Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joshua Borus is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joshua Borus.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2005

Outpatient Prescribing Errors and the Impact of Computerized Prescribing

Tejal K. Gandhi; Saul N. Weingart; Andrew C. Seger; Joshua Borus; Elisabeth Burdick; Eric G. Poon; Lucian L. Leape; David W. Bates

AbstractBACKGROUND: Medication errors are common among inpatients and many are preventable with computerized prescribing. Relatively little is known about outpatient prescribing errors or the impact of computerized prescribing in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates, types, and severity of outpatient prescribing errors and understand the potential impact of computerized prescribing. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study in 4 adult primary care practices in Boston using prescription review, patient survey, and chart review to identify medication errors, potential adverse drug events (ADEs) and preventable ADEs. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients over age 18 who received a prescription from 24 participating physicians. RESULTS: We screened 1879 prescriptions from 1202 patients, and completed 661 surveys (response rate 55%). Of the prescriptions, 143 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4% to 8.8%) contained a prescribing error. Three errors led to preventable ADEs and 62 (43%; 3% of all prescriptions) had potential for patient injury (potential ADEs); I was potentially life-threatening (2%) and 15 were serious (24%). Errors in frequency (n=77, 54%) and dose (n=26, 18%) were common. The rates of medication errors and potential ADEs were not significantly different at basic computerized prescribing sites (4.3% vs 11.0%, P=.31; 2.6% vs 4.0%, P=.16) compared to handwritten sites. Advanced checks (including dose and frequency checking) could have prevented 95% of potential ADEs. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing errors occurred in 7.6% of outpatient prescriptions and many could have harmed patients. Basic computerized prescribing systems may not be adequate to reduce errors. More advanced systems with dose and frequency checking are likely needed to prevent potentially harmful errors.


Journal of Adolescent Health | 2013

Momentary assessment of social context and glucose monitoring adherence in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes

Joshua Borus; Emily A. Blood; Lisa K. Volkening; Lori Laffel; Lydia A. Shrier

PURPOSE To investigate the associations between momentary social context and glucose monitoring adherence in adolescents with type 1diabetes (T1D). METHODS For 14 days, patients (14-18 years old, T1D duration >1 year) of a pediatric diabetes clinic carried handheld computers that prompted them to report their location, companionship, and attitudes toward companions at the times they usually checked their glucose, and again 30 minutes later to report whether they checked their glucose and, if not, why. Associations between social context factors and checking glucose (adherence) were analyzed using logistic generalized estimating equations and adjusted for age, sex, duration of T1D, and pump use. RESULTS Thirty-six participants (mean age 16.6 ± 1.5 years, mean duration of T1D 8.7 ± 4.4 years) completed 971 context and 1,210 adherence reports, resulting in 805 paired reports. Median signal response rate was 63%. The odds of checking glucose was higher when participants expressed very strong desire to blend in (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07-4.94, p = .03). Strong desire to impress others was associated with decreased likelihood of checking glucose (AOR = .52, 95% confidence interval .28-.97, p = .04.) Location, solitude, type of companion, and attitudes toward companions were not significantly associated with checking glucose. CONCLUSIONS Desire to blend in may support glucose monitoring adherence and desire to impress others may impede this behavior in adolescents with T1D. Other dimensions of social context were not linked to checking glucose in this study.


Hospital pediatrics | 2016

Fractures Among Inpatients in a Pediatric Hospital

Lisa Swartz Topor; Joshua Borus; Sarah Aspinwall; Courtney L. Gilbert; Catherine M. Gordon; Susanna Y. Huh

OBJECTIVE Fractures occurring in hospitalized children may be an underrecognized preventable harm with implications for current and future bone health, but few data exist regarding the clinical characteristics of these pediatric patients. We describe the clinical characteristics of patients who sustained fractures during hospitalization over a 4.5-year period at a single tertiary care center. METHODS We retrospectively identified subjects who experienced inpatient fractures using a voluntary safety event reporting system and computer-assisted keyword search of the electronic medical record. We used the medical record to collect clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and survival status. RESULTS The safety event reporting system and keyword search identified 57% and 43% of subjects, respectively. Fifty-six subjects sustained 128 fractures while hospitalized, most frequently at the femur (33 fractures) and humerus (30 fractures). Twenty-seven subjects sustained multiple fractures. Common clinical characteristics included age ≤1 year (64%); preterm birth (53%); admission to an ICU (90%); immobilization (88%); and weight-for-age z score less than or equal to -2.0 (52%). Sixteen (29%) subjects died, and the mortality rate varied by primary diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Critically ill, immobilized infants under 1 year of age and who were often born preterm sustained the majority of fractures occurring during hospitalization. A voluntary reporting system was insufficient to identify all inpatient fractures. Future studies should explore optimal fracture screening strategies and the relationship among fractures, severity of illness and mortality in hospitalized children.


Current Opinion in Pediatrics | 2017

Teenage pregnancy prevention: the role of young men

Gabriela Vargas; Joshua Borus; Brittany M. Charlton

Purpose of review Although teenage pregnancy is declining in many parts of the world, it remains associated with considerable social, health, and economic outcomes. Pregnancy prevention efforts focus primarily on young women, with minimal attention to young men. This review highlights recent literature pertaining to the role of young men in pregnancy prevention. Recent findings Young men have varying views on contraception as well as which partner(s) should be responsible for its use. Limited contraception knowledge reduces young mens sexual health communication as well as their contraception use. Healthcare providers play a major role as one of the main sources of sexual health information for young men, but there are gaps in young mens sexual health care so new guidelines have emerged. Summary Recent literature highlights young mens range of views on contraception as well as their low sexual health knowledge and sexual health communication. To address teenage pregnancy and improve young mens overall wellness, healthcare providers should routinely address sexual health. Healthcare providers may use our newly proposed acronym, HIS BESTT, (Hello. Initiate. Sexual health assessment. Both condoms and female dependent methods. Examine genitals. STI screening. Talking to partner(s). Talking to parent(s) or guardians), to incorporate current clinical recommendations.


Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America | 2016

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment

Joshua Borus; Iman Parhami; Sharon Levy

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment is a quick, effective technique with which to manage substance use in adolescents and young adults. Use of a validated measure for detecting substance use and abuse is significantly more effective than unvalidated tools or provider intuition. There are a variety of validated tools available to use in the adolescent/young adult population, and there are opportunities to increase the efficiency and scalability of screening by using computerized questionnaires. This area continues to evolve rapidly.


The Clinical Teacher | 2018

Acceptability of peer clinical observation by faculty members

Joshua Borus; Sarah Pitts; Holly C. Gooding

Most doctors are not observed in the actual practice of medicine after they complete training. Direct observation and feedback are seen as invaluable in learning in most other professions, at formative stages of medical training and in other aspects of academic medicine, yet are not performed at the level of the independently practicing clinician. Creating an opportunity for faculty member development based on observation of clinical practice is needed for continued growth and competence as a clinician.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2003

Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care

Tejal K. Gandhi; Saul N. Weingart; Joshua Borus; Andrew C. Seger; Josh F. Peterson; Elisabeth Burdick; Diane L. Seger; Kirstin Shu; Frank Federico; Lucian L. Leape; David W. Bates


Current Opinion in Pediatrics | 2010

Adherence challenges in the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents: prevention and intervention

Joshua Borus; Lori Laffel


JAMA Internal Medicine | 2005

Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care.

Saul N. Weingart; Tejal K. Gandhi; Andrew C. Seger; Diane L. Seger; Joshua Borus; Elisabeth Burdick; Lucian L. Leape; David W. Bates


American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy | 2004

Understanding of drug indications by ambulatory care patients

Stephen D. Persell; Heather L. Heiman; Saul N. Weingart; Elisabeth Burdick; Joshua Borus; Harvey J. Murff; David W. Bates; Tejal K. Gandhi

Collaboration


Dive into the Joshua Borus's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Bates

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elisabeth Burdick

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew C. Seger

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Holly C. Gooding

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge