Judith J. Stephenson
Wilmington University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Judith J. Stephenson.
Sleep | 2011
Ronald C. Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Catherine Coulouvrat; Goeran Hajak; Thomas Roth; Shahly; Alicia C. Shillington; Judith J. Stephenson; James K. Walsh
STUDY OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence and associations of broadly defined (i.e., meeting full ICD-10, DSM-IV, or RDC/ICSD-2 inclusion criteria) insomnia with work performance net of comorbid conditions in the America Insomnia Survey (AIS). DESIGN/SETTING Cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS National sample of 7,428 employed health plan subscribers (ages 18+). INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS Broadly defined insomnia was assessed with the Brief Insomnia Questionnaire (BIQ). Work absenteeism and presenteeism (low on-the-job work performance defined in the metric of lost workday equivalents) were assessed with the WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Regression analysis examined associations between insomnia and HPQ scores controlling 26 comorbid conditions based on self-report and medical/pharmacy claims records. The estimated prevalence of insomnia was 23.2%. Insomnia was significantly associated with lost work performance due to presenteeism (χ² (1) = 39.5, P < 0.001) but not absenteeism (χ² (1) = 3.2, P = 0.07), with an annualized individual-level association of insomnia with presenteeism equivalent to 11.3 days of lost work performance. This estimate decreased to 7.8 days when controls were introduced for comorbid conditions. The individual-level human capital value of this net estimate was
Biological Psychiatry | 2011
Thomas Roth; Catherine Coulouvrat; Goeran Hajak; Matthew D. Lakoma; Nancy A. Sampson; Victoria Shahly; Alicia C. Shillington; Judith J. Stephenson; James K. Walsh; Ronald C. Kessler
2,280. If we provisionally assume these estimates generalize to the total US workforce, they are equivalent to annualized population-level estimates of 252.7 days and
Advances in Therapy | 2011
Hiangkiat Tan; Qian Cai; Sonalee Agarwal; Judith J. Stephenson; S Kamat
63.2 billion. CONCLUSIONS Insomnia is associated with substantial workplace costs. Although experimental studies suggest some of these costs could be recovered with insomnia disease management programs, effectiveness trials are needed to obtain precise estimates of return-on-investment of such interventions from the employer perspective.
Sleep | 2011
James K. Walsh; Catherine Coulouvrat; Goeran Hajak; Lakoma; M. Petukhova; Thomas Roth; Nancy A. Sampson; Shahly; Alicia C. Shillington; Judith J. Stephenson; Ronald C. Kessler
BACKGROUND Although several diagnostic systems define insomnia, little is known about the implications of using one versus another of them. METHODS The America Insomnia Survey, an epidemiological survey of managed health care plan subscribers (n = 10,094), assessed insomnia with the Brief Insomnia Questionnaire, a clinically validated scale generating diagnoses according to DSM-IV-TR; International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10); and Research Diagnostic Criteria/International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Second Edition (RDC/ICSD-2) criteria. Regression analysis examines associations of insomnia according to the different systems with summary 12-item Short-Form Health Survey scales of perceived health and health utility. RESULTS Insomnia prevalence estimates varied widely, from 22.1% for DSM-IV-TR to 3.9% for ICD-10 criteria. Although ICD insomnia was associated with significantly worse perceived health than DSM or RDC/ICSD insomnia, DSM-only cases also had significant decrements in perceived health. Because of its low prevalence, 66% of the population-level health disutility associated with overall insomnia and 84% of clinically relevant cases of overall insomnia were missed by ICD criteria. CONCLUSIONS Insomnia is highly prevalent and associated with substantial decrements in perceived health. Although ICD criteria define a narrower and more severe subset of cases than DSM criteria, the fact that most health disutility associated with insomnia is missed by ICD criteria, while RDC/ICSD-only cases do not have significant decrements in perceived health, supports use of the broader DSM criteria.
Sleep | 2012
Ronald C. Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Catherine Coulouvrat; Timothy Fitzgerald; Goeran Hajak; Thomas Roth; Victoria Shahly; Alicia C. Shillington; Judith J. Stephenson; James K. Walsh
BackgroundAdherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is essential for the reduction of multiple sclerosis (MS) progression and relapse. However, only limited data currently exist on the impact of treatment adherence on MS-related clinical and economic outcomes in the real world setting.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of treatment adherence on MS-related hospitalizations (inpatient [INP]), ER visits, MS relapses, and medical costs.Design/MethodsPatients with ≥1 ICD-9-CM code for MS who received ≥1 DMT between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2008 were identified using the administrative claims database. The first DMT received during the study period was defined as the index treatment and ≥6-month preindex and ≥12-month postindex continuous health-plan enrollment were required for inclusion. Adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR); patients with MPR ≥80% were regarded as adherent. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of adherence on MS-related outcomes after controlling for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsIn this cohort (n=2446), 59.6% of the patients were adherent to their DMT. Compared with the nonadherent group, adherent patients were significantly less likely to have MS-related INP (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.83) and MS relapses (OR: 0.71, 95% CI, 0.59–0.85). No significant difference was found in ER risk between adherent and nonadherent groups (8.4% vs. 10.5%, P=0.068, OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60–1.07). On average, the adherent group incurred lower medical costs than the nonadherent group (
Sleep | 2010
Ronald C. Kessler; Catherine Coulouvrat; Goeran Hajak; Matthew D. Lakoma; Thomas Roth; Nancy A. Sampson; Victoria Shahly; Alicia C. Shillington; Judith J. Stephenson; James K. Walsh; Gary Zammit
3380, 95% CI,
Value in Health | 2006
O. Baser; Liisa Palmer; Judith J. Stephenson
3046–
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 2015
Judith J. Stephenson; Qian Cai; Michelle Mocarski; Hiangkiat Tan; Jalpa A. Doshi; Sean D. Sullivan
3750 vs.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | 2012
Judith J. Stephenson; David M. Kern; Sonalee Agarwal; Ruth Zeidman; K Rajagopalan; S Kamat; John Foley
4348, 95% CI,
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2009
Stephen J. Boccuzzi; John Martin; Judith J. Stephenson; Charles Kreilick; Joaquim Fernandes; Jane Beaulieu; Ole Hauch; Jennifer Kim
3828-