Juan F. Ascaso

Lipoprotein ratios: Physiological significance and clinical usefulness in cardiovascular prevention.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentration has been the prime index of cardiovascular disease risk and the main target for therapy. However, several lipoprotein ratios or “atherogenic indices” have been defined in an attempt to optimize the predictive capacity of the lipid profile. In this review, we summarize their pathophysiological aspects, and highlight the rationale for using these lipoprotein ratios as cardiovascular risk factors in clinical practice, specifying their cut-off risk levels and a target for lipid-lowering therapy. Total/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and LDL/HDL cholesterol ratios are risk indicators with greater predictive value than isolated parameters used independently, particularly LDL. Future recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia, including instruments for calculating cardiovascular risk or action guidelines, should include the lipoprotein ratios with greater predictive power which, in view of the evidence-based results, are none other than those which include HDL cholesterol.

Cuantificación de insulinorresistencia con los valores de insulina basal e índice HOMA en una población no diabética

Fundamento Calcular la prevalencia y definir el sindrome de insulinorresistencia mediante la determinacion de insulinemia basal y el indice HOMA, y estudiar su relacion con otros componentes del sindrome metabolico. Sujetos y metodo Estudiamos una poblacion de 292 sujetos no diabeticos, de ambos sexos y edades entre 20 y 65 anos, seleccionados por un metodo de muestreo simple aleatorio entre los que consultaron durante un ano en un centro de salud (en el area metropolitana de Valencia), mediante un metodo de busqueda oportunista. De ellos se selecciono a un subgrupo formado por 96 sujetos que no tenian caracteristicas clinicas ni analiticas del sindrome de insulinorresistencia, y se estudiaron los lipidos plasmaticos, parametros antropometricos, glucosa e insulina plasmatica y el valor del indice HOMA. Resultados El diagnostico de insulinorresistencia se ha establecido por los cortes del percentil 90 de la subpoblacion sin parametros clinicos ni analiticos del sindrome de insulinorresistencia, considerando una insulina plasmatica basal de 16,7 mU/l o superior, o indice HOMA de 3,8 o mayor. El indice HOMA es mas sensible que la insulina plasmatica para el diagnostico de insulinorresistencia. La prevalencia de insulinorresistencia (HOMA ≥ 3,8) en la poblacion estudiada por nosotros es elevada, 31,8%, siendo mas frecuente en hombres que en mujeres. Conclusion Ademas de los valores plasmaticos de insulina e indice HOMA, los mejores indicadores clinicobioquimicos de insulinorresistencia son los valores de glucemia en ayunas, el indice de masa corporal (IMC) y los trigliceridos plasmaticos. Asi, la razon de probabilidad de tener insulinorresistencia es de 5,9, 2,6 y 2,2, respectivamente para glucemia ≥ 110 mg/dl, IMC ≥ 25 kg/m2 y trigliceridos ≥ 150 mg/dl.

Gastroesophageal reflux in diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE:Although abnormal gastroesophageal (GE) reflux is the most frequent alteration of the gastrointestinal tract, its prevalence in diabetes mellitus (DM) is not widely known. The objective of this study was to analyze both the presence of abnormal GE reflux in diabetic patients with no esophageal symptoms and the influence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CVAN) in the development of abnormal GE reflux.METHODS:Fifty insulin-dependent diabetic patients, averaging 29.2 ± 9.0 yr of age, who had had diabetes for > 5 yr and showed no symptoms or history of gastroesophageal disease, were compared with a control group composed of 36 healthy volunteers (18 men, 18 women) whose average age was 35.9 ± 10.1 yr. The cardiovascular autonomic nervous system was examined in the diabetics and control subjects who complied with inclusion criteria. Long-term (24-h) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed, as well as a manometric study of the lower esophageal sphincter.RESULTS:The parameters obtained from the monitoring showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between DM and control subjects. Abnormal GE reflux, defined as any percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 exceeding 3.5% of total time (8.7 ± 5.6%; range, 4.1–24.4%), was detected in 14 patients. Diabetic subjects were classified according to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy tests (without CVAN [n = 19, 38%] and with abnormal CVAN tests [n = 31, 62%]). The pH monitoring parameters showed significant differences between these two groups (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:A higher prevalence (28%) of abnormal GE reflux appeared among asymptomatic diabetic patients than among the general population. The presence of abnormal GE reflux in diabetic patients was associated with the existence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (abnormal GE reflux = 38.7% in diabetic patients with abnormal CVAN tests vs 10.5% in diabetic patients without CVAN).

A study of insulin resistance using the minimal model in nondiabetic familial combined hyperlipidemic patients

The presence of insulin resistance in 20 male nondiabetic patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) and 20 controls of similar age and body mass index (BMI) was investigated using the minimal model method modified by the administration of insulin and an oral glucose tolerance test. The peripheral sensitivity of insulin, expressed as the insulin sensitivity index (Si), was 1.91+/-1.05 and 2.86+/-1.19 x 10(-4) x min(-1) x mU/L in FCH patients and controls, respectively (P < .01), and the corresponding value for the peripheral utilization of glucose independently of insulin (Sg) was 1.70+/-1.13 in FCH patients and 2.35+/-0.60 x 10(-2) x min(-1) in controls (P < .02). In the FCH group, the Si value correlated significantly (P < .05) with the waist to hip ratio (WHR), plasma triglycerides (TG), free fatty acids (FFA), and the area under the curve of glucose (AUCg) and insulin (AUCi). In the control group, the correlation also reached statistical significance (P < .05) with age, BMI, WHR, blood pressure, TG, AUCg, and AUCi. Subgrouping the subjects with respect to central obesity defined as a WHR of 0.95 or greater, we observed lower Si values in obese and non-obese FCH subjects relative to controls (P < .02). The mean Si value in obese subjects was significantly lower than in non-obese FCH subgroups (1.40+/-0.79 v 2.68+/-0.95 x 10(-4) x min(-1) x mU/L, respectively, P < .01). In conclusion, a higher degree of insulin resistance relative to control values appears to be an integral part of the metabolic derangements observed in FCH, and central-trunk obesity exacerbates the insulin resistance syndrome.

Management of Dyslipidemia in the Metabolic Syndrome Recommendations of the Spanish HDL-Forum

In order to characterize the metabolic syndrome it becomes necessary to establish a number of diagnostic criteria. Because of its impact on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality, considerable attention has been focussed on the dyslipidemia accompanying the metabolic syndrome.The aim of this review is to highlight the fundamental aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the treatment of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia with recommendations to clinicians.The clinical expression of the metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). In addition, metabolic syndrome dyslipidemia is associated with high levels of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100-rich particles of a particularly atherogenic phenotype (small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C]. High levels of triglyceride-rich particles (very low-density lipoprotein) are also evident both at baseline and in overload situations (postprandial hyperlipidemia). Overall, the ‘quantitative’ dyslipidemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of HDL-C and the ‘qualitative’ dyslipidemia characterized by high levels of apo B-100- and triglyceride-rich particles, together with insulin resistance, constitute an atherogenic triad in patients with the metabolic syndrome.The therapeutic management of the metabolic syndrome, regardless of the control of the bodyweight, BP, hyperglycemia or overt diabetes mellitus, aims at maintaining optimum plasma lipid levels. Therapeutic goals are similar to those for high-risk situations because of the coexistence of multiple risk factors. The primary goal in treatment should be achieving an LDL-C level of <100 mg/dL (or <70 mg/dL in cases with established ischemic heart disease or risk equivalents). A further goal is increasing the HDL-C level to ≥40 mg/dL in men or 50 mg/dL in women. A non-HDL-C goal of 130 mg/dL should also be aimed at in cases of hypertriglyceridemia.Lifestyle interventions, such as maintaining an adequate diet, and a physical activity program, constitute an essential part of management. Nevertheless, when pharmacologic therapy becomes necessary, fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the most effective drugs in controlling the metabolic syndrome hyperlipidemia, and are thus the drugs of first choice. Fibrates are effective in lowering triglycerides and increasing HDL-C levels, the two most frequent abnormalities associated with the metabolic syndrome, and statins are effective in lowering LDL-C levels, even though hypercholesterolemia occurs less frequently. In addition, the combination of fibrates and statins is highly effective in controlling abnormalities of the lipid profile in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Significance of High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol in Cardiovascular Risk Prevention

In the approach to lipid-related risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, serum high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels bear a particular significance as this lipoprotein is considered to be an antiatherogenic factor mainly, but not only, because of its influence and impact on reverse cholesterol transport. Hence the need and requirement to consider serum HDL-C levels for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A particularly important aspect is the association of the ‘low HDL syndrome’ with the metabolic syndrome.These factors force us to consider serum HDL-C level as a therapeutic target by itself, or even in association with low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels when the latter are increased. This review stresses the aspects connecting serum HDL-C levels and cardiovascular risk, and looks at the populations that should be considered amenable to therapeutic management because of low serum HDL-C levels.We review therapeutic strategies, both pharmacological and nonpharmacological. The aim of this review is to present therapeutic management recommendations for correcting the proportion of cardiovascular risk that is attributable to changes in HDL-C. Serum HDL-C levels of >40 mg/dL must be a therapeutic target in primary and secondary prevention. This goal is particularly important in patients with low serum HDL-C levels and ischemic heart disease (IHD) or its equivalents, even if the therapeutic target for serum LDL-C levels (<100 mg/ dL) has been achieved. The first choice for this clinical condition is fibric acid derivates. The same therapeutic option should be considered in patients without IHD with low serum HDL-C levels and high cardiovascular risk (>20%), hypertriglyceridemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or metabolic syndrome.

Polymorphisms at the SRBI locus are associated with lipoprotein levels in subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Scavenger receptor, class B, type 1 (SRBI) is a promising candidate gene involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. We have examined the association of three common polymorphisms at the SRBI locus in 77 subjects who were heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The alleles represented by polymorphisms in exon 1 and exon 8 were associated with variation in plasma concentrations of fasting triglyceride (TG). Mean plasma TG concentrations for homozygotes for the most common allele, and for heterozygotes and homozygotes for the less common allele were 85 ± 6, 111 ± 9 and 135 ± 22 mg/dl (p = 0.011) for exon 1, and 96 ± 11, 86 ± 6 and 134 ± 13 mg/dl (p = 0.007) for exon 8, after adjustment for age, sex and body mass index. In addition, the exon 8 polymorphism was associated with increased total cholesterol (320 ± 15, 340 ± 8 and 388 ± 18 mg/dl, p = 0.015), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (18 ± 2.9, 15.7 ± 1.6 and 33.4 ± 3.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (251 ± 15, 270 ± 8 and 312 ± 10 mg/dl, p = 0.041) concentrations. In agreement with animal studies, our data also suggest a role for the SRBI in the metabolism of apolipoprotein B (apoB)‐containing lipoproteins in humans. This pathway may constitute a backup mechanism to LDL receptor‐mediated pathways for the catabolism of these lipoproteins, which could be particularly relevant in subjects with high levels of apoB‐containing lipoproteins, such as those occurring in patients with FH.

Genetic Variation at the ApoA-IV Gene Locus and Response to Diet in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Plasma lipid response to dietary fat and cholesterol is, in part, genetically controlled. The apolipoprotein A-IV (apoA-IV protein; APOA4, gene) has been shown to influence the response to dietary changes in normolipidemic individuals. The response to diet in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is also variable, and no studies are available on the influence of APOA4 mutations on dietary response in these subjects. We studied the effect of 2 common apoA-IV genetic variants (Gln360-->His and Thr347-->Ser) on the lipid response to the National Cholesterol Education Program type I (NCEP-I) diet in 67 FH heterozygotes (43 women and 24 men). Subjects were studied at baseline (after consuming for 1 month a diet with 35% fat [10% saturated] and 300 mg/d cholesterol) and after 3 months of consuming a low-fat diet. No sex-related differences were found, and results were combined for men and women. The APOA4-360 mutation was assessed in 67 subjects, 51 with genotype 1/1 and 16 with genotype 1/2. The APOA4-2 allele was associated with marginally significantly lower (P=0.049) low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and significantly lower (P=0.027) apoB levels independent of diet effects. After consuming an NCEP-I diet, carriers of the APOA4-2 allele showed a significantly lower reduction in apoB concentration (6.2%) than 1/1 subjects (14.1%; P=0.036); however, no significant differences in response were noted for LDL cholesterol. The APOA4-347 mutation was assessed in 63 individuals, 44 with the A/A allele and 19 with the A/T and T/T alleles. No significant differences were observed in baseline or post-NCEP-I diet values for these 2 groups in total, LDL, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma apoB levels. After dietary intervention, A/A individuals showed significant reductions in plasma triglyceride and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; no changes were found in carriers of the T allele. Haplotype analysis suggested that in these FH subjects, the APOA4-360-2 allele was associated with lower plasma lipid levels during the NCEP-I diet period, whereas no significant effects were observed for the APOA4-347-T allele.

Influence of genetic variation at the apo A-I gene locus on lipid levels and response to diet in familial hypercholesterolemia

We have examined the apo AI - 75 (G/A) and apo AI + 83(MspI +/-) polymorphisms at the APOA1 gene locus for associations with plasma lipid levels and response to an NCEP-I diet in 69 (44 women, 25 men) heterozygotes for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Subjects were studied at baseline (after consuming for one month a diet with 35%, fat, 10% saturated, and 300 mg/day cholesterol) and after 3 months of an NCEP-I diet. No gender-related differences for any of the lipid variables examined were found and the data were analyzed for men and women combined. For the apo AI - 75 (G/A) polymorphism, there were 51 G/G and 18 G/A subjects. At baseline, G/A subjects showed significantly lower total cholesterol (p = 0.0036), and LDL-C (p = 0.0023), and apo B (p = 0.0209), than G/G individuals, but no differences were found for HDL-C, triglycerides and VLDL-C values. Following the NCEP-I diet these genotype-related differences remained significant for total and LDL-C. The MspI (-) allele at the apo AI + 83 polymorphism was detected in the heterozygous state in five subjects and its presence was not associated with altered baseline lipids nor with dietary response to the NCEP-I diet. Our results suggest that FH subjects carrying the A allele at the apoAI - 75 (G/A) polymorphism have significantly lower total and LDL-C and apo B baseline levels but respond to a low-fat diet with similar reductions in total and LDL-C when compared with homozygotes for the G allele at this polymorphic site.

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Spain: Prevalence and Phenotype-Genotype Relationship

Background— Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare disease characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and extremely high risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. HoFH is caused by mutations in several genes, including LDL receptor ( LDLR ), apolipoprotein B ( APOB ), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 ( PCSK9 ), and LDL protein receptor adaptor 1 ( LDLRAP1 ). No epidemiological studies have assessed HoFH prevalence or the clinical and molecular characteristics of this condition. Here, we aimed to characterize HoFH in Spain. Methods and Results— Data were collected from the Spanish Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society and from all molecular diagnoses performed for familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain between 1996 and 2015 (n=16 751). Clinical data included baseline lipid levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. A total of 97 subjects were identified as having HoFH—of whom, 47 were true homozygous (1 for APOB , 5 for LDLRAP1 , and 41 for LDLR ), 45 compound heterozygous for LDLR , 3 double heterozygous for LDLR and PSCK9 , and 2 double heterozygous for LDLR and APOB . No PSCK9 homozygous cases were identified. Two variants in LDLR were identified in 4.8% of the molecular studies. Over 50% of patients did not meet the classical HoFH diagnosis criteria. The estimated HoFH prevalence was 1:450 000. Compared with compound heterozygous cases, true homozygous cases showed more aggressive phenotypes with higher LDL-C and more atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Conclusions— HoFH frequency in Spain was higher than expected. Clinical criteria would underestimate the actual prevalence of individuals with genetic HoFH, highlighting the importance of genetic analysis to improve familial hypercholesterolemia diagnosis accuracy.Background—Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare disease characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and extremely high risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. HoFH is caused by mutations in several genes, including LDL receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and LDL protein receptor adaptor 1 (LDLRAP1). No epidemiological studies have assessed HoFH prevalence or the clinical and molecular characteristics of this condition. Here, we aimed to characterize HoFH in Spain. Methods and Results—Data were collected from the Spanish Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society and from all molecular diagnoses performed for familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain between 1996 and 2015 (n=16 751). Clinical data included baseline lipid levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. A total of 97 subjects were identified as having HoFH—of whom, 47 were true homozygous (1 for APOB, 5 for LDLRAP1, and 41 for LDLR), 45 compound heterozygous for LDLR, 3 double heterozygous for LDLR and PSCK9, and 2 double heterozygous for LDLR and APOB. No PSCK9 homozygous cases were identified. Two variants in LDLR were identified in 4.8% of the molecular studies. Over 50% of patients did not meet the classical HoFH diagnosis criteria. The estimated HoFH prevalence was 1:450 000. Compared with compound heterozygous cases, true homozygous cases showed more aggressive phenotypes with higher LDL-C and more atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. Conclusions—HoFH frequency in Spain was higher than expected. Clinical criteria would underestimate the actual prevalence of individuals with genetic HoFH, highlighting the importance of genetic analysis to improve familial hypercholesterolemia diagnosis accuracy.