-1-infected patients carrying the CCR5 tropism who are antiretroviral-na:?ve or have experienced therapeutic failure following traditional antiretroviral therapies. This article is a review of the main characteristics of maraviroc and the latest data regarding its clinical application.Maraviroc is effective and well tolerated in pre-treated and antiretroviral-naïve patients with HIV-1 infections carrying the CCR5 tropism. Data from the phase III programme of maraviroc, which includes the MOTIVATE 1 and 2 studies and the MERIT study, indicate that maraviroc significantly (p < 0.001) increases CD4+ cell counts compared with placebo in pre-treated patients and to a similar extent as efavirenz in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Even in cases where viral load is not completely suppressed, maraviroc improves immunological response compared with placebo. In addition, promising research suggests that maraviroc has favourable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles in patients with high cardiovascular risk or those co-infected with tuberculosis or hepatitis and could be considered an option for treatment of HIV-infected patients with these co-morbidities.Resistance to maraviroc is low and mainly related to the presence of chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) tropism HIV-1-infections or to mutations in the V3 region of glycoprotein (gp) 120; however, the exact mechanisms by which resistance is acquired and their genotypic and phenotypic pattern have not yet been established. It is recommended that a tropism test should be performed when considering maraviroc as an alternate drug in HIV-1-infected patients. Current tropism assays have increased sensitivity to reliably detect CXCR4 HIV with rapid turn-around and at a low cost. Improved detection together with positive data on the drug’s efficacy and safety profiles should help physicians to identify more accurately the appropriate candidates for commencement of treatment with maraviroc.In summary, maraviroc improves immunological response and has shown favourable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles in patients with high cardiovascular risk or in those co-infected with tuberculosis or hepatitis. Long-term studies are needed to confirm whether therapeutic expectations resulting from clinical trials with maraviroc translate into a real benefit for HIV-1-infected patients for whom traditional antiretroviral therapies have failed or are not suitable.

Transmission of HIV-1 from an obstetrician to a patient during a caesarean section.

We describe a probable case of HIV-1 transmission from a healthcare worker (HCW) to a patient during a caesarean section. Genetic distance comparisons of the viral sequence of the C2V4 region of the viruses from the patient and the obstetrician showed an average nucleotide sequence divergence of 3% (2.8–3.1). HIV can be transmitted from an infected HCW to a patient when percutaneous injuries with subsequent exposure of the patient to the blood of the HCW can occur.

Pharmacokinetic study of saquinavir 500 mg plus ritonavir (1000/100 mg twice a day) in HIV-positive pregnant women.

Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy is critical to preventing human immunodeficiency virus vertical transmission. Physiological changes during pregnancy can alter drug kinetics. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of saquinavir (SQV) boosted with ritonavir during pregnancy and postpartum. Fourteen human immunodeficiency virus-positive pregnant women started SQV 500 mg new tablet formulation plus ritonavir at a dose of 1000/100 mg twice a day + 2 nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors during pregnancy. At weeks 24 and 34 of pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum, a 12-hour PK study was conducted. PK parameters were calculated using Win Nolin software version 4.1. At week 24, the geometric mean values for SQV area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0–12 hours (AUC0–12), the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), trough plasma concentration (Cmin), and the elimination half-life (t1/2) were 24.80 mg·h−1·mL−1, 4.66 mg/mL, 0.93 mg/mL, and 4.31 hours, respectively. At week 34, AUC0–12, Cmax, Cmin, and t1/2 were 12.71 mg·h−1·mL−1, 3.23 mg/mL, 0.26 mg/mL, and 4.06 hours, respectively. Finally, at 6 weeks postpartum, mean values for SQV AUC0–12, Cmax, Cmin, and t1/2 were 28.94 mg·h−1·mL−1, 3.92 mg/mL, 0.86 mg/mL, and 3.60 hours, respectively. Although PK parameters in week 24 and postpartum were very similar, those for week 34 showed an important reduction: −71.20%, −30.61%, −48.73%, and −5.81% in Cmin, Cmax, AUC0–12, and t1/2, respectively, compared with week 24, but no statistically significant differences were shown between patients. No vertical transmissions were reported. Therapeutic drug monitoring of SQV during pregnancy should be considered, mainly during the third trimester, to ensure adequate drug exposure throughout the entire pregnancy.

Evolution of resistance mutations pattern in Hiv-1-infected patients during intensification therapy with a boosted protease inhibitor

Intensification therapy adding a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to a failing regimen has the potential to worsen the resistance profile. Sixty-six patients included in four different boosted PI intensification studies were assessed and resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase and protease genes were evaluated at baseline and 4 weeks after the initiation of the intensification strategy. Only one of the 66 patients developed changes in their pattern of mutations able to generate or increase resistance to new drugs.