Josephine Feliciano

GP88 (progranulin): a novel tissue and circulating biomarker for non–small cell lung carcinoma

GP88 (progranulin) is a growth and survival factor implicated in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Previous studies showed that GP88 was expressed in breast cancer tissue in inverse correlation with survival. This study evaluates GP88 tissue expression in localized/locally advanced lung cancer and GP88 serum levels in advanced disease. GP88 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue from non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, 85 with localized (stage I-II), and 40 with locally advanced disease (stage IIIa) and correlated with clinical outcome. Serum GP88 levels from stage IIIb/IV patients, quantified by enzyme immunoassay were compared with GP88 levels from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy individuals. GP88 was expressed in more than 80% adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in contrast to normal lung or small cell lung cancer. There was a statistically significant inverse association of GP88 expression (GP88 immunohistochemistry score, 3+ versus < 3+) with survival for patients with localized resected NSCLC with hazard ratio (HR) = 2.28 (P = .0076) for disease-free survival and HR = 2.17 (P = .014) for overall survival. A statistically significant decrease in progression-free survival (HR = 2.9; P = .022) for GP88 scores of 3+ versus less than 3+ was observed for stage IIIa after chemoradiotherapy. In addition, serum GP88 was significantly elevated in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC compared with control subjects (49.9 ng/mL versus 28.4 ng/mL; P < .0001). This is the first study demonstrating GP88 tissue and serum expression as a prognostic biomarker in localized and advanced disease. Future research will determine utility of monitoring GP88 and the potential of GP88 expression as a predictive marker for anti-GP88 therapeutics.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Apricoxib in Combination With Either Docetaxel or Pemetrexed in Patients With Biomarker-Selected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE Overexpression of COX-2 correlates with advanced stage and worse outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), possibly as a result of elevated levels of COX-2-dependent prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Exploratory analyses of studies that used COX-2 inhibitors have demonstrated potentially superior outcome in patients in whom the urinary metabolite of PGE2 (PGE-M) is suppressed. We hypothesized that patients with disease defined by PGE-M suppression would benefit from the addition of apricoxib to second-line docetaxel or pemetrexed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with NSCLC who had disease progression after one line of platinum-based therapy, performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function were potentially eligible. Only patients with a ≥ 50% decrease in urinary PGE-M after 5 days of treatment with apricoxib could enroll. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days per the investigator was administered with apricoxib or placebo 400 mg once per day. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory analysis was performed regarding baseline urinary PGE-M and outcomes. RESULTS In all, 101 patients completed screening, and 72 of the 80 who demonstrated ≥ 50% suppression were randomly assigned to apricoxib or placebo. Toxicity was similar between the arms. No improvement in PFS was seen with apricoxib versus placebo. The median PFS for the control arm was 97 days (95% CI, 52 to 193 days) versus 85 days (95% CI, 67 to 142 days) for the experimental arm (P = .91). CONCLUSION Apricoxib did not improve PFS, despite biomarker-driven patient selection.

Pulmonologist Involvement, Stage-Specific Treatment, and Survival in Adults with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

RATIONALE Up to 80% of patients with lung cancer have comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Many of them are poor candidates for stage-specific lung cancer treatment due to diminished lung function and poor functional status, and many forego treatment. The negative effect of COPD may be moderated by pulmonologist-guided management. OBJECTIVES This study examined the association between pulmonologist management and the probability of receiving the recommended stage-specific treatment modality and overall survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with preexisting COPD. METHODS Early- and advanced-stage NSCLC cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 with a prior COPD diagnosis (3-24 months before NSCLC diagnosis) were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registry data linked to Medicare claims. Study outcomes included receipt of recommended stage-specific treatment (surgical resection for early-stage NSCLC and chemotherapy for advanced-stage NSCLC [advNSCLC]) and overall survival. Pulmonologist management was considered present if one or more Evaluation and Management visit claims with pulmonologist specialty were observed within 6 months after NSCLC diagnosis. Stage-specific multivariate logistic regression tested association between pulmonologist management and treatment received. Cox proportional hazard models examined the independent association between pulmonologist care and mortality. Two-stage residual inclusion instrumental variable (2SRI-IV) analyses tested and adjusted for potential confounding based on unobserved factors or measurement error. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The cohorts included 5,488 patients with early-stage NSCLC and 6,426 patients with advNSCLC disease with preexisting COPD. Pulmonologist management was recorded for 54.9% of patients with early stage NSCLC and 35.7% of patients with advNSCLC. Of those patients with pulmonologist involvement, 58.5% of patients with early NSCLC received surgical resection, and 43.6% of patients with advNSCLC received chemotherapy. Pulmonologist management post NSCLC diagnosis was associated with increased surgical resection rates (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.45) for early NSCLC and increased chemotherapy rates (odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.10) for advNSCLC. Pulmonologist management was also associated with reduced mortality risk for patients with early-stage NSCLC but not AdvNSCLC. CONCLUSIONS Pulmonologist management had a positive association with rates of stage-specific treatment in both groups and overall survival in early-stage NSCLC. These results provide preliminary support for the recently published guidelines emphasizing the role of pulmonologists in lung cancer management.

Chemoradiation for definitive, preoperative, or postoperative therapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

AbstractOver the last few decades, the integration of chemotherapy and radiation has played a crucial role in the management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Locally advanced NSCLC is a very heterogeneous disease. Because of this heterogeneity, advanced NSCLC can be managed in various ways depending on the bulk of disease, the comorbidities of the patient, and the expertise and resources of the treating physicians and facilities. This review describes the evolution of current treatment strategies and predicted future changes for the management of locally advanced NSCLC.

Neutrophil‐Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Locally Advanced (Stage IIIA and IIIB) Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Combined Modality Therapy

BACKGROUND Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a measure of systemic inflammation that appears prognostic in localized and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Increased systemic inflammation portends a poorer prognosis in cancer patients. We hypothesized that low NLR at diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in locally advanced NSCLC (LANSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Records from 276 patients with stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery between 2000 and 2010 with adequate data were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline demographic data and pretreatment peripheral blood absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were collected. Patients were grouped into quartiles based on NLR. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare mortality between groups. A linear test-for-trend was used for the NLR quartile groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS The NLR was prognostic for OS (p < .0001). Median survival in months (95% confidence interval) for the first, second, third, and fourth quartile groups of the population distribution of NLR were 27 (19-36), 28 (22-34), 22 (12-31), and 10 (8-12), respectively. NLR remained prognostic for OS after adjusting for race, sex, stage, performance status, and chemoradiotherapy approach (p = .004). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, our series is the largest to demonstrate that baseline NLR is a significant prognostic indicator in LANSCLC patients who received definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery. As an indicator of inflammatory response, it should be explored as a potential predictive marker in the context of immunotherapy and radiation therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio measured at the time of diagnosis was associated with improved overall survival in 276 patients with stage IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery. To our knowledge, our series is the largest to demonstrate that baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a significant prognostic indicator in locally advanced NSCLC patients who received definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is an inexpensive biomarker that may be easily utilized by clinicians at the time of locally advanced NSCLC diagnosis to help predict life expectancy.

Obesity is associated with long-term improved survival in definitively treated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

OBJECTIVES To determine the prognostic effect of Body Mass Index (BMI) in definitively treated locally advanced NSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single institution retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 291 patients who were treated for locally advanced NSCLC from 2000 to 2010. They were stratified into four BMI groups based on World Health Organization criteria: underweight (<18.5kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to <25kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30kg/m2), and obese (≧30kg/m2). Overall survival was analyzed by BMI group. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics and treatment parameters were similar between obese and normal weight patients. Increasing BMI was associated with improved overall survival (P=0.011), even when underweight cases were excluded. There was a sustained 31%-58% reduction in mortality of obese relative to normal weight patients (HR 0.68±0.21, 0.61±0.19, and 0.42±0.19, for each year post-treatment respectively). Statin use after diagnosis was highly associated with increasing BMI (P<0.001) and predicted improved survival in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89, P=0.011). CONCLUSION Obese patients in this retrospective study had significantly improved survival relative to normal weight patients. Our data suggest that the protective effect of obesity in locally advanced NSCLC is not solely due to short-term treatment effects, decreased smoking exposure, or poor prognostic factors from underweight patients. Notably, statin use was also associated with improved survival. Additional studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms and possible concomitant factors underlying the obesity paradox in NSCLC.

Oncological outcomes from trimodality therapy receiving definitive doses of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (≥60 Gy) and factors influencing consideration for surgery in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose Guidelines for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) recommend definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for cN2-N3 disease, reserving surgery for patients with minimal nodal involvement at presentation. The current literature suggests that surgery after CRT for stage III NSCLC can improve freedom-from-recurrence (FFR) but has not consistently demonstrated an improvement in overall survival, perhaps partly due to the low (45-50.4 Gy) preoperative doses delivered that result in low rates of mediastinal nodal clearance. We therefore analyzed factors associated with trimodality therapy receipt and determined outcomes in patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with definitive doses (≥60 Gy) of neoadjuvant CRT prior to surgery. Methods and materials We retrospectively analyzed 355 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with curative intent between January 2000 and December 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the overall survival and FFR of patients who were initially planned to receive trimodality treatment but never underwent surgery (unplanned bimodality) compared with those who were never considered to be surgical candidates (planned bimodality) and those who underwent surgical resection after CRT (trimodality). Cox proportional hazards regression with forward selection was used for multivariate analyses, and the Fisher exact test was used to test contingency tables. Results Patients who received trimodality therapy had a longer median survival than those with unplanned or planned bimodality therapy at 59.9, 20.1, and 17.3 months, respectively (P < .001). The survival benefit with surgery persisted in patients with stage IIIB (P < .001) and N3 (P = .010) nodal disease when mediastinal nodal clearance was achieved. FFR was also improved with surgical resection (P = .001). Race (P < .001), stage (P < .001), performance status (P < .001), age (P < .001), and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .009) were significant indicators that influenced both the decision to initially choose trimodality therapy at consultation and to actually perform surgical resection. Conclusions Trimodality treatment significantly improves survival and FFR in patients with LA-NSCLC when definitive doses of radiation with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are employed. We identified important demographic features that predict the use of surgical intervention in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Prostaglandin E Receptor EP4 expression, survival and pattern of recurrence in locally advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND Elevated COX-2 expression has been correlated with inferior outcome in NSCLC. COX-2 catalyzes the transformation of arachidonate to PGE2. We and others have demonstrated that PGE2 induces proliferation and metastatic spread and immunosuppression through the G protein-coupled EP4 receptor. We hypothesized that EP4 expression on malignant cells would correlate with outcome and patterns of relapse after treatment of LANSCLC stage IIIA (7th edition, N2+). METHODS Tissue specimens from 41 pts treated for LANSC at UMGCC were obtained. A tissue microarray was prepared and examined for EP4 expression. Intensity of staining was scored semi-quantitatively as 0-4 in both the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments by a pathologist blinded to the clinical data. RESULTS EP4 nuclear staining 0-1 vs. 2+ was associated with overall survival, (OS) (44.3 vs. 18 mo; HR=0.41, p=0.024) and numerically superior progression free survival (PFS) (16.4 vs. 10.2 mo, p=0.16). EP4 cytoplasmic staining did not correlate with OS (0-1 vs. 2+, 23.8 vs. 28.8 mo; HR=1.2, p=0.81). Relapse pattern (no relapse or local vs. systemic) did not correlate with EP nuclear staining (p=1.0, X2). CONCLUSIONS This is the first clinical study of EP4 expression in lung cancer. There was a significant correlation between OS and nuclear EP4 expression, indicating that this is a potential therapeutic target. Studies with AT-007, a specific inhibitor of EP4, are planned to commence this year.

Time-to-Treatment-Failure and Related Outcomes Among 1000+ Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Comparisons Between Older Versus Younger Patients (Alliance A151711)

Introduction: Time‐to‐treatment‐failure (TTF) is the interval from chemotherapy initiation to premature discontinuation. We evaluated TTF based on age. Methods: Pooled analyses were conducted with first‐line chemotherapy trials for advanced NSCLC (CALGB 9730, 30203, and 30801). Comparisons among patients who were 65 years and older and 70 years and older were performed for TTF (primary endpoint), reasons for early chemotherapy cessation, grade 3+ adverse events, and overall survival. Results: Among 1006 patients, 460 (46%) were older than 65 years of age. One hundred forty‐five older patients (32% of this age cohort) completed all six planned chemotherapy cycles as did 170 (32%) younger patients. Median TTF was 2.9 months (95% confidence interval: 2.7– 3.2) in older patients and 3 months (95% confidence interval: 2.9–3.5) in younger patients; adjustment for performance status and stratification by chemotherapy by trial yielded no statistically significant age‐based difference in TTF. However, reasons for early chemotherapy cessation differed between age groups (multivariate p = 0.004). Older patients were less likely to discontinue from cancer progression (41% versus 55%) and more likely from toxicity or patient choice (16% and 15%, respectively) compared to younger patients (13% and 6%, respectively). Older patients were more likely to experience grade 3+ adverse events (86% versus 79%) with no statistically significant difference in survival. An age cutpoint of 70+ years showed no difference in TTF, a lower trend of early cessation due to cancer progression, and somewhat shorter older patient survival. Conclusions: TTF was comparable between older and younger patients; but different, age‐based, and potentially modifiable reasons account for it.

Maintenance Sunitinib following Initial Platinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced-Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study—CALGB 30607 (Alliance)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of maintenance sunitinib after first‐line chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Methods: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 30607 trial was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III study that enrolled patients without progression after four cycles of first‐line platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was allowed only during the four cycles of chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive sunitinib, 37.5 mg/d, or placebo and were treated until unacceptable adverse event(s), progression, or death. The primary end point was progression‐free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 210 patients were enrolled, randomized, and included in the intent‐to‐treat analysis. Ten patients did not receive maintenance therapy (four who received placebo and six who received sunitinib). Grade 3/4 adverse events affecting more than 5% of the patients were fatigue (25%), thrombocytopenia (12%), hypertension (12%), rash (11%), mucositis (11%), neutropenia (7%), and anemia (6%) for sunitinib and none for placebo. There were three grade 5 events in patients receiving sunitinib (one pulmonary hemorrhage, one other pulmonary event, and one death not associated with a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events term) and two grade 5 events in patients receiving placebo (one other pulmonary event and one thromboembolism). Median PFS was 4.3 months for sunitinib and 2.6 months for placebo (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.82, p = 0.0006). Median overall survival was 11.7 months for sunitinib versus 12.1 months for placebo (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73–1.31, p = 0.89). Conclusions: Maintenance sunitinib was safe and improved PFS as maintenance therapy in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC but had no impact on overall survival. There is no room for future investigations of sunitinib in this setting.