Juan Carlos Prieto

Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist Vorapaxar in Acute Coronary Syndromes

BACKGROUND Vorapaxar is a new oral protease-activated-receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist that inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. METHODS In this multinational, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared vorapaxar with placebo in 12,944 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization. RESULTS Follow-up in the trial was terminated early after a safety review. After a median follow-up of 502 days (interquartile range, 349 to 667), the primary end point occurred in 1031 of 6473 patients receiving vorapaxar versus 1102 of 6471 patients receiving placebo (Kaplan-Meier 2-year rate, 18.5% vs. 19.9%; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.01; P=0.07). A composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 822 patients in the vorapaxar group versus 910 in the placebo group (14.7% and 16.4%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P=0.02). Rates of moderate and severe bleeding were 7.2% in the vorapaxar group and 5.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.58; P<0.001). Intracranial hemorrhage rates were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively (hazard ratio, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.78 to 6.45; P<0.001). Rates of nonhemorrhagic adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute coronary syndromes, the addition of vorapaxar to standard therapy did not significantly reduce the primary composite end point but significantly increased the risk of major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. (Funded by Merck; TRACER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00527943.).

The Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRA.CER) trial: study design and rationale

BACKGROUND The protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1), the main platelet receptor for thrombin, represents a novel target for treatment of arterial thrombosis, and SCH 530348 is an orally active, selective, competitive PAR-1 antagonist. We designed TRA*CER to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SCH 530348 compared with placebo in addition to standard of care in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and high-risk features. TRIAL DESIGN TRA*CER is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III trial with an original estimated sample size of 10,000 subjects. Our primary objective is to demonstrate that SCH 530348 in addition to standard of care will reduce the incidence of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, and urgent coronary revascularization compared with standard of care alone. Our key secondary objective is to determine whether SCH 530348 will reduce the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke compared with standard of care alone. Secondary objectives related to safety are the composite of moderate and severe GUSTO bleeding and clinically significant TIMI bleeding. The trial will continue until a predetermined minimum number of centrally adjudicated primary and key secondary end point events have occurred and all subjects have participated in the study for at least 1 year. The TRA*CER trial is part of the large phase III SCH 530348 development program that includes a concomitant evaluation in secondary prevention. CONCLUSION TRA*CER will define efficacy and safety of the novel platelet PAR-1 inhibitor SCH 530348 in the treatment of high-risk patients with NSTE ACS in the setting of current treatment strategies.

Synergism between paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in experimental acute pain

Abstract The antinociception induced by the intraperitoneal coadministration of combinations of paracetamol with the nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diclofenac, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, meloxicam, metamizol, naproxen, nimesulide, parecoxib and piroxicam was studied by isobolographic analysis in the acetic acid abdominal constriction test of mice (writhing test). The effective dose that produced 50% antinociception (ED50) was calculated from the log dose–response curves of fixed ratio combinations of paracetamol with each NSAID. By isobolographic analysis, this ED50 was compared to the theoretical additive ED50 calculated from the ED50 of paracetamol and of each NSAID alone obtained from ED50 dose–response curves. As shown by isobolographic analysis, all the combinations were synergistic, the experimental ED50s being significantly smaller than the theoretically calculated ED50s. The results of this study demonstrate potent interactions between paracetamol and NSAIDs and validate the clinical use of combinations of these drugs in the treatment of pain conditions.

Cardioprotection against ischaemia/reperfusion by vitamins C and E plus n-3 fatty acids: molecular mechanisms and potential clinical applications.

The role of oxidative stress in ischaemic heart disease has been thoroughly investigated in humans. Increased levels of ROS (reactive oxygen species) and RNS (reactive nitrogen species) have been demonstrated during ischaemia and post-ischaemic reperfusion in humans. Depending on their concentrations, these reactive species can act either as benevolent molecules that promote cell survival (at low-to-moderate concentrations) or can induce irreversible cellular damage and death (at high concentrations). Although high ROS levels can induce NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) activation, inflammation, apoptosis or necrosis, low-to-moderate levels can enhance the antioxidant response, via Nrf2 (nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2) activation. However, a clear definition of these concentration thresholds remains to be established. Although a number of experimental studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress plays a major role in heart ischaemia/reperfusion pathophysiology, controlled clinical trials have failed to prove the efficacy of antioxidants in acute or long-term treatments of ischaemic heart disease. Oral doses of vitamin C are not sufficient to promote ROS scavenging and only down-regulate their production via NADPH oxidase, a biological effect shared by vitamin E to abrogate oxidative stress. However, infusion of vitamin C at doses high enough to achieve plasma levels of 10 mmol/l should prevent superoxide production and the pathophysiological cascade of deleterious heart effects. In turn, n-3 PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acid) exposure leads to enhanced activity of antioxidant enzymes. In the present review, we present evidence to support the molecular basis for a novel pharmacological strategy using these antioxidant vitamins plus n-3 PUFAs for cardioprotection in clinical settings, such as post-operative atrial fibrillation, percutaneous coronary intervention following acute myocardial infarction and other events that are associated with ischaemia/reperfusion.

Synergism between NSAIDs in the orofacial formalin test in mice

Opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to relieve acute and chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of interaction between dexketoprofen and NSAID examples of COXs inhibitors using the isobolographic analysis in the formalin orofacial test in mice. The drugs, i.p., induced a dose-dependent antinociception with different potencies in both test phases. Combinations of dexketoprofen with naproxen, nimesulide, ibuprofen or paracetamol on the basis of the fixed ratio (1:1) of their ED(50)s values alone demonstrated synergism in both phases. This is important since the orofacial pain is a test not currently used in mice; the drugs are all analgesic for humans and phase II is representative of inflammatory pain. The synergism was: COX-3>COX-2>COX-1 inhibitors, this is particularly interesting since the inhibitor of COX-3, paracetamol, displayed a robust anti-inflammatory activity in an assay of acute and inflammatory pain that mimics inflammatory pain in humans. In conclusion, the synergism of the dexketoprofen/NSAID combinations may improve this type of therapeutic profile, since with low doses of the components, side effects are not likely to occur, and they may be used in long-term treatments.

Bedside markers of coronary artery patency and short-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and thrombolysis

BACKGROUND In this study we have evaluated the prognostic power of noninvasive markers of coronary artery reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with intravenous streptokinase. METHODS In 967 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated within 6 hours of symptoms, we analyzed the prognostic power of resolution of chest pain and ST-segment elevation >50% at 90 minutes, abrupt creatine kinase rise before 12 hours, and T-wave inversion in infarct-related electrocardiographic leads within the first 24 hours after thrombolysis. RESULTS Global in-hospital mortality rate was 12.0%. Each reperfusion marker was associated with improved outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 3 of the 4 markers of coronary artery reperfusion were significantly and independently associated to low in-hospital mortality rate. The presence of early T-wave inversion was associated with the lowest in-hospital mortality rate (odds ratio 0.25, confidence interval 0. 10-0.56). When all markers of coronary artery reperfusion were included in the regression model, T-wave inversion (odds ratio 0.29, confidence interval 0.11-0.68) and abrupt creatine kinase rise (odds ratio 0.36, confidence interval 0.16-0.77) continued to be significantly associated with better outcome. CONCLUSION A systemic analysis of noninvasive markers of coronary artery reperfusion can provide the clinician with an excellent tool to predict clinical outcomes when treating myocardial infarction.

Spinal synergy between nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors and morphine antinociception in mice

The antinociception induced by the intrathecal coadministration of combinations of morphine with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) naproxen, piroxicam, metamizol, diclofenac and ketoprofen was studied by isobolographic analysis in the acetic acid writhing test of mice. The effective dose that produced 50% antinociception (ED(50)) was calculated from the log dose-response curve of intrathecally administered fixed ratio combinations of morphine with each NSAID. By isobolographic analysis, this ED(50) was compared to the theoretical additive ED(50) calculated from the ED(50) of morphine and of each NSAID alone. As shown by isobolograms, all the combinations were synergistic, the experimental ED(50)s being significantly smaller than the theoretically calculated ED(50)s. The results of this study demonstrate potent interactions between morphine and NSAIDs and validate the clinical use of the combinations of opioids and NSAIDs in pain treatment, even by the intrathecal route.

Analgesic synergism between intrathecal morphine and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in mice

The analgesic effects of the intrathecal coadministration of morphine with nimesulide, meloxicam and parecoxib, preferential cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, were studied in mice using a chemical model of visceral pain, the acetic acid writhing test. Isobolographic analysis was used to characterize the interactions between mixtures of morphine with each non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Antinociception dose-response curves were analyzed to obtain the ED50s of each drug. A dose response curve for fixed ratio mixtures of morphine with COX-2 inhibitors was then performed and the observed ED50s were plotted on a two-dimensional isobologram. All the combinations tested showed synergistic interactions and the strength of the interaction was ranked as: morphine/parecoxib>morphine/meloxicam>morphine nimesulide. The results demonstrate that the intrathecal coadministration of COX-2 inhibitors significantly enhance morphine-induced antinociception and could result in an opioid sparing action which may be useful in the clinical treatment of severe pain. A sparing action means that less opioids have to be administered to obtain a given analgesic effect. Since intrathecal morphine is often used in clinical pain situations, the opioid sparing effect resulting from the synergy observed with the coadministration of COX-2 inhibitors may be clinically relevant. One of the most significant advantages should be the reduction of opioid toxicity which often acts as a major obstacle in pain treatment.

Effects of tramadol and dexketoprofen on analgesia and gastrointestinal transit in mice

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the nature of the antinociceptive interaction among dexketoprofen (DEX), a mixed inhibitor of the cyclo‐oxygenases, and tramadol (TRAM), a weak opioid with monoaminergic activity that inhibits norepinephrine and serotonin re‐uptake. We assessed antinociception in the acetic acid writhing test, the tail flick and the formalin (FT) tests, and gastrointestinal transit (GIT) after the administration of a charcoal meal. The analysis of the interaction was carried out using isobolograms and interaction indexes or the fixed‐dose method GIT. The administration of DEX or TRAM individually induced dose–dependent antinociception in all the algesiometric tests. In the three tests, TRAM was between 5.2 (FT, phase I) and 35 times (FT, Phase II) more potent than DEX. When testing combinations at different potency ratios (1 : 1, 1 : 3, 3 : 1), we could demonstrate synergy in all algesiometric tests, only when drugs were combined in a 1 : 1 proportion. Interestingly, the proportion of the drugs in the combination could change the type of interaction from synergy to antagonism. On the inhibition of GIT, a dose‐related inhibition was established for TRAM, but not for DEX. Using a fixed‐dose protocol, we could demonstrate antagonism between DEX and TRAM on the inhibition of GIT. The results of the present study suggest that a combination of DEX and TRAM in a 1 : 1 proportion could be adequate to use in future clinical trials in humans.

Effect of Carvedilol and Nebivolol on Oxidative Stress‐related Parameters and Endothelial Function in Patients with Essential Hypertension

Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction have been associated with essential hypertension (EH) mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of carvedilol and nebivolol on the oxidative stress‐related parameters and endothelial function in patients with EH. The studied population included 57 patients, either sex, between 30 and 75 years of age, with mild‐to‐moderate EH complications. Participants were randomized to receive either carvedilol (12.5 mg) (n = 23) or nebivolol (5 mg) (n = 21) for 12 weeks. Measurements included; 24‐hr ambulatory blood pressure (BP), flow‐mediated dilatation, levels of nitric oxide estimated as nitrite – a nitric oxide metabolite ( NO 2 ) – in plasma, and oxidative stress‐related parameters in plasma and erythrocyte. EH patients who were treated with nebivolol or carvedilol showed systolic BP reductions of 17.4 and 19.9 mmHg, respectively, compared with baseline values (p < 0.01). Diastolic BP was reduced by 13.7 and 12.8 mmHg after the treatment with ebivolol and carvedilol, respectively (p < 0.01) (fig. 2B). Nebivolol and carvedilol showed 7.3% and 8.1% higher endothelium‐dependent dilatation in relation to baseline values (p < 0.05). Ferric‐reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) and reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione (GSSH) ratio showed 31.5% and 29.6% higher levels in the carvedilol group compared with basal values; however, nebivolol‐treated patients did not show significant differences after treatment. On the other hand, the NO 2 plasma concentration was not modified by the administration of carvedilol. However, nebivolol enhanced these levels in 62.1% after the treatment. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the antihypertensive effect of both beta‐blockers. However, carvedilol could mediate these effects by an increase in antioxidant capacity and nebivolol through the raise in NO 2 concentration. Further studies are needed to determine the molecular mechanism of these effects.