Josef Kletzmayr

Viral features of lamivudine resistant hepatitis B genotypes A and D

Viral differences among lamivudine resistant hepatitis B (HBV) genotypes have not been yet investigated. Therefore, we analyzed the characteristics of these viral strains in vivo. Forty‐one patients carrying lamivudine resistant HBV were enrolled. Twenty‐six patients (63%) carried resistant HBV genotype A (group A) and 15 patients (37%) carried resistant HBV genotype D (group D). The rate of reverse transcriptase 204I mutants was significantly higher in group D (67%) compared with group A (19%), whereas rt204V mutants (81% in group A vs 33% in group D; P = .006) and rt180M mutants (81% in group A vs 40% in group D, P = .015) prevailed in group A. The median time of shift from rt204I to rt204V mutants was significantly shorter in group A (4 months in group A, >12 months in group D, P < .001). Additional resistance associated mutations were detected exclusively in group D (P = .004). In a multivariate analysis, HBV genotype (P = .039) and pretreatment serum HBV DNA (P = .001) were independently associated with emerging rt204I or rt204V mutants, respectively. Serum HBV copy numbers after emergence of resistance were higher in group A (mean log10 6.99 copies/ml; range 3–9) compared with group D (mean log10 6.1 copies/ml; range 3.3–8; P = .04). There was no difference between both groups regarding core promoter/precore mutations, viral turnover, and number of flares or disease progression during follow‐up. In conclusion, the mutational pattern during selection of lamivudine resistant HBV strains differs between genotypes A and D. This may have consequences for a salvage regimen initiated for treatment of lamivudine resistant HBV. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;39:42–50.)

Monitoring the Virus Load Can Predict the Emergence of Drug-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Strains in Renal Transplantation Patients during Lamivudine Therapy

The development of resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains during lamivudine treatment has been described repeatedly. To investigate whether the development of such resistant HBV strains can be predicted in an early phase of therapy, the HBV loads of 11 renal transplantation patients were screened at 3-month intervals by a quantitative HBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Lamivudine resistance was detected by sequence analysis. Five patients developed resistance to lamivudine in the 12-15-month follow-up period. In all of them, a virus load of 1x103 HBV DNA copies still was detectable after 3 months of therapy. This was statistically significantly different from those patients who did not develop lamivudine resistance within the observation period, all of whom had no HBV DNA detectable after 3 months of treatment (P=.0022). Thus, virus load testing by use of a sensitive PCR assay allows the early prediction of the emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV strains.

Antibody Maturation and Viremia after Primary Cytomegalovirus Infection, in Immunocompetent Patients and Kidney-Transplant Patients

To investigate antibody maturation and serum levels of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA after primary CMV infection, we studied 51 immunocompetent and 27 kidney-transplant patients. Compared with the immunocompetent patients, the transplant patients had significantly more-prolonged and -variable antibody maturation, clearly longer durations of viremia, and higher levels of CMV DNA; however, antibody maturation continued for >1 year even in immunocompetent patients. Long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis in the transplant patients was associated with either delayed immunoglobulin-G seroconversion, inhibition of antibody maturation (n=2), or immunoglobulin-class switching (n=1). In conclusion, antibody maturation continues in immunocompetent patients for a period longer than previously had been thought and is significantly delayed or even inhibited in kidney-transplant patients.

Acute infection with a single hepatitis C virus strain in dialysis patients: analysis of adaptive immune response and viral variability.

BACKGROUND/AIMS While the adaptive immune response is crucial for spontaneous resolution of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, it also constitutes the driving force for viral escape. For acutely HCV-infected dialysis patients, little is known about the host response and its impact on viral evolution. METHODS Four haemodialysis patients accidentally infected with the same HCV strain were prospectively investigated with respect to the clinical course, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, neutralizing antibodies, viral kinetics and sequence variability. RESULTS In one patient, a robust CD4+ T-cell response was associated with transient control of infection, while in the other patients, weak responses correlated with persistently high viremia. Despite the presence of CD8+ T-cell effectors in the first patient, no sequence differences were detected in targeted regions of the viral genome in any of the patients when viral persistence was established. Genetic stability in the envelope genes, including the hypervariable regions, correlated with low-level or absent neutralizing antibodies in all of the patients. CONCLUSIONS The establishment of viral persistence in the special patient group of dialysis patients is due to a failure of the adaptive immune system, as shown by the absence of significant T-cell and antibody responses, as well as viral variability.