Joseph R. Berger

PML diagnostic criteria: Consensus statement from the AAN Neuroinfectious Disease Section

Objective: To establish criteria for the diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Methods: We reviewed available literature to identify various diagnostic criteria employed. Several search strategies employing the terms “progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy” with or without “JC virus” were performed with PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE search engines. The articles were reviewed by a committee of individuals with expertise in the disorder in order to determine the most useful applicable criteria. Results: A consensus statement was developed employing clinical, imaging, pathologic, and virologic evidence in support of the diagnosis of PML. Two separate pathways, histopathologic and clinical, for PML diagnosis are proposed. Diagnostic classification includes certain, probable, possible, and not PML. Conclusion: Definitive diagnosis of PML requires neuropathologic demonstration of the typical histopathologic triad (demyelination, bizarre astrocytes, and enlarged oligodendroglial nuclei) coupled with the techniques to show the presence of JC virus. The presence of clinical and imaging manifestations consistent with the diagnosis and not better explained by other disorders coupled with the demonstration of JC virus by PCR in CSF is also considered diagnostic. Algorithms for establishing the diagnosis have been recommended.

Reactivation of JC virus and development of PML in patients with multiple sclerosis

The attention of researchers and clinicians specializing in both multiple sclerosis (MS) and JC virus (JCV), the etiologic agent of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), was rekindled by the development of PML in two patients with MS enrolled in a clinical trial of combination therapy with natalizumab (Tysabri) and interferon β-1A (Avonex) in recent years. PML had not been previously reported with either MS or treatment with interferon β alone. This occurrence of PML with α4β1-integrin inhibition in MS raised a number of issues in terms both of the scientific understanding of these diseases and for the future of immunomodulatory treatment for MS. In this review, we examine the current status of knowledge of the virus, its molecular biology, life cycle, and pathogenetic mechanisms, and how this relates to the basic science and clinical perspectives of MS. A better understanding of the specific steps from JCV infection to the development of PML is key to this issue. Other critical issues for further investigation include the role of α4β1-integrin inhibition by natalizumab in the re-expression of JCV from latent sites and in the inhibition of entry into the brain and peripheral sites.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and newer biological agents.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease of the brain due to a polyoma virus, JC virus. Despite the ubiquity of this virus, PML is rare and almost always seen in association with an underlying immunosuppressive condition. In the last 30 years, AIDS has been the most common predisposing factor. The observation of PML attending the use of certain monoclonal antibody therapies and other pharmacological agents has raised concerns about the safety profile of these agents, but has also provided a window into the pathogenesis of PML. Certain agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies natalizumab, an α4b1 and α4β7 integrin inhibitor, and efalizumab, an antibody directed against CD11a, appear to uniquely predispose to PML. Prior to their introduction for multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease with respect to natalizumab, and psoriasis with respect to efalizumab, PML had never been observed with these disorders. PML occurring with other agents that currently carry US FDA-mandated ‘black-box’ warnings, such as rituximab, an antibody directed to CD20, or mycophenolate mofetil, a drug that inhibits T- and B-cell proliferation, typically occur in the background of underlying disorders that have already been identified as risks for PML. This review will focus on the available data regarding the risk for PML with monoclonal antibodies and other drugs. A biologically plausible explanation for the increased risk of PML will be proposed, as well as potential strategies for mitigating disease risk.

JC Virus Antibody Status Underestimates Infection Rates

JC virus (JCV) seropositivity is a risk factor for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients on natalizumab. Accordingly, the JCV serological antibody test is of paramount importance in determining disease risk.

Persistence and pathogenesis of the neurotropic polyomavirus JC.

Many neurological diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) are underpinned by malfunctions of the immune system, including disorders involving opportunistic infections. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a lethal CNS demyelinating disease caused by the human neurotropic polyomavirus JC (JCV) and is found almost exclusively in individuals with immune disruption, including patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, patients receiving therapeutic immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies to treat conditions such as multiple sclerosis, and transplant recipients. Thus, the public health significance of this disease is high, because of the number of individuals constituting the at‐risk population. The incidence of PML is very low, whereas seroprevalence for the virus is high, suggesting infection by the virus is very common, and so it is thought that the virus is restrained but it persists in an asymptomatic state that can only occasionally be disrupted to lead to viral reactivation and PML. When JCV actively replicates in oligodendrocytes and astrocytes of the CNS, it produces cytolysis, leading to formation of demyelinated lesions with devastating consequences. Defining the molecular nature of persistence and events leading to reactivation of the virus to cause PML has proved to be elusive. In this review, we examine the current state of knowledge of the JCV life cycle and mechanisms of pathogenesis. We will discuss the normal course of the JCV life cycle including transmission, primary infection, viremia, and establishment of asymptomatic persistence as well as pathogenic events including migration of the virus to the brain, reactivation from persistence, viral infection, and replication in the glial cells of the CNS and escape from immunosurveillance. Ann Neurol 2015;77:560–570

Classifying PML risk with disease modifying therapies

OBJECTIVEnTo catalogue the risk of PML with the currently available disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS).nnnBACKGROUNDnAll DMTs perturb the immune system in some fashion. Natalizumab, a highly effective DMT, has been associated with a significant risk of PML. Fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate have also been unquestionably associated with a risk of PML in the MS population. Concerns about PML risk with other DMTs have arisen due to their mechanism of action and pharmacological parallel to other agents with known PML risk. A method of contextualizing PML risk for DMTs is warranted.nnnMETHODSnClassification of PML risk was predicated on three criteria:: 1) whether the underlying condition being treated predisposes to PML in the absence of the drug; 2) the latency from initiation of the drug to the development of PML; and 3) the frequency with which PML is observed.nnnRESULTSnAmong the DMTs, natalizumab occupies a place of its own with respect to PML risk. Significantly lesser degrees of risk exist for fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate. Whether PML will be observed with other DMTs in use for MS, such as, rituximab, teriflunomide, and alemtuzumab, remains uncertain.nnnDISCUSSIONnA logical classification for stratifying DMT PML risk is important for both the physician and patient in contextualizing risk/benefit ratios. As additional experience accumulates regarding PML and the DMTs, this early effort will undoubtedly require revisiting.

The effect of dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera™) on lymphocyte counts: A potential contributor to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk

Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera™) is an effective therapy for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Our study suggests that this drug may have immunosuppressive properties evidenced by significant sustained reduction in CD8 lymphocyte counts and, to a lesser extent, CD4 lymphocyte counts. This observation is relevant in light of the recent case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient receiving this drug.

Fatigue heralding multiple sclerosis.

Background: Fatigue is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is an important determinant of overall well-being and disability. Objective: To assess the frequency with which fatigue precedes the diagnosis of MS using a retrospective database analysis. Methods: Between January 1, 2003 and September 30, 2008, patients diagnosed with fatigue with and without fatigue-related medications within a 3-year period prior to newly diagnosed MS were identified from the MarketScan Databases. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS. Results: Of the 16,976 patients with MS in the overall population, 5305 (31.3%) were newly diagnosed with MS and had three years of continuous healthcare coverage prior to MS diagnosis. Of these patients, 1534 (28.9%) were labeled with chronic fatigue syndrome (ICD9-780.71) or malaise or fatigue (ICD9-780.79) prior to the diagnosis of MS. One-third of these patients were labeled with fatigue one to two years before the diagnosis; 30.8% were diagnosed only with fatigue and had no other MS symptoms prior to their MS diagnosis. Among the patients diagnosed with fatigue, 10.4% were also prescribed medication for fatigue. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that fatigue may herald MS, often by years. A careful history for transient neurological symptoms and a physical examination is warranted in any patient presenting with fatigue.

Re-evaluating the incidence of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

OBJECTIVEnTo estimate the prospective risk of developing PML during therapy with natalizumab in JCV-seropositive patients.nnnMETHODSnWe analyzed postmarketing data about the incidence of PML on natalizumab, and quantified the risk by either applying the Kaplan-Meier estimator or, where this was not possible due to the unavailability of the respective raw data, using formulae yielding very similar figures.nnnRESULTSnIn JCV-seropositive patients with prior immunosuppressant (IS) use, the incidence of PML during months 25-48 of natalizumab therapy is about 19.5 per thousand. Without prior IS use, the incidence during months 25-48 is approximately 7.4 per thousand, and during months 49-72, it is approximately 10.8 per thousand. If one additionally assumes that the JCV index is in the range 0.9-1.5, then the incidence during months 49-72 is around 6.2 per thousand in comparison to 17.0 per thousand when the JCV index exceeds 1.5.nnnCONCLUSIONSnBiogens statistics concerning the risk of PML on natalizumab, while in principle helpful, underestimate the true incidence systematically and significantly; realistic estimates of the longterm risk of PML are nearly double those previously published, with some patient groups carrying a risk that is almost nine times higher. Fortunately, a refined risk-stratification algorithm with the incorporation of such markers as L-selectin and CSF lipid-specific IgM bands has the potential to make natalizumab a considerably safer drug.

Reassessing the risk of natalizumab-associated PML

The risk algorithm for natalizumab-associated PML was first established in 2012 using the observations that JC virus antibody status, prolonged duration of natalizumab therapy (>2xa0years), and prior exposure to immunosuppressive therapy increased the risk for the disease. Prior to the publication of Biogen’s algorithm, a risk algorithm was created by Fox and Rudick using an Excel spreadsheet in order to address the concerns of their patients. Applying the most recently available data regarding natalizumab-associated PML, the risk assessments for PML were recalculated. The current numbers indicate substantially higher risks for PML in 2015 than in 2012. Our calculations suggest that an individual having all three risk factors has an approximately 1 in 44 chance of developing PML.