Joseph H. Ricker

Long-term Neuropsychological Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective:To describe neuropsychological outcome 5 years after injury in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who received inpatient medical rehabilitation. To determine the magnitude and pattern neuropsychological recovery from 1 year to 5 years after injury. Design:Longitudinal cohort study with inclusion based on the availability of neuropsychological data at 1 year and 5 years after injury. Setting:National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care. Participants:One hundred eighty-two persons with complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury. Primary Outcome Measures:Digits Forward and Backward, Logical Memory I and II, Token Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Trail Making Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Visual Form Discrimination, Block Design, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Grooved Pegboard. Results:Significant variability in outcome was found 5 years after TBI, ranging from no measurable impairment to severe impairment on neuropsychological tests. Improvement from 1 year after injury to 5 years was also variable. Using the Reliable Change Index, 22.2% improved, 15.2% declined, and 62.6% were unchanged on test measures. Conclusions:Neuropsychological recovery after TBI is not uniform across individuals and neuropsychological domains. For a subset of persons with moderate to severe TBI, neuropsychological recovery may continue several years after injury with substantial recovery. For other persons, measurable impairment remains 5 years after injury. Improvement was most apparent on measures of cognitive speed, visuoconstruction, and verbal memory.

The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation

This study determined whether performance patterns on four California Verbal Learning Test variables (CVLT ; Trials 1-5 List A, discriminability, recognition hits, and long-delay cued recall) could differentiate participants with moderate and severe brain injuries from those with mild head injuries who were giving incomplete effort. Litigating mild head injury participants (n = 23) performing at chance level or worse on a forced-choice test obtained significantly lower scores on the four CVLT variables than participants with moderate and severe brain injuries (n = 23). The linear discriminant function accurately classified 91%, and the quadratic function, 96%. The discriminability cutoff score accurately classified 93% of the cases ; recognition hits, 89% ; long-delay cued recall, 87% ; and CVLT total, 83%.

Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis : a randomized clinical trial

This randomized clinincal trial utilized established techniques to improve new learning and memory performance in multiple sclerosis (MS) participants with learning impairment. Participants were 29 individuals with clinincally definite MS with documented learning deficits, randomly assigned to the experimental or control group. The experimental group underwent eight sessions of the Story Memory Technique (SMT), while the control group participated in eight sessions of memory exercises. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted at baseline, immediately following treatment and 5 weeks later to assess outcome. When stratifying participants by degree of learning deficits, a significant treatment effect was noted. MS participants with moderate-severe impairment in learning showed a significant improvement in learning abilities when compared to controls, (t(19)-3.32, P<0.01) evident in 88% of participants in the experimental group. Little improvement was noted in MS participants with mild learning impairments. Significant self-reported improvements in memory were noted in MS participants that underwent treatment, but not those that did not undergo treatment (t(26)-2.55, P<0.01). Results indicate that learning and memory deficits in MS can be effectively treated through a memory rehabilitation program utilizing context and imagery to improve new learning. Appropriate patient selection is important, with moderately-severely impaired individuals showing significantly greater benefit from treatment.

Cerebral activation patterns during working memory performance in multiple sclerosis using FMRI.

Working memory deficits are common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and have been identified behaviorally in numerous studies. Despite recent advance in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), few published studies have examined cerebral activations associated with working memory dysfunction in MS. The present study examines brain activation patterns during performance of a working memory task in individuals with clinically definite MS, compared to healthy controls (HC). fMRI was performed using a 1.5 Tesla GE scanner during a modified Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (mPASAT). Participants were 6 individuals with MS with working memory impairment as evidenced on neuropsychological testing, 5 individuals with MS without working memory impairment, and 5 HC. Groups were demographically equivalent. Data were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM99) software, with a stringent significance level (alpha < .005, voxel extent ≥ 8). Both MS groups and the HC group were able to perform the task, with comparable performance in terms of numbers of correct responses. Activation patterns within the HC and MS not-impaired groups were noted in similar brain regions, consistent with published observations in healthy samples. That is, activations were lateralized to the left hemisphere, involving predominantly frontal regions. In contrast, the MS impaired group showed greater right frontal and right parietal lobe activation, when compared with the HC group. Thus, it appears that working memory dysfunction in MS is associated with altered patterns of cerebral activation that are related to the presence of cognitive impairment, and not solely a function of MS. This research was supported by the Henry H. Kessler Foundation, the Hyde and Watson Foundation and the Kirby Foundation. The authors wish to thank Rinki Jajoo for her help with data management, as well as Dr. Scott Millis and Dr. Dane Cook for their statistical advice. Dr. Christopher Christodoulou is now in the Department of Neurology, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Dr. Joseph Ricker is now in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.

The Predictive Validity of a Brief Inpatient Neuropsychologic Battery for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE To examine the predictive validity of a brief neuropsychologic test battery consisting of the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test, the California Verbal Learning Test-II, Trail-Making Test (TMT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test, grooved pegboard, phonemic and categorical word generation tasks, the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 relative to functional outcome at 1 year in persons with traumatic brain injury. DESIGN Inception cohort study. Follow-up period of 12 months. SETTING Seven Traumatic Brain Injury Model System centers. Neuropsychologic testing was conducted during the acute inpatient rehabilitation stay and functional outcome measures were obtained at 1-year outpatient follow-up. PARTICIPANTS Adults (N=174) who met criteria for admission to inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES FIM instrument, Disability Rating Scale, Supervision Rating Scale, Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. RESULTS Multiple regression analyses revealed that performance on the neuropsychologic test battery was predictive of outcome at 1 year postinjury for all outcome measures, except FIM motor scores and the SWLS. Cognitive performance using this battery was found to predict 1-year outcomes above and beyond functional variables and injury severity variables collected during inpatient rehabilitation, thereby indicating incremental validity for this test battery. Individual tests that were found to be significant predictors of 1-year outcomes included the WTAR and TMT part B. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the clinical utility and ecological validity of this battery with respect to level of disability, functional independence, and supervision required.

Effect of citicoline on functional and cognitive status among patients with traumatic brain injury: Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT).

CONTEXT Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States, yet no treatment is currently available to improve outcome after TBI. Approved for use in TBI in 59 countries, citicoline is an endogenous substance offering potential neuroprotective properties as well as facilitated neurorepair post injury. OBJECTIVE To determine the ability of citicoline to positively affect functional and cognitive status in persons with complicated mild, moderate, and severe TBI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS The Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT), a phase 3, double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted between July 20, 2007, and February 4, 2011, among 1213 patients at 8 US level 1 trauma centers to investigate effects of citicoline vs placebo in patients with TBI classified as complicated mild, moderate, or severe. INTERVENTION Ninety-day regimen of daily enteral or oral citicoline (2000 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Functional and cognitive status, assessed at 90 days using the TBI-Clinical Trials Network Core Battery. A global statistical test was used to analyze the 9 scales of the core battery. Secondary outcomes were functional and cognitive improvement, assessed at 30, 90, and 180 days, and examination of the long-term maintenance of treatment effects. RESULTS Rates of favorable improvement for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended were 35.4% in the citicoline group and 35.6% in the placebo group. For all other scales the rate of improvement ranged from 37.3% to 86.5% in the citicoline group and from 42.7% to 84.0% in the placebo group. The citicoline and placebo groups did not differ significantly at the 90-day evaluation (global odds ratio [OR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83-1.15]); in addition, there was no significant treatment effect in the 2 severity subgroups (global OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.88-1.49] and 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72-1.49] for moderate/severe and complicated mild TBI, respectively). At the 180-day evaluation, the citicoline and placebo groups did not differ significantly with respect to the primary outcome (global OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.72-1.04]). CONCLUSION Among patients with traumatic brain injury, the use of citicoline compared with placebo for 90 days did not result in improvement in functional and cognitive status. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00545662.

Analysis of an Oral Paradigm for the Trail Making Test

Performance on the Trail Making Test is dependent upon multiple factors (e.g., motor speed, visual search, symbolic set shifting, capacity to sustain effort), many of which are difficult to assess differentially using the tests traditional administration, or with certain clinical populations (e.g., blind or grossly motor-impaired individuals). The present study investigated a motor-free, vision-free, oral version of the Trail Making Test in two groups of younger adults and one group of elderly adults. The results demonstrated that although there were age-associated differences in raw performance times, the comparability of oral and written performances, as assessed by oral-to-written ratios, was consistent across age groups. These results suggest that the oral version of the Trail Making Test yields results consistent with an individuals written performance in normal subjects, regardless of age. Findings are discussed with regard to the potential clinical application of this measure as an alternative for specific populations, and as a useful way of interpreting written Trail Making performances.

An Investigation of Working Memory Rehearsal in Multiple Sclerosis Using fMRI

The present study examined patterns of cerebral activation during a working memory (WM) rehearsal task in individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in healthy adults. BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)was performed using a 1.5TGE scanner to assess activation during aWMtask adapted fromthe Sternberg paradigm (Sternberg, 1969). Participants included 8 individuals diagnosed with MS, and 5 healthy controls (HCs) matched for age and education. Task difficulty was manipulated by increasing the length of time that strings of letters were to be rehearsed. Findings revealed increased right prefrontal cortex activation and increased right temporal lobe activation in individuals diagnosed with MS compared to HCs. The potential explanations for increased right hemisphere activation in persons with MS are discussed.

Telerehabilitation needs: a survey of persons with acquired brain injury.

Objective:To survey individuals with acquired brain injury to assess multiple facets of interest, access, and familiarity necessary to implement new telerehabilitation technologies. Design:Anonymous mail survey. Setting:Community. Participants:Seventy-one respondents to a survey. These individuals had experienced acquired brain injury (predominantly severe traumatic brain injury [TBI]) and were living in the community. Surveys were mailed by a state chapter of the Brain Injury Association to a random selection of members with acquired brain injury. Main Outcome Measure:Survey designed specifically for this investigation. Results:The survey responses indicate that there is great interest in the possibility of accessing telerehabilitative services among individuals with acquired brain injury. In particular, there was strong interest expressed in services that could be used to assist with problems in memory, attention, problem-solving, and activities of daily living. Conclusions:Telemedicine, and more specifically telerehabilitation, holds great promise as an adjunct to traditional clinical service delivery. Little research in this area has been applied, however, to individuals with acquired brain injuries. Although on the surface, telerehabilitation seems to be an appropriate assessment and treatment modality for individuals with brain injury, it will only succeed if those individuals have the interest—and the access—necessary to use new and evolving technologies.

Verbal learning patterns in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury

Previous studies that have examined performances on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) among individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have found differing levels of performance. Differential patterns of performance, however, have only been inferred. The present investigation sought to determine empirically if differential patterns of performance could be discerned in a TBI sample of 65 subjects with CVLT variables. The CVLT variables were selected based on the instruments factor structure. Cluster analysis yielded four distinct subtypes of brain-injured individuals. The Active subtype demonstrated impaired unassisted retrieval, but used active encoding strategies and showed relatively intact ability to store novel information. The Disorganized subtype demonstrated an inconsistent, haphazard learning style along with deficits in encoding. The Passive subtype was marked by an overreliance on a serial clustering strategy as well as impaired encoding and/or consolidation. The Deficient subtype was the most impaired of all groups, exhibiting a slowed rate of acquisition, passive learning style, and significant impairment in encoding. Implications for rehabilitation are discussed.