Juan J. Grau

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

CONTEXT Despite potentially curative resection of stomach cancer, 50% to 90% of patients die of disease relapse. Numerous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have compared surgery alone with adjuvant chemotherapy, but definitive evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES To perform an individual patient-level meta-analysis of all RCTs to quantify the potential benefit of chemotherapy after complete resection over surgery alone in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival, and to further study the role of regimens, including monochemotherapy; combined chemotherapy with fluorouracil derivatives, mitomycin C, and other therapies but no anthracyclines; combined chemotherapy with fluorouracil derivatives, mitomycin C, and anthracyclines; and other treatments. DATA SOURCES Data from all RCTs comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone in patients with resectable gastric cancer. We searched MEDLINE (up to 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the National Institutes of Health trial registry, and published proceedings from major oncologic and gastrointestinal cancer meetings. STUDY SELECTION All RCTs closed to patient recruitment before 2004 were eligible. Trials testing radiotherapy; neoadjuvant, perioperative, or intraperitoneal chemotherapy; or immunotherapy were excluded. Thirty-one eligible trials (6390 patients) were identified. DATA EXTRACTION As of 2010, individual patient data were available from 17 trials (3838 patients representing 60% of the targeted data) with a median follow-up exceeding 7 years. RESULTS There were 1000 deaths among 1924 patients assigned to chemotherapy groups and 1067 deaths among 1857 patients assigned to surgery-only groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant benefit in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.90; P < .001) and disease-free survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.90; P < .001). There was no significant heterogeneity for overall survival across RCTs (P = .52) or the 4 regimen groups (P = .13). Five-year overall survival increased from 49.6% to 55.3% with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Among the RCTs included, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on fluorouracil regimens was associated with reduced risk of death in gastric cancer compared with surgery alone.

Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 1): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) progressing after first-line platinum regimens have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. Afatinib, an irreversible ERBB family blocker, has shown efficacy in a phase 2 study in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib compared with methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC progressing on or after platinum-based therapy. METHODS In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial conducted in 101 centres in 19 countries, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC that was recurrent, metastatic, or both who had progressed on or after first-line platinum-based therapy, were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Previous treatment with more than one systemic regimen in this setting was not allowed; previous treatment with EGFR-targeted antibody therapy (but not EGFR-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) was allowed. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) per week), stratified by ECOG performance status and previous EGFR-targeted antibody therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or web-based response system. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation; independent review of tumour response was done in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent, central imaging review committee. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01345682. FINDINGS Between Jan 10, 2012, and Dec 12, 2013, we enrolled 483 patients and randomly assigned 322 to afatinib and 161 to methotrexate. After a median follow-up of 6·7 months (IQR 3·1-9·0), progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group than in the methotrexate group (median 2·6 months [95% CI 2·0-2·7] for the afatinib group vs 1·7 months [1·5-2·4] for the methotrexate group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·65-0·98], p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were rash or acne (31 [10%] of 320 patients in the afatinib group vs none of 160 patients in the methotrexate group), diarrhoea (30 [9%] vs three [2%]), stomatitis (20 [6%] vs 13 [8%]), fatigue (18 [6%] vs five [3%]), and neutropenia (1 [<1%] vs 11 [7%]); serious adverse events occurred in 44 (14%) of afatinib-treated patients and 18 (11%) of methotrexate-treated patients. INTERPRETATION Afatinib was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and had a manageable safety profile. These findings provide important new insights into the treatment of this patient population and support further investigations with irreversible ERBB family blockers in HNSCC. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.

Phase II study of the combination of cetuximab and weekly paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of a novel combination of weekly paclitaxel and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab for the first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m(2)), weekly, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was response rate. RESULTS Among 46 patients enrolled, the overall response rate was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI) 39% to 69%], with 10 (22%) complete responses and a disease control rate of 80%. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 4.2 (95% CI 2.9-5.5 months) and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.6-9.6 months), respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were acne-like rash (24%), asthenia (17%) and neutropenia (13%). Prior chemotherapy and the development of acne-like rash were associated with tumor response but not survival. No association between tumor EGFR expression or EGFR gene copy number and response or survival was found. CONCLUSION The combination of cetuximab and weekly paclitaxel was active and well tolerated by these poor prognosis patients and may be an option for the treatment of medically unfit patients, particularly those for whom platinum is contraindicated.

Sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer

Although thyroid cancer usually has an excellent prognosis, few therapeutic options are available in the refractory setting. Based on the recent results of phase II studies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, we designed a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic thyroid cancer treated with sorafenib in seven Spanish referral centers. Consecutive patients with progressive metastatic thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular, medullary, and anaplastic) not suitable for curative surgery, radioactive-iodine therapy, or radiotherapy were treated with sorafenib 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was objective response rate (RR). Secondary end points included toxicity, median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and correlation between tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin, calcitonin, and carcinoembryonic antigen) and efficacy. Between June 2006 and January 2010, 34 patients were included in the study. Sixteen patients presented differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTC) of which seven (21%) were papillary, nine (26%) follicular, 15 (44%) medullary (MTC), and three (9%) were anaplastic (ATC). Eleven (32%) patients achieved partial response and 14 (41%) had stable disease beyond 6 months. Regarding histological subtype, RRs were 47% (seven of 15) for MTC, 19% (three of 16) for DTC, and 33% (one of three) for ATC. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, mPFS were 13.5, 10.5, and 4.4 months for DTC, MTC, and ATC respectively. Tumor markers were evaluated in 22 patients, and a statistically significant association was observed between RR and decrease in tumor marker levels >50% (P=0.033). In this retrospective trial, sorafenib showed antitumor efficacy in all histological subtypes of thyroid cancer, warranting further development in this setting.

Positive Results of Adjuvant Mitomycin-C in Resected Gastric Cancer: A Randomised Trial on 134 Patients

In order to evaluate the results on successful adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer we performed a randomised trial on 134 patients in two arms: a control one with no further treatment after surgery versus a treatment arm given mitomycin-C (MMC), 20 mg/m2 intravenously one day every 6 weeks for four courses, starting before the sixth week after surgery. The median follow-up was 105 months. In the control arm, 49 out of 66 patients died due to recurrence, versus 40 out of 68 patients in treatment arm. Actuarial survival curve was statistically significant (P < 0.025) in favour of the treatment group. Liver metastases were lower in adjuvant group than in the control group (8/68 versus 19/66). Toxicity was mild. Main toxic effects were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, nausea and vomiting. A pelvis renal cancer as a second malignancy 8 years after gastric cancer was observed. In that particular case MMC was given after surgery. We conclude that adjuvant chemotherapy based on MMC given in the early period after surgery, improves survival rate in gastric cancer resected patients.

Mitomycin C as an adjuvant treatment to resected gastric cancer. A 10-year follow-up.

Seventy consecutive patients were entered in a two-arm randomized trial after surgical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer. In the first arm, 37 patients were included as a control group, receiving no further treatment after surgery. In the second arm, 33 patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of mitomycin C (MMC), 20 mg/m2 administered intravenously once every 6 weeks for four consecutive cycles. All patients in both arms were followed in the same way for 5 years. At 5 years 23 of 37 patients in the control arm and 7 of 33 patients in the treatment arm were dead because of relapse. Actuarial survival curve was statistically significant in favor of patients given adjuvant MMC (p less than 0.001). After 10 years follow-up, 31 of 37 patients in the control arm and 16 out of 33 patients in the treatment arm were dead because of relapse, the statistical differences continuing in the actuarial survival curve in favor of treated patients (p less than 0.01). The best advantages of adjuvant treatment were observed in the T3N0M0 stage. The most frequent relapse site was the peritoneal cavity and the relapse pattern shows special decrease in liver metastases in treated patients. Toxicity was acute and mild. No delayed toxicity or second malignancies were observed. These data suggest that adjuvant MMC after resected surgery of gastric cancer is a successful treatment and its effects are still evident after 10 years of follow-up.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin plus ftorafur versus mitomycin alone in resected locally advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE We performed a clinical trial to determine whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with two drugs versus one drug could prolong survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1985 to 1996, 85 patients with completely resected locally advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. The subjects were randomized into two treatment groups, as follows: mitomycin (MMC) 10 to 20 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 every 6 weeks plus ftorafur (FT) 500 mg/m2/d for 36 consecutive days; or MMC alone, 10 to 20 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks. All courses were repeated four times. RESULTS After a median follow-up duration of 62 months, the overall 5-year survival rates were 67% for the MMC-FT group versus 44% for the MMC group (P = .04). Subgroup analysis to compare survival curves using the method of Mantel-Cox showed survival rates significantly in favor of the MMC-FT group in the subsets of patients with node-negative disease (P = .01) and those whose disease was stage IB or II (P = .008). CONCLUSION Significantly better survival results were observed for MMC-FT versus MMC alone. Subset analysis suggest a strong benefit in patients with node-negative and early-stage resected gastric cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel for platin-resistant stage IV head and neck cancer patients

Conclusions. Weekly paclitaxel may be an active and well tolerated chemotherapy regimen for patients with platin-resistant advanced head and neck cancer. Objectives. Weekly paclitaxel should be an active and well tolerated regimen for palliative treatment of platin-resistant patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. We analyzed the antitumor activity and toxicity profile. Patients and methods. Sixty consecutive patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with 1 h infusion of paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2 weekly, for 6 consecutive weeks. Patients who showed disease response or disease stabilization continued until progression of disease. Results. A total of 719 doses of paclitaxel were administered to the 60 patients. No complete response was observed. Partial response and stable disease were observed in 26 (43.3%) and 9 (15%) patients, respectively. Median time to tumor progression for patients who responded to therapy was 6.2 months (SD=1.3; 95% CI, 3.7–8.6) and the overall median survival in this group of patients was 8.5 months (SD=1.4; 95% CI, 5.7–11.2). The main toxic effects were leukopenia (26.6%), anemia (43.3%), fatigue (37.4%), alopecia (18.7%), rash/desquamation (13.3%), and thrombophlebitis (6.8%).

Follow-Up Study in Head and Neck Cancer: Cure Rate according to Tumor Location and Stage

The purpose of this clinical study was to analyze a long-term follow-up of all the patients with head and neck cancer in our institution. Between 1973 and 1993, 1,355 consecutive cases of head and neck cancerwere diagnosed, treated and followed up regularly. All were subjected to a multidisciplinary approach, and followed up until death or for 10 years with no event of disease. The local relapse rate was 20% and the node-regional relapse rate 15%. Distant metastases were observed in 6% of the patients mainly arising from the nasopharynx (23%) followed by the hypopharynx (11%). The main organ involved was the lung (50%). Median follow-up of the group was 10 years (range 4 months to 15 years). Cancer cure was observed after 5 years in glottic and supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma, oral and nasopharyngeal cancer and after 2.5 years in patients with cancer of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The highest cure rate was 80% in the glottis, followed by 70% in the supraglottic area, 45% in the mouth, 30% in the nasopharynx, 25% in the oropharynx, and 20% in the hypopharynx. A second primary tumor was observed in 7% of the patients and a third primary in 0.6% of the patients. Only in 7 patients, the second or third primary was seen after 5 years of follow-up. Curability should be observed after 5 years from definitive therapy of glottic, supraglottic, oral and nasopharyngeal and earlier in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Further follow-up should be discontinued. Second and third neoplasias are the main problems after 5 years of follow-up but their incidence is low.

Multidisciplinary Approach in Advanced Cancer of the Oral Cavity: Outcome with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy according to Intention-to-Treat Local Therapy

Objectives: To determine outcomes in local-regional control and overall survival in patients with squamous locally advanced cancer of the oral cavity, based on intention-to-treat with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or radiation therapy. Methods: Two hundred and four out of 1,089 patients analyzed met the defined criteria. All had squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity in stage III or in nonmetastatic stage IV and were selected for surgery or radiation therapy (if located in the tonsils or in the base of the tongue). Chemotherapy was based on cisplatin 120 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 plus bleomycin 20 mg/m2 days 1–5 in continuous i.v. perfusion or plus 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 days 1–5 in continuous i.v. perfusion. A total of 418 cycles were given to 204 patients (mean 2.049 per patient). Definitive surgery (n = 73; plus adjuvant radiation therapy) or definitive radiation therapy (n = 131) was performed. Results: One hundred thirty-five out of 204 (66%) patients were chemotherapy responders, 16% complete and 50% partial. One hundred ninety-four patients (95%) completed 2 courses of chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 34 out of 46 patients considered inoperable initially (74%) obtained a disease-free status with surgery. Eighty-three percent of surgical patients obtained a disease-free status (initial tumor control) versus 72% of radiation therapy patients. Disease-free survival rates at 5 years were 26 and 22%, respectively. A better prognosis was observed in stage III over IV (p = 0.02); primary tumor in the retromolar trigone, palate or buccal mucosa over tongue, tonsil or floor of the mouth (p = 0.0085); negative cervical nodes over positive (p = 0.0186); responders to chemotherapy over nonresponders (p = 0.0003); and adjuvant postsurgical radiation therapy (p = 0.0013). Causes of death were relapses in local area (86%), regional nodes (10.5%) or distant metastases (3.5%). Eleven patients (5%) died of a second primary. The main toxic effects were vomiting in 9% of patients and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in 3% of the patients treated with bleomycin. Conclusions: In locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces a high response rate that may facilitate definitive surgery or radiotherapy. In this study, patients have an acceptable long-term survival.