Joshua de Leeuw
Indiana University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joshua de Leeuw.
Behavior Research Methods | 2015
Joshua de Leeuw
Online experiments are growing in popularity, and the increasing sophistication of Web technology has made it possible to run complex behavioral experiments online using only a Web browser. Unlike with offline laboratory experiments, however, few tools exist to aid in the development of browser-based experiments. This makes the process of creating an experiment slow and challenging, particularly for researchers who lack a Web development background. This article introduces jsPsych, a JavaScript library for the development of Web-based experiments. jsPsych formalizes a way of describing experiments that is much simpler than writing the entire experiment from scratch. jsPsych then executes these descriptions automatically, handling the flow from one task to another. The jsPsych library is open-source and designed to be expanded by the research community. The project is available online at www.jspsych.org .
PLOS ONE | 2016
Paulo F. Carvalho; David W. Braithwaite; Joshua de Leeuw; Benjamin A. Motz; Robert L. Goldstone
Study sequence can have a profound influence on learning. In this study we investigated how students decide to sequence their study in a naturalistic context and whether their choices result in improved learning. In the study reported here, 2061 undergraduate students enrolled in an Introductory Psychology course completed an online homework tutorial on measures of central tendency, a topic relevant to an exam that counted towards their grades. One group of students was enabled to choose their own study sequence during the tutorial (Self-Regulated group), while the other group of students studied the same materials in sequences chosen by other students (Yoked group). Students who chose their sequence of study showed a clear tendency to block their study by concept, and this tendency was positively associated with subsequent exam performance. In the Yoked group, study sequence had no effect on exam performance. These results suggest that despite findings that blocked study is maladaptive when assigned by an experimenter, it may actually be adaptive when chosen by the learner in a naturalistic context.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Benjamin A. Motz; Joshua de Leeuw; Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho; Kaley L. Liang; Robert L. Goldstone
Despite widespread assertions that enthusiasm is an important quality of effective teaching, empirical research on the effect of enthusiasm on learning and memory is mixed and largely inconclusive. To help resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a carefully-controlled laboratory experiment, investigating whether enthusiastic instructions for a memory task would improve recall accuracy. Scripted videos, either enthusiastic or neutral, were used to manipulate the delivery of task instructions. We also manipulated the sequence of learning items, replicating the spacing effect, a known cognitive technique for memory improvement. Although spaced study reliably improved test performance, we found no reliable effect of enthusiasm on memory performance across two experiments. We did, however, find that enthusiastic instructions caused participants to respond to more item prompts, leaving fewer test questions blank, an outcome typically associated with increased task motivation. We find no support for the popular claim that enthusiastic instruction will improve learning, although it may still improve engagement. This dissociation between motivation and learning is discussed, as well as its implications for education and future research on student learning.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences | 2016
Robert L. Goldstone; Joshua de Leeuw; David Landy
Attention is often inextricably intertwined with perception, and it is deployed not only to spatial regions, but also to sensory dimensions, learned dimensions, and learned complex configurations. Firestone & Scholls (F&S)s tactic of isolating visual perceptual processes from attention and action has the negative consequence of neglecting interactions that are critically important for allowing people to perceive their world in efficient and useful ways.
Behavior Research Methods | 2016
Joshua de Leeuw; Benjamin A. Motz
Cognition | 2015
Robert L. Goldstone; Joshua de Leeuw; David Landy
ICRA 2017 Workshop on Reproducible Research in Robotics: Current Status and Road Ahead | 2017
Florian Lier; Phillip Lücking; Joshua de Leeuw; Sven Wachsmuth; Selma Šabanović; Robert L. Goldstone
Collabra | 2016
Joshua de Leeuw; Janet K. Andrews; Kenneth R. Livingston; Benjamin M. Chin
Cognitive Science | 2014
Joshua de Leeuw; Jan Andrews; Kenneth R. Livingston
Archive | 2018
Jan Andrews; Joshua de Leeuw; Katherine Lawson; Thomas Possidente; Anne Shriver; Ayela Faruqui; Christina Griesmer; Eileen Doyle-Samay; Henry Molina; Hui Xin Ng
Collaboration
Dive into the Joshua de Leeuw's collaboration.
Paulo César de Faccio Carvalho
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
View shared research outputs