José Ursic-Bedoya

Incidence of solid organ cancers after liver transplantation: comparison with regional cancer incidence rates and risk factors.

Increased rates of solid organ cancers post‐liver transplantation have been reported, but the contribution of environmental factors and immunosuppressive therapy is not clear. This studys aims were to compare the incidence of de novo solid organ cancers after liver transplantation; identify risk factors independent of immunosuppressive therapy associated with these cancers; and assess the influence of calcineurin inhibitors on the appearance of these cancers.

Tacrolimus and the risk of solid cancers after liver transplant: a dose effect relationship.

Although increased rates of solid organ cancers have been reported following liver transplantation (LT), the impact of quantitative exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) remains unclear. We have therefore probed the relationship between the development of solid organ cancers following LT and the level of CNI exposure. This prospective single‐center study was conducted between 1995 and 2008 and is based on 247 tacrolimus‐treated liver transplant recipients who survived at least 1 year following surgery. The incidence of cancer was recorded, and the mean blood concentration of tacrolimus (TC) was determined at 1 and 3 years following LT. The study results indicate that 43 (17.4%) patients developed de novo solid cancers. Mean TC during the first year after LT was significantly higher in patients who developed solid organ tumors (10.3 ± 2.1 vs. 7.9 ± 1.9 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Independent risks factors in multivariate analysis were tobacco consumption before LT (OR = 5.42; 95% CI [1.93–15.2], p = 0.0014) and mean annual TC during the first year after LT (p < 0.0001; OR = 2.01; 95% CI [1.57–2.59], p < 0.0001). Similar effects were observed in 216 patients who received tacrolimus continuously for ≥3 years. It appears therefore that CNI should be used with caution after LT, and that new immunosuppressive therapies could deliver significant clinical benefits in this regard.

Solid, non-skin, post-liver transplant tumors: Key role of lifestyle and immunosuppression management

Liver transplantation has been the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease since 1983. Cancer has emerged as a major long-term cause of death for liver transplant recipients. Many retrospective studies that have explored standardized incidence ratio have reported increased rates of solid organ cancers post-liver transplantation; some have also studied risk factors. Liver transplantation results in a two to five-fold mean increase in the rate of solid organ cancers. Risk of head and neck, lung, esophageal, cervical cancers and Kaposis sarcoma is high, but risk of colorectal cancer is not clearly demonstrated. There appears to be no excess risk of developing breast or prostate cancer. Environmental risk factors such as viral infection and tobacco consumption, and personal risk factors such as obesity play a key role, but recent data also implicate the role of calcineurin inhibitors, whose cumulative and dose-dependent effects on cell metabolism might play a direct role in oncogenesis. In this paper, we review the results of studies assessing the incidence of non-skin solid tumors in order to understand the mechanisms underlying solid cancers in post-liver transplant patients and, ultimately, discuss how to prevent these cancers. Immunosuppressive protocol changes, including a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen, combined with dietary guidelines and smoking cessation, are theoretically the best preventive measures.

Subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancers and impact of immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients

Background: Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most frequent cancers in solid organ transplant recipients, with a high rate of subsequent tumors. Objectives: To describe subsequent NMSCs in a large cohort of liver transplant recipients (LTRs) with long follow‐up and analyze the factors influencing it, including immunosuppressive regimen. Methods: A total of 96 LTRs (76 male) with a personal post‐transplant history of squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma or Bowens disease were included, with a median follow‐up of 12.4 years (range, 1.5‐27.8) after liver transplantation. Results: The median follow‐up after first NMSC was 6.4 years (range, 0.17‐22.1). In all, 52 patients (53.1%) developed 141 subsequent NMSCs with a basal cell carcinoma–to–squamous cell carcinoma ratio of 1.8:1. The actuarial risk for development of a second NMSC was 13.7% at 1 year, 28.4% at 2 years, 49.4% at 5 years, 65.7% at 10 years, and 88.4% at 15 years. Multivariate analysis found that skin phototype I or II (vs III or IV) was a significant risk factor for development of a second NMSC (hazard ratio, 2.556; 95% confidence interval, 1.45‐4.48; P = .001), whereas withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors was significantly protective (hazard ratio, 0.358; 95% confidence interval, 0.142‐0.902; P = .029). Limitations: Retrospective analysis. Conclusions: Subsequent NMSCs are very frequent in LTRs, and conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppressive regimen to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor/antimetabolite‐based immunosuppressive regimen can reduce subsequent NMSCs.

Addictive behaviors in liver transplant recipients: The real problem?

Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. Whatever the primary indication of LT, substance abuse after surgery may decrease survival rates and quality of life. Prevalence of severe alcohol relapse is between 11 and 26%, and reduces life expectancy regardless of the primary indication of LT. Many patients on waiting lists for LT are smokers and this is a major risk factor for both malignant tumors and cardiovascular events post-surgery. The aim of this review is to describe psychoactive substance consumption after LT, and to assess the impact on liver transplant recipients. This review describes data about alcohol and illicit drug use by transplant recipients and suggests guidelines for behavior management after surgery. The presence of an addiction specialist in a LT team seems to be very important.

Alcohol use and smoking after liver transplantation; complications and prevention

The last thirty years have been very prosperous in the field of liver transplantation (LT), with great advances in organ conservation, surgical techniques, peri-operative management and long-term immunosuppression, resulting in improved patient and graft survival rates as well as quality of life. However, substance addiction after LT, namely alcohol and tobacco, results in short term morbidity together with medium and long-term mortality. The main consequences can be vascular (increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis in smokers), hepatic (recurrent alcoholic cirrhosis in alcohol relapsers) and oncological (increased risk of malignancy in patients consuming tobacco and/or alcohol after LT). This issue has thus drawn attention in the field of LT research. The management of these two at-risk behaviors addictions need the implication of hepatologists and addiction specialists, before and after LT. This review will summarize our current knowledge in alcohol use and cigarette smoking in the setting of LT, give practical tools for identification of high risk patients and treatment options.

Liver Biopsy in Chronic Liver Diseases: Is There a Favorable Benefit: Risk Balance?

Liver biopsy is still useful in selected clinical situations in which it is the only tool to obtain information necessary for the diagnosis, the prognosis, and the decision for treatment. Main examples are viral hepatitis with confounding co-morbidities, non alcoholic fatty liver disease, and autoimmune liver diseases.Liver biopsy is still useful in selected clinical situations in which it is the only tool to obtain information necessary for the diagnosis, the prognosis, and the decision for treatment. Main examples are viral hepatitis with confounding co-morbidities, non alcoholic fatty liver disease, and autoimmune liver diseases.