Juan González-García

Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver‐related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection modifies the natural history of chronic hepatitis C, thus promoting more rapid progression to cirrhosis and end‐stage liver disease. The objective of our study was to determine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients positive for HIV and HCV. It was an ambispective cohort study carried out in 11 HIV units in Spain and involved 711 consecutive patients positive for HIV/HCV who started interferon plus ribavirin therapy between 2000 and 2005. We measured sustained virologic response (SVR), i.e., undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment, and clinical outcomes, defined as death (liver‐related or non–liver‐related), liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation. Of 711 patients who were positive for HIV/HCV, 31% had SVR. During a mean follow‐up of 20.8 months (interquartile range: 12.2‐38.7), the incidence rates per 100 person‐years of overall mortality, liver‐related mortality, and liver decompensation were 0.46, 0.23, and 0.23 among patients with SVR and 3.12, 1.65, and 4.33 among those without SVR (P = 0.003, 0.028, and <0.001 by the log‐rank test), respectively. Cox regression analysis adjusted for fibrosis, HCV genotype, HCV RNA viral load, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical category, and nadir CD4+ cell count showed that the adjusted hazard ratio of liver‐related events was 8.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.20; 66.11, P = 0.032) for nonresponders in comparison with responders and 4.96 (95% confidence interval, 2.27; 10.85, P < 0.001) for patients with fibrosis grade of F3‐F4 versus those with F0‐F2.Because this was not a prospective study, selection and survival biases may influence estimates of effect. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the achievement of an SVR after interferon‐ribavirin therapy in patients coinfected with HIV/HCV reduces liver‐related complications and mortality. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.)

Severe Nucleoside-Associated Lactic Acidosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients: Report of 12 Cases and Review of the Literature

Lactic acidosis is a rare but often fatal complication reported in some human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients treated with nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. We report a series of 12 patients with HIV infection treated with nucleoside analogues who developed unexplained metabolic acidosis. We have also reviewed 60 additional published cases. The aim of the present study is to describe the clinical picture, prognostic factors, and final outcome for nucleoside-associated lactic acidosis. The mortality rate is high: 33% for our patients, and 57% for the patients described in the literature. In the multivariate analysis, a lactate serum level of >10 mM (odds ratio [OR], 13.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.96-59.25) was the only factor associated with higher mortality. The administration of specific therapy with cofactors against acidosis was associated with a lower mortality (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.73). We conclude that specific therapy with cofactors may improve the outcome for patients with this syndrome.

Lopinavir/ritonavir as single-drug therapy for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression: 48-week results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, proof-of-concept pilot clinical trial (OK Study).

Objective:This study evaluated maintenance with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleosides in HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication. Design:Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, pilot clinical trial. Methods:Adult patients were eligible if they had no history of virologic failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, were receiving 2 nucleosides + lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg b.i.d.) for >1 month and had maintained serum HIV RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months prior to enrollment. Results:Forty-two patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or stop the nucleosides. At baseline there were no significant differences between groups in median CD4 cells/μL (baseline or nadir), pre-HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) HIV log10 viremia, or time with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL prior to enrollment. After 48 weeks of follow-up, percentage of patients remaining at <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention to treat, M = F) was 81% for the monotherapy group (95% CI: 64% to 98%) vs. 95% for the triple-therapy group (95% CI: 86% to 100%); P = 0.34. Patients in whom monotherapy failed had significantly worse adherence than patients who remained virally suppressed on monotherapy. Monotherapy failures did not show primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and were successfully reinduced with prerandomization nucleosides. Mean change in CD4 cells/μL: +70 (monotherapy) and +8 (triple) (P = 0.27). Mean serum fasting lipids remained stable in both groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion:Most of the patients maintained with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy remain with undetectable viral load after 48 weeks. Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy were not associated with the development of primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and could be successfully reinduced adding back prior nucleosides.

Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV.

Background:Prior attempts to reduce the number of drugs needed to maintain viral suppression in patients with suppressed HIV replication while receiving three antiretroviral drugs have been unsuccessful. Methods:In 205 patients with suppressed HIV replication on lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides, this randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial compared the strategies of continuation of triple therapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy followed by reinduction with two nucleosides if virological rebound occurred without genotypic resistance to lopinavir-ritonavir. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients without therapeutic failure, defined as confirmed HIV RNA higher than 500 copies/mL (with exclusion of patients receiving monotherapy who resuppressed to < 50 copies/mL after resuming baseline nucleosides), or loss to follow-up, or change of randomized therapy other than reinduction. Results:At week 48, the percentage of patients without therapeutic failure was 94% in the monotherapy group versus 90% in the triple therapy group (difference,-4%; upper limit of 95% confidence interval for difference, 3.4%). The percentage of patients with HIV RNA 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks by intention-to-treat, missing data or reinductions considered as failures, were 85% in the monotherapy group versus 90% in the triple therapy group (P = 0.31; 95% upper limit of 95% confidence interval for difference, 14%). Conclusion:In this trial, 48 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was non-inferior to continuation of two nucleosides and lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with prior stable suppression. However, episodes of low level viremia were more common in patients receiving monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00114933).

Impact of protease inhibitor therapy on HIV-related oropharyngeal candidiasis.

ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between antiretroviral therapy and changes in prevalence and amount of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) and skin test reactivity for delayed type hypersensitivity. DesignObservational cohort. SettingUniversity-based public hospital AIDS clinic. PatientsAdults with advanced HIV infection who had been taking nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor drugs but had not taken a protease inhibitor and who started antiretroviral treatment with ritonavir. Main outcome measuresOPC lesions score, oral candidal colonization, oral candidal quantification, skin test reactivity for delayed type hypersensitivity (purified protein derivative, candidal and streptokinase antigens), plasma HIV RNA and CD4 cell count at weeks 8, 16 and 48 weeks. ResultsIn the 99 patients who entered the study, there was a significant reduction in the HIV plasma RNA (mean log decrease from baseline at 48 weeks 0.88) and a significant increase in CD4 cell counts (mean CD4 cell increase from baseline at 48 weeks 128 × 106 cells/l). Only 17% of patients had < 200 copies/ml HIV RNA at 48 weeks. There were significant decreases in the prevalence of OPC lesions (31% at baseline to 1% at 48 weeks;P  < 0.001), and in oral candidal loads [2226 to 811 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml;P  = 0.0171]. The percentage of patients with at least one positive skin test increased significantly (6 to 28%;P  < 0.05). Patients whose CD4 lymphocyte count was > 200 × 106 cells/l at 48 weeks had significantly lower oral candidal loads and were more likely to have a positive skin test than patients whose CD4 cell count was < 200 × 106 cells/l. ConclusionIn patients with advanced HIV infection, antiretroviral treatment including a protease inhibitor has a positive impact in the natural history of OPC. This positive impact appears to be correlated with a better immunological function and occurs despite continuous HIV replication.

Estudio multicéntrico sobre prevalencia de las coinfecciones por virus de hepatitis, indicaciÓn de tratamiento de hepatitis crÓnica C y necesidad de trasplante hepático en pacientes infectados por el VIH en España.Estudio GESIDA 29/02-FIPSE 12185/01

Introduccion Los objetivos del estudio son estimar la prevalencia de las coinfecciones por virus de la hepatitis en la poblacion espanola infectada por el VIH y determinar el porcentaje de pacientes candidatos a tratamiento de la hepatitis C cronica (HCC) y a trasplante hepatico dentro de esta poblacion. Metodos Estudio transversal de dos poblaciones de pacientes infectados por el VIH realizado en el ano 2002: 1.260 pacientes de la poblacion de 39 centros de toda la geografia espanola (P1) y 1.560 pacientes de la de tres hospitales de tercer nivel de Madrid (P2). Resultados La prevalencia serica de virus de las hepatitis A (VHA), B (VHB) y HCC encontrada respectivamente en P1 y P2. IgG anti-VHA+: 74% y 78%. HBsAg+: 4,9 y 4,8%. HBsAg−, anti-HBc+, anti-HBs+: 39 y 39%. HBsAg−, anti-HBc+, anti-HBs− : 25 y 31%. HBsAg−, anti-HBc−, anti-HBs+: 7 y 8%. HBsAg−, anti-HBc−, anti-HBs− : 22 y 16%. Anti-VHC+: 61 y 65%. Entre estos 88,8 y 84,6% tenian una PCR VHC+. Coinfeccion multiple por virus de la hepatitis 3,2 y 2,8% y de estos, 70 y 78% con coinfeccion por el VHB, el VHC y el VHD. Cirrosis hepatica el 5,8 y 9,6% de los pacientes coinfectados por el VIH y el VHC, con indicacion de considerar trasplante hepatico aproximadamente en uno de cada seis. El 43 y 37% de los coinfectados por el VHC eran buenos candidatos a tratamiento de HCC, pero solo el 14 y el 15% lo habian iniciado. Conclusiones Un elevado porcentaje de pacientes infectados por el VIH en Espana estan coinfectados por virus de hepatitis, especialmente por el tipo C (VHC). El numero de posibles candidatos a trasplante hepatico es elevado y puede aumentar en los proximos anos. En el futuro sera necesario un mayor esfuerzo de tratamiento en los pacientes coinfectados por el VIH y virus de hepatitis.

Tuberculous Radiculomyelitis Complicating Tuberculous Meningitis: Case Report and Review

Tuberculous radiculomyelitis (TBRM) is a complication of tuberculous meningitis (TBM), which has been reported rarely in the modern medical literature. We describe a case of TBRM that developed in an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patient, despite prompt antituberculous treatment. To our knowledge, this is the second case of TBRM reported in an HIV-infected patient. We also review 74 previously reported cases of TBRM. TBRM develops at various periods after TBM, even in adequately treated patients after sterilization of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The most common symptoms are subacute paraparesis, radicular pain, bladder disturbance, and subsequent paralysis. CSF evaluation usually shows an active inflammatory response with a very high protein level. MRI and CT scan are critical for diagnosis, revealing loculation and obliteration of the subarachnoid space along with linear intradural enhancement. As in other forms of paradoxical reactions to antituberculous treatment, there is evidence that steroid treatment might have a beneficial effect.

Long-acting intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine in adults with HIV-1 infection (LATTE-2): 96-week results of a randomised, open-label, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND Cabotegravir and rilpivirine are antiretroviral drugs in development as long-acting injectable formulations. The LATTE-2 study evaluated long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression through 96 weeks. METHODS In this randomised, phase 2b, open-label study, treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 initially received oral cabotegravir 30 mg plus abacavir-lamivudine 600-300 mg once daily. The objective of this study was to select an intramuscular dosing regimen based on a comparison of the antiviral activity, tolerability, and safety of the two intramuscular dosing regimens relative to oral cabotegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine. After a 20-week induction period on oral cabotegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine, patients with viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to intramuscular long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine at 4-week intervals (long-acting cabotegravir 400 mg plus rilpivirine 600 mg; two 2 mL injections) or 8-week intervals (long-acting cabotegravir 600 mg plus rilpivirine 900 mg; two 3 mL injections) or continued oral cabotegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine. Randomisation was computer-generated with stratification by HIV-1 RNA (<50 copies per mL, yes or no) during the first 12 weeks of the induction period. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with viral suppression at week 32 (as defined by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm), protocol-defined virological failures, and safety events through 96 weeks. All randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug during the maintenance period were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses. The primary analysis used a Bayesian approach to evaluate the hypothesis that the proportion with viral suppression for each long-acting regimen is not worse than the oral regimen proportion by more than 10% (denoted comparable) according to a prespecified decision rule (ie, posterior probability for comparability >90%). Difference in proportions and associated 95% CIs were supportive to the primary analysis. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02120352. FINDINGS Among 309 enrolled patients, 286 were randomly assigned to the maintenance period (115 to each of the 4-week and 8-week groups and 56 to the oral treatment group). This study is currently ongoing. At 32 weeks following randomisation, both long-acting regimens met primary criteria for comparability in viral suppression relative to the oral comparator group. Viral suppression was maintained at 32 weeks in 51 (91%) of 56 patients in the oral treatment group, 108 (94%) of 115 patients in the 4-week group (difference 2·8% [95% CI -5·8 to 11·5] vs oral treatment), and 109 (95%) of 115 patients in the 8-week group (difference 3·7% [-4·8 to 12·2] vs oral treatment). At week 96, viral suppression was maintained in 47 (84%) of 56 patients receiving oral treatment, 100 (87%) of 115 patients in the 4-week group, and 108 (94%) of 115 patients in the 8-week group. Three patients (1%) experienced protocol-defined virological failure (two in the 8-week group; one in the oral treatment group). Injection-site reactions were mild (3648 [84%] of 4360 injections) or moderate (673 [15%] of 4360 injections) in intensity and rarely resulted in discontinuation (two [<1%] of 230 patients); injection-site pain was reported most frequently. Serious adverse events during maintenance were reported in 22 (10%) of 230 patients in the intramuscular groups (4-week and 8-week groups) and seven (13%) of 56 patients in the oral treatment group; none were drug related. INTERPRETATION The two-drug combination of all-injectable, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks was as effective as daily three-drug oral therapy at maintaining HIV-1 viral suppression through 96 weeks and was well accepted and tolerated. FUNDING ViiV Healthcare and Janssen R&D.

The natural history of liver cirrhosis in HIV-hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients.

Objective:To provide detailed information about the natural history of HIV–hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients with cirrhosis. Methods:Prospective cohort including 340 HIV–HCV-coinfected patients with compensated (n = 248) or decompensated (n = 92) cirrhosis. We evaluated predictors of survival and of first hepatic decompensation. Results:The mortality rate for patients with decompensated and compensated cirrhosis was 27.14 deaths per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.93–35.35] and 3.98 deaths per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.42–5.54), respectively. Rate of first hepatic decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis was 4.62 per 100 persons-years (95% CI 2.91–6.33). In the complete cohort, permanent HAART interruption during follow-up, CD4 cell count nadir and baseline Child-Pugh score (CPS) B or C were significantly associated with shorter survival. In patients with compensated cirrhosis factors significantly associated with decreased survival were having the first hepatic decompensation during follow-up, permanent HAART discontinuation, and CPS B and C at baseline. For patients with compensated cirrhosis, time since diagnosis of HCV infection, CPS B and C and permanent HAART discontinuation were significantly associated with the risk of first hepatic decompensation. Sustained viral response to anti-HCV therapy was not independently associated with better survival in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Conclusion:HIV–HCV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis have a relatively good 3-year survival (87%). In contrast, 2-year survival of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis is only 50%. Three-year survival was mostly impacted by liver-related factors and HAART maintenance.

Long-term (4 years) efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for maintenance of HIV suppression

OBJECTIVES Data are scarce on the long-term efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for the maintenance of HIV suppression. Four years of results of patients randomized to monotherapy in the Only Kaletra (OK) pilot clinical trial are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication (<50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months and without previous failure while receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen started lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. Follow-up was performed within the OK pilot clinical trial during the first 2 years and according to routine clinical practice during the 3rd and 4th years. RESULTS Fourteen patients (67%) remain on monotherapy and with RNA <50 copies/mL (intention-to-treat analysis, with missing patients scored as failures). Five patients (24%) had virological rebound and all of them were successfully re-suppressed by adding two nucleosides. No major protease inhibitor mutations were found. CONCLUSIONS Our data support the long-term efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for the maintenance of HIV suppression, a finding that must be confirmed in larger studies.