Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Josef Settele is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Josef Settele.


Biodiversity and Conservation | 2004

Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation

Klaus Henle; Kendi F. Davies; Michael Kleyer; Chris Margules; Josef Settele

We reviewed empirical data and hypotheses derived from demographic, optimal foraging, life-history, community, and biogeographic theory for predicting the sensitivity of species to habitat fragmentation. We found 12 traits or trait groups that have been suggested as predictors of species sensitivity: population size; population fluctuation and storage effect; dispersal power; reproductive potential; annual survival; sociality; body size; trophic position; ecological specialisation, microhabitat and matrix use; disturbance and competition sensitive traits; rarity; and biogeographic position. For each trait we discuss the theoretical justification for its sensitivity to fragmentation and empirical evidence for and against the suitability of the trait as a predictor of fragmentation sensitivity. Where relevant, we also discuss experimental design problems for testing the underlying hypotheses. There is good empirical support for 6 of the 12 traits as sensitivity predictors: population size; population fluctuation and storage effects; traits associated with competitive ability and disturbance sensitivity in plants; microhabitat specialisation and matrix use; rarity in the form of low abundance within a habitat; and relative biogeographic position. Few clear patterns emerge for the remaining traits from empirical studies if examined in isolation. Consequently, interactions of species traits and environmental conditions must be considered if we want to be able to predict species sensitivity to fragmentation. We develop a classification of fragmentation sensitivity based on specific trait combinations and discuss the implications of the results for ecological theory.


Ecological Monographs | 2008

MEASURING BEE DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN HABITATS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS

Catrin Westphal; Riccardo Bommarco; Gabriel Carré; Ellen Lamborn; Nicolas Morison; Theodora Petanidou; Simon G. Potts; Stuart Roberts; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Thomas Tscheulin; Bernard E. Vaissière; Michal Woyciechowski; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; William E. Kunin; Josef Settele; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Bee pollinators are currently recorded with many different sampling methods. However, the relative performances of these methods have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In response to the strong need to record ongoing shifts in pollinator diversity and abundance, global and regional pollinator initiatives must adopt standardized sampling protocols when developing large-scale and long-term monitoring schemes. We systematically evaluated the performance of six sampling methods (observation plots, pan traps, standardized and variable transect walks, trap nests with reed internodes or paper tubes) that are commonly used across a wide range of geographical regions in Europe and in two habitat types (agricultural and seminatural). We focused on bees since they represent the most important pollinator group worldwide. Several characteristics of the methods were considered in order to evaluate their performance in assessing bee diversity: sample coverage, observed species richness, species richness estimators, collector biases (identified by subunit-based rarefaction curves), species composition of the samples, and the indication of overall bee species richness (estimated from combined total samples). The most efficient method in all geographical regions, in both the agricultural and seminatural habitats, was the pan trap method. It had the highest sample coverage, collected the highest number of species, showed negligible collector bias, detected similar species as the transect methods, and was the best indicator of overall bee species richness. The transect methods were also relatively efficient, but they had a significant collector bias. The observation plots showed poor performance. As trap nests are restricted to cavity-nesting bee species, they had a naturally low sample coverage. However, both trap nest types detected additional species that were not recorded by any of the other methods. For large-scale and long-term monitoring schemes with surveyors with different experience levels, we recommend pan traps as the most efficient, unbiased, and cost-effective method for sampling bee diversity. Trap nests with reed internodes could be used as a complementary sampling method to maximize the numbers of collected species. Transect walks are the principal method for detailed studies focusing on plant-pollinator associations. Moreover, they can be used in monitoring schemes after training the surveyors to standardize their collection skills.


Nature Climate Change | 2012

Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale

Vincent Devictor; Chris van Swaay; Tom Brereton; Lluı´s Brotons; Dan E. Chamberlain; Janne Heliölä; Sergi Herrando; Romain Julliard; Mikko Kuussaari; Åke Lindström; Jiří Reif; David B. Roy; Oliver Schweiger; Josef Settele; Constantí Stefanescu; Arco J. van Strien; Chris Van Turnhout; Zdeněk Vermouzek; Michiel F. WallisDeVries; Irma Wynhoff; Frédéric Jiguet

Climate changes have profound effects on the distribution of numerous plant and animal species(1-3). However, whether and how different taxonomic groups are able to track climate changes at large spatial scales is still unclear. Here, we measure and compare the climatic debt accumulated by bird and butterfly communities at a European scale over two decades (1990-2008). We quantified the yearly change in community composition in response to climate change for 9,490 bird and 2,130 butterfly communities distributed across Europe(4). We show that changes in community composition are rapid but different between birds and butterflies and equivalent to a 37 and 114 km northward shift in bird and butterfly communities, respectively. We further found that, during the same period, the northward shift in temperature in Europe was even faster, so that the climatic debts of birds and butterflies correspond to a 212 and 135 km lag behind climate. Our results indicate both that birds and butterflies do not keep up with temperature increase and the accumulation of different climatic debts for these groups at national and continental scales.


Ecology Letters | 2010

Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis

Erik Öckinger; Oliver Schweiger; Thomas O. Crist; Diane M. Debinski; Jochen Krauss; Mikko Kuussaari; Jessica D. Petersen; Juha Pöyry; Josef Settele; Keith S. Summerville; Riccardo Bommarco

There is a lack of quantitative syntheses of fragmentation effects across species and biogeographic regions, especially with respect to species life-history traits. We used data from 24 independent studies of butterflies and moths from a wide range of habitats and landscapes in Europe and North America to test whether traits associated with dispersal capacity, niche breadth and reproductive rate modify the effect of habitat fragmentation on species richness. Overall, species richness increased with habitat patch area and connectivity. Life-history traits improved the explanatory power of the statistical models considerably and modified the butterfly species-area relationship. Species with low mobility, a narrow feeding niche and low reproduction were most strongly affected by habitat loss. This demonstrates the importance of considering life-history traits in fragmentation studies and implies that both species richness and composition change in a predictable manner with habitat loss and fragmentation.


Journal of Apicultural Research | 2010

Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in Europe

Simoon G. Potts; Stuart Roberts; Robin Dean; Mike A. Brown; R.E. Jones; Peter J. Neumann; Josef Settele

Summary Growing evidence indicates that European managed honey bees are in decline, but information for Europe remains patchy and localized. Here we compile data from 18 European countries to assess trends in the number of honey bee colonies and beekeepers between 1965 and 2005. We found consistent declines in colony numbers in central European countries and some increases in Mediterranean countries. Beekeeper numbers have declined in all of the European countries examined. Our data support the view that honey bees are in decline at least in some regions, which is probably closely linked to the decreasing number of beekeepers. Our data on colony numbers and beekeepers must, however, be interpreted with caution due to different approaches and socioeconomic factors in the various countries, thereby limiting their comparability. We therefore make specific recommendations for standardized methodologies to be adopted at the national and global level to assist in the future monitoring of honey bees.


BioScience | 2009

Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services

Gary W. Luck; R. Harrington; Paula A. Harrison; Claire Kremen; Pam Berry; Rob Bugter; Terence P. Dawson; Francesco de Bello; Sandra Díaz; Christian K. Feld; John R. Haslett; Daniel Hering; Areti Kontogianni; Sandra Lavorel; Mark Rounsevell; Michael J. Samways; Leonard Sandin; Josef Settele; Martin T. Sykes; Sybille van den Hove; Marie Vandewalle; Martin Zobel

Research on ecosystem services has grown rapidly over the last decade. Two conceptual frameworks have been published to guide ecological assessments of organisms that deliver services—the concepts of service-providing units (SPUs) and ecosystem service providers (ESPs). Here, we unite these frameworks and present an SPU-ESP continuum that offers a coherent conceptual approach for synthesizing the latest developments in ecosystem service research, and can direct future studies at all levels of organization. In particular, we show how the service-provider concept can be applied at the population, functional group, and community levels. We strongly emphasize the need to identify and quantify the organisms and their characteristics (e.g., functional traits) that provide services, and to assess service provision relative to the demands of human beneficiaries. We use key examples from the literature to illustrate the new approach and to highlight gaps in knowledge, particularly in relation to the impact of species interactions and ecosystem dynamics on service provision.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2015

Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates

L. Pisa; V. Amaral-Rogers; Luc P. Belzunces; Jean-Marc Bonmatin; C. A. Downs; Dave Goulson; David P. Kreutzweiser; Christian H. Krupke; Matthias Liess; Melanie McField; Christy A. Morrissey; D. A. Noome; Josef Settele; N. Simon-Delso; John D. Stark; J.P. van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; Martin Wiemers

We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earthworms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section “other invertebrates” review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.


Conservation Biology | 2009

Advantages of Volunteer-Based Biodiversity Monitoring in Europe

Dirk S. Schmeller; Pierre-Yves Henry; Romain Julliard; Bernd Gruber; Jean Clobert; Frank Dziock; Szabolcs Lengyel; Piotr Nowicki; Eszter Déri; Eduardas Budrys; Tiiu Kull; Kadri Tali; Bianca Bauch; Josef Settele; Chris van Swaay; Andrej Kobler; Valerija Babij; Eva Papastergiadou; Klaus Henle

Without robust and unbiased systems for monitoring, changes in natural systems will remain enigmatic for policy makers, leaving them without a clear idea of the consequences of any environmental policies they might adopt. Generally, biodiversity-monitoring activities are not integrated or evaluated across any large geographic region. The EuMon project conducted the first large-scale evaluation of monitoring practices in Europe through an on-line questionnaire and is reporting on the results of this survey. In September 2007 the EuMon project had documented 395 monitoring schemes for species, which represents a total annual cost of about 4 million euro, involving more than 46,000 persons devoting over 148,000 person-days/year to biodiversity-monitoring activities. Here we focused on the analysis of variations of monitoring practices across a set of taxonomic groups (birds, amphibians and reptiles, mammals, butterflies, plants, and other insects) and across 5 European countries (France, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, and Poland). Our results suggest that the overall sampling effort of a scheme is linked with the proportion of volunteers involved in that scheme. Because precision is a function of the number of monitored sites and the number of sites is maximized by volunteer involvement, our results do not support the common belief that volunteer-based schemes are too noisy to be informative. Just the opposite, we believe volunteer-based schemes provide relatively reliable data, with state-of-the-art survey designs or data-analysis methods, and consequently can yield unbiased results. Quality of data collected by volunteers is more likely determined by survey design, analytical methodology, and communication skills within the schemes rather than by volunteer involvement per se.


Biological Reviews | 2010

Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination

Oliver Schweiger; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Riccardo Bommarco; Thomas Hickler; Philip E. Hulme; Stefan Klotz; Ingolf Kühn; Mari Moora; Anders Nielsen; Ralf Ohlemüller; Theodora Petanidou; Simon G. Potts; Petr Pyšek; Jane C. Stout; Martin T. Sykes; Thomas Tscheulin; Montserrat Vilà; Gian-Reto Walther; Catrin Westphal; Marten Winter; Martin Zobel; Josef Settele

Global change may substantially affect biodiversity and ecosystem functioning but little is known about its effects on essential biotic interactions. Since different environmental drivers rarely act in isolation it is important to consider interactive effects. Here, we focus on how two key drivers of anthropogenic environmental change, climate change and the introduction of alien species, affect plant–pollinator interactions. Based on a literature survey we identify climatically sensitive aspects of species interactions, assess potential effects of climate change on these mechanisms, and derive hypotheses that may form the basis of future research. We find that both climate change and alien species will ultimately lead to the creation of novel communities. In these communities certain interactions may no longer occur while there will also be potential for the emergence of new relationships. Alien species can both partly compensate for the often negative effects of climate change but also amplify them in some cases. Since potential positive effects are often restricted to generalist interactions among species, climate change and alien species in combination can result in significant threats to more specialist interactions involving native species.


Journal of Insect Conservation | 2009

The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review

John W. Dover; Josef Settele

We review the literature on the influence of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement. We start by examining the definition of landscape commonly used in spatial ecology. Landscape-level processes are reviewed before focusing on the impact of the geometry and spatial arrangement of habitat patches on butterflies e.g. the nature of the matrix, patch size and shape, minimum area requirements, immigration and emigration, and temporal habitat dynamics. The role of landscape elements is reviewed in terms of corridors (and stepping-stones), barriers, nodes, environmental buffers, and prominent landmark features.

Collaboration


Dive into the Josef Settele's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oliver Schweiger

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingolf Kühn

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joachim H. Spangenberg

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Wiemers

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Klaus Henle

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Musche

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Harpke

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge