Jose Vercher-Conejero

N staging of lung cancer patients with PET/MRI using a three-segment model attenuation correction algorithm: initial experience.

AbstractObjectivesEvaluate the performance of PET/MRI at tissue interfaces with different attenuation values for detecting lymph node (LN) metastases and for accurately measuring maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) in lung cancer patients.Materials and MethodEleven patients underwent PET/CT and PET/MRI for staging, restaging or follow-up of suspected or known lung cancer. Four experienced readers determined the N stage of the patients for each imaging method in a randomised blinded way. Concerning metastases, SUVmax of FDG-avid LNs were measured in PET/CT and PET/MRI in all patients. A standard of reference was created with a fifth experienced independent reader in combination with a chart review. Results were analysed to determine interobserver agreement, SUVmax correlation between CT and MRI (three-segment model) attenuation correction and diagnostic performance of the two techniques.ResultsOverall interobserver agreement was high (κ = 0.86) for PET/CT and substantial (κ = 0.70) for PET/MRI. SUVmax showed strong positive correlation (Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.93, P < 0.001) between the two techniques. Diagnostic performance of PET/MRI was slightly inferior to that of PET/CT, without statistical significance (P > 0.05).ConclusionsPET/MRI using three-segment model attenuation correction for LN staging in lung cancer shows a strong parallel to PET/CT in terms of SUVmax, interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance.Key Points•F18-FDG PET/MRI shows similar performance to F18-FDG PET/CT in lung cancer N staging. •PET/MRI has substantial interobserver agreement in N staging. •A three-segment model attenuation correction is reliable for assessing the mediastinum.

Qualitative and Quantitative Performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging and PET/CT are integrated in the work-up of head and neck cancer patients. The hybrid imaging technology 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging combining morphological and functional information might be attractive in this patient population. The aim of the study was to compare whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer, both qualitatively in terms of lymph node and distant metastases detection and quantitatively in terms of standardized uptake values measured in 18F-FDG-avid lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with head and neck cancer underwent both whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR imaging after a single injection of 18F-FDG. Two groups of readers counted the number of lesions on PET/CT and PET/MR imaging scans. A consensus reading was performed in those cases in which the groups disagreed. Quantitative standardized uptake value measurements were performed by placing spheric ROIs over the lesions in 3 different planes. Weighted and unweighted κ statistics, correlation analysis, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: κ statistics for the number of head and neck lesion lesions counted (pooled across regions) revealed interreader agreement between groups 1 and 2 of 0.47 and 0.56, respectively. Intrareader agreement was 0.67 and 0.63. The consensus reading provided an intrareader agreement of 0.63. For the presence or absence of metastasis, interreader agreement was 0.85 and 0.70. The consensus reading provided an intrareader agreement of 0.72. The correlations between the maximum standardized uptake value in 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for primary tumors and lymph node and metastatic lesions were very high (Spearman r = 1.00, 0.93, and 0.92, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with head and neck cancer, 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG-PET/CT provide comparable results in the detection of lymph node and distant metastases. Standardized uptake values derived from 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging can be used reliably in this patient population.

Image quality and diagnostic performance of a digital PET prototype in patients with oncologic diseases: Initial experience and comparison with analog PET

We report our initial clinical experience for image quality and diagnostic performance of a digital PET prototype scanner with time-of-flight (DigitalTF), compared with an analog PET scanner with time-of-flight (GeminiTF PET/CT). Methods: Twenty-one oncologic patients, mean age 58 y, first underwent clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT on the GeminiTF. The scanner table was then withdrawn while the patient remained on the table, and the DigitalTF was inserted between the GeminiTF PET and CT scanner. The patients were scanned for a second time using the same PET field of view with CT from the GeminiTF for attenuation correction. Two interpreters reviewed the 2 sets of PET/CT images for overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and sharpness. They counted the number of suggestive 18F-FDG–avid lesions and provided the TNM staging for the 5 patients referred for initial staging. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and SUV gradients as a measure of lesion sharpness were obtained. Results: The DigitalTF showed better image quality than the GeminiTF. In a side-by-side comparison using a 5-point scale, lesion conspicuity (4.3 ± 0.6), lesion sharpness (4.3 ± 0.6), and diagnostic confidence (3.4 ± 0.7) were better with DigitalTF than with GeminiTF (P < 0.01). In 52 representative lesions, the lesion maximum SUV was 36% higher with DigitalTF than with GeminiTF, lesion–to–blood-pool SUV ratio was 59% higher, and SUV gradient was 51% higher, with good correlation between the 2 scanners. Lesions less than 1.5 cm showed a greater increase in SUV from GeminiTF to DigitalTF than those lesions 1.5 cm or greater. In 5 of 21 patients, DigitalTF showed an additional 8 suggestive lesions that were not seen using GeminiTF. In the 15 restaging patients, the true-negative rate was 100% and true-positive rate was 78% for both scanners. In the 5 patients for initial staging, DigitalTF led to upstaging in 2 patients and showed the same staging in the other 3 patients, compared with GeminiTF. Conclusion: DigitalTF provides better image quality, diagnostic confidence, and accuracy than GeminiTF. DigitalTF may be the most beneficial in detecting small tumor lesions and disease staging.

Initial experience of MR/PET in a clinical cancer center.

Magentic Resonance/positron emission tomography (PET) has been introduced recently for imaging of clinical patients. This hybrid imaging technology combines the inherent strengths of MRI with its high soft‐tissue contrast and biological sequences with the inherent strengths of PET, enabling imaging of metabolism with a high sensitivity. In this article, we describe the initial experience of MR/PET in a clinical cancer center along with a review of the literature. For establishing MR/PET in a clinical setting, technical challenges, such as attenuation correction and organizational challenges, such as workflow and reimbursement, have to be overcome. The most promising initial results of MR/PET have been achieved in anatomical areas where high soft‐tissue and contrast resolution is of benefit. Head and neck cancer and pelvic imaging are potential applications of this hybrid imaging technology. In the pediatric population, MR/PET can decrease the lifetime radiation dose. MR/PET protocols tailored to different types of malignancies need to be developed. After the initial exploration phase, large multicenter trials are warranted to determine clinical indications for this exciting hybrid imaging technology and thereby opening new horizons in molecular imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:768–780.

Amyloid PET/MRI in the differential diagnosis of dementia.

The potential of brain imaging has grown rapidly with new modalities, hybrid combinations of existing modalities, and novel metabolic tracers. F-florbetapir is an amyloid plaque-binding molecule labeled to F that allows positron imaging of the amyloid deposition in the brain. This protein deposition is known to be one of the features in Alzheimer disease and therefore can be of interest in the differential diagnosis of dementia. We present 2 cases combining the new hybrid imaging modality PET/MRI, which offers molecular and morphological information, with F-florbetapir in the differential diagnosis of dementia.

PET/MRI: Applications in Clinical Imaging

PET/MRI is a new hybrid modality which is increasingly being used in clinical settings, although both clinical evaluation and technical optimization are still an ongoing process. Initial experience with this new imaging device proves promising for oncologic applications. Other clinical indications in the field of cardiac imaging and neuroimaging are also being explored. This article aims to review the current status of PET/MRI and its value in oncologic applications, and summarizes our own preliminary experience in this field.

Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System.

The aim of this study was to assess the physical performance of a new PET/CT system, the Discovery IQ with 5-ring detector blocks. Methods: Performance was measured using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU2-2012 methodology. Image quality was extended by accounting for different acquisition parameters (lesion-to-background ratios [8:1, 4:1, and 2:1] and acquisition times) and reconstruction algorithms (VUE-point HD [VPHD], VPHD with point-spread-function modeling [VPHD-S], and Q.Clear). Tomographic reconstruction was also assessed using a Jaszczak phantom. Additionally, 30 patient lesions were analyzed to account for differences in lesion volume and SUV quantification between reconstruction algorithms. Results: Spatial resolution ranged from 4.2 mm at 1 cm to 8.5 mm at 20 cm. Sensitivity measured at the center and at 10 cm was 22.8 and 20.4 kps/kBq, respectively. The noise-equivalent counting rate peak was 124 kcps at 9.1 kBq/cm3. The scatter fraction was 36.2%. The accuracy of correction for count losses and randoms was 3.9%. In the image quality test, contrast recovery for VPHD, VPHD-S, and Q.Clear ranged from 18%, 18%, and 13%, respectively (hot contrast; 10-mm sphere diameter; ratio, 2:1), to 68%, 67%, and 81%, respectively (cold contrast; 37-mm sphere diameter; ratio, 8:1). Background variability ranged from 3.4%, 3.0%, and 2.1%, respectively (ratio, 2:1), to 5.5%, 4.8%, and 3.7%, respectively (ratio, 8:1). On Q.Clear reconstruction, the decrease in the penalty term (β) increased the contrast recovery coefficients and background variability. With the Jaszczak phantom, image quality increased overall when a reconstruction algorithm modeling the point-spread function was used, and use of Q.Clear increased the signal-to-noise ratio. Lesions analyzed using VPHD-S and Q.Clear had an SUVmean of 6.5 ± 3 and 7 ± 3, respectively (P < 0.01), and an SUVmax of 11 ± 4.8 and 12 ± 4, respectively (P < 0.01). No significant difference in mean lesion volume was found between algorithms. Conclusion: Among the various Discovery bismuth germanium oxide–based PET/CT scanners, the IQ with 5-ring detector blocks has the highest overall performance, with improved sensitivity and counting rate performance. Q.Clear reconstruction improves the PET image quality, with higher recovery coefficients and lower background variability.

The impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction software on interreader variability when delineating areas of interest in the head and neck

PURPOSE Metal artifacts during computed tomography (CT) hinder the evaluation of diagnostic images and impair the delineation of tumor volume in treatment planning. Several solutions are available to minimize these artifacts. Our objective was to determine the impact of one of those tools on the interreader variability when measuring head and neck structures in the presence of metal artifacts. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eleven patients were retrospectively selected from an institutional review board-approved study based on the presence of metallic artifacts in the head and neck region. CT raw data were postprocessed using a metal artifact reduction tool. A single matching CT slice from the filtered backprojection and postprocessed data sets was selected in the region of the metal artifact. Areas of selected anatomical structures were measured by independent readers, including an anatomical structure selected from a CT slice with no metal artifact in each patient as control. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS Two extreme outliers were identified and the intraclass correlation coefficient was performed with and without them. The intraclass correlation on filtered backprojection, postprocessed, and control images was 0.903, 0.948, and 0.985 with outliers and 0.884, 0.971, and 0.989 without outliers, respectively, for all readers. On the other hand, the intraclass correlation on filtered backprojection, postprocessed, and control images for experienced readers was 0.904, 0.979, and 0.976 with outliers and 0.934, 0.975, and 0.990 without outliers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The interreader variability of areas measured in the presence of metal artifact was greatly decreased by the use of the metal artifact reduction tool and almost matched the variability observed in the absence of the metal artifact.

Cancer Biology: What’s Important for Imaging

Cancer is known to be a mosaic of genetic alterations producing biological changes in cells. In addition, it has been mainly accepted that some common hallmarks could ease the oncologic process. Cancer cells show different characteristics from normal cells including rapid proliferation, immortality, resistance to apoptosis, altered metabolism, metastatic ability, and resistance to immunologic blitz.

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Introduction Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In the United States, approximately 232,000 new cases of breast cancer and 40,000 cancer deaths were expected in 2013, and 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer in her lifetime. Currently, mammography is the primary method of breast cancer screening; however, extensive controversy exists regarding the timing, frequency, and schedule of such screening. Mammography has its limitations, with reported sensitivities ranging from30%-96% and is influenced bymultiple factors, including age and breast tissue density. Given the known limitations of mammography, alternative modalities have been explored to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer, including dynamic contract-enhanced magnetic resonance tomography (DCE-MRI), whole-breast ultrasound, andmolecular breast imaging using positron emission tomography (PET). Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) has been used in patients with breast cancer as a tool to diagnose breast cancer as well as to detect metastasis and recurrence. This article reviews the current state of DCE-MRI and FDG-PET/CT in patients with breast cancer and then delves into the potential utilization of PET/MRI (Figs. 1-3).