Joy L. Hambrook

Liposomally-encapsulated ricin toxoid vaccine delivered intratracheally elicits a good immune response and protects against a lethal pulmonary dose of ricin toxin

A small study was performed to examine whether the instillation of ricin toxoid vaccine into the lungs of Porton rats offered protection from lethal effects of subsequent intratracheal challenge with ricin toxin. Further the immune response to liposomally-encapsulated vaccine and the protection offered was compared with vaccine either adsorbed to Alhydrogel adjuvant or as a simple aqueous solution. The formaldehyde-treated ricin toxin vaccine (RTV) was administered at two dose levels, 500 and 100 micrograms kg-1 body weight to groups of rats, on two occasions by intratracheal instillation. Liposomally-encapsulated vaccine (LRTV) produced a higher titre of ricin-specific antibodies than Alhydrogel-vaccine (ARTV) and vaccine solution. When challenged with 3 LD50 of ricin by intratracheal instillation 7 weeks after the second vaccine instillation, all rats in both LRTV dose groups survived with minimal signs of incapacitation. Analysis of antibody secretion by spleen cells, 14 days post challenge, showed that the IgG isotype in the LRTV group was significantly higher than that in the ARTV and RTV groups and also that the proportion of specific IgA in lung fluid was higher in the LRTV group than in the ARTV and RTV groups. The results of this study indicate that effective vaccinations against inhaled ricin could be achieved with liposomally-encapsulated ricin toxoid, via the lung and should be investigated further.

Local and systemic responses against ricin toxin promoted by toxoid or peptide vaccines alone or in liposomal formulations.

The objective of this study was to develop a vaccine which would ultimately protect man from the lethal effects of inhaled ricin toxin. Porton rats have previously been protected from lethal quantities of inhaled ricin by subcutaneous (s.c.) ricin toxoid vaccine, but not without lung damage. This situation might be improved by an alternative vaccine such as the A chain of ricin, already known to protect against inhaled ricin. Another option would be to improve respiratory tract immunity by local vaccination in conjunction with liposomal formulation with a view to enhancing lung secretion of immune IgA. While boosted s.c. doses of ricin toxoid or A chain produced indistinguishable systemic immune responses 3 weeks later, when delivered by the intratracheal (i.t.) route, the A chain failed to elicit a specific immune response, unlike ricin toxoid. This situation was overcome by liposomal formulations and although ricin toxoid was readily encapsulated in liposomes, A chain was not. However, by simply mixing A chain and liposomes in the same weight ratio determined for liposomal toxoid, systemic immune responses for each formulation were indistinguishable 1 week after boosting. Ricin antibody responses in lung fluid monitored 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after i.t. challenge with ricin were statistically indistinguishable, but the group vaccinated with liposomal toxoid secreted 28.7% IgA compared with 0.9-14.9% for the A chain liposomal group. From this, it might be anticipated that the lungs would be better protected by liposomally-encapsulated ricin toxoid than by the A chain-liposome mixture.

Diisopropylglutathione ester protects A549 cells from the cytotoxic effects of sulphur mustard

The A549 cell line was used to assess the ability of diisopropylglutathione (DIPE) to protect against a 100 mM challenge dose of sulphur mustard (HD) using gentian violet (GV), thiazolyl blue (MTT) and neutral red (NR) assays as indicators of cell culture viability. As part of a continuing study of the efficacy of protective nucleophiles as candidate treatments for HD poisoning, several different combinations of protectant and HD were used to determine the optimal means of protecting A549 cells from the effects of HD. It was found that DIPE (4 mM) could protect cells against the effects of HD though for optimal effect, DIPE had to be present at the time of HD challenge. Cultures protected with DIPE were up to 2.9- fold more viable than HD exposed cells 48 h after HD challenge when using the GV, MTT and NR assays to assess viability. Observations by phase contrast microscopy of GV stained cultures confirmed these findings. Pretreating A549 cultures with DIPE for 1 h followed by its removal prior to HD challenge did maintain cell viability, though at a relatively low level (only up to 1.4- fold more viable than HD only exposed cells). DIPE was also able to protect HD exposed A549 cultures when added to cell cultures at intervals of up to 12 to 15 min after the initial HD exposure, though viability tended to decrease over this period, so that at 1 h, addition of DIPE did not maintain the viability of the cultures. This is the first such report of the anti-HD protectant properties of DIPE in A549 cells. It is concluded that the protection observed against HD is probably largely due to extracellular inactivation of HD by DIPE.

Protection of A549 cells against the toxic effects of sulphur mustard by hexamethylenetetramine

The A549 cell line was used as a model of the deep lung to study the toxicity and mechanism of action of sulphur mustard (HD), using the neutral red (NR) dye retention and gentian violet (GV) assays as indices of cell viability. It was found that exposure to concentrations in excess of 40 μM HD resulted in a rapid onset of toxicity. Exposure to 1000 μM HD reduced viability in A549 cell cultures to 61% after 2 h (control cultures=100%), whereas exposure to 40 μM HD did not result in deleterious effects until 26 h at which point viability fell to only 84% (NR assay). Agarose gel electrophoresis of cell cultures exposed to 40 and 1000 μM HD and harvested at 4.5, 19 and 43 h after exposure to HD, indicated that cell death was due to necrosis, despite the observation that at the higher concentration of HD cells displayed many of the features common to cells undergoing apoptotic death. The ability of hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) to protect A549 cells against the effects of an LC50 challenge dose of HD was assessed using the GV and NR assays. It was found that HMT (15 mM) could protect cells against the effects of HD though HMT had to be present at the time of HD challenge. Cultures treated with HD only were 49% viable at 48 h after HD challenge, compared to 101% for protected cultures (NR assay) and 58% and 91% for unprotected and protected cultures respectively using the GV assay. Morphological observations of GV and NR stained cultures confirmed these findings. HMT concen trations of 2.5 to 25 mM were used. Maximal protection against the toxic effects of HD (LC50) was found at 10 to 25 mM HMT. Over this concentration range, HMT did not exert any toxic effects on A549 cells. Pretreatment of A549 cultures with HMT followed by its removal prior to HD challenge had no protective effect. Similarly, treating cultures with HD followed by addition of HMT did not increase the viability of the cultures, even if the HMT was added immediately after HD exposure. HMT was found to protect against the toxic effects ofHD, though it must be present at the time ofHD challenge. A549 cells were found to be a valuable experimental model for studying the toxicology of HD and other lung damaging agents, and for screening other compounds for potential therapeutic efficacy as a prelude to studies with non- transformed cell culture systems and in vivo models.

An in vitro comparison of the cytotoxicity of sulphur mustard in melanoma and keratinocyte cell lines

In vivo, the pigment producing melanocytes are the most susceptible cell type to sulphur mustard (HD) in the epidermal region of pig skin. It has been postulated that this is due to the melanogenic pathway producing a cytotoxic, free radical cascade within the melanocyte following HD poisoning, leading to cellular necrosis and subsequent inflammation. To test this hypothesis, the cytotoxicity of HD was tested in three human melanoma cell lines and compared to SVK-14 human keratinocytes, a cell line in which the response to HD has already been characterised. The results of both neutral red (NR) and gentian violet (GV) assays showed that all three melanoma cell lines, particularly the G361 line, were less susceptible to the toxic effects of HD than the SVK-14 keratinocyte cell line. Preliminary data indicate that the expression level of the DNA repair cofactor, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), is up to 13-fold greater in the HD-resistant cell line G361 compared to the HD-sensitive SVK-14 cell line. The data point to the importance of DNA lesions in HD-induced cell death and to potential mechanisms associated with increased resistance to HD. A dose–response study was carried out to confirm the differences between these two cell lines. It was found that the G361 line is 5-fold more resistant to HD and 5.5-fold more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of H2O2 than the SVK-14 line, as determined by the MTT assay. The results suggest that differences in the relative efficiency of DNA repair processes may underlie these responses. Whilst the study indicates the limitations of using melanoma cell lines (in vitro) to model melanocyte responses to HD, analysis of the biochemical basis of the observed differences in sensitivity to HD could assist in the identification of novel therapeutic strategies against HD.