Jui G. Bhagwat
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publication
Featured researches published by Jui G. Bhagwat.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 2005
Thomas A. Lasko; Jui G. Bhagwat; Kelly H. Zou; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are frequently used in biomedical informatics research to evaluate classification and prediction models for decision support, diagnosis, and prognosis. ROC analysis investigates the accuracy of a models ability to separate positive from negative cases (such as predicting the presence or absence of disease), and the results are independent of the prevalence of positive cases in the study population. It is especially useful in evaluating predictive models or other tests that produce output values over a continuous range, since it captures the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity over that range. There are many ways to conduct an ROC analysis. The best approach depends on the experiment; an inappropriate approach can easily lead to incorrect conclusions. In this article, we review the basic concepts of ROC analysis, illustrate their use with sample calculations, make recommendations drawn from the literature, and list readily available software.
medical image computing and computer assisted intervention | 2005
Steven Haker; William M. Wells; Simon K. Warfield; Ion Florin Talos; Jui G. Bhagwat; Daniel Goldberg-Zimring; Asim Mian; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Kelly H. Zou
In any medical domain, it is common to have more than one test (classifier) to diagnose a disease. In image analysis, for example, there is often more than one reader or more than one algorithm applied to a certain data set. Combining of classifiers is often helpful, but determining the way in which classifiers should be combined is not trivial. Standard strategies are based on learning classifier combination functions from data. We describe a simple strategy to combine results from classifiers that have not been applied to a common data set, and therefore can not undergo this type of joint training. The strategy, which assumes conditional independence of classifiers, is based on the calculation of a combined Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, using maximum likelihood analysis to determine a combination rule for each ROC operating point. We offer some insights into the use of ROC analysis in the field of medical imaging.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 2005
Kelly H. Zou; Frederic S. Resnic; Ion Florin Talos; Daniel Goldberg-Zimring; Jui G. Bhagwat; Steven Haker; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A. Jolesz; Lucila Ohno-Machado
OBJECTIVE Medical classification accuracy studies often yield continuous data based on predictive models for treatment outcomes. A popular method for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests is the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The main objective was to develop a global statistical hypothesis test for assessing the goodness-of-fit (GOF) for parametric ROC curves via the bootstrap. DESIGN A simple log (or logit) and a more flexible Box-Cox normality transformations were applied to untransformed or transformed data from two clinical studies to predict complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) and for image-guided neurosurgical resection results predicted by tumor volume, respectively. We compared a non-parametric with a parametric binormal estimate of the underlying ROC curve. To construct such a GOF test, we used the non-parametric and parametric areas under the curve (AUCs) as the metrics, with a resulting p value reported. RESULTS In the interventional cardiology example, logit and Box-Cox transformations of the predictive probabilities led to satisfactory AUCs (AUC=0.888; p=0.78, and AUC=0.888; p=0.73, respectively), while in the brain tumor resection example, log and Box-Cox transformations of the tumor size also led to satisfactory AUCs (AUC=0.898; p=0.61, and AUC=0.899; p=0.42, respectively). In contrast, significant departures from GOF were observed without applying any transformation prior to assuming a binormal model (AUC=0.766; p=0.004, and AUC=0.831; p=0.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In both studies the p values suggested that transformations were important to consider before applying any binormal model to estimate the AUC. Our analyses also demonstrated and confirmed the predictive values of different classifiers for determining the interventional complications following PCIs and resection outcomes in image-guided neurosurgery.
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | 2006
Ion-Florin Talos; Asim Mian; Kelly H. Zou; Li Hsu; D. Goldberg-Zimring; Steven Haker; Jui G. Bhagwat; Robert V. Mulkern
Abstract.The introduction and development, over the last three decades, of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopy technology for in vivo studies of the human brain represents a truly remarkable achievement, with enormous scientific and clinical ramifications. These effectively non-invasive techniques allow for studies of the anatomy, the function and the metabolism of the living human brain. They have allowed for new understandings of how the healthy brain works and have provided insights into the mechanisms underlying multiple disease processes which affect the brain. Different MR techniques have been developed for studying anatomy, function and metabolism. The primary focus of this review is to describe these different methodologies and to briefly review how they are being employed to more fully appreciate the intricacies associated with the organ, which most distinctly differentiates the human species from the other animal forms on earth.
Radiology | 2006
Stuart G. Silverman; Syed A. Akbar; Koenraad J. Mortele; Kemal Tuncali; Jui G. Bhagwat; Julian L. Seifter
Radiology | 2006
Ion Florin Talos; Kelly H. Zou; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jui G. Bhagwat; Ron Kikinis; Peter McL. Black; Ferenc A. Jolesz
Journal of Nutrition | 2006
Kurt Z. Long; Teresa Estrada-Garcia; Jorge L. Rosado; José Ignacio Santos; Meredith Haas; Mathew Firestone; Jui G. Bhagwat; Cheryl Young; Herbert L. DuPont; Ellen Hertzmark; N. Nanda Nanthakumar
Radiology | 2004
Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Jui G. Bhagwat; Kelly H. Zou; Adheet Gogate; Lisa Intriere; Pauline Kelly; Steven E. Seltzer; Pablo R. Ros
Radiology | 2005
Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Jui G. Bhagwat; Kelly H. Zou; Eric Nathanson; Ileana E. Gill; Pablo R. Ros
Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2004
Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Jui G. Bhagwat; Ileana E. Gill; Eric Nathanson; Steven E. Seltzer; Pablo R. Ros