José V. Sorlí

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet

BACKGROUND Observational cohort studies and a secondary prevention trial have shown an inverse association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular risk. We conducted a randomized trial of this diet pattern for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events. METHODS In a multicenter trial in Spain, we randomly assigned participants who were at high cardiovascular risk, but with no cardiovascular disease at enrollment, to one of three diets: a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts, or a control diet (advice to reduce dietary fat). Participants received quarterly individual and group educational sessions and, depending on group assignment, free provision of extra-virgin olive oil, mixed nuts, or small nonfood gifts. The primary end point was the rate of major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes). On the basis of the results of an interim analysis, the trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 4.8 years. RESULTS A total of 7447 persons were enrolled (age range, 55 to 80 years); 57% were women. The two Mediterranean-diet groups had good adherence to the intervention, according to self-reported intake and biomarker analyses. A primary end-point event occurred in 288 participants. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.92) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.96) for the group assigned to a Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil (96 events) and the group assigned to a Mediterranean diet with nuts (83 events), respectively, versus the control group (109 events). No diet-related adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS Among persons at high cardiovascular risk, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (Funded by the Spanish governments Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; Controlled-Trials.com number, ISRCTN35739639.).

Prevention of Diabetes With Mediterranean Diets: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial

Context Can changes in diet prevent diabetes in older adults? Contribution This subgroup analysis of a multicenter trial involved older adults with high risk for heart disease who were randomly assigned to a Mediterranean diet supplemented with either extra-virgin olive oil or mixed nuts or to a low-fat control diet. Neither energy restriction nor increased physical activity was advised. After 4 years of follow-up, fewer persons in the Mediterranean diet groups developed diabetes than in the control group. Implication Changes in dietary patterns that do not necessarily lead to weight loss or include energy restrictions could help prevent diabetes in some older adults. The Editors Type 2 diabetes mellitus represents a major health problem because worldwide prevalence has more than doubled in the past 3 decades, with nearly 347 million persons with diabetes in 2010 (1), and is a potent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), blindness, renal failure, and lower limb amputation (2). Compelling evidence shows that diabetes can be prevented with lifestyle changes. Intensive lifestyle modification promoting weight loss through energy-restricted diets together with increased physical activity can decrease incident diabetes to as low as 50% (3). Indeed, lifestyle modification has performed better than pharmacologic approaches (such as metformin or rosiglitazone) in diabetes prevention (46). Of interest, the benefit of lifestyle changes in decreasing diabetes risk seems to extend beyond the termination of active intervention (68). However, there is little information on whether changes in the overall dietary pattern, without energy restriction, increased physical activity, and ensuing weight loss, may also be effective to prevent diabetes. Prospective epidemiologic studies strongly suggest that dietary patterns characterized by high consumption of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and fish and reduced consumption of red and processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, and starchy foods delay diabetes onset (9). In the last 6 years, the traditional Mediterranean diet has emerged as a healthy dietary pattern that is also associated with a decreased risk for diabetes (1012). The Mediterranean diet is moderately rich in fat (35% to 40% of energy), especially from vegetable sources (rich in olive oil and nuts), and relatively low in dairy products. Moderate consumption of alcohol, mostly wine, and frequent use of sauces with tomato, onions, garlic, and spices for meal preparation are also typical. Preliminary data from the PREDIMED (Prevencin con Dieta Mediterrnea) study (1317) showed that traditional Mediterranean diets enriched with high-fat foods of vegetable origin decreased the incidence of diabetes (18). However, that report studied participants only from 1 of the 11 PREDIMED recruiting centers. In this analysis, we provide the final results on diabetes incidence in the whole multicenter trial after a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Methods Design Overview The PREDIMED study is a parallel-group, randomized, primary cardiovascular prevention trial done in Spain in persons at high risk but without CVD at baseline. The protocol, design, objectives, and methods have been reported in detail elsewhere (13, 14). Briefly, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 nutrition interventions: Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts, or a control diet consisting of advice to reduce intake of all types of fat. A complete list of PREDIMED study investigators is available in Supplement 1. The local institutional review boards approved the protocol at each study location, and all participants provided written informed consent. Supplement. Original Version (PDF) Supplement 1. List of Prevencin con Dieta Mediterrnea Study Investigators Setting and Participants Eligible participants were community-dwelling men (aged 55 to 80 years) and women (aged 60 to 80 years) without CVD at baseline who had either type 2 diabetes or at least 3 or more cardiovascular risk factors, namely current smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, overweight or obesity, and family history of premature CVD. Exclusion criteria have previously been reported (13). Randomization and Intervention From October 2003 to June 2009, 7447 suitable candidates were enrolled in the trial. The study nurse from each recruiting center randomly assigned each participant to the corresponding intervention group following computer-generated random numbers for allocation contained in sealed envelopes, which were centrally prepared for each center by the coordinating unit. Four strata of randomization were built by sex and age (cutoff, 70 years) but not by baseline diabetes status. The primary care physicians did not participate in the randomization process. The study nurses were independent of the nursing staff of the primary care health centers. Therefore, they were not involved in the usual clinical care of participants, and their exclusive role was to collect data for the trial. Given the nature of the interventions (nutritional advice and provision of foods), only investigators assessing outcomes were blinded with respect to intervention assignment. This was done by providing them with coded data sets and medical records blinded with respect to the personal identity of the participant and without any information on treatment allocation. Because our main objective was to determine the effect of the 3 interventions on diabetes incidence, this report includes data only on participants who did not have diabetes at baseline and for whom we could ascertain the incidence of diabetes during follow-up (n= 3541) (Figure 1). Figure 1. Study flow diagram. EVOO = extra-virgin olive oil; MedDiet = Mediterranean diet. A behavioral intervention promoting the Mediterranean diet was implemented in the corresponding groups of the trial, as described (13). Dietitians gave personalized advice to participants about the amount and use of EVOO for cooking and dressing; weekly intake of nuts; increased consumption of vegetables, fruits, legumes, and fish; recommended intake of white meat instead of red or processed meat; avoidance of butter, fast food, sweets, pastries, or sugar-sweetened beverages; and the dressing of dishes with sofrito sauce (using tomato, garlic, onion, and spices simmered in olive oil). Reduction of alcoholic beverages other than wine was advised to all participants. Wine with meals was recommended with moderation only to habitual drinkers. At baseline and quarterly thereafter, dietitians conducted individual and group dietary training sessions to provide information on typical Mediterranean foods, seasonal shopping lists, meal plans, and recipes for each group. In each session, a 14-item questionnaire was used to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet (13, 14) so that personalized advice could be provided to upgrade participants adherence. The same questionnaire was assessed yearly in the control group. Participants assigned to the 2 Mediterranean diet groups received allotments of either EVOO (50 mL/d) or mixed nuts (30 g/d: 15 g of walnuts, 7.5 g of almonds, and 7.5 g of hazelnuts) at no cost. Participants assigned to the control diet received recommendations to reduce intake of all types of fat (from both animal and vegetable sources) and received nonfood gifts (kitchenware, tableware, aprons, or shopping bags). Through October 2006, participants in the control group received only a leaflet describing the low-fat diet. Thereafter, participants assigned to the control diet also received personalized advice and were invited to group sessions with the same frequency and intensity as those in the Mediterranean diet groups. A separate 9-item dietary questionnaire (14) was used to assess adherence to the low-fat diet. Neither energy restriction nor increased physical activity was advised for any intervention group. At baseline examination and yearly during follow-up, we administered a 137-item validated semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (19); the validated Spanish version of the Minnesota Leisure-time Physical Activity Questionnaire (20); and a 47-item questionnaire about education, lifestyle, medical history, and medication use. At baseline, trained personnel performed electrocardiography and anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Blood pressure was measured in triplicate by using a validated semiautomatic oscillometer with a 5-minute interval between measurements and the participant in a sitting position (Omron HEM-705CP, Omron, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands). Fasting blood and spot urine were sampled at baseline and follow-up years 1, 3, 5, and 7. After an overnight fast, tubes for EDTA plasma, citrate plasma, and serum and urine samples were collected and aliquots were coded and stored at 80C in the central laboratory until analysis. Serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured using standard enzymatic methods. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was measured after precipitation with phosphotungstic acid and magnesium chloride. Biomarkers of adherence to the supplemental foods, including urine hydroxytyrosol levels and plasma -linolenic acid proportions, which are reliable biomarkers of EVOO and walnut intake, respectively, were measured in random subsamples of participants during the first 5 years of follow-up (by gas chromatographymass spectrometry and by gas chromatography, respectively). Laboratory technicians were blinded to intervention group. Outcomes and Follow-up Diabetes was a prespecified secondary outcome of the PREDIMED trial. IT was considered to be present at baseline by clinical diagnosis or use of antidiabetic medication. New-onset diabetes during follow-up was diagnosed using the American Diabetes Association criteria, namely fasting plasma glucose levels of 7.0 mmol/L or g

Effect of the Mediterranean diet on blood pressure in the PREDIMED trial: results from a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundHypertension can be prevented by adopting healthy dietary patterns. Our aim was to assess the 4-year effect on blood pressure (BP) control of a randomized feeding trial promoting the traditional Mediterranean dietary pattern.MethodsThe PREDIMED primary prevention trial is a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial conducted in Spanish primary healthcare centers. We recruited 7,447 men (aged 55 to 80 years) and women (aged 60 to 80 years) who had high risk for cardiovascular disease. Participants were assigned to a control group or to one of two Mediterranean diets. The control group received education on following a low-fat diet, while the groups on Mediterranean diets received nutritional education and also free foods; either extra virgin olive oil, or nuts. Trained personnel measured participants’ BP at baseline and once yearly during a 4-year follow-up. We used generalized estimating equations to assess the differences between groups during the follow-up.ResultsThe percentage of participants with controlled BP increased in all three intervention groups (P-value for within-group changes: P<0.001). Participants allocated to either of the two Mediterranean diet groups had significantly lower diastolic BP than the participants in the control group (−1.53 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI) −2.01 to −1.04) for the Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra virgin olive oil, and −0.65 mmHg (95% CI -1.15 to −0.15) mmHg for the Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts). No between-group differences in changes of systolic BP were seen.ConclusionsBoth the traditional Mediterranean diet and a low-fat diet exerted beneficial effects on BP and could be part of advice to patients for controlling BP. However, we found lower values of diastolic BP in the two groups promoting the Mediterranean diet with extra virgin olive oil or with nuts than in the control group.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN35739639

Mediterranean Diet and Invasive Breast Cancer Risk Among Women at High Cardiovascular Risk in the PREDIMED Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Breast cancer is the leading cause of female cancer burden, and its incidence has increased by more than 20% worldwide since 2008. Some observational studies have suggested that the Mediterranean diet may reduce the risk of breast cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of 2 interventions with Mediterranean diet vs the advice to follow a low-fat diet (control) on breast cancer incidence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The PREDIMED study is a 1:1:1 randomized, single-blind, controlled field trial conducted at primary health care centers in Spain. From 2003 to 2009, 4282 women aged 60 to 80 years and at high cardiovascular disease risk were recruited after invitation by their primary care physicians. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly allocated to a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts, or a control diet (advice to reduce dietary fat). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Breast cancer incidence was a prespecified secondary outcome of the trial for women without a prior history of breast cancer (n = 4152). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, we identified 35 confirmed incident cases of breast cancer. Observed rates (per 1000 person-years) were 1.1 for the Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil group, 1.8 for the Mediterranean diet with nuts group, and 2.9 for the control group. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios vs the control group were 0.32 (95% CI, 0.13-0.79) for the Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil group and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.26-1.35) for the Mediterranean diet with nuts group. In analyses with yearly cumulative updated dietary exposures, the hazard ratio for each additional 5% of calories from extra-virgin olive oil was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57-0.90). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This is the first randomized trial finding an effect of a long-term dietary intervention on breast cancer incidence. Our results suggest a beneficial effect of a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil in the primary prevention of breast cancer. These results come from a secondary analysis of a previous trial and are based on few incident cases and, therefore, need to be confirmed in longer-term and larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN.org Identifier: ISRCTN35739639.

Mediterranean diets and metabolic syndrome status in the PREDIMED randomized trial

Background: Little evidence exists on the effect of an energy-unrestricted healthy diet on metabolic syndrome. We evaluated the long-term effect of Mediterranean diets ad libitum on the incidence or reversion of metabolic syndrome. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the PREDIMED trial — a multicentre, randomized trial done between October 2003 and December 2010 that involved men and women (age 55–80 yr) at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary interventions: a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts or advice on following a low-fat diet (the control group). The interventions did not include increased physical activity or weight loss as a goal. We analyzed available data from 5801 participants. We determined the effect of diet on incidence and reversion of metabolic syndrome using Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Over 4.8 years of follow-up, metabolic syndrome developed in 960 (50.0%) of the 1919 participants who did not have the condition at baseline. The risk of developing metabolic syndrome did not differ between participants assigned to the control diet and those assigned to either of the Mediterranean diets (control v. olive oil HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94–1.30, p = 0.231; control v. nuts HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92–1.27, p = 0.3). Reversion occurred in 958 (28.2%) of the 3392 participants who had metabolic syndrome at baseline. Compared with the control group, participants on either Mediterranean diet were more likely to undergo reversion (control v. olive oil HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15–1.58, p < 0.001; control v. nuts HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08–1.51, p < 0.001). Participants in the group receiving olive oil supplementation showed significant decreases in both central obesity and high fasting glucose (p = 0.02); participants in the group supplemented with nuts showed a significant decrease in central obesity. Interpretation: A Mediterranean diet supplemented with either extra virgin olive oil or nuts is not associated with the onset of metabolic syndrome, but such diets are more likely to cause reversion of the condition. An energy-unrestricted Mediterranean diet may be useful in reducing the risks of central obesity and hyperglycemia in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. ISRCTN35739639.

Inverse association between habitual polyphenol intake and incidence of cardiovascular events in the PREDIMED study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Epidemiologic and biological evidence supports an inverse association between polyphenol consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, no previous studies have prospectively evaluated the relationship between polyphenol intake and the incidence of CVD in such a comprehensive way. The aim was to evaluate the association between intakes of total polyphenol and polyphenol subgroups, and the risk of major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke or death from cardiovascular causes) in the PREDIMED study. METHODS AND RESULTS The present work is an observational study within the PREDIMED trial. Over an average of 4.3 years of follow-up, there were 273 confirmed cases of CVD among the 7172 participants (96.3%) who completed a validated 137-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at baseline. Polyphenol consumption was calculated by matching food consumption data from the FFQ with the Phenol-Explorer database on polyphenol content of each reported food. After multivariate adjustment, a 46% reduction in risk of CVD risk was observed comparing Q5 vs. Q1 of total polyphenol intake (HR = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.33-0.91; P-trend = 0.04). The polyphenols with the strongest inverse associations were flavanols (HR = 0.40; CI 0.23-0.72; P-trend = 0.003), lignans (HR = 0.51; CI 0.30-0.86; P-trend = 0.007), and hydroxybenzoic acids (HR = 0.47; CI 0.26-0.86; P-trend 0.02). CONCLUSION Greater intake of polyphenols, especially from lignans, flavanols, and hydroxybenzoic acids, was associated with decreased CVD risk. Clinical trials are needed to confirm this effect and establish accurate dietary recommendations.

Olive oil intake and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the PREDIMED Study

BackgroundIt is unknown whether individuals at high cardiovascular risk sustain a benefit in cardiovascular disease from increased olive oil consumption. The aim was to assess the association between total olive oil intake, its varieties (extra virgin and common olive oil) and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in a Mediterranean population at high cardiovascular risk.MethodsWe included 7,216 men and women at high cardiovascular risk, aged 55 to 80 years, from the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea (PREDIMED) study, a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Participants were randomized to one of three interventions: Mediterranean Diets supplemented with nuts or extra-virgin olive oil, or a control low-fat diet. The present analysis was conducted as an observational prospective cohort study. The median follow-up was 4.8 years. Cardiovascular disease (stroke, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death) and mortality were ascertained by medical records and National Death Index. Olive oil consumption was evaluated with validated food frequency questionnaires. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards and generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association between baseline and yearly repeated measurements of olive oil intake, cardiovascular disease and mortality.ResultsDuring follow-up, 277 cardiovascular events and 323 deaths occurred. Participants in the highest energy-adjusted tertile of baseline total olive oil and extra-virgin olive oil consumption had 35% (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.89) and 39% (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.85) cardiovascular disease risk reduction, respectively, compared to the reference. Higher baseline total olive oil consumption was associated with 48% (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.93) reduced risk of cardiovascular mortality. For each 10 g/d increase in extra-virgin olive oil consumption, cardiovascular disease and mortality risk decreased by 10% and 7%, respectively. No significant associations were found for cancer and all-cause mortality. The associations between cardiovascular events and extra virgin olive oil intake were significant in the Mediterranean diet intervention groups and not in the control group.ConclusionsOlive oil consumption, specifically the extra-virgin variety, is associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular disease and mortality in individuals at high cardiovascular risk.Trial registrationThis study was registered at controlled-trials.com (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN35739639). International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 35739639. Registration date: 5 October 2005.

Genetic variation at the perilipin (PLIN) locus is associated with obesity‐related phenotypes in White women

Perilipin coats intracellular lipid droplets and modulates adipocyte lipolysis. We have evaluated the association between several polymorphisms at the perilipin (PLIN) locus (PLIN1 : 6209T > C, PLIN4 : 11482G > A, PLIN5 : 13041A > G, and PLIN6 : 14995A > T) with obesity‐related phenotypes in 1589 White subjects randomly selected from a general Spanish population. In women (n = 801), the less common alleles of PLIN1 and PLIN4, in strong linkage disequilibrium (D′ : 0.96), were significantly associated with lower body mass index. Carriers of the allele 2 (6209C) at the PLIN1 locus weighed significantly less (−2.2 kg; p = 0.007) than women homozygotes for the wild‐type genotype. The same was true for 11482A carriers at PLIN4 (p = 0.01). Moreover, the PLIN4 variant was associated with significantly lower waist‐to‐hip ratio, plasma glucose, and triacylglycerol concentrations. No significant associations with these obesity‐related phenotypes were found in men. In agreement with these results, statistically significant gene–gender interactions were obtained when the risk of obesity was estimated (281 subjects were obese and 1308 non‐obese). Only in women, PLIN1 and PLIN4 variant alleles (6209C and 11482A) were associated with a lower obesity risk [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38–0.93 and OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36–0.89, respectively]. In summary, our data suggest that common alleles at the PLIN locus modulate body weight and metabolic variables in humans.

Separating the Mechanism-Based and Off-Target Actions of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors With CETP Gene Polymorphisms

Background— Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but torcetrapib, the first-in-class inhibitor tested in a large outcome trial, caused an unexpected blood pressure elevation and increased cardiovascular events. Whether the hypertensive effect resulted from CETP inhibition or an off-target action of torcetrapib has been debated. We hypothesized that common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CETP gene could help distinguish mechanism-based from off-target actions of CETP inhibitors to inform on the validity of CETP as a therapeutic target. Methods and Results— We compared the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on lipid fractions, blood pressure, and electrolytes in up to 67 687 individuals from genetic studies and 17 911 from randomized trials. CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment reduced CETP activity and had a directionally concordant effect on 8 lipid and lipoprotein traits (total, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL cholesterol; HDL2; HDL3; apolipoproteins A-I and B; and triglycerides), with the genetic effect on HDL cholesterol (0.13 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.14 mmol/L) being consistent with that expected of a 10-mg dose of torcetrapib (0.13 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.15). In trials, 60 mg of torcetrapib elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 4.47 mm Hg (95% CI 4.10 to 4.84 mm Hg) and 2.08 mm Hg (95% CI 1.84 to 2.31 mm Hg), respectively. However, the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms on systolic blood pressure (0.16 mm Hg, 95% CI −0.28 to 0.60 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (−0.04 mm Hg, 95% CI −0.36 to 0.28 mm Hg) was null and significantly different from that expected of 10 mg of torcetrapib. Conclusions— Discordance in the effects of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on blood pressure despite the concordant effects on lipids indicates the hypertensive action of torcetrapib is unlikely to be due to CETP inhibition or shared by chemically dissimilar CETP inhibitors. Genetic studies could find a place in drug-development programs as a new source of randomized evidence for drug-target validation in humans.

Associations of the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes are modulated by diet, being higher when adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern is low

BackgroundAlthough the Fat Mass and Obesity (FTO) and Melanocortin-4 Receptor (MC4R) genes have been consistently associated with obesity risk, the association between the obesity-risk alleles with type 2 diabetes is still controversial. In some recent meta-analyses in which significant results have been reported, the associations disappeared after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). However gene-diet interactions with dietary patterns have not been investigated. Our main aim was to analyze whether these associations are modulated by the level of adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet).MethodsCase-control study in 7,052 high cardiovascular risk subjects (3,430 type 2 diabetes cases and 3,622 non-diabetic subjects) with no differences in BMI. Diet was assessed by validated questionnaires. FTO-rs9939609 and MC4R-rs17782313 were determined. An aggregate genetic score was calculated to test additive effects. Gene-diet interactions were analyzed.ResultsNeither of the polymorphisms was associated with type 2 diabetes in the whole population. However, we found consistent gene-diet interactions with adherence to the MedDiet both for the FTO- rs9939609 (P-interaction=0.039), the MC4R-rs17782313 (P-interaction=0.009) and for their aggregate score (P-interaction=0.006). When adherence to the MedDiet was low, carriers of the variant alleles had higher type 2 diabetes risk (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.03-1.40; P=0.019 for FTO- rs9939609 and OR=1.17, 95%CI:1.01-1.36; P=0.035 for MC4R-rs17782313) than wild-type subjects. However, when adherence to the MedDiet was high, these associations disappeared (OR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.85-1.16; P=0.673 for FTO- rs9939609 and OR=0.89, 95%CI:0.78-1.02; P=0.097 for MC4R-rs17782313). These gene-diet interactions remained significant even after adjustment for BMI. As MedDiet is rich in folate, we also specifically examined folate intake and detected statistically significant interaction effects on fasting plasma glucose concentrations in non-diabetic subjects. However these findings should be interpreted with caution because folate intake may simply reflect a healthy dietary pattern.ConclusionsThese novel results suggest that the association of the FTO-rs9939609 and the MC4R-rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes depends on diet and that a high adherence to the MedDiet counteracts the genetic predisposition.