Joshua H. Barnett
Arizona State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joshua H. Barnett.
Computers in Education | 2010
Leanna Archambault; Joshua H. Barnett
This study examines the nature of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through the use of a factor analysis. Using a survey with 24 items designed to measure each of the areas described by the TPACK framework, and measuring the responses of 596 online teachers from across the United States, data suggest that while the framework is helpful from an organizational standpoint, it is difficult to separate out each of the domains, calling into question their existence in practice. Three major factors become evident, but rather than being comprised of pedagogy, content, and technology, the only clear domain that distinguishes itself is that of technology. This research examines the validity of the TPACK model and suggests that measuring each of these domains is complicated and convoluted, potentially due to the notion that they are not separate.
Phi Delta Kappan | 2016
Gary W. Ritter; Joshua H. Barnett
Since 2010, there has been much policy activity on teacher evaluation. Many education policy makers have embraced the idea that improved teacher evaluation can cultivate genuine improvements in the teaching force and improved student outcomes. Can genuine evaluation actually enhance the effectiveness of those evaluated? Using structured interviews with educators and policy makers in five states, the authors find that rigorous evaluations can provide a focus for professional development and that the feedback from evaluations can encourage self-reflection and meaningful conversations focused on classroom practice among educators. Moreover, the data suggest that educators are open to such evaluations when certain key conditions are met in schools.
Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education | 2011
Joshua H. Barnett; Roger Opneshaw
Policymakers across the globe are actively seeking reforms that lead to improved student performance. One reform gaining momentum is the usage of merit pay for educators who are able to increase performance on standardized measures. However, educators’ voices are often missing from the discussion, as policies are put onto them rather than determined with them. The present paper examines the historical landscape in one country, infuses the growing international literature on merit pay into the conversation, and makes recommendations for those considering the inclusion or creation of such pay for performance models and how educators can help shape the policies.
Techtrends | 2010
Joshua H. Barnett; Leanna Archambault
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2012
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley; Joshua H. Barnett
Teachers College Record | 2013
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley; Joshua H. Barnett; Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh
Archive | 2013
Gary W. Ritter; Joshua H. Barnett; James Guthrie
Association of Mexican American Educators Journal | 2010
Joshua H. Barnett; Nathan C. Jensen; Gary W. Ritter
Action in teacher education | 2010
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley; Joshua H. Barnett
Phi Delta Kappan | 2016
Gary W. Ritter; Joshua H. Barnett