Joseph P. Iaconis

Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to ceftaroline: an epidemiological and structural perspective

OBJECTIVES Ceftaroline, approved in Europe in 2012, has activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with MIC90 values of 1-2 mg/L depending on geographical location. During a global 2010 surveillance programme, conducted prior to the European launch, 4 S. aureus isolates, out of 8037 tested, possessing ceftaroline MIC values of >2 mg/L were identified. The objective of this study was to characterize these four isolates to elucidate the mechanism of ceftaroline resistance. METHODS MIC determinations were performed using broth microdilution and whole genome sequencing was performed to enable sequence-based analyses. RESULTS The only changes in proteins known to be required for full expression of methicillin resistance that correlated with the ceftaroline MIC were in penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a). Isolates with a ceftaroline MIC of 2 mg/L had a Glu239Lys mutation in the non-penicillin-binding domain whereas the four isolates with ceftaroline MIC values of 8 mg/L carried an additional Glu447Lys mutation in the penicillin-binding domain. The impact of these mutations was analysed using the known X-ray structure of S. aureus PBP2a and a model for ceftaroline resistance proposed. Analysis of the core genomes showed that the isolates with reduced susceptibility to ceftaroline were epidemiologically related. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in PBP2a can affect the activity of ceftaroline against MRSA. Although a rare event, based on surveillance studies, it appears a first-step change in the non-penicillin-binding domain together with a second-step in the penicillin-binding domain may result in elevation of the ceftaroline MIC to >2 mg/L.

Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial

BACKGROUND Ceftriaxone with or without a macrolide antibiotic is a recommended treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospital admission and intravenous antibiotic treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil compared with ceftriaxone in the treatment of Asian patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS In this international, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial, adult Asian patients with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III-IV acute community-acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg every 12 h) or ceftriaxone (2 g every 24 h) for 5-7 days. Patients were randomly assigned via centralised telephone and web-based system; patients and treating clinicians were masked to treatment allocation. Investigators who did study assessments remained masked to treatment allocation until completion of the study. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (8-15 days after last dose of study drug) in the clinically evaluable population. Non-inferiority of ceftaroline fosamil was defined as a lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in the proportion of patients clinically cured of -10% or higher; if non-inferiority was achieved, superiority was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 0%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01371838. FINDINGS Between Dec 13, 2011, and April 26, 2013, 847 patients were enrolled at 64 centres in China, India, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam, of whom 771 were randomly assigned and 764 received study treatment. In the clinically evaluable population (n=498) 217 (84%) of 258 patients in the ceftaroline fosamil group and 178 (74%) of 240 patients in the ceftriaxone group were clinically cured at the test-of-cure visit (difference 9·9%, 95% CI 2·8-17·1). The superiority of ceftaroline fosamil was consistent across all preplanned patient subgroup analyses (split by age 65 years, age 75 years, sex, PORT risk class, and previous antibiotic use) apart from patients younger than 65 years. The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups and the safety results for ceftaroline fosamil were consistent with the cephalosporin class and previous clinical trial data. INTERPRETATION Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg given every 12 h was superior to ceftriaxone 2 g given every 24 h for the treatment of Asian patients with PORT III-IV community-acquired pneumonia. These data suggest that ceftaroline fosamil should be regarded as an alternative to ceftriaxone in empirical treatment regimens for this patient population. FUNDING AstraZeneca.

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against bacterial pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections in Europe, Russia and Turkey in 2012: results from the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) surveillance programme

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to analyse antimicrobial susceptibility testing data generated by the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) global surveillance programme for pathogens causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in European countries in 2012. METHODS Confirmation of pathogen identity by MALDI-TOF and antimicrobial susceptibility testing following the CLSI broth microdilution method were performed by a central laboratory. RESULTS Using CLSI breakpoint criteria, ceftaroline was active against MSSA (n = 1116; MIC90, 0.25 mg/L; 99.8% susceptible), MRSA (n = 1467; MIC90, 1 mg/L; 92.2% susceptible) and Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 312; MIC90, 0.008 mg/L; 100% susceptible). By CLSI interpretative criteria, two S. aureus isolates (2/2583, 0.08%) were ceftaroline resistant (MIC, ≥4 mg/L) and 114 isolates (114/2583, 4.4%) were ceftaroline intermediate (2 mg/L). By EUCAST interpretative criteria (MIC, >1 mg/L), 4.5% (116/2583) of S. aureus isolates were ceftaroline resistant. Most ceftaroline-non-susceptible isolates (81.0%, 94/116) were from Russia, Turkey, Italy and Hungary. Ceftaroline susceptibility was equal to or exceeded 99% for S. aureus isolates submitted by 7 of 17 countries. Against Escherichia coli (n = 349), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 215), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 74) and Proteus mirabilis (n = 121), ceftaroline activity was dependent upon ESBL production. For ESBL-negative E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca and P. mirabilis, 87.5% (MIC90, 1 mg/L), 92.3% (MIC90, 0.5 mg/L), 93.2% (MIC90, 0.5 mg/L) and 85.1% (MIC90, 2 mg/L) of isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against a contemporary collection of bacterial pathogens from patients with SSTIs in European countries, Russia and Turkey. Surveillance programmes such as AWARE are essential to global efforts to improve antimicrobial stewardship.

A Phase III, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infection with systemic inflammatory response or underlying comorbidities

Objectives Increasing the ceftaroline fosamil dose beyond 600 mg every 12 h may provide additional benefit for patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) with severe inflammation and/or reduced pathogen susceptibility. A Phase III multicentre, randomized trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h in this setting. Methods Adult patients with cSSTI and systemic inflammation or comorbidities were randomized 2:1 to intravenous ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg every 8 h) or vancomycin (15 mg/kg every 12 h) plus aztreonam (1 g every 8 h) for 5–14 days. Clinical cure was assessed at the test of cure (TOC) visit (8–15 days after the final dose) in the modified ITT (MITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI around the treatment difference greater than –10%. An MRSA-focused expansion period was initiated after completion of the main study. Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers NCT01499277 and NCT02202135. Results Clinical cure rates at TOC demonstrated non-inferiority of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in the MITT and CE populations: 396/506 (78.3%) versus 202/255 (79.2%) patients (difference −1.0%, 95% CI −6.9, 5.4) and 342/395 (86.6%) versus 180/211 (85.3%) patients (difference 1.3%, 95% CI −4.3, 7.5), respectively. In the expansion period, 3/4 (75%) patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil were cured at TOC. The frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusions Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h was effective for cSSTI patients with evidence of systemic inflammation and/or comorbidities. No new safety signals were identified.

In vitro activity of Ceftaroline against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in African and Middle Eastern countries: AWARE global surveillance program 2012–2014

The objective of this report was to document antimicrobial susceptibility testing surveillance data for ceftaroline and comparative agents from the AWARE (Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation) global surveillance program for bacterial pathogens causing skin and soft tissue and respiratory tract infections in African and Middle Eastern countries from 2012 through 2014. Pathogen identities were confirmed by MALDI-TOF and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. All methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n= 923; MIC90, 0.25 μg/mL) and 91.8% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n= 1161; MIC90, 1 μg/mL) tested were susceptible to ceftaroline. The maximum ceftaroline MIC observed for isolates of MRSA was 2 μg/mL. All Streptococcus pyogenes (n= 174; MIC90, 0.008 μg/mL), Streptococcus agalactiae (n= 44; MIC90, 0.015 μg/mL), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n= 351; MIC90, 0.25 μg/mL), and Haemophilus influenzae (n= 84; MIC90, ≤0.015 μg/mL) were susceptible to ceftaroline. Rates of susceptibility to ceftaroline among ESBL-negative Escherichia coli (n= 338), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n= 241), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n= 97) were 89.1% (MIC90, 1 μg/mL), 94.2% (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL), and 99.0% (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL), respectively.

Activity of ceftaroline and comparators against pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections in Latin America - results of AWARE surveillance 2012

As part of the Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) surveillance program in 2012 the in vitro activity of ceftaroline and relevant comparator antimicrobials was evaluated in six Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela) against pathogens isolated from patients with hospital associated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). The study documented that ceftaroline was highly active (MIC90 0.25mg/L/% susceptible 100%) against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MIC90 2mg/L/% susceptible 83.3%) and β-hemolytic streptococci (MIC90 0.008-0.015mg/L/% susceptible 100%). The activity of ceftaroline against selected species of Enterobacteriaceae was dependent upon the presence or absence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Against ESBL screen-negative Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella oxytoca the MIC90 and percent susceptible for ceftaroline were (0.5mg/L/94.1%), (0.5mg/L/99.0%) and (0.5mg/L/91.5%), respectively. Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against a recent collection of pathogens associated with SSTI in six Latin American countries in 2012.

Multi-center and multi-method evaluation of in vitro activities of ceftaroline against S. aureus

This five-site study was performed to assess the reproducibility of ceftaroline MIC and disk results for Staphylococcus aureus. Three commercial broth microdilution, three gradient diffusion and ceftaroline 5μg disk diffusion methods were compared to a reference broth microdilution method against challenge isolates (n = 41) and isolates collected at four European sites (n = 30/site). For four MIC methods (Sensititre and three gradient diffusion methods), 99.0% of consolidated MIC results were within +/- 1 dilution of the reference MIC. Categorical agreement rates based on EUCAST breakpoints for the challenge isolates were 75.6-100% and for disk testing were 78.0-92.7%. There was no clear distinction between isolates with MIC results of 1 and 2mg/L with regard to variation in MIC or molecular genotyping results. The addition of an intermediate category for isolates with MIC results of 2mg/L would help to identify these isolates as borderline susceptible/non-susceptible isolates.

In vitro Activity of Ceftaroline Against Pathogens Collected Globally from the AWARE Surveillance Program, 2016

Abstract Background Ceftaroline, the active metabolite of ceftaroline fosamil, is a cephalosporin developed for treating infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, β-hemolytic streptococci, and some Gram-negative pathogens. This study reports the in vitro activity of ceftaroline against clinically relevant isolates collected in 2016 from the AWARE Surveillance Program. Methods 22,752 non-duplicate methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), MRSA, S. pneumoniae, β-hemolytic streptococci (S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae) Haemophilus influenzae, and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-negative Enterobacteriaceae were collected from (n/%) Asia/South Pacific (4,215/18.5%), Europe (12,962/57.0%), Latin America (3,384/14.9%), and Middle East/Africa (2,191/9.6%) during 2016. Isolates were from (n/%) complicated intraabdominal (2,149/9.5%), complicated urinary tract (3,029/13.3%), complicated skin and skin structure (8,271/36.4%), blood stream (2,422/10.6%) and lower respiratory tract infections (6,881/30.2%). MIC values were determined by broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI breakpoints. Results Ceftaroline activity, based on % susceptibility (%S) and MIC90, is shown in the table. Ceftaroline was active in vitro against both Gram-positive (100% of MSSA, 93.6% of MRSA and 99.7% of S. pneumoniae) and Gram-negative (99.7% of H. influenzae and 91.7% of ESBL-negative Enterobacteriaceae) isolates. Organism (N) % S % I % R MIC 50 MIC 90 MRSA (5,022) 93.6 6.0 0.5 0.5 1 MSSA (3,675) 100 0 0 0.25 0.25 Streptococcus pneumoniae (2,024) 99.7 -- 0.3 0.008 0.12 β-hemolytic streptococci (1,713) 100 -- -- 0.008 0.015 Enterobacteriaceae, ESBL-Negative (9,647) 91.7 3.7 4.6 0.12 0.5 Haemophilus influenzae (671) 99.7 -- 0.3 ≤0.015 0.03 %S, %I, %R- percent susceptible, intermediate, resistant based on CLSI breakpoints; MIC50, MIC90 in µg/mL. Conclusion Based on these data generated with isolates collected in 2016, ceftaroline exhibited potent in vitro activity against clinically relevant isolates, with >91% of all isolates susceptible at their CLSI breakpoints. Funding: This study was sponsored by AstraZeneca. The AstraZeneca product ceftaroline fosamil was acquired by Pfizer in December 2016. Disclosures J. Iaconis, AstraZeneca: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shareholder in AstraZeneca