José Moltó

Long-term neuropsychiatric disorders on efavirenz-based approaches : Quality of life, psychologic issues, and adherence

Background:Efavirenz has been associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, although little is known about its long-term toxicity. Objective:To assess neuropsychiatric disorders and their relation to efavirenz plasma levels as well as quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence in HIV-infected patients on long-term efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. Methods:Cross-sectional study comparing 60 patients on an efavirenz-based approach (EFV group) and 60 patients on a protease inhibitor-containing regimen (PI group) for at least 1 year. Adverse events, efavirenz plasma levels, quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence were assessed. Results:The mean time on treatment was 91.1 ± 39.5 weeks in the EFV group and 119.9 ± 67.4 weeks in the PI group. Mild dizziness, sadness, mood changes, irritability, lightheadedness, nervousness, impaired concentration, abnormal dreams, and somnolence were reported more frequently in the EFV group than in the PI group (P < 0.05). Forty-nine of 60 patients presented with therapeutic efavirenz plasma levels (range: 1.0-4.0 mg/L). Efavirenz plasma levels were similar in subjects with and without neuropsychiatric disorders. No significant differences were found between the EFV group and the PI group regarding quality of life and psychologic status. Sixty percent of patients in the EFV group and 55% in the PI group reported adherence ≥95%. Conclusions:Mild and clinically tolerable neuropsychiatric disorders may persist in patients after a mean of 2 years using an efavirenz-based approach. Quality of life and psychologic status remained good in both study groups. Interventions to enhance long-term adherence should be applied in clinical practice.

Ezetimibe, a promising lipid-lowering agent for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients with poor response to statins.

Objective:To assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic interactions of ezetimibe in HIV-infected patients with poorly controlled antiretroviral-associated dyslipidaemia while taking pravastatin alone. Design:A prospective, open-label, one-arm study of 24 weeks duration. Patients and setting:Nineteen patients (18 on stable HAART), with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol values of ≥ 130 mg/dl despite the use of pravastatin. Methods:Ezetimibe, 10 mg/day, was added to pravastatin 20 mg/day, while patients maintained the same antiretroviral regimen. Determinations of total, LDL-, and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, apoproteins, and inflammatory factors (homocystein and C-reactive protein) were performed at baseline, and at weeks 6, 12, and 24. Liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were also assessed. Protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) Cmin was determined just before and 12 weeks after ezetimibe introduction. Results:At week 24, 61.5% of patients achieved the endpoint of the study (LDL-cholesterol < 130 mg/dl). Significant declines in mean total and LDL-cholesterol levels were observed between baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 24, irrespective of antiretroviral type (PI or NNRTI). Mean HDL-cholesterol and apoprotein A increased significantly. No patients discontinued therapy due to intolerance or presented toxicity of grade 2 or more. No differences were observed in lopinavir or nevirapine Cmin measured just before and 12 weeks after ezetimibe introduction. Conclusion:The addition of ezetimibe to ongoing pravastatin seems to be an effective and safe option for HIV-infected patients not achieving the NCEP ATPIII LDL-cholesterol goals while receiving a statin alone. Its high tolerability and the lack of interactions with the cytochrome CYP3A4 indicate that ezetimibe will not increase the risk of toxicity or pharmacokinetic interactions with antiretrovirals.

Unexpected CD4 cell count decline in patients receiving didanosine and tenofovir-based regimens despite undetectable viral load.

Background: We recently observed a significant CD4 cell count decline in patients receiving didanosine (ddI) 400 mg, tenofovir (TDF) and nevirapine (NVP), despite virological suppression. Methods: We identified from our computerized patient database subjects who initiated combinations containing ddI and/or TDF for reasons other than virological failure, including simplification or intolerance. Changes in total, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts since the initiation of therapy were analysed retrospectively. Plasma concentration of ddI was prospectively determined in eight of these patients receiving ddI 400 mg + TDF + NVP and 3 weeks after a ddI dosage reduction. Results: A total of 302 patients were studied. A significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 and in total lymphocyte counts was only seen in subjects receiving ddI standard dose + TDF-containing regimens, despite the maintenance of viral suppression. More than 50% of these patients showed a decline of more than 100 CD4 cells at 48 weeks. In contrast, subjects not receiving ddI + TDF together experienced the expected progressive increase in CD4 T-cell counts. Plasma levels of ddI were elevated in all patients receiving the standard ddI dose + TDF. DdI plasma levels significantly decreased when patients weighting > 60 kg reduced ddI dose to 250 mg, achieving similar levels to those generated by ddI 400 mg without TDF. Conclusions: Co-administration of ddI at standard doses plus TDF appears to exert a deleterious effect on CD4 and CD8 counts. Although lymphocyte toxicity related to excessive ddI plasma levels could explain our findings, other mechanisms cannot be excluded. Pharmacokinetic data suggest ddI dose reduction when coadministered with TDF.

Measurement of Intracellular Didanosine and Tenofovir Phosphorylated Metabolites and Possible Interaction of the Two Drugs in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients

ABSTRACT Recent work has demonstrated the existence of a systemic interaction between didanosine (ddI) and tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate (TDF) that leads to a significant increase in plasma ddI levels when coadministered with TDF (40 to 50% increase). These two drugs are, respectively, nucleoside and nucleotide analogues of adenosine and efficiently inhibit the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase when transformed to their triphosphate moieties in the intracellular (IC) medium (ddA-TP and TFV-DP, respectively). Since ddI and TDF partly share the same IC metabolic pathway leading to the active triphosphates, we investigated a putative IC interaction. We used high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry techniques to determine ddA-TP and TFV-DP IC levels in HIV-infected patients cotreated with both drugs, in comparison with patients treated with just one of the two drugs. These measurements revealed no significant differences in IC levels of the corresponding triphosphates when ddI (250 mg, once a day [QD]) was coadministered with TDF (300 mg, QD) compared to ddI 400 mg (QD) administered without TDF, thus supporting the dose adaptation proposed for this combination. However, we observed that both ddA-TP and TFV-DP have very long IC half-lives, resulting in unusual IC pharmacokinetic profiles with no significant changes in triphosphate concentrations between two dosings. In the case of TFV-DP, this t1/2 of elimination was roughly estimated to be 180 h (7.5 days). This characteristic is certainly interesting in terms of efficacy but could have some drawbacks in terms of virus resistance for patients discontinuing these drugs.

Nadir CD4 cell count predicts neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected patients.

Though antiretroviral therapy attenuates neurocognitive disruption, impairment is still observed. We studied the nadir CD4 cell count as a predictor of neurocognitive changes. This cross-sectional study assessed 64 HIV-infected patients in two groups: G1 (n = 26, nadir CD4 < or =200 cells/ml) and G2 (n = 38, nadir CD4 >200 cells/ml). Percentages of patients showing neurocognitive impairment were compared according to different nadir CD4 cutoffs (200, 250, 300, and 350 cells/ml). From G2, we also took the subgroup of patients receiving treatment (G3) and compared this group with G1, in which all patients were being treated. Demographic and clinical variables were evaluated, as were differences in neurocognitive function. Neurocognitive impairment tended to be more prevalent in G1 [19 patients (73.1%)] than in G2 [20 (52.6%), p = 0.123]. When nadir CD4 cutoffs were compared, there was a trend toward more impaired subjects as the CD4 nadir decreased. Significantly different functioning was found in attention/working memory (digit span backward, p = 0.032) and executive functions (trail making test, part B, p = 0.020), with better performance in G2. Comparison between G1 and G3 confirmed those findings. We found differences in neurocognitive functioning in relation to nadir CD4 count in HIV-infected patients. Attention should be given to this value in the management of neurocognitive protection in HIV infection.

Prevalence of etravirine-associated mutations in clinical samples with resistance to nevirapine and efavirenz

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the expected activity of etravirine in clinical samples, according to mutational patterns associated with decreased virological response (VR). METHODS We identified 1586 routine clinical samples with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to nevirapine and efavirenz (K103N 60%, Y181C 37%, G190A 27%, V108I 13%). Concerning in vitro identified etravirine mutations, samples with F227C, Y181I, M230L or L100I plus K103N plus Y181C were considered highly resistant. Samples with two RAMs plus Y181C or V179D or K101E or Y188L were considered intermediate. The prevalence of 13 RAMs recently associated with decreased VR to etravirine in the DUET clinical trials was also investigated. RESULTS Most samples (69%) harboured more than one IAS-USA RAM to first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): 42% harboured two RAMs, 21% three RAMs and 6% four or more RAMs. The prevalence of 13 specific etravirine RAMs was V179F 0.12%, G190S 3.9%, Y181V 0.1%, V106I 2.6%, V179D 1.6%, K101P 2.0%, K101E 10.1%, Y181C 36.9%, A98G 5.9%, V90I 6.9%, Y181I 3.6%, G190A 27% and L100I 9.1%. The five RAMs with the most impact on VR (V179F/D, G190S, Y181V and V106I) occurred less often. Overall, 8.2% of the samples had three or more etravirine RAMs and only 1.1% had four or more. In addition, patterns of RAMs previously associated with intermediate etravirine resistance were present in 26.2% of the samples, whereas 4.85% displayed patterns of high-degree resistance. CONCLUSIONS For RAMs associated with decreased VR, etravirine resistance in routine clinical samples was lower than previously reported. High-degree resistance was uncommon, even in patients with resistance to first-generation NNRTIs, whereas low-to-intermediate etravirine resistance was more common.

Monitoring Atazanavir Concentrations With Boosted or Unboosted Regimens in Hiv-infected Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

Although atazanavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are related, the atazanavir plasma trough concentrations of patients on regimens that are not boosted by low doses of ritonavir may not be high enough to maintain viral suppression. In this cross-sectional study, the percentage of patients with atazanavir trough concentrations lower than the proposed minimum effective concentration was compared between HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy with ritonavir-boosted (ATV/r, n = 31) or unboosted (ATV, n = 54) atazanavir in clinical practice. Blood samples were drawn 21 to 25 hours after the last atazanavir dose. Drug concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and considered suboptimal if they were lower than 0.15 mg/L or potentially toxic if higher than 0.85 mg/L. The median (interquartile range) atazanavir concentration was 0.711 (0.394-0.914) mg/L in patients receiving ATV/r and 0.121 (0.052-0.209) mg/L in patients receiving ATV (P < 0.001). None of the patients receiving ATV/r and 62.9% of the subjects receiving ATV showed drug concentrations below 0.15 mg/L (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-3.8; P < 0.001). In contrast, atazanavir concentrations were higher than 0.85 mg/L in 32.2% of the patients receiving ATV/r compared with 3.7% of the subjects receiving ATV (odds ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-37.2; P = 0.001). Atazanavir and total bilirubin concentrations in plasma were correlated. In conclusion, atazanavir trough concentrations may be lower than the proposed minimum effective concentration in a considerable percentage of HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy with unboosted atazanavir. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in this setting.

Lopinavir/ritonavir plus nevirapine as a nucleoside-sparing approach in antiretroviral-experienced patients (NEKA study).

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of a nucleoside-sparing approach with a conventional highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in antiretroviral-experienced patients with prolonged viral suppression. Methods: Pilot study including 31 antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA <80 copies/mL. Subjects were randomly assigned to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/rtv) 400/100 mg BID plus nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg BID (NVP group, n = 16) or LPV/rtv plus the 2 previous NRTIs (NRTI group, n = 15). The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who maintained viral suppression at week 48. Changes in lipid metabolism, mitochondrial parameters, and LPV trough levels were also assessed. Results: All patients maintained viral suppression after 48 weeks. No subject discontinued therapy because of adverse events. HDL cholesterol increased by 28% at week 24 (P < 0.0001) and 10% after 48 weeks of follow-up (P = 0.319) in the NVP group. In the NRTI group, LDL cholesterol increased by 14% at week 48 (P = 0.076). Mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA ratio and mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV activity showed a trend toward increasing in the NVP group. Mean (SD) LPV trough levels were 6340 (2129) ng/mL in the NRTI group and 5161 (2703) ng/mL in the NVP group (P = 0.140). Conclusions: In antiretroviral-experienced subjects with sustained viral suppression, dual therapy with NVP plus LPV/rtv at standard dosage was as potent and safe as standard-of-care HAART at 48 weeks of follow-up. This approach may reduce mitochondrial toxicity and improve LPV/rtv-associated lipid abnormalities. The results of this pilot study support the study of this approach in a larger, randomized trial.

Detection of a sexually transmitted hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor-resistance variant in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected homosexual man.

There is an international epidemic of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men. Transmission of HCV variants that are resistant to recently approved direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) could be an important clinical and public health problem. We document a case of transmission of a DAA-resistant variant of HCV from a patient who was treated with telaprevir to his sexual partner. The transmission of HCV DAA-resistant variants could impair therapeutic regimens that include DAAs.

The pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of tenofovir and emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected pregnant women

Objective:To describe the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir and emtricitabine in the third trimester of pregnant HIV-infected women and at postpartum. Design:A nonrandomized, open-label, multicentre phase IV study in HIV-infected pregnant women recruited from HIV treatment centres in Europe. Methods:HIV-infected pregnant women treated with the nucleotide/nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF 300 mg; equivalent to 245 mg tenofovir disoproxil) and/or emtricitabine (FTC 200 mg) were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic curves were recorded in the third trimester (preferably week 33) and postpartum (preferably week 4–6). Collection of a cord blood sample and maternal sample at delivery was optional. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software version 5.3. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 16.0. Results:Thirty-four women were included in the analysis. Geometric mean ratios of third trimester vs. postpartum [90% confidence interval (CI)] were 0.77 (0.71–0.83) for TDF area under the curve (AUC0–24 h); 0.81 (0.68–0.96) for TDF Cmax and 0.79 (0.70–0.90) for TDF C24 h and 0.75 (0.68–0.82) for FTC AUC0–24 h; and 0.87 (0.77–0.99) for FTC Cmax and 0.77 (0.52–1.12) for FTC C24 h. The viral load close to delivery was less than 200 copies/ml in all but one patient, the average gestational age at delivery was 38 weeks. All children were tested HIV-negative and no congenital abnormalities were reported. Conclusion:Although pharmacokinetic exposure of the NRTIs TDF and FTC during pregnancy is approximately 25% lower, this was not associated with virological failure in this study and did not result in mother-to-child transmission.