Joseph P. Imperato
Northwestern University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joseph P. Imperato.
The Journal of Urology | 1995
Guinan P; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Amy M. Fremgen; Joan S. Chmiel; Sylvester Jl; Stephen F. Sener; Joseph P. Imperato
ABSTRACTIn an attempt to define the relationship among tumor size, stage and survival, the Cancer Incidence and End Results Committee of the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division, Inc.reviewed the records of 2,473 patients with a histological diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. Tumor size was related to stage and survival. Larger tumors were generally associated with an increased stage (p <=0.0005) as well as poorer survival (p <=0.005). For Robson stages II, III and IV, tumor size may contribute additional prognostic information for patient survival.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1996
Edward C. Halperin; James E. Herndon; S. Clifford Schold; Mark Brown; Nicholas A. Vick; J. Gregory Cairncross; David R. Macdonald; Laurie E. Gaspar; Barbara Fischer; Edward J. Dropcho; Steven S. Rosenfeld; Richard Morowitz; Joseph M. Piepmeier; William N. Hait; Thomas N. Byrne; Merle M. Salter; Joseph P. Imperato; Janardan D. Khandekar; Nina Paleologos; Peter C. Burger; Gunilla C. Bentel; Allan H. Friedman
PURPOSE This study was designed to evaluate strategies to overcome the resistance of anaplastic gliomas of the brain to external beam radiotherapy (ERT) plus carmustine (BCNU). Patients were > or = 15 years of age, had a histologic diagnosis of malignant glioma, and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 60%. METHODS AND MATERIALS In Randomization 1, patients were assigned to receive either ERT alone (61.2 Gy) or ERT plus mitomycin C (Mito, IV 12.5 mg/m(2)) during the first and fourth week of ERT. After this treatment, patients went on to Randomization 2, where they were assigned to receive either BCNU (i.v. 200 mg/m(2)) given at 6-week intervals or 6-mercaptopurine (6- MP, 750 mg/m(2) IV daily for 3 days every six weeks), with BCNU given on the third day of the 6-MP treatment. Three hundred twenty-seven patients underwent Randomization 1. One hundred sixty-four received ERT alone, and 163 received ERT + Mito [average 52.7 years; 63% male; 69% glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); 66% had a resection; 56% KPS > or = 90%]. Step-wise analysis of survival from Randomization 1 or 2 indicates that survival was significantly diminished by: (a) age > or = 45 years (b) KPS < 90%; (c) GBM/gliosarcoma histology; (d) stereotactic biopsy as opposed to open biopsy or resection. Median survival from Randomization 1 in both arms (ERT + Mito) was 10.8 months. Median survival from Randomization 2 was 9.3 months for BCNU/6MP vs. 11.4 months for the BCNU group (p = 0.35). Carmustine/6-MP showed a possible survival benefit for histologies other than GBM/GS. Two hundred and thirty-three patients underwent Randomization 2. The proportion of patients in the ERT group who terminated study prior to Randomization 2 was significantly less in the ERT group than in the ERT + Mito group (20 vs. 37%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS (a) The addition of Mito to ERT had no impact on survival; (b) patients treated with ERT + Mito were at greater risk of terminating therapy prior to Randomization 2; (c) there was not a significant survival benefit to the addition of 6-MP to BCNU.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
Gregory M.M. Videtic; Laurie E. Gaspar; Amr Aref; Isabelle M. Germano; Brian J. Goldsmith; Joseph P. Imperato; Karen J. Marcus; Michael W. McDermott; Mark W. McDonald; Roy A. Patchell; H. Ian Robins; C. Leland Rogers; John H. Suh; Aaron H. Wolfson; Franz J. Wippold
EXPERT PANEL ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY–BRAIN METASTASES; GREGORY M. M. VIDETIC, M.D.,* LAURIE E. GASPAR, M.D., M.B.A.,y AMR M. AREF, M.D.,z ISABELLE M. GERMANO, M.D.,x BRIAN J. GOLDSMITH, M.D.,k JOSEPH P. IMPERATO, M.D.,{ KAREN J. MARCUS, M.D., MICHAEL W. MCDERMOTT, M.D.,** MARK W. MCDONALD, M.D.,yy ROY A. PATCHELL, M.D.,zz H. IAN ROBINS, M.D., PH.D.,xx C. LELAND ROGERS, M.D.,kk JOHN H. SUH, M.D.,* AARON H. WOLFSON, M.D.,{{ AND FRANZ J. WIPPOLD, II, M.D.
Current Problems in Cancer | 2010
John H. Suh; Gregory M.M. Videtic; Amr Aref; Isabelle M. Germano; Brian J. Goldsmith; Joseph P. Imperato; Karen J. Marcus; Michael W. McDermott; Mark W. McDonald; Roy A. Patchell; H. Ian Robins; C. Leland Rogers; Aaron H. Wolfson; Franz J. Wippold; Laurie E. Gaspar
Single brain metastasis represents a common neurologic complication of cancer. Given the number of treatment options that are available for patients with brain metastasis and the strong opinions that are associated with each option, appropriate treatment for these patients has become controversial. Prognostic factors such as recursive partitioning analysis and graded prognostic assessment can help guide treatment decisions. Surgery, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery or combination of these treatments can be considered based on a number of factors. Despite Class I evidence suggestive of best therapy, the treatment recommendation is quite varied among physicians as demonstrated by the American College of Radiologys Appropriateness Panel on single brain metastasis. Given the potential concerns of the neurocognitive effects of WBRT, the use of SRS alone or SRS to a resection cavity has gained support. Since aggressive local therapy is beneficial for survival, local control and quality of life, the use of these various treatment modalities needs to be carefully investigated given the growing number of long-term survivors. Enrollment of patients onto clinical trials is important to advance our understanding of brain metastasis.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1993
Edward C. Halperin; Laurie E. Gaspar; Joseph P. Imperato; Merle M. Salter; James E. Herndon; Sean Dowling
The CNS Cancer Consortium has conducted a phase III study comparing diaziquone (AZQ) with carmustine (BCNU) in the treatment of adults with primary anaplastic glial brain tumors. Patients eligible for this study were 18 years of age or older at the time of biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection of an anaplastic glial brain tumor. Within 3 weeks of surgery, patients received whole brain radiotherapy at 1.7 to 2 Gy per fraction to a total whole brain dose of 42–48 Gy. This was followed by a boost to the tumor bed as ascertained by computed tomography (CT), angiography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 1.7 to 2 Gy per fraction to a dose of 12–19 Gy. The recommended cumulative dose to the tumor bed was therefore 55–61 Gy. At 8 weeks following radiotherapy, patients were randomized to receive either AZQ at 15 mg/day for 3 days i.v. every 4 weeks or BCNU at 200 mg i.v. every 8 weeks. Chemotherapy was continued for at least 1 year unless death occurred, treatment failure was declared, or toxicity necessitated alteration of therapy. In the 249 randomized patients, there was no difference between the AZQ- and BCNU-treated patients in age, sex distribution, race, tumor histology, type of surgical resection, or Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Age and KPS at the initiation of therapy and tumor histology were the best overall predictors of survival. The type of chemotherapy (AZQ vs BCNU) was not predictive of survival. Two-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 22% in the AZQ-treated patients and 25% in BCNU-treated patients. In an analysis of radiotherapy administered we found that, within the range of doses required for this study, there was no influence of whole brain dose, boost dose, total dose, or size of the boost field on survival. The institution providing radiotherapy (teaching hospital vs nonteaching facility) did not influence survival.
Annals of Neurology | 1990
Joseph P. Imperato; Nina Paleologos; Nicholas A. Vick
JAMA | 1991
Roger Hand; Stephen F. Sener; Joseph P. Imperato; Joan S. Chmiel; Jo Anne Sylvester; Amy Fremgen
The Journal of Urology | 1995
Guinan P; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Amy M. Fremgen; Joan S. Chmiel; Sylvester Jl; Stephen F. Sener; Joseph P. Imperato
The Journal of Urology | 1995
Guinan P; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Amy M. Fremgen; Joan S. Chmiel; Sylvester Jl; Stephen F. Sener; Joseph P. Imperato
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 1989
Stephen F. Sener; Joseph P. Imperato; Joan S. Chmiel; Amy Fremgen; Jo Anne Sylvester