Joseph A. Paladino

Evaluation of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) as predictors of outcome for cefepime and ceftazidime in serious bacterial infections

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship of the predicted pharmacodynamic parameters 24-h area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC=area under the concentration-time curve for 24h of dosing/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC) and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) with clinical and microbiological outcomes in patients with bacteraemia and sepsis treated with cefepime or ceftazidime. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were derived for 76 of 107 patients enrolled in two prospective, randomised, clinical trials comparing cefepime with ceftazidime for the treatment of sepsis with bacteraemia, lower respiratory tract infection or complicated urinary tract infection. The relationships between the pharmacodynamic parameters and outcomes were examined. Whilst no significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between cefepime and ceftazidime, there were significant differences in the pharmacodynamic analysis. Patients with an AUIC> or =250 had significantly greater clinical cure (79% vs. 33%; P=0.002) and bacteriological eradication (96% vs. 44%; P<0.001) than patients with an AUIC<250. Patients with T>MIC of 100% had significantly greater clinical cure (82% vs. 33%; P=0.002) and bacteriological eradication (97% vs. 44%; P<0.001) than patients with T>MIC of <100%. Both microbiological and clinical cure rates were suboptimal in patients receiving cefepime or ceftazidime for the treatment of serious infections if the AUIC was <250 or T>MIC was <100%.

Clinical and economic evaluation of oral ciprofloxacin after an abbreviated course of intravenous antibiotics

PURPOSE Oral ciprofloxacin has the requisite pharmacokinetic and antibacterial properties to rival the potency of intravenous antibiotics. This study was designed to determine whether oral ciprofloxacin could abbreviate the course of intravenous antibiotics in the treatment of serious infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS Hospitalized adult patients were eligible for enrollment if they had a serious infection that was expected to require 8 or more days of intravenous antibiotic treatment. After conventional intravenous antibiotics were administered for 3 days, informed consent was obtained and patients were randomly assigned to either continue parenteral antibiotics (n = 53) or switch to oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg taken twice daily (n = 52). Ninety-nine of the 105 patients were evaluable for the assessment of efficacy. Clinical and bacteriologic efficacy, adverse events, and costs of the two treatments were compared. RESULTS The two treatment groups were comparable for demographic characteristics, types of infections, bacteria isolated, initial intravenous antibiotic regimens, and duration of antibiotic treatment. The most common infections were of the skin and skin structure; bacteremia and infections of the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract, and bone and joint were also represented. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. The most frequently prescribed intravenous antibiotics before randomization included aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, vancomycin, and nafcillin; 52 evaluable patients were treated with combination therapy while 47 received monotherapy. The clinical and bacteriologic outcomes and adverse reaction frequency with oral ciprofloxacin were comparable to those of the continued intravenous antibiotic regimens. Ciprofloxacin was associated with an average cost savings of

Genesis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), How Treatment of MRSA Infections Has Selected for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, and the Importance of Antibiotic Management and Infection Control

293 per patient. CONCLUSION When used after 3 days of intravenous antibiotics, oral ciprofloxacin was as safe and effective as full courses of intravenous antibiotics and provided substantial cost savings.

What Have We Learned from Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Theories

We extensively studied the epidemiology and time course of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Millard Fillmore Hospital, a 600-bed teaching hospital in Buffalo. The changeover from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus to MRSA begins on the first hospital day, when patients are given cefazolin as presurgical prophylaxis. Under selective antibiotic pressure, colonizing flora change within 24 to 48 hours. For patients remaining hospitalized, subsequent courses of third-generation cephalosporins further select and amplify the colonizing MRSA population. Therefore, managing antibiotic selective pressure might be essential. Other strategies include attention to dosing, so that serum concentrations of drug exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration, and antibiotic cycling. Although there are some promising new antibiotics on the horizon, it is necessary to deal with many resistance patterns by using the combined strategies of infection control and antibiotic management.

Changes in antimicrobial agent usage resulting from interactions among clinical pharmacy, the infectious disease division, and the microbiology laboratory

Pharmacokinetic characteristics and pharmacodynamic properties dictate antimicrobial response and, along with natural immune responses, clinical outcomes. As new agents are developed with long half-lives, we will lose the ability to differentiate between concentration-dependent and time-dependent properties. The area under the inhibitory concentration curve (AUIC) defines drug regimens as a ratio of drug exposure to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows them to be compared with each other. With AUIC and agents with long half-lives, these comparisons are possible regardless of chemical classification or concentration or time-dependent activity. Historical examples of reduced drug exposure from decreased doses (i.e., cefaclor, clarithromycin, and ciprofloxacin), and thus low AUIC values, directly correlate with drug resistance. In the face of rising MICs (as is occurring worldwide with Streptococcus pneumoniae), close attention to appropriate dosing and concentration above the MIC may delay and potentially even prevent antibiotic resistance. Creating selective pressure on reliable antibiotics by inappropriately reducing their doses will undoubtedly challenge these agents and may destroy entire drug classes with similar mechanisms of action or resistance.

Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous followed by Oral Azithromycin Monotherapy in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Rapid reporting of culture and susceptibility data is the first of several important steps in the successful management of infected patients. As has been said many times, rapidly reported data are of little value unless the patient directly benefits. Benefit requires better overall communication and an action plan linked to timely use of these results. In 1989 the Millard Fillmore Hospital Antibiotic Review Committee developed and implemented a prototype approach to hospital wide antimicrobial management. The formulary was revised and the drug use evaluation process modified to enhance effectiveness and to lower the cost of therapy and inventory. Clinical pharmacy antimicrobial agent management specialists were then recruited to individualize patient treatments to the isolated pathogens in conjunction with the Division of Infectious Diseases. To provide the clinical pharmacy specialists with rapid and clinically useful information, a real-time computer link was created between the pharmacy (antibiotic orders) and the microbiology laboratory (culture results). Customized software was implemented to screen all patients automatically for mismatches between pathogens and drugs, or to screen for doses inappropriate to minimum inhibitory concentration or renal function. Special attention was paid to identification of opportunities to target a more appropriate narrow-spectrum regimen after culture results became available. Changes in antimicrobial regimen or dosage were made by contacting the prescribing physician. Over 90% of the recommended changes were made, and virtually all changed regimens had satisfactory clinical outcome. Real dollar expenditures for antimicrobial agents declined by >

Comparison of the fluoroquinolones based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters

200,000 per year. Prior to the institution of this computerized clinical management strategy, antimicrobial purchases were rising yearly at the rate of 12%-15%. The combined efforts of clinical pharmacy, microbiology, and infectious disease personnel successfully optimized antimicrobial therapy on a hospital wide basis. Antimicrobial agent optimization improved patient outcome, and the cost savings more than covered the costs of the program personnel and software.

Economic consequences of antimicrobial resistance.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate intravenous (i.v.) azithromycin followed by oral azithromycin as a monotherapeutic regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two trials of i.v. azithromycin used as initial monotherapy in hospitalized CAP patients are summarized. Clinical efficacy is reported from an open-label randomized trial of azithromycin compared to cefuroxime with or without erythromycin. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy results are also presented from a noncomparative trial of i.v. azithromycin that was designed to give additional clinical experience with a larger number of pathogens. Azithromycin was administered to 414 patients: 202 and 212 in the comparative and noncomparative trials, respectively. The comparator regimen was used as treatment for 201 patients; 105 were treated with cefuroxime alone and 96 were given cefuroxime plus erythromycin. In the comparative trial, clinical outcome data were available for 268 evaluable patients with confirmed CAP at the 10- to 14-day visit, with 106 (77%) of the azithromycin patients cured or improved and 97 (74%) of the comparator patients cured or improved. Mean i.v. treatment duration and mean total treatment duration (i.v. and oral) for the clinically evaluable patients were significantly (P < 0.05) shorter for the azithromycin group (3.6 days for the i.v. group and 8.6 days for the i.v. and oral group) than for the evaluable patients given cefuroxime plus erythromycin (4.0 days for the i.v. group and 10.3 days for the i.v. and oral group). The present comparative study demonstrates that initial therapy with i.v. azithromycin for hospitalized patients with CAP is associated with fewer side effects and is equal in efficacy to a 1993 American Thoracic Society-suggested regimen of cefuroxime plus erythromycin when the erythromycin is deemed necessary by clinicians.

Cefepime: A Fourth-Generation Parenteral Cephalosporin

Assessment of pharmacodynamic activity from standard in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) alone is insufficient to predict in vivo potency. Achievable serum and tissue concentrations as well as pharmacokinetic characteristics must be considered. When pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic values are combined, the area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) and peak concentration: MIC ratio predict clinical cure for fluoroquinolones. Clinical data and animal models indicate that a peak:MIC of 10:1 and above and an AUIC of 125 and above are predictive of a clinical cure for this class of antimicrobials against gram‐negative organisms. The values may be used to compare and contrast fluoroquinolones to determine which would be best for treating a specific microorganism. Pharmacodynamic data also can be used to design regimens that minimize the risk of suboptimal drug levels. Ensuring the optimal fluoroquinolone dosage based on pharmacodynamic principles would diminish the emergence of resistant organisms and prevent treatment failures.

Impact of rapid methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction testing on mortality and cost effectiveness in hospitalized patients with bacteraemia: a decision model.

BACKGROUND In the past two decades, a dramatic increase in the frequency and prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens has challenged clinicians and researchers. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of the literature was conducted. Available data identifying the costs and consequences of resistance are summarized while the issues and limitations of research assessing the economics of resistance are acknowledged. RESULTS Microbial resistance is a complex, multifactorial phenomenon, but the single most powerful influence is antimicrobial use. Treatment guidelines, clinical pathways, and other directives exert widespread influences on individual selection of antimicrobial agents. However, use of an empiric regimen that does not provide effective coverage, or a targeted regimen that is dosed too low to provide optimal therapy, will delay eradication of the pathogen, increase the potential for resistance to emerge, extend and increase morbidity, and expose the patient to an increased risk of mortality. Coincident with these untoward clinical events are economic consequences secondary to increased duration of treatment, and for some, an extended duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSION Resistant gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria have been associated with increased direct medical costs ranging from several thousand dollars to tens of thousands of dollars per patient.