Julia Geynisman-Tan

Pneumothorax after laparoscopic robotic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy

We present a case of a patient in whom subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumothorax occurred on postoperative day 1 after robotic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and retropubic midurethral sling placement for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. This case demonstrates a rare complication of gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.

Changing Referral Patterns to Urogynecology

Objective The study aims to identify sources of and changes in referral patterns for pelvic floor disorders. Methods All new patient visits to urogynecology at our institution between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified. Patient demographics, referral source, insurance type, and visit diagnoses using ICD-9 codes were abstracted. ICD-9 codes were grouped into 18 urogynecologic diagnoses. Data were analyzed using SPSS (Version 20; Chicago, IL). Results Five thousand seven hundred ninety-nine new patient visits were included in the analysis. The mean age was 54 ± 17 years and 59% were Caucasian. Forty-four percent were referred by obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), 32% by primary care providers (PCPs), 14% by self-referral, and 9% by other specialties. New patient visits increased overall by 280% over 6 years; self- and PCP referrals increased by 480% and 320%, respectively. In comparison, OB/GYN referrals increased by only 229%. Patients diagnosed with prolapse and stress incontinence were more likely to be referred by an OB/GYN (P < 0.001), whereas PCPs were more likely to refer for urinary tract infections (P < 0.005) and urgency urinary incontinence (P < 0.001) than OB/GYNs. Conclusions Demand for pelvic floor specialists is growing quickly, with PCP and self-referrals outpacing referrals from obstetrician-gynecologists to tertiary care urogynecology practices.

Anal penetrative intercourse as a risk factor for fecal incontinence

Objective The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between anal penetrative intercourse (API) and pelvic floor symptoms, specifically, anal incontinence (AI). Methods This was an institutional review board–approved, cross-sectional, e-mail survey of women enrolled in the Illinois Womens Health Registry. Participants were anonymously queried about their sexual practices and the effects of these on bowel and bladder symptoms. Urinary symptoms were assessed using the urogenital distress inventory-6 and bowel symptoms with the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Results One thousand three women (mean age of 46 ± 15 years) completed the survey. Eighty percent were white, 56% were married, and 99% reported ever being sexually active. Thirty-two percent had API at least once, and 12% considered it “part of their sexual practice.” Sixty percent of the cohort reported a bothersome urinary symptom on the urogenital distress inventory-6, 70% reported AI on the FISI, and 15% reported fecal incontinence. Of women who engaged in API, 18% reported it changed their stool consistency, and 10% reported it caused AI. Having engaged in API within the last month was correlated with higher FISI scores (P = 0.05) and with fecal incontinence on the FISI (28.3% vs 14.4%; P = 0.01; odds ratio, 2.48). In addition, API was more commonly practiced among women who reported that vaginal intercourse caused dyspareunia (17% vs 12%, P = 0.05) or changes in bladder symptoms such as urgency or dysuria (44% vs 30%, P < 0.001). Conclusions Self-reported AI and FI (as measured by the FISI scores) are higher in women who have had API, and frequency of API may be important in determining the risk of bowel symptoms.