Jp Seale

An evaluation of pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma

It is 15 yr since Jones et al.’ first described the effects of isoproterenol on the postexercise increase in airway resistance in patients with asthma. Studies of the incidence, severity, and reproducibility of exercise-induced asthma (EIA) have established that in 70% to 75% of patients with clinically recognized asthma, the postexercise fall in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or forced expiratory volume in 1 set (FEV,) exceeds 10% of the preexercise value.2. I’ Changes in lung mechanics and blood gas tensions seen during EIA are similar to those observed in patients with asthma provoked by other stimuli.“. Irk II Consequently EIA has been used as a model for the investigation of drugs used in treatment of asthmatics. During the past 10 yr many studies have been carried out to determine the effect of a wide variety of pharmacologic agents on EIA. The drug groups studied include

Inhibition of mast cell PGD2 release protects against mannitol-induced airway narrowing

Mannitol inhalation increases urinary excretion of 9α,11β-prostaglandin F2 (a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 and marker of mast cell activation) and leukotriene E4. The present study tested the hypothesis that β2-adrenoreceptor agonists and disodium cromoglycate (SCG) protect against mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction by inhibition of mast cell mediator release. Fourteen asthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol (mean dose 252±213 mg) in order to induce a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of ≥25%. The same dose was given 15 min after inhalation of formoterol fumarate (24 µg), SCG (40 mg) or placebo. Pre- and post-challenge urine samples were analysed by enzyme immunoassay for 9α,11β-prostaglandin F2 and leukotriene E4. The maximum fall in FEV1 of 32±10% on placebo was reduced by 95% following formoterol and 63% following SCG. Following placebo, there was an increase in median urinary 9α,11β-prostaglandin F2 concentration from 61 to 92 ng·mmol creatinine−1, but no significant increase in 9α,11β-prostaglandin F2 concentration in the presence of either formoterol (69 versus 67 ng·mmol creatinine−1) or SCG (66 versus 60 ng·mmol creatinine−1). The increase in urinary leukotriene E4 following placebo (from 19 to 31 ng·mmol creatinine−1) was unaffected by the drugs. These results support the hypothesis that the drug effect on airway response to mannitol is due to inhibition of mast cell prostaglandin D2 release.

Arterial plasma histamine levels at rest, and during and after exercise in patients with asthma: effects of terbutaline aerosol.

Eight asthmatic patients and two normal subjects performed two identical exercise tests 140 minutes apart (first test preceded by inhalation of saline and the second by terbutaline sulphate). A ninth asthmatic patient exercised twice after placebo 40 minutes apart. Arterial plasma levels of histamine and cyclic AMP, expiratory flow rates and volumes were measured at rest and during and after exercise. After the first test the mean +/- SEM fall in PEFR was 45.2 +/- 2.6%. In five asthmatics there was an increase in plasma histamine (mean +/- SEM 14.8 +/- 3.3 pmol ml-1) coinciding with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Histamine levels returned to pre-exercise values within 30 minutes. After terbutaline these five patients had histamine levels greater than those observed before, during, or after the first test. This effect may have been the result of changes in pulmonary microcirculation. After the second test the levels decreased indicating no further release of histamine in response to exercise. No EIA occurred in these patients after terbutaline. The other patients and the two normal subjects had little or no change in histamine throughout the study. The one patient in whom exercise was repeated after placebo demonstrated less histamine release and less EIA after the second test.

The effect of inhaled frusemide on airway sensitivity to inhaled 4.5% sodium chloride aerosol in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Frusemide inhaled by asthmatic subjects before a variety of indirect bronchial challenges inhibits the airway response to these challenges. Since inhalation of hyperosmolar saline is an indirect bronchial challenge, the effect of inhaled frusemide and its vehicle on airway sensitivity to a 4.5% sodium chloride (NaCl) aerosol challenge was investigated. METHODS: Eleven asthmatic subjects (five females, six males) who had a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second after 4.5% NaCl challenge were enrolled in this double blind controlled crossover trial. Sensitivity was measured as the dose of aerosol required to provoke a 20% fall in FEV1. Frusemide (33.2 mg) or its vehicle was delivered through a Fisoneb ultrasonic nebuliser and inhaled 10 minutes before challenge with 4.5% NaCl. A Mistogen ultrasonic nebuliser was used to generate the 4.5% NaCl aerosol and FEV1 was measured before and one minute after each challenge period of 0.5, one, two, four, eight, eight and eight minutes. The doubling dose difference for PD20 was calculated. RESULTS: Frusemide or vehicle had no effect on baseline lung function. The geometric mean PD20 after vehicle was 1.3 ml with a 95% confidence interval of 0.7-2.3 and after frusemide was 8.2 ml with a 95% confidence interval of 4.7-14.1. This represented a 2.6 doubling dose increase in PD20 after frusemide inhalation. In five of the 11 subjects an increase from baseline FEV1 occurred after exposure to 4.5% NaCl challenge in the presence of frusemide. This transient bronchodilatation may be caused by the release of prostaglandin E2. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of frusemide is very effective in delaying airway narrowing induced by an aerosol of 4.5% NaCl in asthmatic subjects.

Mucociliary clearance during and after isocapnic hyperventilation with dry air in the presence of frusemide

We have previously shown that mucociliary clearance (MCC) decreased during and increased after isocapnic hyperventilation (ISH) with dry air, both in asthmatic and healthy subjects. Inhaled frusemide, an inhibitor of the Na+/K+/2Cl- and NaCl co-transporters on the basolateral membrane of the epithelial cell, prevents the airway narrowing provoked by ISH with dry air. The co-transport system controls epithelial cell volume and chloride secretion and, thus, frusemide has the potential to modify the rate of recovery of periciliary fluid volume during and after ISH with dry air, and hence affect MCC. Frusemide also blocks mediator release from mast cells, which may also modify the increase in MCC after ISH. Eleven asthmatic and 11 healthy subjects inhaled frusemide (35.7 +/- 0.44 mg) or its vehicle, from a Fisoneb ultrasonic nebulizer 30 min before ISH with dry air, on two separate occasions. MCC was measured using 99mTc-sulphur colloid and a gamma camera. Frusemide, compared to its vehicle, did not affect MCC during or 45 min after ISH. However, in the presence of frusemide, the onset of the increase of MCC after ISH was significantly delayed for approximately 10 min in the whole right lung (p < 0.002) and central region (p < 0.01) in the asthmatic but not in the healthy subjects. These findings could be explained by frusemide delaying the recovery of the periciliary fluid volume after ISH with dry air and/or interfering with the stimulus that causes the increase in MCC in the asthmatic subjects after ISH.

Effect of inhaled frusemide and oral indomethacin on the airway response to hypertonic saline challenge in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: Inhaled frusemide inhibits airway narrowing and causes a transient increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) during hypertonic saline challenge. This inhibitory effect could be secondary to prostaglandin release during challenge. The involvement of prostaglandins in the inhibitory action of frusemide during challenge with 4.5% NaCl was investigated by premedicating with indomethacin, a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor. METHODS: Fourteen asthmatic subjects (eight women) aged 26.6 (range 18-56) years participated in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. The subjects attended five times and inhaled 4.5% NaCl for 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 8, and 8 minutes, or part thereof, or until a provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 FEV1) was recorded. Indomethacin (100 mg/day) or placebo were taken three days before all visits, except control day. The FEV1 was measured and frusemide (38.0 (6.4) mg, pH = 9) or vehicle (0.9% NaCl, pH = 9) were inhaled 10 minutes before the challenge. Bronchodilation was calculated as the percentage rise in FEV1 from the prechallenge FEV1 to the highest FEV1 recorded during the challenge. RESULTS: Frusemide caused a fold increase in PD20 FEV1 compared with the vehicle which was similar in the presence of both indomethacin and placebo (3.7 (95% CI 2.0 to 7.3) versus 3.3 (2.0 to 5.4)). Frusemide, but not vehicle, also caused a transient percentage rise in FEV1 during challenge with 4.5% NaCl which was not blocked by indomethacin (3.6% (1.2 to 6.0)) or placebo (3.1% (1.0 to 5.2)). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled frusemide inhibited airway narrowing and caused a transient increase in FEV1 during challenge with 4.5% NaCl. These effects were not blocked by indomethacin, which suggests that the inhibitory action of frusemide is not secondary to prostaglandin release.

Effects of terbutaline in combination with mannitol on mucociliary clearance

β2-agonists and osmotic agents stimulate mucociliary clearance (MCC) via different mechanisms which could potentially interact. The effects of inhaling terbutaline in combination with mannitol on MCC were investigated in nine healthy (aged 19±1 yrs) and 11 mild (aged 21±4 yrs) asthmatic subjects. Using 99mTc-sulphur colloid radioaerosol and a gamma camera, MCC was studied on four separate days with each of the following interventions: 1) terbutaline or its placebo inhaled 10 min before mannitol (in random, double blind); 2) terbutaline inhaled 5 min after mannitol; and 3) terbutaline inhaled 10 min before the control for mannitol. Lung images were collected over a period of 120 min postintervention and over 150 min in total. The mannitol-induced increase in clearance was transiently inhibited by terbutaline pretreatment and transiently enhanced when terbutaline was administered after mannitol both in asthmatic and healthy subjects. The order of administration of mannitol and terbutaline did not affect the total clearance of radioactive mucus over 140 min from the start of intervention in both groups. The pathways through which terbutaline and mannitol increase mucociliary clearance may transiently interact in an inhibitory or synergistic way, depending on the order of administration. However, this did not affect the overall increase in mucociliary clearance over 140 min.