Joseph M. Croffie

Constipation in infants and children: Evaluation and treatment

BACKGROUND Constipation, defined as a delay or difficulty in defecation, present for 2 or more weeks, is a common pediatric problem encountered by both primary and specialty medical providers. METHODS The Constipation Subcommittee of the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition has formulated clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric constipation. The Constipation Subcommittee, consisting of two primary care pediatricians, a clinical epidemiologist, and pediatric gastroenterologists, based its recommendations on an integration of a comprehensive and systematic review of the medical literature combined with expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through Nominal Group Technique, a structured quantitative method. RESULTS The Subcommittee developed two algorithms to assist with medical management, one for older infants and children and the second for infants less than 1 year of age. The guidelines provide recommendations for management by the primary care provider, including evaluation, initial treatment, follow-up management, and indications for consultation by a specialist. The Constipation Subcommittee also provided recommendations for management by the pediatric gastroenterologist. CONCLUSIONS This report, which has been endorsed by the Executive Council of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, has been prepared as a general guideline to assist providers of medical care in the evaluation and treatment of constipation in children. It is not intended as a substitute for clinical judgment or as a protocol for the management of all patients with this problem.

Comparison of Oral Prednisone and Topical Fluticasone in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Randomized Trial in Children

BACKGROUND & AIMS Although eosinophilic esophagitis is recognized increasingly, outcome data guiding therapy are limited. We conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing oral prednisone (P) and swallowed fluticasone (F) for histologic and clinical response. METHODS Patients were randomized to receive P or F for 4 weeks, followed by an 8-week weaning protocol. Esophageal histology was evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy. Clinical assessments were performed at weeks 0, 4, 12, 18, and 24. RESULTS Eighty patients with eosinophilic esophagitis were enrolled: 40 in the P arm and 40 in the F arm. Histologic improvement was seen in 30 of 32 P and 34 of 36 F patients, with a greater degree of histologic improvement in the P group. All P and 35 of 36 F patients were free of presenting symptom(s) at week 4. Symptom relapse was seen in 45% of patients by week 24. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between P and F with regard to relapse rate (P = .7399). No significant difference in time to relapse was found between groups (P = .2529). Systemic adverse effects were noted in 40% of the P arm, whereas esophageal candidal overgrowth was seen in 15% of the F arm. CONCLUSIONS Systemic and topical corticosteroids were effective in achieving initial histologic and clinical improvement. P resulted in a greater degree of histologic improvement, without evidence of an associated clinical advantage over F in terms of symptom resolution, relapse rates, or time to relapse. Symptom relapse was common to both groups upon therapy discontinuation, highlighting the need for maintenance treatment protocols.

Correlation between number of eosinophils and reflux index on same day esophageal biopsy and 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.

OBJECTIVE:The presence of eosinophils on esophageal biopsy is a marker of esophagitis in children. Eosinophilic inflammation without evidence of gastroesophageal reflux has led to the new diagnosis of eosinophilic, or allergic, esophagitis. The aim of this study was to correlate the number of eosinophils with the reflux index on same day esophageal biopsy and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring.METHODS:A retrospective analysis of data collected from children who underwent same day endoscopy with esophageal biopsies and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring over a 3-yr period was performed. The patients were divided into five groups: Group 1: 0 eosinophils/hpf and no histologic change, Group 2: 0 eosinophils/hpf but histologic changes, Group 3: 1–5 eosinophils/hpf, Group 4: 6–20 eosinophils/hpf, and Group 5: >20 eosinophils/hpf. Reflux indices were analyzed within each group.RESULTS:A total of 305 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean reflux indices ± standard error within each group were Group 1 (n = 171): 2.14 ± 0.18%, Group 2 (n = 40): 3.93 ± 1.24%, Group 3 (n = 42): 5.96 ± 1.53%, Group 4 (n = 21): 4.18 ± 1.27%, and Group 5 (n = 31): 2.02 ± 0.53%. The mean reflux index in Group 3 was significantly greater than Groups 1 and 5.CONCLUSIONS:The presence of denser infiltrates of eosinophils does not correlate with increased gastroesophageal reflux. The finding of more than 20 eosinophils/hpf is likely associated with a normal reflux index and a nonacid-related cause of esophagitis.

White specks in the esophageal mucosa: an endoscopic manifestation of non-reflux eosinophilic esophagitis in children☆

BACKGROUND White specks in the esophageal mucosa have been observed in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between white specks in the esophageal mucosa and allergic (non-reflux) eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS Endoscopic data, pH probe results, and histopathology reports for children with esophageal endoscopic abnormalities seen during a 17-month period were reviewed. Eosinophilic esophagitis was grouped according to the number of eosinophils per high power field (non-allergic, <15 eosinophils/high power field; allergic, > or =15 eosinophils/high power field). RESULTS Of 1041 endoscopies performed during the study period, 153 revealed evidence of eosinophilic esophagitis. Of these 153, 61 had fewer than 15 eosinophils/high power field and 92 had 15 or more eosinophils/high power field. At 31 of the 153 procedures, white specks were noted in the esophageal mucosa. The sensitivity of white specks in the esophageal mucosa for allergic eosinophilic esophagitis was only 30%, but the specificity was 95%. pH probe testing was performed in 21 patients with white specks and was normal in all. CONCLUSIONS This report describes a new endoscopic finding associated with allergic eosinophilic esophagitis in children. Eosinophilic esophagitis tends to be severe when white specks are present (> or =15 eosinophils/high power field) and is not associated with pathologic gastroesophageal reflux, as demonstrated by pH probe testing.

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report.

Objectives: Our goal is to evaluate the indications, findings, therapies, safety, and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children. Methods: Our database was searched for patients 17 years of age or younger undergoing ERCP between January 1994 and March 2003. Additional information was obtained by chart review. The safety and technical success of ERCP were examined. Complications were classified by the consensus criteria. Results: A total of 245 patients (95 M, 150 F; mean age 12.3 years) underwent 329 examinations. Indications included biliary pathology (n = 93), pancreatic pathology (n = 111), and chronic abdominal pain of suspected biliary or pancreatic origin (n = 41). The ERCP findings were bile duct stone(s) (n = 29), benign biliary stricture (n = 19), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 7), anomalous pancreaticobiliary union (n = 8), choledochal cyst (n = 5), bile duct leak (n = 6), malignant biliary stricture (n = 2), biliary atresia (n = 1), chronic pancreatitis (n = 44), pancreas divisum (n = 26), pancreatic duct stricture with (n = 6) or without (n = 9) leak, pancreatic tumor (n = 1), periampullary adenoma (n = 2), and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (n = 65). Endoscopic therapies were performed in 71% of the procedures and included sphincterotomy, stone extraction, stricture dilation, endoprosthesis placement, snare papillectomy, and cystoduodenostomy. Thirty-two (9.7%) post-ERCP complications occurred and included cholangitis in 1 patient and pancreatitis in 31. The pancreatitis was graded mild in 24, moderate in 5, and severe in 2. No mortality related to ERCP occurred. Conclusions: Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP results are similar in children and adults except for a lower incidence of malignant disease in children. Technical success rates are high. However, ERCP-related pancreatitis is not uncommon, and the risk and benefits should be carefully reviewed before proceeding. Outcome data are necessary and is currently being accumulated at our institution.

Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Children-A Retrospective Study of Outcome in a Group Referred to a Pediatric Gastroenterology Practice

Recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) affects a significant number of children each year. We reviewed our experience over a 2-year period to determine the outcome of patients who were referred for pediatric gastroenterology consultation. We identified 356 patients, 149 (42%) male and 207 (58%) female. All patients underwent a thorough interview and complete physical examination. Patients suspected of having irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were treated as such without further initial evaluation. Others underwent an initial blood and urine evaluation. When these initial screening studies were negative, additional studies were performed including abdominal ultrasonography, radiography, and/or endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract if the history suggested a possible diagnosis that could be excluded or confirmed by such tests. There was no identifiable diagnosis in 43.5% of the patients studied. IBS was diagnosed in 25.8% of all patients. Constipation was diagnosed in 3.7%. Miscellaneous causes, including GI mucosal lesions, and renal and pancreatic disorders were found in an additional 27% of patients. In a follow-up survey, more than 70% of the treated respondents were improved (i.e., their RAP had resolved or was markedly improved). We conclude that most children with RAP have a functional disorder. Patients with an organic cause for pain can be identified and treated in a cost-effective manner with carefully planned evaluation.

The role of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the initial evaluation of childhood inflammatory bowel disease: A 7-year study

Objectives To assess the role of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the evaluation of children with suspected inflammatory bowel disease. Methods All children with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy during their initial evaluation at our institution during a 7-year period (December 1993 to November 2000) were included in the study. Results The study included 115 patients: 81 with Crohn disease (mean age, 11.34 years; 42 males) and 34 with ulcerative colitis (mean age, 11.79 years; 20 males). Abnormal findings on esophagogastroduodenoscopy were noted in 64% of patients with Crohn disease and 50% of children with ulcerative colitis; histologic abnormalities were found in 81.6% and 70.6% of the patients, respectively. Granulomas were found in the upper gastrointestinal tracts of 23 of 81 patients (28.4%), with the most common site being the gastric mucosa. Nine of these 23 patients had granulomas solely in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Additional unsuspected pathology noted included: candidiasis, hiatal hernia, Helicobacter pylori infection, and giardiasis. Conclusions Endoscopic and histologic abnormalities were found in the upper gastrointestinal tracts of a significant number of children with inflammatory bowel disease. While the mechanism(s) underlying these abnormalities in patients with ulcerative colitis is unclear, the pathology can contribute to the patients clinical condition. Pathology in the upper gastrointestinal tract should not exclude a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Granulomas, confirming the diagnosis of Crohn disease, were found in the upper gastrointestinal tracts of 28% of our patients with Crohn disease. In some cases, granulomas were found solely in the upper gastrointestinal tracts. Based on our data, esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy should be performed in all pediatric patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease.

Is esophagogastroduodenoscopy necessary in all caustic ingestions

Background It is unclear whether symptoms alone can identify patients with caustic ingestion who will benefit from esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The published data are contradictory. The purpose of the current study was to determine the relationship between initial symptoms and EGD findings in patients with caustic ingestion. Methods Chart review of all caustic ingestions who underwent EGD during a 4-year period (December 1993 through November 1997). Results Twenty-eight patients (15 girls; mean age, 2.7 years (range, 0.92–13.33) underwent EGD after caustic ingestion. Fourteen percent (4/28) of patients were asymptomatic, and findings on endoscopy were normal. Another 57% (16/28) had normal endoscopic findings, although all were symptomatic. Twenty-nine percent (8/28) of patients had esophageal injury on EGD, and all were symptomatic. Esophageal injury was graded as 1 (mucosal erythema), 2 (superficial burns; noncircumferential) or 3 (deep burns; circumferential). The injury was grade 1 in three of eight patients and grade 2 in two; all had one symptom each. Grade 3 injury was found in three of eight patients: two had two symptoms (drooling and vomiting, drooling and stridor), and one had one symptom (dysphagia). All patients with grade 3 injury subsequently underwent esophageal dilations. Follow-up information was secured for two of the three patients with grade 1 injury and both patients with grade 2 injury at 34.3 months (range, 24–50) after the ingestion, and all were asymptomatic. Of the 20 patients with absence of esophageal mucosal damage, follow-up data were available for l5 patients at 37.2 months (range, 7–63) after the event and all were well. Conclusions All patients with clinically significant injury (grades 2 and 3) were symptomatic at initial assessment. No single symptom or combination of symptoms could identify all patients with esophageal injury. All asymptomatic patients had normal findings on endoscopic examinations. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy seems unnecessary in asymptomatic patients with alleged caustic ingestion. A larger, prospective study would be necessary to unequivocally answer this clinically important question.

Cysteinyl Leukotriene Levels in Esophageal Mucosal Biopsies of Children with Eosinophilic Inflammation: Are They All the Same?

OBJECTIVES:Allergic eosinophilic esophagitis (AEE) is characterized by intense eosinophilic inflammation of the esophageal mucosa. Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT) are eosinophil chemoattractants. We studied CysLT levels in esophageal mucosa of children with AEE and controls.METHODS:CysLT levels (pg CysLT/μg protein) were quantified by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) on endoscopically obtained esophageal mucosal biopsies.RESULTS:Twelve children with AEE (eight boys, mean age 6.6 yr, range 1.0–14.5 yr) and 10 controls (six boys, mean age 9.56 yr, range 1.08–15.08 yr) were enrolled. None were on anti-LT or corticosteroid therapy. All controls had histologically normal mucosal biopsies of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. Patients with AEE had intense eosinophilic inflammation of the esophageal mucosa (mean 39 eosinophils/hpf, range 15–70 eosinophils/hpf) and a normal 24-h pH probe study. CysLT levels were similar between the two groups: mean levels were 12.44 (median 10.87, range 2.54–28.29) in AEE patients and 9.52 (median 9.26, range 1.71–21.64) in controls. CysLT levels did not correlate with the degree of esophageal eosinophilic inflammation. Incidentally, five patients with eosinophilic gastroduodenitis, in addition to esophagitis, were enrolled; their CysLT levels were statistically higher than those of controls.CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study to examine CysLT levels in esophageal mucosal biopsies of children with AEE and normal children. CysLT levels in AEE patients are similar to those in controls, and independent of the severity of inflammation. While this would argue against the use of CysLT antagonists in the treatment of AEE, further studies into the expression of the CysLT receptor itself are needed.

Experience with juvenile polyps in North American children: the need for pancolonoscopy

We report a recent experience with juvenile polyps (JP) in a large cohort of North American children to determine if a pancolonoscopy (PC) is needed in all children with suspected polyps. We reviewed hospital charts of all patients with JP seen over a 9-yr period (January, 1990–October, 1998). A total of 331 JP were encountered during 195 procedures in 184 patients (64% males, 88% white, mean age 5.93 yr [range 0.42–15.5 yr], median age 4.84 yr). Painless rectal bleeding was the commonest symptom. PC was performed in 42% (82/195) of procedures, and 177 JP were encountered: 54% (97/177) were in the rectosigmoid colon, 14% (24/177) were in the descending colon, and 32% (56/177) were proximal to the splenic flexure (i.e., proximal polyps). Overall, proximal polyps were seen in 37% (31/82) of PC. Only proximal polyps were noted in 12% (10/82) of PC. Five patients were re-endoscoped after an initial limited examination because of continuing symptoms from proximal polyps. All but one of the polyps had typical features of a JP on histological examination. Though most JP are located in the left colon, a PC should be the initial procedure because: 1) 37% of PC revealed proximal polyps, 2) 32% of polyps were located proximal to splenic flexure, 3) persistence of symptoms from missed proximal polyp(s) necessitates a repeat study with attendant risks, and 4) there is a possibility of malignant transformation in an unidentified JP.