Jose Nery

Transplantation of the abdominal wall

BACKGROUND Closure of the abdomen in patients undergoing intestinal transplantation can be extremely difficult, if not impossible. We describe our initial experience with abdominal wall allotransplantation to facilitate abdominal closure. METHODS We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants in eight patients. The grafts blood supply was based on the inferior epigastric vessels left in continuity with the donor femoral and iliac vessels. Skin biopsies were undertaken randomly and when rejection was suspected. Vessel patency was monitored by doppler ultrasound. FINDINGS Six patients have survived, five of whom have intact, viable abdominal wall grafts. Two patients have had a clinically mild episode of acute rejection of the skin of the abdominal wall that resolved with corticosteroid therapy. No clinically apparent graft-versus-host disease has been noted. INTERPRETATION Transplantation of an abdominal wall composite allograft can facilitate reconstruction and closure of the abdominal compartment in intestinal transplant recipients with complex abdominal wall defects.

Liver transplantation with cavoportal hemitransposition in the presence of diffuse portal, vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND Orthotopic liver transplantation is possible even in the presence of recipient portal vein thrombosis, provided that hepatopetal portal flow to the graft can be restored. On rare occasions this is not possible due to diffuse thrombosis of the portal venous system. In these cases, successful liver transplantation has been considered impossible. Portocaval transposition was introduced in the pretransplantation era to study the effect of systemic venous flow on the liver and has been used in three patients for the treatment of glycogen storage disease. We used portocaval hemitransposition (portal perfusion with inflow from the inferior vena cava) in liver transplantation when portal inflow to the graft was not feasible. We are reporting the collective experience of nine patients from four liver transplant centers. METHODS Cavoportal hemitransposition was used in nine patients. In seven of these cases, the technique was used during the original transplant (primary group). In two cases, it was used after the portal inflow to the first transplant had clotted (secondary group). RESULTS Five of seven patients in the primary group are alive after intervals of 6-11 months. The two patients in the rescue group died. In the successful cases, liver function and histology were indistinguishable from those of conventional liver transplantation. Ascites disappeared within 3-4 months and the patients were able to return to their normal activities. Postoperative variceal bleeding necessitated splenectomy and gastric devascularization in one case and splenic artery embolization in another case. Bleeding was controlled in both these cases. Splenectomy and gastric devascularization were performed prophylactically in one patient with a history of variceal bleeding in order to prevent this complication after transplantation. CONCLUSION Portocaval hemitransposition maybe useful in liver transplantation when hepatopetal flow to the liver graft cannot be established by other techniques. Rescue after failure of conventional technique was not possible in two patients.

High-dose donor bone marrow infusions to enhance allograft survival: The effect of timing

BACKGROUND The development of strategies to enhance survival of transplanted organs and to potentially lower or even discontinue immunosuppressive therapy would represent a significant advance in posttransplant patient care. The aim of this clinical trial was to determine the effect of timing and dose of peripheral donor bone marrow cell (DBMC) infusion on graft and patient survival after liver transplantation. METHODS DBMC, obtained from vertebral bodies, were administered in 101 recipients of liver allografts (OLTX). There were 107 patients for whom DBMC could not be obtained; they received OLTX alone (controls). A total of 5 x 10(8)/kg DBMC were infused at day 0 (group 1; n=9); at days 0 and 11 (group 2; n=26); or at days 5 and 11 (group 3; n=26). In group 4 (n=40), patients received up to five infusions of 2 x 10(8)/kg DBMC at days 5, 14, 21, 28, and 90 after OLTX. RESULTS When the results from patients receiving two or more DBMC infusions (groups 2, 3, and 4) are considered, both patient and graft survival were significantly improved compared with the control group (P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively). In groups 3 and 4, 88.5% and 95% of patients were alive with mean follow-up of 536 and 265 days, respectively, compared with 77.6% of patients in the control group (average follow-up of 452 days) (P=0.02). Graft survival was also significantly improved in groups 3 (88.5%) and 4 (92.5%), compared with the controls (72%) (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that dose and timing of DBMC infusions may be important variables affecting allograft survival. A randomized prospective trial is now in progress to compare group 3 DBMC infusion protocol with controls receiving OLTX alone.

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has been established as a treatment option for patients that suffer from intestinal failure with complications from total parenteral nutrition. It is still rapidly evolving and just reached a landmark of 1,000 cases worldwide. Intestinal allografts can be transplanted as isolated, combined with the liver or as a part of a multivisceral allograft. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimens have been used universally with improved outcomes. Clinical outcome in intestinal transplantation has improved significantly over time, impacted by refinement of surgical technique and novel immunosuppression. However rejection, infection, and technical complications still remain the most difficult barrier to improve patient and graft survival.

Treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C in liver-transplant recipients with pegylated interferon-alfa-2b and ribavirin therapy

Introduction. The management issues of transplant patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are complex, and interferon therapy is often ineffective. We present data from a retrospective review in liver-transplant recipients suffering from HCV recurrence that were treated with pegylated alpha-2b interferon and ribavirin. Methods. A retrospective review of transplant recipients that received combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon (1.5 mcg/kg/wk) and ribavirin (400–600 mg/day) therapy intended for at least 48 weeks. Complications were recorded and included neutropenia (<750 cells), anemia (hemoglobin <8 g) with and without treatment consisting of blood transfusions, erythropoietin, or dose reduction of ribavirin, and depression. The diagnosis of HCV recurrence was determined by an increase in liver chemistries, histopathologic findings with inflammation along with viral recurrence using the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV test. Results. Fifty-seven liver-transplant recipients were included, 29 naïve (group 1) to therapy and 28 nonresponders (group 2) to at least 6 months of interferon and ribavirin therapy. Eight (27.6%) patients in group 1 and six (21%) patients in group 2 were HCV nondetectable at the end of 48 weeks of therapy. Ribavirin therapy was decreased in 13 of 29 (45%) for group 1 and 11 of 28 (39%) in group 2. Therapeutic interventions were 4 of 57 (7%) blood transfusions, 23 of 57 (40%) erythropoietin, and 17 of 57 (30%) filgrastim. Conclusion. Combination pegylated interferon with ribavirin appears to effective therapy in HCV recurrence and in HCV nonresponsive to interferon and ribavirin. This data reveals the difficulty and caution that must be taken when treating HCV-R liver-transplant recipients with combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon and ribavirin therapy.

Ninety-five cases of intestinal transplantation at the University of Miami.

Intestinal failure requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intestinal transplantation can be a lifesaving option for patients with intestinal failure who develop serious TPN-related complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival, surgical technique, and patient care in patients treated with intestinal transplantation. We reviewed data collected from 95 consecutive intestinal transplants performed between December 1994 and November 2000 at the University of Miami. Fifty-four of the patients undergoing intestinal transplantation were children and 41 were adults. The series includes 49 male and 46 female patients. The causes of intestinal failure included mesenteric venous thrombosis (n = 12), necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 11), gastroschisis (n = 11), midgut volvulus (n = 9), desmoid tumor (n = 8), intestinal atresia (n = 6), trauma (n = 5), Hirschsprung’s disease (n = 5), Crohn’s disease (n = 5), intestinal pseudoobstruction (n = 4), and others (n = 19). The procedures performed included 27 isolated intestine transplants, 28 combined liver and intestine transplants, and 40 multivisceral transplants. Since 1998, we have been using daclizumab (Zenepax) for induction of immunosuppression and zoom videoendoscopy for graft surveillance. We began to use intense cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and systemic drainage of the portal vein. The 1-year patient survival rates for isolated intestinal, liver and intestinal, and multivisceral transplantations were 75%, 40%, and 48%, respectively. Since 1998, the 1-year patient and graft survival rates for isolated intestinal transplants have been 84% and 72%, respectively. The causes of death were as follows: sepsis after rejection (n = 14), respiratory failure (n = 8), sepsis (n = 6), multiple organ failure (n = 4), arterial graft infection (n = 3), aspergillosis (n = 2), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (n = 2), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 2), and fungemia, chronic rejection, graft vs. host disease, necrotizing enterocolitis, pancreatitis, pulmonary embolism, and viral encephalitis (n = 1 case of each). Intestinal transplantation can be a lifesaving alternative for patients with intestinal failure. The prognosis after intestinal transplantation is better when it is performed before the onset of liver failure. Rejection monitoring with zoom videoendoscopy and new immunosuppressive therapy with sirolimus, daclizumab, and campath-1H have contributed to the improvement in patient survival.

Comparison of tacrolimus with microemulsion cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Immunosuppression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) following orthotopic liver transplantation can lead to significant increases in serum viral loads. Our aim was to analyze the effect of a randomized study of two immunosuppressive agents (tacrolimus vs. microemulsion cyclosporine) on the outcome of HCV patients following orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS From December 1995 to September 1996, 50 adult patients transplanted for HCV cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive tacrolimus (Prograf) (group 1, 25 patients) or microemulsion cyclosporine (Neoral) (group 2, 24 patients). All patients received alpha-interferon after transplantation, and the overall steroid doses were no different between the groups. Serum RNA levels were measured by signal amplification of Chiron. Biopsies were taken when transaminases were greater than 2x base line or when there was an inappropriate response to alterations in immunosuppression regimens. RESULTS There were more episodes of rejection in the Neoral group, but there were no differences in bacterial and viral infections, nor in the rate of HCV recurrence between the two groups. There were seven deaths in group 1 and eight in group 2. Overall patient and graft survival rates in the Prograf and Neoral groups at 18 months were 72 and 68% and 67 and 64%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS (a) Both immunosuppression regimens had similar HCV recurrence rates; (b) there were no differences in bacterial or opportunistic infections; and (c) patient and graft survival was similar between the two groups.

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) combined with tacrolimus in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Background. We combined alemtuzumab (Campath-1H, Berlex Laboratories, Montville, NJ) and tacrolimus (Tac) immunosuppression for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Materials and Methods. A total of 21 adult patients received 24 grafts: 14 intestinal, nine multivisceral, and one liver-intestinal graft. Alemtuzumab was administered perioperatively in four doses with low-dose Tac (levels 10–15 ng/dL) and no maintenance steroids. Tac was substituted with sirolimus in case of Tac-related complications. Suspected or mild rejections were treated with steroids. Moderate rejections were treated with steroids or OKT3. Severe rejections were treated with OKT3. Results. Of the 16 patients that were followed up for an average of 9 months, 12 are alive with functioning grafts. Two patients experienced severe rejection, three experienced moderate rejection episodes, and seven experienced mild acute rejection episodes. Four patients never developed acute rejection. Infectious complications included a cytomegalovirus enteritis and four fungal infections (related to central venous access). Conclusions. The combination of alemtuzumab and Tac therapy without steroid use seems to efficiently prevent acute rejection in a significant number of patients without causing frequent opportunistic infections.

Efficacy of lamivudine in controlling hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Indication of liver transplantation for patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains controversial because of the high incidence of posttransplant HBV recurrence and aggressive involvement of the allograft. In this article, we provide evidence that the introduction of lamivudine may favorably alter the prognosis of these patients. METHODS Lamivudine was used in 40 HBV-infected adult patients suffering from chronic end-stage liver disease who underwent liver transplantation. The drug was used in the following settings: failure of prolonged passive immunoprophylaxis, elective conversion from immunoprophylaxis, de novo posttransplant HBV infection, and primary treatment with lamivudine which started before and continued after transplantation. Twenty patients (50%) had viral replication at the time lamivudine was started. Posttransplant and antiviral treatment follow-ups were 8-64 months (median follow-up: 27.5 months) and 9-39 months (median follow-up: 19 months), respectively. RESULTS The patient and graft survival rates were 97.5% (39/40). Thirty-three patients (82.5%) have remained free of viral recurrence. In the seven re-infected patients, the manifestations of HBV involvement of the allograft have been mild. There have been no side effects related to lamivudine, and the treatment is substantially less costly than with other anti-HBV agents. CONCLUSIONS Compared with historic series utilizing other modalities of treatment, the use of lamivudine has, so far, yielded superior results. This drug may be an important acquisition for antiviral prophylaxis in HBV-infected liver recipients. Because of the risk of viral mutations, however, efforts should proceed to achieve more efficacious methods for prevention and control of HBV recurrence.

Outcomes in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B virus: Resistance and recurrence patterns from a large transplant center over the last decade

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence following liver transplantation (LTx) has been controllable primarily with the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and lamivudine (LAM). However, HBV resistance to LAM and/or HBIg has become an increasing problem prompting the use of newer antiviral agents. The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between therapy, HBV breakthrough, and allograft / patient survival in HBV‐positive liver transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients that were transplanted for HBV from June 1994 to May 2003. A total of 92 patients, positive for either hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) pretransplant, received LAM monotherapy or HBIg (6 months) plus LAM therapy post–liver transplant. HBV breakthrough post‐LTx was noted in 14 patients. All patients had detectable HBV DNA prior to liver transplantation; none of the patients that were HBV DNA negative prior to transplant had detectable HBV DNA posttransplant. Of these 14, 9 patients (64%) were switched from LAM to adefovir dipivoxil (ADF) and 5 patients (36%) to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TNV). In conclusion, pre‐LTx HBV viremia should be considered in planning post‐LTx prophylaxis. Trials to evaluate oral antiviral agents in combination with or without HBIg therapy are needed. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:1372–1378.)