Josef Klocker

Targeting Landing Zone 0 by Total Arch Rerouting and TEVAR: Midterm Results of a Transcontinental Registry

BACKGROUND Landing zone 0, defined as a proximal landing zone in the ascending aorta, remains the last frontier to be taken. Midterm results of total arch rerouting and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) extending into landing zone 0 remain to be determined. METHODS From 2003 to 2011, 66 patients (mean age, 70 years; 68% men) presenting with pathologic conditions affecting the aortic arch (atherosclerotic aneurysms [n = 48], penetrating ulcers [n = 6], type B dissections [n = 6], type B after type A dissections [n = 5], and anastomotic aneurysm [n = 1]) were treated in 5 participating centers. Of these 66 patients, only 12% would have been deemed suitable for any kind of conventional surgical repair because of multisegmental aortic disease or comorbidities. RESULTS In-hospital mortality was 9%. Retrograde type A dissection was observed in 3% of patients. The assisted type I and type III endoleak rate was 0%. Stroke was seen in 5% of patients. Permanent paraplegia was observed in 3% of those studied. Median follow-up was 25 months (8-41 months). There was 1 late type Ib endoleak, which was followed by watchful waiting. Five-year survival was 72%. Five-year aorta-related survival was 96%. No aorta-related reintervention had to be performed in the segments treated. CONCLUSIONS Midterm results of total arch rerouting and TEVAR extending into landing zone 0 are excellent in regard to aorta-related survival and freedom from aorta-related reintervention. Retrograde type A dissection, potentially related to compliance mismatch between the ascending aorta and the stent-graft, warrants further attention. Extended application of this strategy augments therapeutic options in a group of patients who are not suitable candidates for conventional therapy.

Endovascular Repair of Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA). Methods: From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31–90) underwent endovascular treatment for isolated IAA at our department. Of these, 77 patients received stent-grafts either alone or in combination with coils or an Amplatzer vascular plug (n=2); 1 patient received a Smart stent combined with coils, and 13 patients were treated with coil embolization only. The aneurysms were classified according to location: type I=common iliac artery (CIA), type II=internal iliac artery (IIA), type III5CIA and IIA, and type IV=external iliac artery with/without CIA and/or IIA involvement. Results: Primary technical success was 90.1% for all aneurysm types and 93.6%, 80%, 88.8%, and 93.3% for types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Secondary technical success was 96.7% for all types and 97.8%, 95%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, for each type. Clinical success was 93.4% for all types and 97.8%, 85%, 100%, and 86.7%, respectively, by type. Complications in 18 (19.8%) patients included 7 type I endoleaks, 3 type II endoleaks, 2 enlarged aneurysm sacs (incomplete embolization), 5 cases of buttock claudication, and 2 stent-graft thromboses. Two patients were converted to open surgery; 10 underwent secondary interventions. Mortality rates were 1.1% (n=1) at 30 death days and 23.1% (n=21) over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (no aneurysm-related death). Cumulative overall survival was 97.7% at 1 year and 47.6% at 10 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related complications was 88.6% at 1 year and 83.5% at 5 years. Conclusion: Endovascular repair of isolated IAA is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, it may be associated with several complications and must, therefore, be carefully planned.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for the management of iatrogenic and blunt traumatic intercostal artery injuries

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the management of iatrogenic and blunt traumatic intercostal artery (ICA) injuries associated with hemothorax and clinical deterioration. METHODS From May 1999 through April 2007, 24 consecutive patients (17 men, 7 women; mean age 53 years) presenting with active ICA hemorrhage underwent TAE mainly by means of coils combined with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Eleven of them had blunt traumatic injuries (group A, n = 11) and 13 had iatrogenic injuries (group B, n = 13). In all patients, ICA injuries resulted in acute bleeding with clinical deterioration and hemothorax. Before discharge, all patients underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests, and chest x-ray. After discharge, no specific follow-up protocol was required, and the patients were questioned on their state of health at regular intervals and underwent CT or chest x-ray as needed. RESULTS Primary technical success (PTS) was achieved in 21 of 24 patients (87.5%). In group A, it was achieved in all but one patient (90.9%) and in group B in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%). A total of three patients needed secondary interventions, which failed in one of them, amounting to a secondary technical success rate (STS) of 8.3%. The total cumulative mortality rate was 37.5% (n = 9). In group A, it was 9.1% (n = 1) and in group B, it was 61.5% (n = 8). 30-day-mortality was 9.1% in group A, where one patient died due to multiple severe associated injuries, and 30.8% (n = 4) in group B, where one patient died due to treatment failure and three patients due to severe comorbidities. During follow-up, no more deaths occurred in group A, while in group B, four more patients died due to severe comorbidities, amounting to a late mortality rate of 30.8%. No technical complications and no complications such as chest wall or spinal cord ischemia were observed. The mean observation period was 44.6 months in group A and 23.8 months in group B. CONCLUSION TAE of ICAs is a minimally invasive, safe, and reliable treatment option to control massive intrathoracic hemorrhage, especially in patients with serious comorbidities and/or multiple injuries. However, it should be performed only by experienced interventionalists and exact knowledge of the anatomic features of the affected artery and of collateral pathways is mandatory to avoid complications.

Repair of Arterial Injury after Blunt Trauma in the Upper Extremity–Immediate and Long-term Outcome

OBJECTIVE In contrast to upper extremity stab and gunshot wounds, data on management and outcome in blunt trauma (BT) are limited by small numbers and short follow-up periods. METHODS This study is a retrospective data analysis. All patients who had undergone arterial repair after upper-limb BT were included. Exclusion criteria were artery ligation and/or primary limb amputation. Endpoints included the following: peri-operative death, limb salvage, primary and secondary patency, vascular re-operation and/or intervention. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients (71 male; median age: 34.6 years, range: 2.5-81.7) underwent reconstruction of 96 arteries after BT since 1989: subclavian (n=16), axillary (n=22), brachial (n=48) and forearm (n=10). Concomitant arm vein lesions were present in 15 patients (17%) and accompanying nerve (n=38; 43%) and/or orthopaedic injuries (n=64; 72%) in 77 patients (87%). The 30-day mortality rate was 2% with the limb-salvage rate being 98%. Six reconstructions occluded during the first week (primary/secondary patency rate: 93%/99%). After a median follow-up time of 5.1 years, 67% of the patients were followed: There were no secondary amputations and no arterial re-interventions. CONCLUSIONS Arterial repair in upper extremity BT has excellent early and long-term outcome. In contrast to a significant risk of early occlusion, limb loss after repair, late vascular re-intervention and late arterial occlusion or stenosis are rare.

Risk factors for mortality and failure of conservative treatment after aortic type B dissection.

BACKGROUND Despite medical treatment, one third of patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissections experience severe late complications. The aim of this study was to identify patients at high risk of mortality during follow-up. METHODS A total of 183 patients with acute Stanford type B dissection were treated in one of the university hospitals (Aachen [Germany], Maastricht [The Netherlands], and Innsbruck [Austria]) between 1997 and 2010. Records indicated that 120 patients were treated conservatively. Of these patients, 16 were lost to follow-up. The maximum diameter, extent of the dissection, and patency of the side branches were determined from computed tomography angiography data. Survival and treatment failure were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The univariate analysis investigated the influence of aortic diameter (≥41 vs <41 mm) on survival, and the multivariate analysis investigated the influence of aortic diameter, age, sex, and surgery on survival. RESULTS During the follow-up period, the initial treatment was converted to surgical treatment in 21 patients (20.2%). Sixteen of the 104 patients (15.4%) died after a mean of 845.5±805.9 days. The mean maximum aortic transversal diameter at admission was 41.2±8.7 mm. The multivariate analysis identified aortic diameter (P=.004; hazard ratio, 1.07) and age (P=.038; hazard ratio, 1.05) as risk factors that significantly reduce survival. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed both early aortic dilatation and older age as risk factors for increased mortality after conservative treatment of type B dissection.

Incidence and predisposing factors of cold intolerance after arterial repair in upper extremity injuries

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this report was to present abnormal posttraumatic cold intolerance in patients that previously underwent repair of arterial injuries after civilian upper limb trauma in our institution. METHODS All patients who underwent repair of arterial lesions after upper limb trauma since 1990 were reviewed, and clinical follow-up studies were performed. Patients were asked to complete the cold intolerance symptom severity (CISS) questionnaire to evaluate presence and severity of self-reported cold sensitivity, and the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire to analyze functional disability. Abnormal cold intolerance was defined as a CISS score over 30. Further analysis included evaluation of epidemiologic, clinical, and perioperative data for factors predisposing to abnormal cold intolerance. RESULTS A total of 87 patients with previous repair of upper limb arterial injuries were eligible to answer the CISS and DASH questionnaires, and 56 patients (64%; 43 men; median age: 31.9 years) completed both. In our cohort, blunt trauma was the predominant cause of injury (n = 50; 89%). Accompanying lesions of nerves (n = 22; 39%) and/or orthopedic injuries (n = 36; 64%) were present in 48 patients (86%). After a median follow-up period of 5.5 years (range, 0.5-19.7), 23 patients (41% of 56) reported on abnormal cold intolerance. Patients with cold intolerance had worse functional results (as measured by the DASH questionnaire; mean ± SD, 42.7 ± 29.7 vs 11.5 ± 23.9; P < .001) when compared with patients without. Cold intolerance was more frequently seen in patients with previous nerve lesion (P = .027) and in proximal injuries (subclavian or axillary vs brachial or forearm arteries: P = .006), but was not correlated to gender, age, involvement of the dominant or nondominant arm, and the presence of ischemia, bone injury, or an isolated vascular injury. CONCLUSIONS Abnormal cold intolerance is frequently seen in patients with a history of arterial repair in upper limb trauma. It is associated with significant functional impairment. Concomitant nerve injury and involvement of the subclavian or axillary artery are the major predisposing factors for development of cold intolerance after upper limb trauma.

Endovascular Management of Inadvertent Subclavian Artery Catheterization during Subclavian Vein Cannulation

PURPOSE To retrospectively review a 9-year experience with endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during subclavian vein cannulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS From June 2000 through July 2009 (109 months), 13 patients underwent endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization. All catheters were still in situ, including one 7-F catheter, six 8-F catheters, and six large-bore 10-11-F catheters. Treatment was performed with an Angio-Seal device (n = 6) or balloon catheters (n = 7) and by additional stent-graft placement (n = 4). RESULTS Mean follow-up was 27.3 months (range, 0.4-78 months). The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the late mortality rate was 46.1%. Primary technical success was achieved in nine patients (69.2%), in four with the use of a compliant balloon catheter and in the other five with an Angio-Seal device. Complications required additional stent-graft placement in four patients (30.8%), one because of stenosis after Angio-Seal device deployment and three as a result of insufficient closure of the puncture site by balloon tamponade. Stent-graft repair was successful in all four patients, for a primary assisted technical success rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular techniques offer a less invasive alternative to surgery. The present limited experience shows that the use of the Angio-Seal device is not without risks, whereas balloon tamponade is not always reliable in closing the puncture site. Stent-graft placement may be required in patients in whom balloon tamponade fails or in whom the use of the Angio-Seal device is contraindicated.

Does chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin affect durability of endovascular aortic aneurysm exclusion in a midterm follow-up?

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of oral anticoagulation on durability of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Retrospective review was conducted of 182 consecutive EVAR patients (169 men; mean age 75.3 years, range 53–89) between 1999 and 2003. Patients on warfarin anticoagulation (WA, n=21; International Normalized Ratio of 2 to 3) were compared against a control group (CG) with no postoperative anticoagulation (n=161). Death, aneurysm rupture, and reintervention were considered primary endpoints; endoleaks, endograft migration, and aneurysm remodeling were secondary endpoints. Results: Mean follow-up was 16.3±12.6 months. One-year mortality was 6.6% (9.5% WA versus 6.2% CG); overall mortality was 14.3% (p=0.414). No aneurysm rupture occurred. At 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, cumulative reinterventions (20%/20%/20% WA versus 12%/15%/20% CG; p=0.633) and endoleak rates (25%/25%/25% WA versus 17%/22%/34% CG; p=0.649) were comparable. In both groups, most completion endoleaks resolved (42.9% WA versus 74.4% CG; p=0.474), but few de novo endoleaks did (0% WA versus 12.8% CG; p=0.538). Anticoagulation did not affect mean time to aneurysm sac shrinkage (1.3±0.3 WA versus 1.4±0.1 years CG; p=0.769). Conclusions: After EVAR, anticoagulation appears safe and does not significantly alter mortality, risk for rupture, or the incidence of reintervention. Early endoleaks appear more common in anticoagulated patients, but anticoagulation does not preclude spontaneous endoleak resolution nor does it increase late endoleak rates. Irrespective of the anticoagulation status, early but not late endoleaks usually sealed spontaneously. Observing type II endoleaks appears safe in the absence of aneurysm enlargement.

Influence of Use of a Vascular Closure Device on Incidence and Surgical Management of Access Site Complications after Percutaneous Interventions

AIM The study aimed to evaluate vascular access site complications (ASCs) after percutaneous interventions (PIs) in our institution for changes in annual incidence and surgical management after increased usage of a vascular closure device (VCD; in all cases: Angioseal™). MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients who underwent repair of arterial pseudo-aneurysms or access site stenosis/occlusion leading to leg ischaemia (LI) or new-onset disabling claudication (CI) after PIs between 2001 and 2008 were included. Annual rates of procedures and methods of repair of ASC were evaluated. RESULTS After a total of 58 453 PIs, 352 patients (0.6%) were operated on for: pseudo-aneurysms (n = 300; 0.51%); and local stenosis/occlusion leading to LI/CI (n = 52; 0.09%). Numbers increased significantly with more widespread VCD use: group A (2001-2004: 2860 VCDs; 28 284 PIs; 10.1%): n = 132 (0.47%); and group B (2005-2008: 11,660 VCDs; 30,169 PIs; 38.6%): n = 220 (0.73%) (p < 0.001). In contrast to similar rates of pseudo-aneurysms (group A: n = 124; 0.44%; group B: n = 176; 0.58%; not significant), a significant increase of operations for local stenoses/occlusions was seen with widespread VCD use: n = 8 versus n = 44 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the era of VCDs, complications are rare. However, use of these devices is not without complications, and may require complex reconstructions.

Treatment options of crural pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND Pseudoaneurysms (PAs) of crural arteries represent rare complications of vascular interventions or surgery. Management of crural PAs includes different treatment options, conservative treatment as well as open surgery or endovascular procedures. We reviewed our experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed all patients who were diagnosed with crural PAs since 2003. We evaluated etiology, treatment and outcome. Endpoints were target vessel patency, vascular re-intervention and limb loss. RESULTS A total of 30 patients were diagnosed with crural PAs. PA was caused by vascular intervention in 27 patients (90 %): open balloon thrombectomy (n = 25), subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (n = 1) and transcutaneous catheter-assisted thrombus aspiration (n = 1). In 3 patients (10 %) it was caused by orthopaedic surgical procedures. Location of crural PAs were peroneal artery (n = 11; 36.7 %), posterior tibial artery (n = 10; 33.3 %), anterior tibial artery (n = 5; 16.7 %), and tibioperoneal trunk (n = 4; 13.3 %). Treatment of crural PAs included open surgery (n = 3; 10 %), endovascular procedures (n = 13; 43.3 %) such as endograft implantation (n = 9) or coil embolisation (n = 4), and conservative management (n = 14; 46.7 %). After a median follow-up period of 7 months (range: 0 - 46 months) 8 of 9 endografts were occluded, in none of these patients a minor or a major amputation was necessary. None of the surgically, endovascularly and conservatively treated patients needed a re-intervention for crural PA. A major amputation was necessary in 4 patients due to progression of peripheral arterial disease; none was a directly consequence of the crural PA. CONCLUSIONS Crural PAs are mainly caused by vascular intervention, most frequently by catheter thrombectomy. As a consequence, we recommend fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy over a guide wire as routine technique. In many cases of crural PAs, conservative management is sufficient. The choice of treatment of crural PAs depends on size, location and associated symptoms. Endovascular treatment using endografts is limited by poor long-term patency.