Jukka Harju

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

BackgroundMinilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) has recently challenged the role of the laparoscopic approach (LC) for cholecystectomies. However, the situation is far from clear when operating times and recovery are evaluated.MethodsAltogether 157 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomized into MC (n = 85) and LC (n = 72) groups. Both groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical fitness classification, and operating surgeon.ResultsThe mean operating time was 55 ± 19.5 min in the MC group and 79 ± 27.0 min in the LC group (p < 0.0001). The postoperative hospital stay and length of sick leave did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or postoperative pulmonary function between the groups. The body mass index did not influence operating time or patient recovery in either group. No major complications occurred in either groups.ConclusionThe MC procedure seems to be a faster technique than the LC approach for noncomplicated gallstone disease, with no difference in recovery times. The MC procedure also seems to be suitable for the obese patient.

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: a prospective clinical pilot study.

Background and Aims: In some studies minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) has been shown to be as good as laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the surgical treatment of cholecystolithiasis. To our knowledge, the MC operation is rarely considered as a day surgery procedure. Patients and Methods: Thirty elective symptomatic non-complicated patients were included in the study during the end of the year 2004 to June 2005. The mean age of patients was 52 years (range 27–68), the mean body mass index 29 kg/m2 (range 19–41). Gallstones were confirmed with ultrasound and the pre-operative liver laboratory tests were normal in all patients. A five (+/-2) centimetre-long incision was used avoiding to split the rectus abdominis muscle. All patients were re-evaluated four weeks postoperatively with the follow-up letter. Results: The average operating time was 51 minutes (range 30–105 minutes). Day surgery was possible in 25 cases (83%). Five patients (17%) stayed over night at the hospital. There were four (13%) conversions to conventional cholecystectomy. The average postoperative sick leave was 16 days (range 14–30). Two patients returned to hospital. One patient had wound pain, but no complication was found, and the patient was not admitted. One patient had a wound infection and spent 6 days in the hospital. Twenty-nine (97%) patients were satisfied with the operation and were ready to recommend it for other patients. Conclusions: The results of this study support the suitability of MC as a day surgery procedure, but a prospective randomised trial is needed to evaluate the relative advantages of MC and LC.

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study

Abstract Objective. Cholecystectomy by minilaparotomy (MC) or by laparoscopy (LC) has been shown to have equal results of both early and late recovery. Although, the ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has seen used in LC, the technique is rarely used in MC. Material and methods. Initially, 88 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomized into MC with UsD (n = 44) or conventional LC (n = 44) over a 2-year period (2010–2012). The two groups were similar in terms of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. Results. Both groups were similar in terms of the operative time and the time in the operation theatre, the success of day-surgery and satisfaction with the procedure. The MC group had significantly less postoperative pain than the LC group, p = 0.002, and the MC group used less analgesics doses during the first 24 h: 2.8 (1.2) doses vs. 3.8 (1.4) doses, p = 0.003. The convalescence needed was 3 days shorter in the MC group, 7 (3) days, than that in the LC-group, 10 (8) days, p = 0.024. In the MC group 4 patients and in the LC group 11 (p = 0.046) required more than 14 days of sick leave. In the MC group there was one and in the LC group two conversions to open surgery. Conclusion. The patients in the MC group had less early postoperative pain and had a shorter convalescence than the patients in the LC group.

A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure--1-year outcome.

Abstract Objective. The long-term outcome between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has not been compared in randomized trials. Therefore, we investigated the outcome after conventional LC and MC with UsD in 78 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0172340). Material and methods. Initially 88 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (n = 44) or LC (n = 44) over a period of 2 years (2010–2012) and 78 of them (89%) were reached for a follow-up interview at 12 months after the surgery. Results. Baseline parameters were similar in the two groups, and 1/44 MCs and 2/44 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) one year after the procedure was quite similar in the two groups: 3/36 (8%) in the MC group and 2/42 (5%) in the LC group (p = 0.502). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but the proportion was similar in both groups (28% in MC and 33% in LC group, p = 0.665). Both groups were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (numeric rating scale, p = 0.470). The Quality of life (QoL) improved 34/36 (94%) in the MC group and 33/42 (79%) in the LC group (p = 0.046) and all patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation overall. Conclusion. Day-case MC and LC patients have a quite similar one-year outcome with no significant difference regarding residual abdominal symptoms, cosmetic satisfaction, QoL or CPSP.

A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups

Abstract Objective: Ultrasonic dissection (UsD) has been used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), though it is not the golden standard technique. Applying UsD to cholecystectomy by minilaparotomy (MC) is less common and there are no prospective randomized trials comparing these two techniques. Therefore, we conducted the present study to investigate the use of the UsD in the MC versus the LC procedure. Material and methods: Initially 104 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (n = 53) or LC (n = 51) groups, both groups using UsD, over a period of 2 years (2013–2015). The study groups were similar in terms of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. Results: The demographic variables and the surgical data were similar in the study groups. Similar low postoperative pain scores were reported in the two study groups during the first four hours after surgery. The incidence of nausea/vomiting was similar between the two study groups, 47% in the MC group versus 42% in the LC group. However, the patients in the MC group were treated more frequently with antiemetics, the incidence being 39% in the MC group versus 21% in the LC group (p = 0.02). The pain at rest at 24h after the surgery was similar in the two study groups, but the LC patients reported less pain at the normal activity, the mean of numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0–10 score being 3.9 in the MC group versus 2.9 in the LC group (p = 0.05), and the pain at the quick movement/coughing, the mean NRS being 4.9 in the MC group versus 3.2 in the LC group (p = 0.005). The length of sick leave was 17.4 days in the MC group and 14.4 days in the LC group (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that both MC and LC are feasible and safe options for mini-invasive cholecystectomy. A new finding with clinical relevance in the present work is a relatively similar short-term outcome in the MC and LC althought the LC patients reported significantly lower pain score 24 hours postoperatively and a shorter convalescence.

Inflammatory response to surgical trauma in patients with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised multicentre study

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the inflammatory response to surgical trauma in minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Assessment of inflammatory response to surgical trauma in MC has not been addressed properly. Therefore, we investigated five interleukins (IL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in MC versus LC group in a prospective randomised trial. Methods Initially, 106 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomised into MC (n = 56) or LC (n = 50) groups. Plasma levels of five interleukins (IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10) and hs-CRP were measured at three time points; before operation (PRE), immediately after operation (POP1) and six hours after operation (POP2). The primary end-point of the study was to compare the plasma levels of five interleukins and CRP in LC versus MC group. Results The demographic variables and the surgical data were similar in the study groups. The patients in the MC group had higher elevation of the CRP mean values post-operatively (p = 0.01). However, the patients in the MC group had higher elevation of the IL-1ra mean values post-operatively, the mean pre-/post-operative IL-1ra values being 299/614 pg/ml in the MC group versus 379/439 pg/ml in the LC group (p = 0.003). There was no statistical significance in IL-6 mean values between the MC and LC groups pre- and post-operatively (POP1). However, the patients in the MC group had higher IL-6 mean values six hours post-operatively (POP2), the mean IL-6 values being 27.6 pg/ml in the MC group versus 14.8 pg/ml in the LC group (p = 0.037). In addition, the patients in the MC group had higher elevation of the IL-6 mean values post-operatively, the mean pre-/post-operative IL-6 values being 4.1/27.6 pg/ml in the MC group versus 3.8/14.8 pg/ml in the LC group (p = 0.04). There was no statistical significance in IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β mean values between the MC and LC groups pre- and post-operatively. Conclusion Our results suggest that the inflammatory response in MC versus LC groups was similar based on the IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β values. A new finding with possible clinical relevance in the present work is higher relative elevation of the IL-1ra and IL-6 mean values post-operatively in the MC group.

Gallstone Patients with Enhanced Oxidative Stress Biomarker Superoxide Dismutase (SOD1) Plasma Levels Have Significantly Lower Number of Postoperative Analgesic Oxycodone Doses: A Prospective Study with Special Reference to Cancer Patients

Background/Aim: Oxidative stress biomarker superoxide dismutase (SOD1) plasma levels in operated gallstone patients versus cancer patients are unknown. In addition, the number of analgesic doses during the first 24 h postoperatively (NAD24) in gallstone patients operated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or minicholecystectomy (MC) is unreported. The aim of the study was to determine a correlation between the plasma SOD1 levels in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients. Patients and Methods: Initially, 114 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into LC (n=54) or MC (n=60) groups. The plasma levels of the SOD1 marker were measured just before, immediately after (POP1) and 6 h after the operation (POP2). Results: The median plasma SOD1 levels preoperatively and following surgery in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients were statistically insignificant (p=0.90, p=0.88, p=0.21, respectively). The median plasma levels of SOD1 increased immediately after operation (POP1) and the postoperative elevation between the preoperative (PRE) and the POP1 values in the SOD1 marker were statistically significant (p=0.027). Then the median plasma levels of SOD1 marker decreased 6 h postoperatively (POP2) and the decrease between the POP1 and POP2 values in the SOD1 marker were statistically highly significant (p<0.001). There is a highly significant inverse correlation between the individual values of the NAD24 and plasma SOD1 values postoperatively in LC and MC patients (r=−0.335, p=0.011). Conclusion: The plasma SOD1 levels preoperatively and following surgery in the LC and MC patients versus cancer patients were quite similar. Cholecystectomy patients with enhanced levels of SOD1 appeared to have significantly lower number of analgesic oxycodone doses during the first 24 h postoperatively (NAD24).