Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julia E. Flaherty is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julia E. Flaherty.


Atmospheric Pollution Research | 2011

In­situ monitoring of trace gases in a non-urban environment

J. R. Mioduszewski; Xiao-Ying Yu; Victor R. Morris; Carl M. Berkowitz; Julia E. Flaherty

Abstract A set of commercial instruments measuring carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O 3 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and nitrogen oxides [nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), and odd nitrogens (NO X )] was integrated and deployed in a non– urban environment. The deployment occurred between July 2, 2007 and August 7, 2007 in Richland, WA. The mixing ratios of all species were lower than in most rural–suburban environments, and strong diurnal patterns were observed. NO 2 was depleted by photochemically formed ozone during the day and replenished at night as ozone was destroyed. The highest ozone concentration during these episodes was 45 ppb. The overall average was 15 ppb with readings approaching near zero at times. This observation is low compared to average daytime summer readings of 60–80 ppb in highly populated and industrialized urban areas in the Pacific Northwest region. Back-trajectory analysis and prevailing weather conditions both indicated that much of the ozone was transported locally or was produced in– situ . Analysis of SO 2 as a tracer for O 3 advection further indicated lack of long–range regional transport of pollutants to Richland. We also present results of analysis of high ozone episodes and comparisons relative to other areas in the Pacific Northwest region. These results provide a useful sample data set to study the historical record of air quality in rural Eastern Washington.


Archive | 2010

Assessment of the 3430 Building Filtered Exhaust Stack Sampling Probe Location

John A. Glissmeyer; Julia E. Flaherty

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory performed a demonstration to determine the acceptable location in which to place an air sampling probe for emissions monitoring for radionuclides in the exhaust air discharge from the new 3430 Building Filtered Exhaust Stack. The method was to adopt the results of a previously performed test series for a system of similar configuration, followed by a partial test on the actual system to verify the applicability of previously performed tests. The qualification criteria included 1) a uniform air velocity, 2) an average flow angle that does not deviate from the axis of the duct by more than 20°, 3) a uniform concentration of tracer gases, and 4) a uniform concentration of tracer particles. Section 1 provides background information for the demonstration, and Section 2 describes the test strategy, including the criteria for the applicability of model results and the test matrix. Section 3 describes the flow -angle test and the velocity uniformity test, Section 4 provides the test results, and Section 5 provides the conclusions. Appendix A includes the test data sheets, and Appendix B gives applicable qualification results from the previously tested model stack. The data from the previously tested and similarly designed stack was demonstrated to be applicable to the current design for the 3430 Building Filtered Exhaust Stack. The 3430 stack was tested in both January and May of 2010 to document the results of several changes that were made to the exhaust system after the January tests. The 3430 stack meets the qualification criteria given in the American National Standards Institute/Health Physics Society N13.1 standard. Changes to the system configuration or operations outside of the bounds of this report (e.g., exhaust velocity increases, relocation of sample probe) will require retesting/reevaluation to determine compliancewith the requirements.


Archive | 2014

Assessment of the LV-S2 & LV-S3 Stack Sampling Probe Locations for Compliance with ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999

John A. Glissmeyer; Ernest J. Antonio; Julia E. Flaherty; Brett G. Amidan

This document reports on a series of tests conducted to assess the proposed air sampling locations for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Group 1-2A exhaust stacks with respect to the applicable criteria regarding the placement of an air sampling probe. The LV-C2, LV-S2, and LV-S3 exhaust stacks were tested together as a group (Test Group 1-2A). This report only covers the results of LV-S2 and LV-S3; LV-C2 will be reported on separately. Federal regulations1 require that a sampling probe be located in the exhaust stack according to the criteria established by the American National Standards Institute/Health Physics Society (ANSI/HPS) N13.1-1999, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Stack and Ducts of Nuclear Facilities. 2 These criteria address the capability of the sampling probe to extract a sample that represents the effluent stream.


Archive | 2011

Measurement of the Tracer Gradient and Sampling System Bias of the Hot Fuel Examination Facility Stack Air Monitoring System

John A. Glissmeyer; Julia E. Flaherty

This report describes tracer gas uniformity and bias measurements made in the exhaust air discharge of the Hot Fuel Examination Facility at Idaho National Laboratory. The measurements were a follow-up on earlier measurements which indicated a lack of mixing of the two ventilation streams being discharged via a common stack. The lack of mixing is detrimental to the accuracy of air emission measurements. The lack of mixing was confirmed in these new measurements. The air sampling probe was found to be out of alignment and that was corrected. The suspected sampling bias in the air sample stream was disproved.


Archive | 2011

Assessment of the Group 5-6 (LB C2, LB S2, LV S1) Stack Sampling Probe Locations for Compliance with ANSI/HPS N13.1 1999

John A. Glissmeyer; Julia E. Flaherty; Gregory F. Piepel

This document reports on a series of tests to assess the proposed air sampling locations for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Group 5-6 exhaust stacks with respect to the applicable criteria regarding the placement of an air sampling probe. The LB-C2, LV-S1, and LB S2 exhaust stacks were tested together as a group (Test Group 5-6) because the common factor in their design is that the last significant flow disturbance upstream of the air sampling probe is a reduction in duct diameter. Federal regulations( ) require that a sampling probe be located in the exhaust stack according to the criteria of the American National Standards Institute/Health Physics Society (ANSI/HPS) N13.1-1999, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Stack and Ducts of Nuclear Facilities. These criteria address the capability of the sampling probe to extract a sample that represents the effluent stream. The testing on scale models of the stacks conducted for this project was part of the River Protection Project—Waste Treatment Plant Support Program under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830 according to the statement of work issued by Bechtel National Inc. (BNI, 24590-QL-SRA-W000-00101, N13.1-1999 Stack Monitor Scale Model Testing and Qualification, Revision 1, 9/12/2007) and Work Authorization 09 of Memorandum of Agreement 24590-QL-HC9-WA49-00001. The internal Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) project for this task is 53024, Work for Hanford Contractors Stack Monitoring. The testing described in this document was further guided by the Test Plan Scale Model Testing the Waste Treatment Plant LB-C2, LB-S2, and LV-S1 (Test Group 5-6) Stack Air Sampling Positions (TP-RPP-WTP-594). The tests conducted by PNNL during 2009 and 2010 on the Group 5-6 scale model systems are described in this report. The series of tests consists of various measurements taken over a grid of points in the duct cross-section at the designed sampling probe locations and at five duct diameters up and downstream from the design location to accommodate potential construction variability. The tests were done only at the design sampling probe location on the scale model of LB-S2 because that ductwork was already constructed. The ANSI/HPS N13.1-1999 criteria and the corresponding results of the test series on the scale models are summarized in this report.


Archive | 2010

Assessment of the Proposed INTEC CPP 666 Stack Monitoring Site for Compliance with ANSI/HPS N13.1 1999

John A. Glissmeyer; Julia E. Flaherty

This document reports on a series of tests to determine whether the proposed new location for air sampling probes in the CPP-666 heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) exhaust duct would meet the applicable regulatory criteria regarding the placement of an air sampling probe. Federal regulations( ) require that a sampling probe be located in the exhaust stack according to the criteria of the American National Standards Institute/Health Physical Society (ANSI/HPS) N13.1-1999, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactive Substances from the Stack and Ducts of Nuclear Facilities. These criteria address the capability of the sampling probe to extract a sample that is representative of the effluent stream.


Atmospheric Environment | 2007

Characteristics of puff dispersion in an urban environment

J. C. Doran; K.J. Allwine; Julia E. Flaherty; K.L. Clawson; R.G. Carter


Seventh Conference on Coastal Atmospheric and Oceanic Prediction and Processes joint with the Seventh Symposium on the Urban Environment (10-13 September 2007) | 2007

Evaluation study of building-resolved urban dispersion models

Julia E. Flaherty; K Jerry Allwine; Michael J. Brown; William J. Coirier; Shawn C. Ericson; Olav R. Hansen; Alan H. Huber; Sura Kim; Martin J. Leach; Jeff D. Mirocha; Rob K. Newsom; Gopal Patnaik; Inanc Senocak


Seventh Conference on Coastal Atmospheric and Oceanic Prediction and Processes joint with the Seventh Symposium on the Urban Environment (10-13 September 2007) | 2007

Urban Dispersion Program: Urban Measurements Applied to Emergency Response

K Jerry Allwine; Kirk L. Clawson; Julia E. Flaherty; John H. Heiser; Rayford P. Hosker; Martin Leach; Leo W. stockham


Atmospheric Environment | 2018

Evaluation of nitrous oxide as a substitute for sulfur hexafluoride to reduce global warming impacts of ANSI/HPS N13.1 gaseous uniformity testing

Xiao-Ying Yu; J. Matthew Barnett; Brett G. Amidan; Kurtis P. Recknagle; Julia E. Flaherty; Ernest J. Antonio; John A. Glissmeyer

Collaboration


Dive into the Julia E. Flaherty's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John A. Glissmeyer

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brett G. Amidan

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest J. Antonio

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K Jerry Allwine

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiao-Ying Yu

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. B. White

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan H. Huber

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl M. Berkowitz

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clark W. King

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gopal Patnaik

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge