Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jua Choi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jua Choi.


Transplantation | 2014

A Phase I/II Placebo-Controlled Trial of C1-Inhibitor for Prevention of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in HLA Sensitized Patients

Ashley Vo; Adriana Zeevi; Jua Choi; Kristen Cisneros; Mieko Toyoda; Joseph Kahwaji; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Dechu Puliyanda; Nancy L. Reinsmoen; Mark Haas; Stanley C. Jordan

Background Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a severe form of rejection, mediated primarily by antibody-dependent complement (C) activation. C1 inhibitor (C1-INH, Berinert) inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of C activation. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study using C1-INH in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients for prevention of AMR. Methods Twenty highly sensitized patients desensitized with IVIG + rituximab ± plasma exchange were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive plasma-derived human C1-INH (20 IU/kg/dose) versus placebo intraoperatively, then twice weekly for 7 doses. Renal function, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs, C3, C4, and C1-INH levels were monitored and C1q+ HLA antibodies were also blindly assessed. Results One patient in the C1-INH group versus 2 patients in the placebo group developed serious AEs, but none were related to study drug. Delayed graft function developed in 1 C1-INH subject and 4 in the placebo. The C1-INH trough levels increased with C1-INH treatment. C3 and C4 levels also increased significantly in the C1-INH group compared to placebo. No C1-INH patient developed AMR during the study. Two patients developed AMR after the study. Three placebo patients developed AMR, one during the study. C1q+ donor specific antibodies were reduced in 2 C1-INH treated patients tested, while immunoglobulin G DSA levels showed decreased binding for both groups. Conclusions The C1-INH appears safe in the posttransplant period. The C1-INH treatment may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. The C1-INH also resulted in significant elevations of C1-INH levels, C3, C4, and reduced C1q+ HLA antibodies. Taken together, the combination of antibody reduction and C1-INH may prove useful in prevention of AMR. Further controlled studies are warranted.


Transplantation | 2014

Benefits of rituximab combined with intravenous immunoglobulin for desensitization in kidney transplant recipients.

Ashley Vo; Jua Choi; Kristen Cisneros; Nancy L. Reinsmoen; Mark Haas; Shili Ge; Mieko Toyoda; Joseph Kahwaji; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Stanley C. Jordan

Background Highly HLA-sensitized (HS) patients have difficulty accessing compatible donors, especially deceased donor (DD) transplants. Desensitization protocols (DES) have evolved, but rigorous evaluation is lacking. Here, we examined the efficacy of rituximab as a DES agent in a placebo-controlled trial. Methods Candidates were randomized to IVIG+placebo versus IVIG+rituximab. End points included rates of transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and renal function. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 year and analysis of patient and graft survival and donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) were performed. Results Initially, 15 HS DDs were randomized with 13 receiving transplants. However, we discontinued study entry after five serious adverse events were observed. The study was un-blinded and attribution of patients was noted (IVIG+placebo N=7, IVIG+rituximab N=6). No significant differences were seen in DSA levels at transplant. All ABMR episodes occurred in the IVIG+placebo arm and required intense therapy (P=0.06). The two graft losses were in the placebo group. DSA rebound associated with severe ABMR was seen in three patients in the IVIG+placebo group. No rebound was seen in the IVIG+rituximab group. Renal function at 6 and 12 months showed a significant benefit for IVIG+rituximab (P=0.04). Conclusions Based on limited assessment with acknowledged limitations, both protocols appear effective in achieving levels of DSA allowable for transplantation. However, IVIG+rituximab appeared more effective in preventing DSA rebound and, more importantly, preventing ABMR and development of transplant glomerulopathy.


Transplantation | 2015

A Phase I/II Trial of the Interleukin-6 Receptor-Specific Humanized Monoclonal (Tocilizumab) + Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Difficult to Desensitize Patients.

Ashley Vo; Jua Choi; I. Kim; Sabrina Louie; Kristen Cisneros; Joseph Kahwaji; Mieko Toyoda; Shili Ge; Mark Haas; Dechu Puliyanda; Nancy L. Reinsmoen; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Stanley C. Jordan

Background Current desensitization (DES) methods are not always effective. Thus, novel, more effective approaches are desirable. Interleukin (IL)-6 is an attractive target as it promotes B-cell differentiation to plasma cells, is important for immunoglobulin production, and induces Th17 cells. Here, we undertook a phase I/II pilot study of DES using a novel drug (anti–IL-6 receptor (IL-6R),Tocilizumab [TCZ]) + intravenous Ig (IVIg) to assess safety and limited efficacy. Methods From July 2012 to November 2013, 10 patients unresponsive to DES with IVIg + Rituximab were treated with IVIg + TCZ. Patients received IVIg on days 0 and 30 at 2 g/kg and TCZ 8 mg/kg on day 15 then monthly for 6 months. If transplanted, patients received IVIg once and TCZ monthly for 6 months. Results No differences in baseline characteristics were seen in patients not transplanted versus transplanted. Two patients in each group developed serious adverse events: not transplanted- pulmonary congestion with epilepticus (likely not related) versus transplanted infective colitis with colonic perforation and Bell Palsy (both possibly related). Five of 10 patients were transplanted. Mean time to transplant from first DES was 25 ± 10.5 months but after TCZ was 8.1 ± 5.4 months. Six-month protocol biopsies showed no antibody-mediated rejection. Donor-specific antibody strength and number were reduced by TCZ treatment. Renal function at 12 months was 60 ± 25 mL/min. Conclusions Tocilizumab and IVIg appear to be safe. From this pilot trial, we are cautiously optimistic that targeting the IL-6/IL-6R pathway could offer a novel alternative for difficult to desensitize patients. Larger controlled studies are essential to prove efficacy.


Transplantation | 2015

Factors Predicting Risk for Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Highly Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitized Patients Transplanted After Desensitization

Ashley Vo; Aditi Sinha; Mark Haas; Jua Choi; James Mirocha; Joseph Kahwaji; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Stanley C. Jordan

Background Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab (I+R) significantly improves transplant rates in highly sensitized patients, but antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains a concern. Patients and Methods Between July 2006 and December 2012, 226 highly sensitized patients received transplants after desensitization. Most received alemtuzumab induction and standard immunosuppression. Two groups were examined: ABMR− (n = 181) and ABMR+ (n = 45, 20%). Risk factors for ABMR, pathology, and outcomes were assessed. Results Significant risks for ABMR included previous transplants and pregnancies as sensitizing events, donor-specific antibody (DSA) relative intensity scores greater than 17, presence of both class I and II DSAs at transplant and time on waitlist. The ABMR− showed a significant benefit for graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years (P < 0.0001). Banff pathology characteristics for ABMR+ patients with or without graft loss did not differ. C4d+ versus C4d− ABMR did not predict graft loss (P = 0.086). Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA+) significantly predicted graft failure (P = 0.045). The ABMR episodes were treated with I+R (n = 25), or, in more severe ABMR+, plasma exchange (PLEX)+I+R (n = 20). Graft survival for patients treated with I+R was superior (P = 0.028). Increased mortality was seen in ABMR+ patients experiencing graft loss after ABMR treatment (P = 0.004). The PLEX + Eculizumab improved graft survival for TMA+ patients (P = 0.036). Conclusion Patients desensitized with I+R who remain ABMR− have long-term graft and patient survival. The ABMR+ patients have significantly reduced graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years, especially TMA+. Severe ABMR+ episodes benefit from treatment with PLEX + Eculizumab. The DSA-relative intensity scores at transplant was a strong predictor of ABMR. Donor-specific antibody avoidance and reduction strategies before transplantation are critical to avoiding ABMR and improving long-term outcomes.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2017

Assessment of Tocilizumab (Anti–Interleukin‐6 Receptor Monoclonal) as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy in HLA‐Sensitized Renal Allograft Recipients

Jua Choi; Olivier Aubert; Ashley Vo; Alexandre Loupy; Mark Haas; Dechu Puliyanda; I. Kim; Sabrina Louie; Alexis Kang; Alice Peng; Joe Kahwaji; Nancy L. Reinsmoen; Mieko Toyoda; Stanley C. Jordan

Extending the functional integrity of renal allografts is the primary goal of transplant medicine. The development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) posttransplantation leads to chronic active antibody‐mediated rejection (cAMR) and transplant glomerulopathy (TG), resulting in the majority of graft losses that occur in the United States. This reduces the quality and length of life for patients and increases cost. There are no approved treatments for cAMR. Evidence suggests the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 (IL‐6) may play an important role in DSA generation and cAMR. We identified 36 renal transplant patients with cAMR plus DSAs and TG who failed standard of care treatment with IVIg plus rituximab with or without plasma exchange. Patients were offered rescue therapy with the anti–IL‐6 receptor monoclonal tocilizumab with monthly infusions and monitored for DSAs and long‐term outcomes. Tocilizumab‐treated patients demonstrated graft survival and patient survival rates of 80% and 91% at 6 years, respectively. Significant reductions in DSAs and stabilization of renal function were seen at 2 years. No significant adverse events or severe adverse events were seen. Tocilizumab provides good long‐term outcomes for patients with cAMR and TG, especially compared with historical published treatments. Inhibition of the IL‐6–IL‐6 receptor pathway may represent a novel approach to stabilize allograft function and extend patient lives.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2017

IgG Endopeptidase in Highly Sensitized Patients Undergoing Transplantation

Stanley C. Jordan; Tomas Lorant; Jua Choi; Christian Kjellman; Lena Winstedt; Mats Bengtsson; Xiaohai Zhang; Torsten Eich; Mieko Toyoda; Britt-Marie Eriksson; Shili Ge; Alice Peng; Sofia Järnum; Kathryn J. Wood; Torbjörn Lundgren; Lars Wennberg; Lars Bäckman; Erik G. Larsson; Rafael Villicana; Joe Kahwaji; Sabrina Louie; Alexis Kang; Mark Haas; Cynthia C. Nast; Ashley Vo; Gunnar Tufveson

Background Donor‐specific antibodies create an immunologic barrier to transplantation. Current therapies to modify donor‐specific antibodies are limited and ineffective in the most highly HLA‐sensitized patients. The IgG‐degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS), an endopeptidase, cleaves human IgG into F(ab′)2 and Fc fragments inhibiting complement‐dependent cytotoxicity and antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which suggests that IdeS might be useful for desensitization. We report on the combined experience of two independently performed open‐label, phase 1–2 trials (conducted in Sweden and the United States) that assessed the efficacy of IdeS with regard to desensitization and transplantation of a kidney from an HLA‐incompatible donor. Methods We administered IdeS to 25 highly HLA‐sensitized patients (11 patients in Uppsala or Stockholm, Sweden, and 14 in Los Angeles) before the transplantation of a kidney from an HLA‐incompatible donor. Frequent monitoring for adverse events, outcomes, donor‐specific antibodies, and renal function was performed, as were renal biopsies. Immunosuppression after transplantation consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids. Patients in the U.S. study also received intravenous immune globulin and rituximab after transplantation to prevent antibody rebound. Results Recipients in the U.S. study had a significantly longer cold ischemia time (the time elapsed between procurement of the organ and transplantation), a significantly higher rate of delayed graft function, and significantly higher levels of class I donor‐specific antibodies than those in the Swedish study. A total of 38 serious adverse events occurred in 15 patients (5 events were adjudicated as being possibly related to IdeS). At transplantation, total IgG and HLA antibodies were eliminated. A total of 24 of 25 patients had perfusion of allografts after transplantation. Antibody‐mediated rejection occurred in 10 patients (7 patients in the U.S. study and 3 in the Swedish study) at 2 weeks to 5 months after transplantation; all these patients had a response to treatment. One graft loss, mediated by non‐HLA IgM and IgA antibodies, occurred. Conclusions IdeS reduced or eliminated donor‐specific antibodies and permitted HLA‐ incompatible transplantation in 24 of 25 patients. (Funded by Hansa Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02224820, NCT02426684, and NCT02475551.)


British Medical Bulletin | 2015

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Stanley C. Jordan; Jua Choi; Ashley Vo

BACKGROUND Desensitization, a term loosely referring to a collection of antibody reduction and B-cell depletional therapies aimed at improving rates of transplantation in highly HLA and ABO-incompatible transplant recipients, has seen significant growth in the last decade. Advancements relate to an increasing unmet medical need for FDA-approved therapies, advancements in antibody detection methodologies and improved renal pathological assessments of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). SOURCES OF DATA, AREAS OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROVERSY Data reviewed include collective summaries of experience with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), B-cell depletion with rituximab and the use of plasma exchange with low-dose IVIG. Consensus suggests that these protocols are the most commonly used while experiences with other agents (i.e. bortezomib) are evolving. Controversy exists as to the extent of resources required, expense and outcomes of desensitization protocols. GROWING POINTS OR AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH Here we review and synthesize data from evolving protocols and summarize developments of novel biologics aimed at modification of B-cells, antibodies and complement activation which will likely improve desensitization and treatment of ABMR.


Transplantation | 2017

Interleukin-6, A Cytokine Critical to Mediation of Inflammation, Autoimmunity and Allograft Rejection: Therapeutic Implications of IL-6 Receptor Blockade

Stanley C. Jordan; Jua Choi; I. Kim; Gordon D. Wu; Mieko Toyoda; Bonga Shin; Ashley Vo

The success of kidney transplants is limited by the lack of robust improvements in long-term survival. It is now recognized that alloimmune responses are responsible for the majority of allograft failures. Development of novel therapies to decrease allosensitization is critical. The lack of new drug development in kidney transplantation necessitated repurposing drugs initially developed in oncology and autoimmunity. Among these is tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor [IL-6R]) which holds promise for modulating multiple immune pathways responsible for allograft injury and loss. Interleukin-6 is a cytokine critical to proinflammatory and immune regulatory cascades. Emerging data have identified important roles for IL-6 in innate immune responses and adaptive immunity. Excessive IL-6 production is associated with activation of T-helper 17 cell and inhibition of regulatory T cell with attendant inflammation. Plasmablast production of IL-6 is critical for initiation of T follicular helper cells and production of high-affinity IgG. Tocilizumab is the first-in-class drug developed to treat diseases mediated by IL-6. Data are emerging from animal and human studies indicating a critical role for IL-6 in mediation of cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic allograft vasculopathy. This suggests that anti-IL-6/IL-6R blockade could be effective in modifying T- and B-cell responses to allografts. Initial data from our group suggest anti-IL-6R therapy is of value in desensitization and prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, human trials have shown benefits in treatment of graft versus host disease in matched or mismatched stem cell transplants. Here, we explore the biology of IL-6/IL-6R interactions and the evidence for an important role of IL-6 in mediating allograft rejection.


Immunotherapy | 2015

Achieving incompatible transplantation through desensitization: current perspectives and future directions

Stanley C. Jordan; Jua Choi; Ashley Vo

The application of life-saving transplantation is severely limited by the shortage of organs, and histoincompatibility. To increase transplant rates in sensitized patients, new protocols for HLA and blood type incompatible (ABOi) desensitization have emerged. These approaches require significant desensitization using intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab and plasma exchange. In addition, the development of donor-specific antibody responses post transplant is the major cause of allograft failure with return to dialysis. This increases patient morbidity/mortality and cost. Immunotherapeutic agents used for desensitization evolved from drug development in oncology and autoimmune diseases. Currently, there is a renaissance in development of novel drugs likely to improve antibody reduction in transplantation. These include agents that inactivate IgG molecules, anticytokine antibodies, costimulatory molecule blockade, anticomplement agents and therapies aimed at the plasma cell.


Transplant International | 2016

Six-Year Outcomes in Broadly HLA-Sensitized Living Donor Transplant Recipients Desensitized with Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rituximab

Joseph Kahwaji; Stanley C. Jordan; Reiad Najjar; Patarapha Wongsaroj; Jua Choi; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Ashley Vo

Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. However, long‐term outcomes are lacking. Here we analyze long‐term outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients desensitized with this regimen and compare them to low‐risk recipients. Living donor kidney transplants that took place between July 2006 and December 2010 were considered retrospectively. The primary end point of the study was death‐censored allograft survival at last follow‐up. Secondary end points included patient survival, incidence of rejection, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and proteinuria. There were 66 sensitized and 111 low‐risk patients included. Average follow‐up was 68 months. There was no difference in long‐term patient or graft survival. The rate of rejection was similar in the groups with more early rejection in the sensitized group and more late rejection in the low‐risk group. There was more antibody‐mediated rejection in the sensitized group. Estimated GFR was similar during the follow‐up period. Risk factors for rejection included a positive cross‐match (HR: 2.4 CI: 1.35–4.40) and age (HR: 0.97 CI: 0.95–0.99). Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab has good long‐term results with graft outcomes similar to non‐HLA‐sensitized patients despite higher immunologic risk.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jua Choi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ashley Vo

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stanley C. Jordan

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alice Peng

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph Kahwaji

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mieko Toyoda

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rafael Villicana

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Haas

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shili Ge

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dechu Puliyanda

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. Kim

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge