Judd Boczko
University of Rochester Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Judd Boczko.
The Journal of Urology | 2016
Neal D. Shore; Naveen Kella; Brian J. Moran; Judd Boczko; Fernando J. Bianco; E. David Crawford; Thaylon Davis; Kirstin M. Roundy; Kristen Rushton; Charles E. Grier; Rajesh R. Kaldate; Michael K. Brawer; Mark L. Gonzalgo
PURPOSE The cell cycle progression test is a validated molecular assay that assesses prostate cancer specific disease progression and mortality risk when combined with clinicopathological parameters. We present the results from PROCEDE-1000, a large, prospective registry designed to evaluate the impact of the cell cycle progression test on shared treatment decision making for patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Untreated patients with newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study and the cell cycle progression test was performed on the initial prostate biopsy tissue. A set of 4 sequential surveys tracked changes relative to initial therapy recommendations (before cell cycle progression) based on clinicopathological parameters following physician review of the cell cycle progression test result, physician/patient review of the cell cycle progression test results and a minimum of 3 months of clinical followup (actual treatment). RESULTS Of the 1,596 patients enrolled in this registry 1,206 were eligible for analysis. There was a significant reduction in the treatment burden recorded at each successive evaluation (p <0.0001), with the mean number of treatments per patient decreasing from 1.72 before the cell cycle progression test to 1.16 in actual followup. The cell cycle progression test caused a change in actual treatment in 47.8% of patients. Of these changes 72.1% were reductions and 26.9% were increases in treatment. For each clinical risk category there was a significant change in treatment modality (intervention vs nonintervention) before vs after cell cycle progression testing (p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS The cell cycle progression test has a significant impact in assisting physicians and patients reach personalized treatment decisions.
Journal of Endourology | 2007
Judd Boczko; Erdal Erturk; Dragan Golijanin; Ralph Madeb; Hitendra R.H. Patel; Jean V. Joseph
Journal of Endourology | 2005
Jason Hafron; James D. Fogarty; Judd Boczko; David M. Hoenig
Journal of Endourology | 2007
Seth A. Capello; Judd Boczko; Hitendra R.H. Patel; Jean V. Joseph
Canadian Journal of Urology | 2006
Judd Boczko; Ralph Madeb; Dragan Golijanin; Erdal Erturk; Mathe M; H.R.H. Patel; Jean V. Joseph
Radiologic Clinics of North America | 2006
Judd Boczko; Edward M. Messing; Vikram S. Dogra
Urology | 2006
Judd Boczko; Jean V. Joseph
Journal of Endourology | 2007
Judd Boczko; Erdal Erturk; Jean V. Joseph
The Journal of Urology | 2007
Seth A. Capello; Judd Boczko; Hitendra R.H. Patel; Jean V. Joseph
The Journal of Urology | 2006
Jean V. Joseph; Judd Boczko; Dragan Golijanin; Ralph Madeb; Ivelisse Vicente; Erdal Erturk; Raymond S. Rosenbaum; Hitendra R.H. Patel