Joseph P. DeCola

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist APV blocks acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning

The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in Pavlovian fear conditioning was examined using the NMDA antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV). Either APV (5 micrograms/rat) or saline was administered before the training phase, the testing phase, or both. APV completely blocked acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. The L enantiomer of APV did not affect the acquisition of conditional fear. To separate encoding from consolidation processes, APV was administered either before or immediately after the footshock unconditional stimulus (US) during the training phase. The results indicate that APV must be present during the US to produce its effects on fear conditioning. The behavioral effect of the drug is not due to analgesic action because APV did not alter pain sensitivity. The data suggest that NMDA receptors are critical for the acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. These effects on fear conditioning are parallel to the in vitro effects of APV on the acquisition but not expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) and suggest that endogenously generated NMDA-dependent LTP participates in the neural plasticity underlying fear conditioning.

Stress-induced enhancement of fear learning : An animal model of posttraumatic stress disorder

Fear is an adaptive response that initiates defensive behavior to protect animals and humans from danger. However, anxiety disorders, such as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), can occur when fear is inappropriately regulated. Fear conditioning can be used to study aspects of PTSD, and we have developed a model in which pre-exposure to a stressor of repeated footshock enhances conditional fear responding to a single context-shock pairing. The experiments in this chapter address interpretations of this effect including generalization and summation or fear, inflation, and altered pain sensitivity. The results of these experiments lead to the conclusion that pre-exposure to shock sensitizes conditional fear responding to similar less intense stressors. This sensitization effect resists exposure therapy (extinction) and amnestic (NMDA antagonist) treatment. The pattern predicts why in PTSD patients, mild stressors cause reactions more appropriate for the original traumatic stressor and why new fears are so readily formed in these patients. This model can facilitate the study of neurobiological mechanisms underlying sensitization of responses observed in PTSD.

Selective Impairment of Long-Term but Not Short-Term Conditional Fear by the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonist APV

Previous research has indicated that the competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist APV (DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate) prevents the Pavlovian conditioning of fear to contextual stimuli when tested 24 hr, but not immediately, after training. The present study investigated this differential time-dependent effect of APV on fear conditioning. Rats were given either APV or saline and presented with 3 footshocks in a distinctive chamber. Promptly after the shock, rats that had received APV exhibited a species-typical fear response-freezing. However, the freezing lasted for only a short period of time (less than 3 min) compared with that of controls. An immediate-shock procedure showed that freezing was entirely a conditional response to the chamber. In addition, the results of a savings test suggest that APV impairs storage rather than retrieval processes. These results indicate that there are two temporally distinct associative fear processes, a short-term NMDA-independent conditional fear and a long-term NMDA-dependent conditional fear.

Parallel augmentation of hippocampal long-term potentiation, theta rhythm, and contextual fear conditioning in water-deprived rats

The influence of water deprivation on hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), theta rhythm, and contextual fear conditioning in rats was examined. In Experiment 1, hippocampal EEG activity and perforant path LTP were assessed in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Water deprivation did not affect baseline cell excitability or low-frequency synaptic transmission in the dentate gyrus, but it increased the magnitude of perforant path LTP and elevated the proportion of theta rhythm in the EEG. In Experiment 2, rats were classically conditioned to fear a novel context through the use of aversive footshocks. Water deprivation facilitated the rate of contextual fear conditioning but did not alter the asymptote of learning. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the facilitation of contextual fear conditioning was not due to a change in unconditional shock sensitivity. These results suggest that water deprivation exerts an influence on contextual fear conditioning by modulating hippocampal LTP and theta rhythm and that these processes serve to encode contextual information during learning.

Mechanisms responsible for reduced contextual conditioning with massed unsignaled unconditional stimuli

Massed presentation of unsignaled shock results in less conditional freezing to contextual cues than do distributed presentations. Consistent with an account of the learning deficit based on the perceptual-defensive-recuperative theory, the massed-shock deficit was attenuated by preexposure to shock or the conditioning context. This formulation was also successfully applied to the deficit in conditioning that occurs when a single shock is given immediately after placement in a context. Opponent-process theory was not supported by 2 findings: (a) The deficit was neither enhanced by shock preexposure nor reduced by an opioid antagonist, and (b) unconditional reactions were greater with massed shock. Inconsistent with the suggestion that the effect is a performance artifact specific to freezing, the massed-shock deficit was apparent for a 2nd measure of conditioning.

Immediate shock deficit in fear conditioning: effects of shock manipulations.

Pavlovian contextual fear conditioning occurs when an aversive unconditional stimulus (US), such as a footshock, is presented to a rat shortly after it is placed in an experimental context. Contextual fear conditioning does not occur when the shock is presented immediately upon placement of the rat in the novel chamber. In the present study, the authors report that increasing either the number of immediate shock sessions (Experiment 1) or the immediate shock duration (Experiment 2) did not reverse this deficit. However, immediate shock seems to sensitize subsequent context conditioning (Experiment 3). These findings suggest that the associative deficit produced by immediate shock is not related to the rats ability to process the footshock US.

Ventral and dorsolateral regions of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) control different stages of defensive behavior : dorsolateral PAG lesions enhance the defensive freezing produced by massed and immediate shock

Rats that receive nociceptive electric shock in an environment normally show the conditional fear-induced defensive response of freezing when returned to that environment. If several electric shocks are given in a massed manner they will condition less freezing than the same shocks given in a distributed manner. If a single shock is given immediately after placement in the chamber it does not support any conditioning, although the same shock given after a brief delay does. Electrolytic lesions of the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG), which damaged dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and lateral PAG, enhanced freezing under these conditions. Lesions of the ventral PAG, which caused extensive damage to the central gray below the aqueduct, reduced conditioning under the more optimal parameters (distributed or delayed shock). This was taken to indicate that both of these regions support different modes of defensive behavior and that when activated, the dorsolateral PAG inbits conditional fear-induced defensive behavior.

Cross-motivational effects of inescapable shock are associative in nature.

Exposure to inescapable shock interferes with the subsequent acquisition of an appetitive operant. This deficit may be due to either associative interference or activity reduction from the inescapable shock pretreatment. The relative importance of these two factors was examined by using an appetitive response choice discrimination procedure and concurrently measuring activity. Experiment 1 demonstrated separate associative and activity effects of inescapable shock, in that the animals exposed to inescapable shock made more incorrect responses than controls and were lower in activity. Experiment 2 demonstrated that these effects resulted from the uncontrollability of the shock, not from shock exposure per se. In Experiment 3, residual effects of inescapable shock were investigated by exposing animals to discrimination reversals. On these tests, inescapably shocked animals showed performance inferior to nonshocked controls, a result indicating that the effects of inescapable shock are not completely reversed by experience with contingent reward in the discrimination task. No evidence of an activity deficit was observed during this discrimination reversal. These results strongly suggest that associative factors play a more important role than activity reduction in mediating the effects of inescapable shock, at least when these are measured in an appetitive context.

Panic control treatment for agoraphobia.

The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral treatment for panic control alone versus this treatment containing an additional in vivo exposure component. The sample was comprised of 68 individuals who met diagnosis for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two 16-week treatment conditions, panic control only and panic control with in vivo exposure. Assessments were repeated at baseline, mid-treatment, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up using diagnostic and behavioral measures. Results indicated that the two treatment conditions were equally efficacious for both panic disorder and agoraphobia. The intervention explicitly targeting agoraphobia appeared superfluous given the efficacy of panic control alone. On the other hand, reduction in panic frequency predicted reduction in agoraphobic avoidance overall. The practical and theoretical implications are discussed, as are limitations and directions for future research.

Differential effects of selective opioid peptide antagonists on the acquisition of Pavlovian fear conditioning

Pretreatment with opioid antagonists enhances acquisition of Pavlovian fear conditioning. The present experiments attempted to characterize the type of opioid receptor responsible for this effect using a procedure that assessed the fear of rats to a chamber previously associated with electric shock (1 mA, 0.75 s). Freezing, a species-typical immobility, was employed as an index of fear. Two mu opioid antagonists, CTOP (40 ng) and naloxonazine (10 micrograms), enhanced conditioning. On the other hand, the kappa antagonist nor-binaltorphimine reduced conditioning. Two delta antagonist treatments (16-methyl cyprenorphine and naltrindole) had no reliable effect on acquisition. Thus the enhancement of conditioning appears to be mediated by mu receptors. Previous research has shown that the conditional fear produced by these procedures caused an analgesia that is also mediated by mu receptors. It is argued that the enhancement effect occurs because of an antagonism of this analgesia and that the analgesia normally acts to regulate the level of fear conditioning.