Joshua A. Hilton

International perspectives on emergency department crowding.

The maturation of emergency medicine (EM) as a specialty has coincided with dramatic increases in emergency department (ED) visit rates, both in the United States and around the world. ED crowding has become a public health problem where periodic supply and demand mismatches in ED and hospital resources cause long waiting times and delays in critical treatments. ED crowding has been associated with several negative clinical outcomes, including higher complication rates and mortality. This article describes emergency care systems and the extent of crowding across 15 countries outside of the United States: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Italy, The Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Catalonia (Spain), Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The authors are local emergency care leaders with knowledge of emergency care in their particular countries. Where available, data are provided about visit patterns in each country; however, for many of these countries, no national data are available on ED visits rates or crowding. For most of the countries included, there is both objective evidence of increases in ED visit rates and ED crowding and also subjective assessments of trends toward higher crowding in the ED. ED crowding appears to be worsening in many countries despite the presence of universal health coverage. Scandinavian countries with robust systems to manage acute care outside the ED do not report crowding is a major problem. The main cause for crowding identified by many authors is the boarding of admitted patients, similar to the United States. Many hospitals in these countries have implemented operational interventions to mitigate crowding in the ED, and some countries have imposed strict limits on ED length of stay (LOS), while others have no clear plan to mitigate crowding. An understanding of the causes and potential solutions implemented in these countries can provide a lens into how to mitigate ED crowding in the United States through health policy interventions and hospital operational changes.

The Financial Consequences of Lost Demand and Reducing Boarding in Hospital Emergency Departments

STUDY OBJECTIVE Some have suggested that emergency department (ED) boarding is prevalent because it maximizes revenue as hospitals prioritize non-ED admissions, which reimburse higher than ED admissions. We explore the revenue implications to the overall hospital of reducing boarding in the ED. METHODS We quantified the revenue effect of reducing boarding-the balance of higher ED demand and the reduction of non-ED admissions-using financial modeling informed by regression analysis and discrete-event simulation with data from 1 inner-city teaching hospital during 2 years (118,000 ED visits, 22% ED admission rate, 7% left without being seen rate, 36,000 non-ED admissions). Various inpatient bed management policies for reducing non-ED admissions were tested. RESULTS Non-ED admissions generated more revenue than ED admissions (

The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Length of Stay and Medication Treatment Times in Discharged Patients With Acute Asthma

4,118 versus

Emergency department throughput, crowding, and financial outcomes for hospitals.

2,268 per inpatient day). A 1-hour reduction in ED boarding time would result in

Critical pathways for post-emergency outpatient diagnosis and treatment: tools to improve the value of emergency care.

9,693 to

Provider variation in fast track treatment time.

13,298 of additional daily revenue from capturing left without being seen and diverted ambulance patients. To accommodate this demand, we found that simulated management policies in which non-ED admissions are reduced without consideration to hospital capacity (ie, static policies) mostly did not result in higher revenue. Many dynamic policies requiring cancellation of various proportions of non-ED admissions when the hospital reaches specific trigger points increased revenue. The optimal strategies tested resulted in an estimated

Postdischarge Adverse Events for 1-Day Hospital Admissions in Older Adults Admitted From the Emergency Department

2.7 million and

Making Greater Use Of Dedicated Hospital Observation Units For Many Short-Stay Patients Could Save

3.6 in net revenue per year, depending on whether left without being seen patients were assumed to be outpatients or mirrored ambulatory admission rates, respectively. CONCLUSION Dynamic inpatient bed management in inner-city teaching hospitals in which non-ED admissions are occasionally reduced to ensure that EDs have reduced boarding times is a financially attractive strategy.

3.1 Billion A Year

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine if emergency department (ED) crowding was associated with longer ED length of stay (LOS) and time to ordering medications (nebulizers and steroids) in patients treated and discharged with acute asthma and to study how delays in ordering may affect the relationship between ED crowding and ED LOS. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult ED patients aged 18 years and older with a primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), diagnosis of asthma who were treated and discharged from two EDs from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2009. Four validated measures of ED crowding (ED occupancy, waiting patients, admitted patients, and patient-hours) were assigned at the time of triage. The associations between the level of ED crowding and overall LOS and time to treatment orders were tested by analyzing trends across crowding quartiles, testing differences between the highest and lowest quartiles using Hodges-Lehmann distances, and using relative risk (RR) regression for multivariable analysis. RESULTS A total of 1,716 patients were discharged with asthma over the study period (932 at the academic site and 734 at the community site). LOS was longer at the academic site than the community site for asthma patients by 90 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79 to 101 minutes). All four measures of ED crowding were associated with longer LOS and time to treatment order at both sites (p < 0.001). At the highest level of ED occupancy, patients spent 75 minutes (95% CI = 58 to 93 minutes) longer in the ED compared to the lowest quartile of ED occupancy. In addition, comparing the highest and lowest quartiles of ED occupancy, time to nebulizer order was 6 minutes longer (95% CI = 1 to 13 minutes), and time to steroid order was 16 minutes longer (95% CI = 0 to 38 minutes). In the multivariable analysis, the association between ED crowding and LOS remained significant. Delays in nebulizer and steroid orders explained some, but not all, of the relationship between ED crowding and ED LOS. CONCLUSIONS Emergency department crowding is associated with longer ED LOS (by more than 1 hour) in patients who ultimately get discharged with asthma flares. Some but not all of longer LOS during crowded times is explained by delays in ordering asthma medications.

Interventions to improve patient-centered care during times of emergency department crowding

Emergency department (ED) crowding has been identified as a major public health problem in the United States by the Institute of Medicine. ED crowding not only is associated with poorer patient outcomes, but it also contributes to lost demand for ED services when patients leave without being seen and hospitals must go on ambulance diversion. However, somewhat paradoxically, ED crowding may financially benefit hospitals. This is because ED crowding allows hospitals to maximize occupancy with well-insured, elective patients while patients wait in the ED. In this article, the authors propose a more holistic model of hospital flow and revenue that contradicts this notion and offer suggestions for improvements in ED and hospital management that may not only reduce crowding and improve quality, but also increase hospital revenues. Also proposed is that increased efficiency and quality in U.S. hospitals will require changes in systematic microeconomic and macroeconomic incentives that drive the delivery of health services in the United States. Finally, the authors address several questions to propose mutually beneficial solutions to ED crowding that include the realignment of hospital incentives, changing culture to promote flow, and several ED-based strategies to improve ED efficiency.