Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joseph Hopkins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joseph Hopkins.


The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement | 1999

Financial Incentives for Ambulatory Care Performance Improvement

Joseph Hopkins

BACKGROUND Measuring and improving the quality of care while curtailing costs are essential objectives in capitated care. As patient care moves from the hospital to outpatient settings, quality management resources must be shifted to ambulatory care process improvement. The Quality Improvement and Efficiency Financial Incentives Program at Stanford University Medical Center was adopted to increase quality improvement efforts and contain costs. THE INCENTIVE PROGRAM: Each departments budget for care of capitated patients was reduced by 5% from the previous year. Return of a reserve fund (10% of payments for specialty care) required completion of substantive quality improvement projects and containing costs. Successful departments were also eligible for bonus funds. Implementation strategies included endorsement by clinical leaders, physician education, use of administrative data to identify project topics and support measurement of quality and cost variables, project templates and time lines, and the availability of clinical quality managers with special expertise in clinical process improvement. RESULTS Eight of 13 clinical departments developed and implemented 19 ambulatory quality improvement projects to varying degrees. Success in the program was roughly correlated with the potential impact of the incentive on revenues and the status of the lead person selected by the department to spearhead their efforts. Only 5 departments achieved their cost containment goals. DISCUSSION Financial incentives are one method of encouraging physicians to use clinical process improvement methods. Endorsement by clinical leaders and selection of realistic beginning projects enhance chances for success. The capitated population has attributes that make it an attractive focus for initial quality improvement efforts.


Annals of Surgery | 2016

Surgical Comanagement by Hospitalists Improves Patient Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Nidhi Rohatgi; Pooja Loftus; Olgica Grujic; Mark R. Cullen; Joseph Hopkins; Neera Ahuja

Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of a surgical comanagement (SCM) hospitalist program on patient outcomes at an academic institution. Background: Prior studies may have underestimated the impact of SCM due to methodological shortcomings. Methods: This is a retrospective study utilizing a propensity score-weighted intervention (n = 16,930) and control group (n = 3695). Patients were admitted between January 2009 to July 2012 (pre-SCM) and September 2012 to September 2013 (post-SCM) to Orthopedic or Neurosurgery at our institution. Using propensity score methods, linear regression, and a difference-in-difference approach, we estimated changes in outcomes between pre and post periods, while adjusting for confounding patient characteristics. Results: The SCM intervention was associated with a significant differential decrease in the proportion of patients with at least 1 medical complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.96; P = 0.008), the proportion of patients with length of stay at least 5 days (OR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84; P < 0.001), 30-day readmission rate for medical cause (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52–0.81; P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with at least 2 medical consultants (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49–0.63; P < 0.001). There was no significant change in patient satisfaction (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.87–1.33; P = 0.507). We estimated average savings of


JAMA Surgery | 2017

Use of Unsolicited Patient Observations to Identify Surgeons With Increased Risk for Postoperative Complications

William O. Cooper; Oscar D. Guillamondegui; O. Joe Hines; C. Scott Hultman; Rachel R. Kelz; Perry Shen; David A. Spain; John F. Sweeney; Ilene N. Moore; Joseph Hopkins; Ira R. Horowitz; Russell Howerton; J. Wayne Meredith; Nathan Spell; Patricia G. Sullivan; Henry Domenico; James W. Pichert; Thomas F. Catron; Lynn E. Webb; Roger R. Dmochowski; Jan Karrass; Gerald B. Hickson

2642 to


Journal of Hospital Medicine | 2015

Improving and sustaining a reduction in iatrogenic pneumothorax through a multifaceted quality-improvement approach

Lisa Shieh; Minjoung Go; Daniel Gessner; Jonathan H. Chen; Joseph Hopkins; Paul M. Maggio

4303 per patient in the post-SCM group. The overall provider satisfaction with SCM was 88.3%. Conclusions: The SCM intervention reduces medical complications, length of stay, 30-day readmissions, number of consultants, and cost of care.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1971

Protein binding of calcium and strontium in guinea pig maternal and fetal blood plasma.

A.Robert Twardock; Eric Y. H. Kuo; M.K. Austin; Joseph Hopkins

Importance Unsolicited patient observations are associated with risk of medical malpractice claims. Because lawsuits may be triggered by an unexpected adverse outcome superimposed on a strained patient-physician relationship, a question remains as to whether behaviors that generate patient dissatisfaction might also contribute to the genesis of adverse outcomes themselves. Objective To examine whether patients of surgeons with a history of higher numbers of unsolicited patient observations are at greater risk for postoperative complications than patients whose surgeons generate fewer such unsolicited patient observations. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from 7 academic medical centers participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013. Patients older than 18 years included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program who underwent inpatient or outpatient operations at 1 of the participating sites during the study period were included. Patients were excluded if the attending surgeon had less than 24 months of data in the Vanderbilt Patient Advocacy Reporting System preceding the date of the operation. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2015, to October 20, 2016. Exposures Unsolicited patient observations for the patient’s surgeon in the 24 months preceding the date of the operation. Main Outcomes and Measures Postoperative surgical or medical complications as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program within 30 days of the operation of interest. Results Among the 32 125 patients in the cohort (13 230 men, 18 895 women; mean [SD] age, 55.8 [15.8] years), 3501 (10.9%) experienced a complication, including 1754 (5.5%) surgical and 2422 (7.5%) medical complications. Prior unsolicited patient observations for a surgeon were significantly associated with the risk of a patient having any complication (odds ratio, 1.0063; 95% CI, 1.0004-1.0123; P = .03), any surgical complication (odds ratio, 1.0104; 95% CI, 1.0022-1.0186; P = .01), any medical complication (odds ratio, 1.0079; 95% CI, 1.0009-1.0148; P = .03), and being readmitted (odds ratio, 1.0088, 95% CI, 1.0024-1.0151; P = .007). The adjusted rate of complications was 13.9% higher for patients whose surgeon was in the highest quartile of unsolicited patient observations compared with patients whose surgeon was in the lowest quartile. Conclusions and Relevance Patients whose surgeons have large numbers of unsolicited patient observations in the 24 months prior to the patient’s operation are at increased risk of surgical and medical complications. Efforts to promote patient safety and address risk of malpractice claims should continue to focus on surgeons’ ability to communicate respectfully and effectively with patients and other medical professionals.


Health Care Management Review | 2017

Designing a physician leadership development program based on effective models of physician education

Joseph Hopkins; Magali Fassiotto; Manwai Candy Ku; Dagem Mammo; Hannah A. Valantine

BACKGROUND The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has adopted iatrogenic pneumothorax (IAP) as a Patient Safety Indicator. In 2006, in response to a low performance ranking for IAP rate from the University Healthsystem Consortium (UHC), the authors established a multidisciplinary team to reduce our institutions IAP rate. Root-cause analysis found that subclavian insertion of central venous catheterization (CVC) was the most common procedure associated with IAP OBJECTIVE: Our short-term goal was a 50% reduction of both CVC-associated and all-cause IAP rates within 18 months, with long-term goals of sustained reduction. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS Consecutive inpatients from 2006 to 2014. INTERVENTION Our multifaceted intervention included: (1) clinical and documentation standards based on evidence, (2) cognitive aids, (3) simulation training, (4) purchase and deployment of ultrasound equipment, and (5) feedback to clinical services. MEASUREMENTS CVC-associated IAP, all-cause IAP rate. RESULTS We achieved both a short-term (years 2006 to 2008) and long-term (years 2006 to 2008-2014) reduction in our CVC-associated and all-cause IAP rates. Our short-term reduction in our CVC-associated IAP was 53% (P = 0.088), and our long-term reduction was 85% (P < 0.0001). Our short-term reduction in the all-cause IAP rate was 26% (P < 0.0001), and our long-term reduction was 61% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary team, focused on evidence, patient safety, and standardization, can use a set of multifaceted interventions to sustainably improve patient outcomes for several years after implementation. Our hospital was in the highest performance UHC quartile for all-cause IAP in 2012 to 2014.


The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety | 2014

Creating a Patient Complaint Capture and Resolution Process to Incorporate Best Practices for Patient-Centered Representation

Cynthia Mahood Levin; Joseph Hopkins

Abstract In 13 pregnant guinea pigs the average concentrations of total Ca and ultrafilterable Ca (UF Ca) were 1.6 and 0.3 mg. per 100 ml. higher in fetal plasma than in maternal plasma, respectively. The direction of the UF Ca gradient was from fetus to dam in 9 animals and from dam to fetus in 4 animals. The average UF Ca gradient was lower than the average total Ca concentration differences because more fetal plasma Ca was protein bound (34.8 per cent) than maternal plasma Ca (24.8 per cent), even though total plasma protein concentrations were the same in both plasmas (4.3 Gm. per 100 ml.). The greater Ca-binding capacity of fetal plasma protein was attributed to its higher albumin content (2.71 Gm. per 100 ml.) than that of maternal plasma protein (2.16 Gm. per 100 ml.). After in vivo labeling, 45 Ca was slightly less ultrafilterable (4.3 to 8.1 per cent) than stable Ca in both maternal and fetal plasma, with individual values as much as 30 per cent lower. The UF 85 Sr/UF 45 Ca values for male, nonpregnant female, pregnant female, and fetal plasmas after in vitro labeling were 1.09, 1.08, 0.99, and 1.06, respectively.


Journal of Health Organisation and Management | 2017

A long-term follow-up of a physician leadership program

Magali Fassiotto; Yvonne Maldonado; Joseph Hopkins

Background: Because of modern challenges in quality, safety, patient centeredness, and cost, health care is evolving to adopt leadership practices of highly effective organizations. Traditional physician training includes little focus on developing leadership skills, which necessitates further training to achieve the potential of collaborative management. Purpose: The aim of this study was to design a leadership program using established models for continuing medical education and to assess its impact on participants’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and performance. Methodology/Approach: The program, delivered over 9 months, addressed leadership topics and was designed around a framework based on how physicians learn new clinical skills, using multiple experiential learning methods, including a leadership active learning project. The program was evaluated using Kirkpatrick’s assessment levels: reaction to the program, learning, changes in behavior, and results. Four cohorts are evaluated (2008–2011). Results: Reaction: The program was rated highly by participants (mean = 4.5 of 5). Learning: Significant improvements were reported in knowledge, skills, and attitudes surrounding leadership competencies. Behavior: The majority (80%–100%) of participants reported plans to use learned leadership skills in their work. Improved team leadership behaviors were shown by increased engagement of project team members. Results: All participants completed a team project during the program, adding value to the institution. Conclusion: Results support the hypothesis that learning approaches known to be effective for other types of physician education are successful when applied to leadership development training. Across all four assessment levels, the program was effective in improving leadership competencies essential to meeting the complex needs of the changing health care system. Practice implications: Developing in-house programs that fit the framework established for continuing medical education can increase physician leadership competencies and add value to health care institutions. Active learning projects provide opportunities to practice leadership skills addressing real word problems.


The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety | 2010

Improving and Sustaining Core Measure Performance Through Effective Accountability of Clinical Microsystems in an Academic Medical Center

Kim Pardini-Kiely; Elizabeth Greenlee; Joseph Hopkins; Nancy L. Szaflarski; Kevin Tabb

BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence suggests that patient (including family) feedback can provide compelling opportunities for developing risk management and quality improvement strategies, as well as improving customer satisfaction. The Patient Representative Department (PRD) at Stanford Health Care (SHC) (Stanford, California) created a streamlined patient complaint capture and resolution process to improve the capture of patient complaints and grievances from multiple parts of the organization and manage them in a centralized database. METHODS In March 2008 the PRD rolled out a data management system for tracking patient complaints and generating reports to SHC leadership, and SHC needed to modify and address its data input procedures. A reevaluation of the overall work flow showed it to be complex, with over-lapping and redundant steps, and to lack standard processes and actions. Best-practice changes were implemented: (1) leadership engagement, (2) increased capture of complaints, (3) centralized data and reporting, (4) improved average response times to patient grievances and complaints, and (5) improved service recovery. Standard work flows were created for each category of complaint linked to specific actions. RESULTS Complaints captured increased from 20 to 270 per month. Links to a specific physician rose from 16%-36% to more than 80%. In addition, 68% of high-complaint physicians improved. With improved work flows, responses to patients expressing concerns met a requirement of less than seven days. CONCLUSIONS Standardized work flows for managing complaints and grievances, centralized data management and clear leadership accountability can improve responsiveness to patients, capture incidents more consistently, and meet regulatory and accreditation requirements.


International Journal for Quality in Health Care | 2004

A New Instrument to Measure Appropriateness of Services in Primary Care

David H. Thom; Richard L. Kravitz; Steven Kelly-Reif; Ronnie V. Sprinkle; Joseph Hopkins; Lisa V. Rubenstein

Purpose Physician leadership programs serve to develop individual capabilities and to affect organizational outcomes. Evaluations of such programs often focus solely on short-term increases in individual capabilities. The purpose of this paper is to assess long-term individual and organizational outcomes of the Stanford Leadership Development Program. Design/methodology/approach There are three data sources for this mixed-methods study: a follow-up survey in 2013-2014 of program participants ( n=131) and matched (control) non-participants ( n=82) from the 2006 to 2011 program years; promotion and retention data; and qualitative in-person interview data. The authors analyzed survey data across leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as leadership titles held, following program participation using Pearsons χ2 test of independence. Using logistic regression, the authors analyzed promotion and retention among participants and non-participants. Finally, the authors applied both a grounded theory approach and qualitative content analysis to analyze interview data. Findings Program participants rated higher than non-participants across 25 of 30 items measuring leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and were more likely to hold regional/national leadership titles and to have gained in leadership since program participation. Asian program participants were significantly more likely than Asian non-participants to have been promoted, and women participants were less likely to have left the institution than non-participants. Finally, qualitative interviews revealed the long-term impact of leadership learning and networking, as well as the enduring, sustained impact on the organization of projects undertaken during the program. Originality/value This study is unique in its long-term and comprehensive mixed-methods nature of evaluation to assess individual and organizational impact of a physician leadership program.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joseph Hopkins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Scott Hultman

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Gessner

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David H. Thom

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge