Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joseph C. Banis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joseph C. Banis.


Annals of Plastic Surgery | 1984

The Lateral Upper Arm Flap: Anatomy and Clinical Applications

James Katsaros; Mark A. Schusterman; Moroe Beppu; Joseph C. Banis; Robert D. Acland

There is a highly dependable free flap donor site of moderate size on the posterolateral aspect of the distal upper arm. The area is supplied by the posterior radial collateral artery, a direct continuation of the profunda brachii. The flap area is supplied by a direct cutaneous nerve. It can be raised on its own, with underlying tendon, with bone, or with fascia only. This article describes our findings in 32 cadaver dissections and in 23 clinical cases.


American Journal of Bioethics | 2004

On the Ethics of Facial Transplantation Research

Osborne P. Wiggins; John H. Barker; Serge Martinez; Marieke Vossen; Claudio Maldonado; Federico V. Grossi; Cedric Francois; Michael R. Cunningham; Gustavo Perez-Abadia; Moshe Kon; Joseph C. Banis

Transplantation continues to push the frontiers of medicine into domains that summon forth troublesome ethical questions. Looming on the frontier today is human facial transplantation. We develop criteria that, we maintain, must be satisfied in order to ethically undertake this as-yet-untried transplant procedure. We draw on the criteria advanced by Dr. Francis Moore in the late 1980s for introducing innovative procedures in transplant surgery. In addition to these we also insist that human face transplantation must meet all the ethical requirements usually applied to health care research. We summarize the achievements of transplant surgery to date, focusing in particular on the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive medications. We also emphasize the importance of risk/benefit assessments that take into account the physical, aesthetic, psychological, and social dimensions of facial disfiguration, reconstruction, and transplantation. Finally, we maintain that the time has come to move facial transplantation research into the clinical phase.


Transplant International | 2006

Composite tissue allotransplantation of the hand and face: a new frontier in transplant and reconstructive surgery

Brian Gander; Charles S. Brown; Dalibor Vasilic; Allen Furr; Joseph C. Banis; Michael R. Cunningham; Osborne P. Wiggins; Claudio Maldonado; Iain S. Whitaker; Gustavo Perez-Abadia; Johannes Frank; John H. Barker

Each year an estimated 7‐million people in the USA need composite tissue reconstruction because of surgical excision of tumors, accidents and congenital malformations. Limb amputees alone comprise over 1.2 million of these. This figure is more than double the number of solid organs needed for transplantation. Composite tissue allotransplantation in the form of hand and facial tissue transplantation are now a clinical reality. The discovery, in the late 1990s, that the same immunotherapy used routinely in kidney transplantation was also effective in preventing skin rejection made this possible. While these new treatments seem like major advancements most of the surgical, immunological and ethical methods used are not new at all and have been around and routinely used in clinical practice for some time. In this review of composite tissue allotransplantation, we: (i) outline the limitations of conventional reconstructive methods for treating severe facial disfigurement, (ii) review the history of composite tissue allotransplantation, (iii) discuss the chronological scientific advances that have made it possible, (iv) focus on the two unique clinical scenarios of hand and face transplantation, and (v) reflect on the critical issues that must be addressed as we move this new frontier toward becoming a treatment in mainstream medicine.


Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2006

Investigation of risk acceptance in facial transplantation.

John H. Barker; Allen Furr; Michael L. Cunningham; Federico V. Grossi; Dalibor Vasilic; Barckley Storey; Osborne P. Wiggins; Ramsey K. Majzoub; Marieke Vossen; Claudio Maldonado; Christopher C. Reynolds; Cedric Francois; Gustavo Perez-Abadia; Johannes Frank; Moshe Kon; Joseph C. Banis

Background: The surgical techniques necessary to transplant a human face are well established, and the early success of human hand transplants suggests that the immunological hurdles of transplanting human facial tissues have largely been overcome. Therefore, it is the ethical barriers that pose the greatest challenge to performing facial transplantation. At the center of the ethical debate is the question, “Do the risks posed by the life-long immunosuppression that a recipient would have to take justify the benefits of receiving a face transplant?” In this study, the authors answer this question by assessing the degree of risk individuals would be willing to accept to receive a face transplant. Methods: To quantitatively assess risks versus benefits in facial transplantation, the authors developed the Louisville Instrument for Transplantation, or LIFT, which contains 237 standardized questions. Respondents in three study populations (healthy individuals, n = 150; organ transplant recipients, n = 42; and individuals with facial disfigurement, n = 34) were questioned about the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years, or sustain other costs, in exchange for receiving seven different transplant procedures. Results: The authors found that the three populations would accept differing degrees of risk for the seven transplant procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group, while facially disfigured individuals were the least risk tolerant. All groups questioned would accept the highest degree of risk to receive a face transplant compared with the six other procedures. Conclusions: This study presents an empirical basis for assessing risk versus benefit in facial transplantation. In doing so, it provides a more solid foundation upon which to introduce this exciting new reconstructive modality into the clinical arena.


Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 1997

Effect of low dose aspirin on thrombus formation at arterial and venous microanastomoses and on the tissue microcirculation

Frank-W. Peter; Ralph J. P. M. Franken; Wei-zhong Wang; Gary L. Anderson; Dale A. Schuschke; Michael O'Shaughnessy; Joseph C. Banis; H. U. Steinau; John H. Barker

&NA; In free flap/replantation surgery, failure is usually associated with thrombotic occlusion of a microvascular anastomosis (risk zone I) or, on occasion, flow impairment in the microcirculation of the transferred or replanted tissue (risk zone II). The objective of this study is to describe the effect of low dose aspirin on blood flow at both risk zones in microvascular surgery. Risk zone I: In rat femoral arteries and veins, thrombus formation was measured at the anastomoses using transillumination and videomicroscopy. Forty male Wistar rats were assigned in equal numbers to four groups: either arterial or venous injury with either aspirin (5 mg/kg systemically) or saline treatment. We found that aspirin significantly reduces thrombus formation at the venous anastomosis (p = 0.001). Risk zone II: In the isolated rat cremaster muscle downstream from an arterial anastomosis, we measured capillary perfusion, arteriolar diameters, and the appearance of platelet emboli for 6 hours in the muscle microcirculation. Sixteen male Wistar rats in two equal groups received either aspirin (5 mg/kg systemically) or saline. We found that in aspirin‐treated animals, capillary perfusion is significantly (p = 0.002) improved, whereas arteriolar diameters and emboli only slightly increased. In conclusion, low dose aspirin inhibits anastomotic venous thrombosis and improves microcirculatory perfusion in our rat model. These studies provide quantitative data confirming and clarifying the beneficial effects of low dose aspirin in microvascular surgery.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 1994

Pedal or peroneal bypass: Which is better when both are patent?

Thomas M. Bergamini; Salem M. George; H. Todd Massey; Peter K. Henke; Thomas W. Klamer; Glenn E. Lambert; Joseph C. Banis; Frank B. Miller; R. Neal Garrison; J. David Richardson

PURPOSE We compared autogenous vein pedal and peroneal bypasses, focusing on extremities that could have a bypass to either artery. METHODS From 1985 to 1993 we performed a total of 175 pedal and 77 peroneal autogenous vein bypasses for rest pain (n = 75, 30%) and tissue loss (n = 177, 70%). One hundred ninety-six (78%) in situ saphenous vein and 56 (22%) reversed or composite vein bypasses were performed. One hundred fifty-two of these 252 bypasses were performed in extremities with both the pedal and peroneal arteries patent by arteriography. The vascular surgeon chose to perform 99 pedal and 53 peroneal vein bypasses in these 152 extremities. RESULTS The angiogram score of the outflow arteries were similar for pedal and peroneal bypasses with the Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery and modified scoring systems. At 2 years the primary and secondary patency rates for pedal bypasses (70% and 77%) were not significantly different compared with those for peroneal bypasses (60% and 72%). Limb salvage rates at 2 years were similar for pedal and peroneal bypasses for all patients (74% and 73%), patients with both pedal and peroneal arteries patent (83% and 72%), diabetics (76% and 66%), and patients with tissue necrosis (77% and 71%). CONCLUSIONS Pedal and peroneal artery bypasses with equivalent angiogram scores have similar long-term graft patency and limb salvage. The choice between pedal or peroneal artery bypass should be based on the quality of vein and the surgeons preference.


Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2007

Psychosocial implications of disfigurement and the future of human face transplantation.

L. Allen Furr; Osborne P. Wiggins; Michael L. Cunningham; Dalibor Vasilic; Charles S. Brown; Joseph C. Banis; Claudio Maldonado; Gustavo Perez-Abadia; John H. Barker

Summary: Although the first face transplants have been attempted, the social and psychological debates concerning the ethics and desirability of the procedure continue. Critics contend that these issues have not yet been sufficiently addressed. With this in mind, the present article seeks to elaborate on key psychological and social factors that will be central for addressing the ethical and psychosocial challenges necessary to move face transplantation into mainstream medicine. The goals of this article are to (1) discuss the psychosocial sequelae of facial disfiguration and how face transplantation may relieve those problems, and (2) delineate inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of research subjects for face transplantation. The article uses concepts from symbolic interaction theory in sociology to articulate a theoretically coherent scheme for comprehending the psychosocial difficulties of facial disfiguration and the advantages offered by facial transplantation. The authors conclude that the psychosocial implications of disfigurement warrant surgical intervention and that research in the area of face transplantation should continue.


British Journal of Plastic Surgery | 1985

Monitoring free vascularised jejunum grafts

James Katsaros; Joseph C. Banis; Robert D. Acland; Eugene Tan

A reliable method of monitoring free vascularised jejunum to the head and neck region has been used in six patients. Preliminarily, the jejunum island flap is subdivided into major and minor segments. Transferred to the neck, the major part is used to reconstruct the oesophageal or pharyngeal defect, while the minor part supplied by the same segmental mesenteric artery is exteriorised through the neck incision. After five days direct monitoring, the marker segment is clamped, tied and excised before suturing the neck wound under local anaesthesia. No failures of the graft occurred. The effectiveness of this technique has surpassed all previously published and unpublished methods.


Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery | 2008

Composite tissue allotransplantation: a review of relevant immunological issues for plastic surgeons

Iain S. Whitaker; Eileen M. Duggan; Rita R. Alloway; Charlie Brown; Sean McGuire; E. Steve Woodle; Eugene C. Hsiao; Claudio Maldonado; Joseph C. Banis; John H. Barker

BACKGROUND Composite tissue allotransplantation of hand, facial and other tissues is now a clinical reality. The terminology, treatment principles, drug combinations, dosage schedules and mechanisms of the immunosuppression medications on which contemporary transplant surgery is based are unfamiliar to plastic surgeons and most healthcare providers outside the field of transplantation medicine. With this in mind, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide plastic surgeons with a comprehensive and understandable review of key immunological principles relevant to composite tissue allotransplantation. METHODS We present an overview of the immunological basis of composite tissue allotransplantation aimed at the plastic surgery readership, based on our own experience plus manuscripts sourced from MEDLINE, EMBASE, text books, ancient manuscripts and illustrations. RESULTS In this manuscript we provide the reader with a brief history of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA), a concise description of the immunological terminology, treatment approaches, risks associated with immunosuppressive therapy, risk acceptance, and current research avenues relating to contemporary CTA. CONCLUSION Today, as transplant and reconstructive surgeons join forces to move hand and facial tissue allotransplantation into the clinical arena, it is important that plastic surgeons have an understanding of the major immunological principles upon which this new treatment is based.


American Journal of Surgery | 1984

Microvascular free tissue transfer in head and neck and esophageal surgery

Roger J. Tabah; Michael B. Flynn; Robert D. Acland; Joseph C. Banis

Successful reconstruction for excisional defects of the head and neck and esophagus was accomplished in 93 percent of our patients using microvascular free tissue transfer. Complete failure occurred in 7 percent of the patients. Major defects after head and neck cancer surgery constituted the main indication for use of microvascular free tissue transfer for reconstruction. Ninety-four percent of the patients had undergone an extensive excisional procedure. A wide range of cutaneous, myocutaneous, and osteocutaneous free flaps, as well as free bowel autotransfers were used. Complete failure was three times higher in the previously irradiated patients (4 of 41 patients) compared with nonirradiated patients (1 of 34 patients). Morbidity and mortality rates were consistent with expected ranges in patients who were undergoing major head and neck resection. Donor site complications occurred in 23 percent. Thin flaps are favored for reconstruction of anterior defects in the oral cavity, whereas bulkier flaps are more suitable for deeper defects in the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The advantages are both aesthetic and functional. The free jejunal autograft is considered the reconstructive method of choice for defects produced by laryngopharyngoesophagectomy. Highly developed and sophisticated microsurgical skills continue to be the mainstay of success. The implication of free tissue transfer failure, especially for defects of the upper aerodigestive tract, are impressive in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost. These considerations limit the application of this method of reconstruction to centers that have sophisticated and productive reconstructive surgeons with microsurgical skills.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joseph C. Banis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John H. Barker

Goethe University Frankfurt

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allen Furr

University of Louisville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge