Joseph Kei

An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra

The long‐term average speech spectrum (LTASS) and some dynamic characteristics of speech were determined for 12 languages: English (several dialects), Swedish, Danish, German, French (Canadian), Japanese, Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, Welsh, Singhalese, and Vietnamese. The LTASS only was also measured for Arabic. Speech samples (18) were recorded, using standardized equipment and procedures, in 15 localities for (usually) ten male and ten female talkers. All analyses were conducted at the National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney. The LTASS was similar for all languages although there were many statistically significant differences. Such differences were small and not always consistent for male and female samples of the same language. For one‐third octave bands of speech, the maximum short‐term rms level was 10 dB above the maximum long‐term rms level, consistent across languages and frequency. A ‘‘universal’’ LTASS is suggested as being applicable, across languages, for many purposes including use in hearing aid prescription procedures and in the Articulation Index.

Automatic auditory processing of English words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to a variety of speech stimuli (/de:/, /ge:/, /deI/ “day”, and /geI/ “gay”) in a multiple deviant paradigm. It was hypothesized that all speech stimulus contrasts in the multiple deviant paradigm, including the fine acoustic speech contrast [d/g], would elicit robust MMN responses and that consonant vowel (CV) real word deviants (e.g., “day” and “gay”) would elicit larger MMN responses than CV nonword deviants (e.g., “de” and “ge”) within and across experimental contrasts. Design: Ten healthy, right-handed, native English–speaking adults (23.4 ± 2.27 yr) with normal hearing were presented with 12 blocks of stimuli, using a multiple deviant oddball paradigm. Each of the four speech stimuli were presented as standards (p = 0.7) in three blocks, with the remaining stimuli acting as deviants (p = 0.1 each). Subjects were also presented with the same stimuli in a behavioral discrimination task. Results: MMN responses to the fine acoustic speech contrast [d/g] (e.g., “de” versus “ge”, “day” versus “gay”) did not reach significance. However, a significant and larger MMN response was obtained at an earlier latency to the real word deviants among nonword standards with the same initial consonant (i.e., de→day, ge→gay) when compared with the responses to nonword deviants among word standards (day→de, gay→ge). Conclusions: The results showed that MMN responses could be elicited by speech stimuli with large, single acoustic deviances, within a multiple deviant paradigm design. This result has positive clinical implications for the testing of subjects who may only tolerate short testing sessions (e.g., pathological populations) in that responses to a wider range of speech stimuli may be recorded without necessarily having to increase session length. The results also demonstrated that MMN responses were elicited by large, single acoustic deviances but not fine acoustic deviances within the speech stimuli. The poor results for the fine acoustic deviances support previous studies that have used single contrast paradigms and found that when carefully controlled methodological designs and strict methods of analysis are applied, robust responses to fine-grained CV syllable contrasts may be difficult to obtain. The enhanced MMN observed in response to the real word deviants among nonword standards may provide further evidence for the presence of long-term neural traces for words in the brain, however possible contextual effects limit the interpretation of these data. Further research is needed to investigate the ability of the MMN response to accurately reflect speech sounds with fine acoustic contrasts, as well as the ability of the MMN to reflect neural traces for words in the brain, before it can be reliably used as a clinical tool in the investigation of spoken word processing in pathological populations.

Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Objective: To investigate the effect of increased levels of background noise on click‐evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) recordings and to compare the effectiveness of the default CEOAE program with the QuickScreen CEOAE program in increased levels of noise, using an Otodynamics ILO88 recording device. Design: The right ears of 40 young adult women with normal hearing were assessed using CEOAEs under four different noise conditions and with two different methods of data collection. The noise conditions were in quiet, 50 dB A, 55 dB A, and 60 dB A of white noise. Data were collected at each noise level in the default mode and also using the ILO88 QuickScreen program. Results: There was a significant change in a number of important CEOAE output parameters with increased noise. In the default mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 89.2% in quiet but declined to 85% with 50 dB A of white noise, 65% at 55 dB A and 20% at 60 dB A. The QuickScreen program proved more robust to the effects of noise than the default. In that mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 91.7% in quiet, 92.5% with 50 dB A of white noise, 82.5% at 55 dB A and 45% at 60 dB A. Conclusions: The findings of the study indicate ambient noise levels for accurate CEOAE recording should not exceed 50 to 55 dB A of noise and alternatives to the default program should be considered in non‐sound‐treated situations.

Outcomes of transient evoked otoacoustic emission testing in 6-year-old school children : a comparison with pure tone screening and tympanometry

OBJECTIVES (1) To establish test performance measures for Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission testing of 6-year-old children in a school setting; (2) To investigate whether Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission testing provides a more accurate and effective alternative to a pure tone screening plus tympanometry protocol. METHODS Pure tone screening, tympanometry and transient evoked otoacoustic emission data were collected from 940 subjects (1880 ears), with a mean age of 6.2 years. Subjects were tested in non-sound-treated rooms within 22 schools. Receiver operating characteristics curves along with specificity, sensitivity, accuracy and efficiency values were determined for a variety of transient evoked otoacoustic emission/pure tone screening/tympanometry comparisons. RESULTS The Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission failure rate for the group was 20.3%. The failure rate for pure tone screening was found to be 8.9%, whilst 18.6% of subjects failed a protocol consisting of combined pure tone screening and tympanometry results. In essence, findings from the comparison of overall Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission pass/fail with overall pure tone screening pass/fail suggested that use of a modified Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project criterion would result in a very high probability that a child with a pass result has normal hearing (true negative). However, the hit rate was only moderate. Selection of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) criterion set at > or =1 dB appeared to provide the best test performance measures for the range of SNR values investigated. Test performance measures generally declined when tympanometry results were included, with the exception of lower false alarm rates and higher positive predictive values. The exclusion of low frequency data from the Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission SNR versus pure tone screening analysis resulted in improved performance measures. CONCLUSIONS The present study poses several implications for the clinical implementation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission screening for entry level school children. Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission pass/fail criteria will require revision. The findings of the current investigation offer support to the possible replacement of pure tone screening with Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission testing for 6-year-old children. However, they do not suggest the replacement of the pure tone screening plus tympanometry battery.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in 6-year-old school children: a normative study

Great potential has recently been demonstrated for the application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in screening the hearing of school-aged children. The present study aimed to describe the range of TEOAE values obtained from a large cohort of 6-year-old children in school settings. Results indicated significant sex and ear asymmetry effects on signal-to-noise ratio, response, whole wave reproducibility, band reproducibility and noise levels. A prior history of ear infections was also shown to influence response level, whole wave reproducibility and band reproducibility. The sex, ear and history specific normative data tables derived may contribute to future improvements in the accuracy of hearing screening for 6-year-old school children.

High frequency immittance findings: newborn versus six-week-old infants.

This study aimed to compare the high frequency (1 kHz) tympanometry (HFT) and acoustic reflex (AR) measures obtained from infants at birth and at 6–7 weeks of age. HFT results and AR thresholds using a 2-kHz tone and broadband noise activators were obtained from 42 healthy full-term neonates (15 boys and 27 girls) at both test sessions, separated by six weeks. The results showed that the mean values of HFT test parameters and AR thresholds obtained at 6–7 weeks were generally greater than those obtained at birth. In particular, the differences in mean values of uncompensated admittance at 200 daPa, uncompensated peak admittance, uncompensated peak susceptance, peak-compensated static admittance, and AR thresholds with a 2 kHz tone and broadband noise were found to be statistically significant. The findings from this study suggest the need to have separate sets of normative HFT and AR data for infants at birth and 6–7 weeks.

Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates

Objective: The acoustic stapedial reflex (ASR) test has been shown to provide useful information about the function of the auditory system. However, the reliability of this test when applied to healthy neonates has not been systematically studied. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the ASR test in newborn babies shortly after birth. Design: Using a cross-sectional design, 219 healthy neonates, aged between 24 and 192 hr, who passed an automated auditory brain stem response screening test, were recruited and assessed using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), high-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry, and ASR tests. One randomly selected ear from each neonate was tested. ASRs were elicited by presenting a 2 kHz pure tone and broadband noise (BBN) separately to the test ear in an ipsilateral stimulation mode using a Madsen Otoflex diagnostic immittance meter. A total of 194 (86/108 males/females; 115/79 left/right) ears, which met a set of inclusion criteria, were included in the test-retest reliability analysis for the 2-kHz tone stimulus. In addition, 123 (62/61 males/females; 77/46 left/right) ears were included in the test-retest reliability analysis for the BBN stimulus. The ASR threshold (ASRT) for each stimulus was measured. The ASR procedure was then repeated to acquire retest data. Results: Ipsilateral ASRs were elicited in 91.3% (200/219) of neonates, whereas the remaining 8.7% (19/219) exhibited flat tympanograms (no identifiable peak) and absent reflexes with a “refer” outcome in the TEOAE test. The mean ASRT (76.2 dB HL averaged over 194 ears) for the 2 kHz pure tone was higher than that for the BBN (64.9 dB HL averaged over 123 ears). The findings, based on the results of an analysis of variance with repeated measure, showed that the ASRTs for the retest condition did not differ significantly from those of the first test for both stimuli (p > 0.05). The ASR test also showed high test-retest reliability as demonstrated by intracorrelation coefficients across the test-retest conditions of 0.83 for the 2 kHz pure tone and 0.76 for the BBN stimulus. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that ASRs could be consistently elicited from healthy neonates who showed a single-peaked configuration in the high-frequency tympanometry test and passed the automated auditory brain stem response and TEOAE tests. The findings showed that the ASRTs did not vary significantly across the test-retest conditions, and the high intracorrelation coefficients illustrate the reliability of the ASR test. Given the high test-retest reliability, the ASR test holds promise as a useful diagnostic/screening instrument in ascertaining the hearing status in neonates.

The Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Response to Complex Tones and Spoken Words in Individuals with Aphasia

Background: The mismatch negativity (MMN) is a fronto-centrally distributed event-related potential (ERP) that is elicited by any discriminable auditory change. It is an ideal neurophysiological tool for measuring the auditory processing skills of individuals with aphasia because it can be elicited even in the absence of attention. Previous MMN studies have shown that acoustic processing of tone or pitch deviance is relatively preserved in aphasia, whereas the basic acoustic processing of speech stimuli can be impaired (e.g., auditory discrimination). However, no MMN study has yet investigated the higher levels of auditory processing, such as language-specific phonological and/or lexical processing, in individuals with aphasia. Aims: The aim of the current study was to investigate the MMN responses of normal and language-disordered subjects to tone stimuli and speech stimuli that incorporate the basic auditory processing (acoustic, acoustic-phonetic) levels of non-speech and speech sound processing, and also the language-specific phonological and lexical levels of spoken word processing. Furthermore, this study aimed to correlate the aphasic MMN data with language performance on a variety of tasks specifically targeted at the different levels of spoken word processing. Methods & Procedures: Six adults with aphasia (71.7 years ±3.0) and six healthy age-, gender-, and education-matched controls (72.2 years ±5.4) participated in the study. All subjects were right-handed and native speakers of English. Each subject was presented with complex harmonic tone stimuli, differing in pitch or duration, and consonant-vowel (CV) speech stimuli (non-word /de:/ versus real word /deI/). The probability of the deviant for each tone or speech contrast was 10%. The subjects were also presented with the same stimuli in behavioural discrimination tasks, and were administered a language assessment battery to measure their auditory comprehension skills. Outcomes & Results: The aphasic subjects demonstrated attenuated MMN responses to complex tone duration deviance and to speech stimuli (words and non-words), and their responses to the frequency, duration, and real word deviant stimuli were found to strongly correlate with performance on the auditory comprehension section of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). Furthermore, deficits in attentional lexical decision skills demonstrated by the aphasic subjects correlated with a word-related enhancement demonstrated during the automatic MMN paradigm, providing evidence to support the “word advantage effect”, thought to reflect the activation of language-specific memory traces in the brain for words. Conclusions: These results indicate that the MMN may be used as a technique for investigating general and more specific auditory comprehension skills of individuals with aphasia, using speech and/or non-speech stimuli, independent of the individuals attention. The combined use of the objective MMN technique and current clinical language assessments may result in improved rehabilitative management of aphasic individuals.

Monitoring for postnatal hearing loss using risk factors: a systematic literature review.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there was evidence-based support for targeted surveillance programs using a risk-factor registry to detect postnatal hearing loss or whether other programs were available that may be more effective than targeted surveillance. Particularly, it addressed questions that arose along the targeted surveillance pathway, including: (1) the risk factors used to determine a referral, (2) referral frequencies, (3) the relationship between risk factors and a postnatal hearing loss, and (4) other systems that may be more efficient than the use of risk factors. Design: A systematic literature review was completed in peer-reviewed and non–peer-reviewed databases. Methods: Publications were obtained using the databases MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medica on line, and by inspecting the reference lists of relevant articles and expert-committee papers. Quality assessment ratings and data extraction were completed by the research team. Results: In total, 40 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The outcomes drawn from these studies were inconclusive as they were based on small sample sizes and largely from single sites only. With this in mind, from the information obtained: (1) gestational age, low-birth weight, toxoplasmosis, other infections, rubella, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus infections, craniofacial anomalies, respirator support, and the administration of aminoglycosides were the more commonly reported risk factors in programs; (2) referral frequency for monitoring appointments was approximately 3%; and (3) CMV, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn were associated with postnatal hearing loss, whereas, preauricular skin tags and ear pits, low-birth weight, and toxoplasmosis were not. The review also identified that second-phase universal screening programs, CMV screening, and genetic screening should be explored as potential additions or alternatives to targeted surveillance using risk factors. Conclusions: Further large-scale, population-based research on available programs for the detection of postnatal hearing loss should be conducted to improve present practice and assist with the development of evidence-based guidelines for hearing monitoring.

Consensus statement: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear

The participants in the Eriksholm Workshop on Wideband Absorbance Measures of the Middle Ear developed statements for this consensus article on the final morning of the Workshop. The presentations of the first 2 days of the Workshop motivated the discussion on that day. The article is divided into three general areas: terminology; research needs; and clinical application. The varied terminology in the area was seen as potentially confusing, and there was consensus on adopting an organizational structure that grouped the family of measures into the term wideband acoustic immittance (WAI), and dropped the term transmittance in favor of absorbance. There is clearly still a need to conduct research on WAI measurements. Several areas of research were emphasized, including the establishment of a greater WAI normative database, especially developmental norms, and more data on a variety of disorders; increased research on the temporal aspects of WAI; and methods to ensure the validity of test data. The area of clinical application will require training of clinicians in WAI technology. The clinical implementation of WAI would be facilitated by developing feature detectors for various pathologies that, for example, might combine data across ear-canal pressures or probe frequencies.