Joseph E. Rupert
Indiana University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joseph E. Rupert.
Journal of Visualized Experiments | 2016
Andrea Bonetto; Joseph E. Rupert; Rafael Barreto; Teresa A. Zimmers
Cancer cachexia is the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and adipose tissue, negative nitrogen balance, anorexia, fatigue, inflammation, and activation of lipolysis and proteolysis systems. Cancer patients with cachexia benefit less from anti-neoplastic therapies and show increased mortality1. Several animal models have been established in order to investigate the molecular causes responsible for body and muscle wasting as a result of tumor growth. Here, we describe methodologies pertaining to a well-characterized model of cancer cachexia: mice bearing the C26 carcinoma2-4. Although this model is heavily used in cachexia research, different approaches make reproducibility a potential issue. The growth of the C26 tumor causes a marked and progressive loss of body and skeletal muscle mass, accompanied by reduced muscle cross-sectional area and muscle strength3-5. Adipose tissue is also lost. Wasting is coincident with elevated circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly Interleukin-6 (IL-6)3, which is directly, although not entirely, responsible for C26 cachexia. It is well-accepted that a primary mechanism by which the C26 tumor induces muscle tissue depletion is the activation of skeletal muscle proteolytic systems. Thus, expression of muscle-specific ubiquitin ligases, such as atrogin-1/MAFbx and MuRF-1, represent an accepted method for the evaluation of the ongoing muscle catabolism2. Here, we present how to execute this model in a reproducible manner and how to excise several tissues and organs (the liver, spleen, and heart), as well as fat and skeletal muscles (the gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and quadriceps). We also provide useful protocols that describe how to perform muscle freezing, sectioning, and fiber size quantification.
The Journal of Experimental Biology | 2015
Joseph E. Rupert; Jacob A. Rose; Jason M. Organ; Michael T. Butcher
Scratch-digging mammals are commonly described as having large, powerful forelimb muscles for applying high force to excavate earth, yet studies quantifying the architectural properties of the musculature are largely unavailable. To further test hypotheses about traits that represent specializations for scratch-digging, we quantified muscle architectural properties and myosin expression in the forelimb of the groundhog (Marmota monax), a digger that constructs semi-complex burrows. Architectural properties measured were muscle moment arm, muscle mass (MM), belly length (ML), fascicle length (lF), pennation angle and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), and these metrics were used to estimate maximum isometric force, joint torque and power. Myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform composition was determined in selected forelimb muscles by SDS-PAGE and densitometry analysis. Groundhogs have large limb retractors and elbow extensors that are capable of applying moderately high torque at the shoulder and elbow joints, respectively. Most of these muscles (e.g. latissimus dorsi and pectoralis superficialis) have high lF/ML ratios, indicating substantial shortening ability and moderate power. The unipennate triceps brachii long head has the largest PCSA and is capable of the highest joint torque at both the shoulder and elbow joints. The carpal and digital flexors show greater pennation and shorter fascicle lengths than the limb retractors and elbow extensors, resulting in higher PCSA/MM ratios and force production capacity. Moreover, the digital flexors have the capacity for both appreciable fascicle shortening and force production, indicating high muscle work potential. Overall, the forelimb musculature of the groundhog is capable of relatively low sustained force and power, and these properties are consistent with the findings of a predominant expression of the MHC-2A isoform. Aside from the apparent modifications to the digital flexors, the collective muscle properties observed are consistent with its behavioral classification as a less-specialized burrower and these may be more representative of traits common to numerous rodents with burrowing habits or mammals with some fossorial ability.
Anatomical Record-advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology | 2018
Joseph E. Rupert; J. Ethan Joll; Wiaam Y. Elkhatib; Jason M. Organ
The musculoskeletal system is remarkably plastic during growth. The purpose of this study was to examine the muscular plasticity in functional and structural properties in a model known to result in significant developmental plasticity of the postcranial skeleton. Fifteen weanling C57BL/6 mice were raised to 16 weeks of age in one of two enclosures: a climbing enclosure that simulates a fine branch arboreal habitat and is traversed by steel wires crossing at 45° relative to horizontal at multiple intersections, and a control enclosure that resembles a parking deck with no wires but the same volume of habitable space. At killing, ex vivo contractility properties of the soleus (SOL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles were examined. Our results demonstrate that EDL muscles of climbing mice contracted with higher specific forces and were comprised of muscle fibers with slower myosin heavy chain isoforms. EDL muscles also fatigued at a higher rate in climbing mice compared to controls. SOL muscle function is not affected by the climbing environment. Likewise, mass and architecture of both EDL and SOL muscles were not different between climbing and control mice. Our data demonstrate that functional adaptation does not require concomitant architectural adaptation in order to increase contractile force. Anat Rec, 301:434–440, 2018.
Basic Research in Cardiology | 2017
Teresa A. Zimmers; Yanling Jiang; Meijing Wang; Tiffany W. Liang; Joseph E. Rupert; Ernie D. Au; Francesco E. Marino; Marion E. Couch; Leonidas G. Koniaris
Basic Research in Cardiology | 2017
Teresa A. Zimmers; Yanlin Jiang; Meijing Wang; Tiffany W. Liang; Joseph E. Rupert; Ernie D. Au; Francesco E. Marino; Marion E. Couch; Leonidas G. Koniaris
Author | 2017
Teresa A. Zimmers; Yanling Jiang; Meijing Wang; Tiffany W. Liang; Joseph E. Rupert; Ernie D. Au; Francesco E. Marino; Marion E. Couch; Leonidas G. Koniaris
PMC | 2016
Jason M. Organ; Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Paige Price; Jeffery E. Joll; Kelly C. Biro; Joseph E. Rupert; Neal X. Chen; Keith G. Avin; Sharon M. Moe; Matthew R. Allen
The FASEB Journal | 2015
Jeffery E. Joll; Ben Vickery; Joseph E. Rupert; Kelly C. Biro; Joseph M. Wallace; Craig D. Byron; Jason M. Organ
Archive | 2014
Jeffery E. Joll; Joseph E. Rupert; Jeremy Mihajlovich; Jason M. Organ