Judy Hardy

Evaluation of Early Complications Related to De Novo Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation : Insights From the Ontario ICD Database

OBJECTIVESnThis study examined the predictors of early complications after defibrillator implantation.nnnBACKGROUNDnAlthough implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are widely used, predictors of procedural complications and the consequences of these events have not been determined.nnnMETHODSnIn a prospective, multicenter, population-based clinical outcomes registry of all newly implanted defibrillator patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complications and all-cause mortality from February 2007 to May 2009. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as direct implant-related or indirect events.nnnRESULTSnAmong 3,340 patients (mean age 63.8 +/- 12.5 years, 78.5% men), major complications occurred in 4.1% of de novo procedures. Compared with those undergoing a single-chamber device, implantation of a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38 to 3.43, p < 0.001) or dual-chamber device (adjusted HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.79, p = 0.006) was associated with increased risk of major complications. Major complications were increased in women (adjusted HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.16, p = 0.037) and when left ventricular end-systolic dimension exceeded 45 mm (adjusted HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.20, p = 0.018). Major complications (excluding death) occurring early after defibrillator implantation were associated with increased adjusted risk of subsequent death up to 180 days after defibrillator implant (adjusted HR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.64 to 8.33, p = 0.002). Direct implant-related complications were associated with increased risk of early death (adjusted HR: 24.89, p = 0.01), whereas indirect clinical complications conferred increased risk of near-term death (adjusted HR: 12.35, p < 0.001) after defibrillator implantation.nnnCONCLUSIONSnComplications after de novo defibrillator implantation were strongly associated with device type. Major complications were associated with increased risk of mortality.

Predictors of Short-Term Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement: Results From the Ontario ICD Database

Background— Complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement are often clinically devastating, particularly when infection or reoperation occurs. Identifying factors contributing to complications may permit identification of high-risk individuals that warrant incremental monitoring and therapy to attenuate risk. In addition, replacement may be a discretionary decision in the context of an advisory or borderline device performance and patient, device, and implanter factors that predict adverse outcome may assist in clinical decision-making. Methods and Results— In a prospective, multicenter, population-based registry of all ICD patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complication and all-cause mortality rates from February 2007 to August 2009 in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as major or minor. ICD replacement was performed in 1081 of 5176 patients (20.8%) undergoing ICD implantation (age, 64.3±12.7 years; 78.5% men). In patients undergoing ICD replacement, 47 patients (4.3%) had a complication within 45 days, with 47 major complications in 28 patients (2.6%), most commonly infection (n=23), lead revision (n=35), electrical storm (n=14), and pulmonary edema (n=13). Minor complications occurred in 2.3% of patients, most commonly incisional infection (n=10) and pocket hematoma (n=10). On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with major complications were Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.70 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.027) and multiple previous procedures on the pocket (adjusted HR, 3.35 for >1 versus 1; P=0.058). Risk factors associated with any complication were the use of antiarrhythmic therapy (adjusted HR, 6.29; P=0.001), implanter volume (adjusted HR 10.4 for <60/y versus >120/y, P=0.026), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted HR, 3.00 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.031). In a Cox model with a time-dependent variable of major complication within 45 days after replacement, major complications after ICD replacement were associated with an increased risk of mortality at 45, 90, and 180 days (adjusted HR, 9.61, 12.69, and 6.41, respectively; P=0.002 to 0.039). Conclusions— Risk factors associated with complications after ICD replacement include the presence of angina, antiarrhythmic therapy, increased number of previous procedures, and low implanter volume. Major complications may be associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality.

Randomized controlled comparison of antitachycardia pacing algorithms for termination of ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVESnThis study compared the efficacy and safety of two antitachycardia pacing algorithms in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia.nnnBACKGROUNDnThere is agreement that antitachycardia pacing should be adapted to tachycardia rate and be delivered in a burst, but the ideal pacing pattern is not well understood. Effective antitachycardia pacing burst patterns include those with a between-burst decrement (SCAN) with or without an additional within-burst decrement (RAMP).nnnMETHODSnProspective randomized crossover comparison of two antitachycardia pacing algorithms (RAMP vs. SCAN) on identical induced sustained ventricular tachycardias was performed.nnnRESULTSnSixty-five ventricular tachycardias (mean cycle length 364 +/- 74 ms) from 37 invasive studies performed in 29 patients were studied; 86% of patients had coronary artery disease and 72% were receiving antiarrhythmic therapy at the time of study. Of the 65 tachycardias, 40 were identical pairs and 25 were unpaired (including 8 with a > 30-ms difference in cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia pairs). In the paired pacing trials, conversion to sinus rhythm occurred, respectively, in 85% of SCAN versus 90% of RAMP protocols (p = 0.63, power = 93%) and within 1.4 +/- 0.7 versus 1.7 +/- 1.1 attempts (p = 0.41). Discordance for pacing success was seen in three pairs. In unpaired trials, conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 73% and 57%, respectively (p = 0.68, power = 88%). Tachycardia acceleration during pacing occurred in 7 (11%) of 65 attempts (5 SCAN, 2 RAMP). Acceleration in unpaired ventricular tachycardia trials was correlated with tachycardia cycle length. Failure to convert ventricular tachycardia was associated with a shorter tachycardia cycle length (p < 0.05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn the patients studied, adaptive antitachycardia pacing was safe and effective and, when successful, occurred within three attempts of an 8-beat adaptive burst algorithm. Changes in burst pattern did not affect pacing safety or efficacy. Antitachycardia pacing success was dependent on induced ventricular tachycardia cycle length.

Design and implementation of a population-based registry of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in Ontario

BACKGROUNDnThere are scarce population-based data on the use, complication rates, and outcomes of patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).nnnOBJECTIVEnThis study sought to describe the methodology of the Ontario ICD Database, a prospective study of all ICD recipients in Ontario, Canada.nnnMETHODSnIn this registry, web-based data collection will be performed in all patients referred to a cardiac electrophysiologist for consideration of an ICD. The variables included in the database were determined by consensus. Outcomes to be assessed will include defibrillator device therapies (e.g., shock or antitachycardia pacing), morbidity, and death. Preliminary statistics are reported after the first 6 months of data collection.nnnRESULTSnOf 208 total variables selected by consensus, 111 (53.4%) were referral/patient characteristics, 12 (5.8%) were implant-related, and 85 (40.9%) were outcome variables. Among 990 referred patients, 902 were accepted, with the following ICD indications: primary prevention (63.3%), secondary prevention (21.6%), and generator replacement (15.1%). The mean (SD) age of patients with implants was 63.9 +/- 12.6 years, and 79% were men. Among accepted ICD patients, 66% had ischemic heart disease, 23% had nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, and 11% had other cardiac conditions. Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction was highly prevalent, with 82% of primary and 44% of secondary prevention patients having LV ejection fraction <or=30%. The perioperative complication rate was 3.69%.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe Ontario ICD Database will examine defibrillator patient characteristics and clinical and device-related outcomes. Contemporary ICDs are implanted largely for primary prevention, and the majority of these conformed with LV ejection fraction guidelines.

Use of telemetry functions in the assessment of implanted antitachycardia device efficacy

Twenty patients (aged 50 +/- 21 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 37 +/- 17%) with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias were treated with an investigational, implantable combined antitachycardia-pacing cardioverter defibrillator. The devices telemetry capabilities include both stored (1-second snapshots) and real-time display of endocardial and device-circuit signals. The device can store these before, during and after up to 50 tachycardia and antitachycardia pacing episodes. All stored events are indexed to a 24-hour internal clock. During 10.1 +/- 5.1 months of follow-up, the device was used in 11 of 20 patients. In the entire group, antitachycardia pacing was activated on 44 +/- 14 occasions per patient (total 874) and shock delivery occurred on 8 +/- 14 occasions per patient (total 156). Reconstruction by stored telemetry of all device-therapy episodes was possible. Twenty-six percent of all shocks delivered were not appropriate and were due to atrial arrhythmias in 2 patients and dysfunction of the sensing lead in 3. The absence of a relation between symptoms and appropriate shock delivery was documented in 1 patient. Antitachycardia pace acceleration occurred in 5.3% of cases; 7% of attempts at pacing were unsuccessful and needed shock therapy. It is concluded that the enhanced telemetry available in newer antitachycardia devices enables more accurate assessment of device use and enhances diagnosis of inappropriate therapy delivery.

Clinical Risk Stratification for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Background—A conceptualized model may be useful for understanding risk stratification of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators considering the competing risks of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock versus mortality. Methods and Results—In a prospective, multicenter, population-based cohort with left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽35% referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator, we developed dual risk stratification models to determine the competing risks of appropriate defibrillator shock versus mortality using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Among 7020 patients referred, 3445 underwent defibrillator implant (79.7% men, median, 66 years [25th, 75th: 58–73]). During 5918 person-years of follow-up, appropriate shock occurred in 204 patients (3.6 shocks/100 person-years) and 292 died (4.9 deaths/100 person-years). Competing risk predictors of appropriate shock included nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, serum creatinine concentration, digoxin or amiodarone use, and QRS duration near 130-ms peak. One-year cumulative incidence of appropriate shock was 0.9% in the lowest risk category, and 1.7%, 2.5%, 4.9%, and 9.3% in low, intermediate, high, and highest risk groups, respectively. Hazard ratios for appropriate shock ranged from 4.04 to 7.79 in the highest 3 deciles (all P⩽0.001 versus lowest risk). Cumulative incidence of 1-year death was 0.6%, 1.9%, 3.3%, 6.2%, and 17.7% in lowest, low, intermediate, high, and highest risk groups, respectively. Mortality hazard ratios ranged from 11.48 to 36.22 in the highest 3 deciles (all P<0.001 versus lowest risk). Conclusions—Simultaneous estimation of risks of appropriate shock and mortality can be performed using clinical variables, providing a potential framework for identification of patients who are unlikely to benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Sotalol and type IA drugs in combination prevent recurrent of sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVESnThis study assessed the efficacy of the combination of sotalol and either quinidine or procainamide in preventing sustained ventricular tachycardia inducibility and recurrence and prospectively evaluated the ability of the drug combination to prevent ventricular tachycardia recurrence when the arrhythmia remained inducible but was modified.nnnBACKGROUNDnIndividual antiarrhythmic drugs are often ineffective in preventing the induction and recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Beta-adrenergic blockade and prolongation of refractoriness may be important components of successful antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia. We reasoned that the combination of sotalol, which has beta-adrenergic blocking properties and prolonged ventricular refractoriness, and quinidine or procainamide, two agents that slow conduction and prolong refractory periods, would be effective therapy in such patients.nnnMETHODSnWe administered low dose sotalol (205 +/- 84 mg/day) plus quinidine sulfate (1,278 +/- 479 mg/day) or procainamide (2,393 +/- 1,423 mg/day) to 50 patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and inducible ventricular tachycardia.nnnRESULTSnIn 21 (46%) of 46 patients, ventricular tachycardia was rendered noninducible at electrophysiologic study (group I), and in 17 patients (37%), inducible tachycardia was modified according to prospectively identified criteria (group II), for a combined 83% response rate. Ventricular refractory periods increased from 252 +/- 24 to 316 +/- 28 ms and from 265 +/- 33 to 316 +/- 24 ms in groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.001), but from 234 +/- 19 to only 286 +/- 13 ms in the group of patients with unmodified ventricular tachycardia inducibility (n = 8, group III, p < 0.001). Cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia slowed from 324 +/- 62 to 432 +/- 70 ms in group II patients (p < 0.001), whereas it slowed less in group III patients (279 +/- 73 to 314 +/- 63 ms, p = NS). Forty-two of the 50 patients (including all patients in groups I and II) were discharged on treatment with the drug combination. After 25 +/- 19 months of follow-up, the actuarial recurrence rate of ventricular tachycardia was 6%, 6% and 11% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Among patients in whom this drug combination was unsuccessful at electrophysiologic study (group III) and in those who received alternative therapy after combination therapy was discontinued because of side effects, actuarial recurrence rates were 9%, 14% and 32% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe combination of sotalol plus quinidine or procainamide markedly prolongs ventricular refractoriness and slows induced ventricular tachycardia in a high proportion of patients. Patients with modified or noninducible tachycardia have a low rate of arrhythmia recurrence in follow-up. This drug combination deserves further evaluation.

Predictors of Short Term Complications After ICD Replacement: Results from the Ontario ICD Database

Background— Complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement are often clinically devastating, particularly when infection or reoperation occurs. Identifying factors contributing to complications may permit identification of high-risk individuals that warrant incremental monitoring and therapy to attenuate risk. In addition, replacement may be a discretionary decision in the context of an advisory or borderline device performance and patient, device, and implanter factors that predict adverse outcome may assist in clinical decision-making. Methods and Results— In a prospective, multicenter, population-based registry of all ICD patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complication and all-cause mortality rates from February 2007 to August 2009 in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as major or minor. ICD replacement was performed in 1081 of 5176 patients (20.8%) undergoing ICD implantation (age, 64.3±12.7 years; 78.5% men). In patients undergoing ICD replacement, 47 patients (4.3%) had a complication within 45 days, with 47 major complications in 28 patients (2.6%), most commonly infection (n=23), lead revision (n=35), electrical storm (n=14), and pulmonary edema (n=13). Minor complications occurred in 2.3% of patients, most commonly incisional infection (n=10) and pocket hematoma (n=10). On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with major complications were Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.70 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.027) and multiple previous procedures on the pocket (adjusted HR, 3.35 for >1 versus 1; P=0.058). Risk factors associated with any complication were the use of antiarrhythmic therapy (adjusted HR, 6.29; P=0.001), implanter volume (adjusted HR 10.4 for <60/y versus >120/y, P=0.026), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted HR, 3.00 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.031). In a Cox model with a time-dependent variable of major complication within 45 days after replacement, major complications after ICD replacement were associated with an increased risk of mortality at 45, 90, and 180 days (adjusted HR, 9.61, 12.69, and 6.41, respectively; P=0.002 to 0.039). Conclusions— Risk factors associated with complications after ICD replacement include the presence of angina, antiarrhythmic therapy, increased number of previous procedures, and low implanter volume. Major complications may be associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality.

Predictors of Short-Term Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ReplacementClinical Perspective: Results From the Ontario ICD Database

Background— Complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement are often clinically devastating, particularly when infection or reoperation occurs. Identifying factors contributing to complications may permit identification of high-risk individuals that warrant incremental monitoring and therapy to attenuate risk. In addition, replacement may be a discretionary decision in the context of an advisory or borderline device performance and patient, device, and implanter factors that predict adverse outcome may assist in clinical decision-making. Methods and Results— In a prospective, multicenter, population-based registry of all ICD patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complication and all-cause mortality rates from February 2007 to August 2009 in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as major or minor. ICD replacement was performed in 1081 of 5176 patients (20.8%) undergoing ICD implantation (age, 64.3±12.7 years; 78.5% men). In patients undergoing ICD replacement, 47 patients (4.3%) had a complication within 45 days, with 47 major complications in 28 patients (2.6%), most commonly infection (n=23), lead revision (n=35), electrical storm (n=14), and pulmonary edema (n=13). Minor complications occurred in 2.3% of patients, most commonly incisional infection (n=10) and pocket hematoma (n=10). On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with major complications were Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.70 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.027) and multiple previous procedures on the pocket (adjusted HR, 3.35 for >1 versus 1; P=0.058). Risk factors associated with any complication were the use of antiarrhythmic therapy (adjusted HR, 6.29; P=0.001), implanter volume (adjusted HR 10.4 for <60/y versus >120/y, P=0.026), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted HR, 3.00 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.031). In a Cox model with a time-dependent variable of major complication within 45 days after replacement, major complications after ICD replacement were associated with an increased risk of mortality at 45, 90, and 180 days (adjusted HR, 9.61, 12.69, and 6.41, respectively; P=0.002 to 0.039). Conclusions— Risk factors associated with complications after ICD replacement include the presence of angina, antiarrhythmic therapy, increased number of previous procedures, and low implanter volume. Major complications may be associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality.

Predictors of Short-Term Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator ReplacementClinical Perspective

Background— Complications after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement are often clinically devastating, particularly when infection or reoperation occurs. Identifying factors contributing to complications may permit identification of high-risk individuals that warrant incremental monitoring and therapy to attenuate risk. In addition, replacement may be a discretionary decision in the context of an advisory or borderline device performance and patient, device, and implanter factors that predict adverse outcome may assist in clinical decision-making. Methods and Results— In a prospective, multicenter, population-based registry of all ICD patients at 18 centers in Ontario, Canada, we examined 45-day complication and all-cause mortality rates from February 2007 to August 2009 in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. Complications were determined longitudinally and were categorized as major or minor. ICD replacement was performed in 1081 of 5176 patients (20.8%) undergoing ICD implantation (age, 64.3±12.7 years; 78.5% men). In patients undergoing ICD replacement, 47 patients (4.3%) had a complication within 45 days, with 47 major complications in 28 patients (2.6%), most commonly infection (n=23), lead revision (n=35), electrical storm (n=14), and pulmonary edema (n=13). Minor complications occurred in 2.3% of patients, most commonly incisional infection (n=10) and pocket hematoma (n=10). On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with major complications were Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.70 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.027) and multiple previous procedures on the pocket (adjusted HR, 3.35 for >1 versus 1; P=0.058). Risk factors associated with any complication were the use of antiarrhythmic therapy (adjusted HR, 6.29; P=0.001), implanter volume (adjusted HR 10.4 for <60/y versus >120/y, P=0.026), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (adjusted HR, 3.00 for class 2 to 4 versus 0 to 1; P=0.031). In a Cox model with a time-dependent variable of major complication within 45 days after replacement, major complications after ICD replacement were associated with an increased risk of mortality at 45, 90, and 180 days (adjusted HR, 9.61, 12.69, and 6.41, respectively; P=0.002 to 0.039). Conclusions— Risk factors associated with complications after ICD replacement include the presence of angina, antiarrhythmic therapy, increased number of previous procedures, and low implanter volume. Major complications may be associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality.