Julia H. Indik

Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest*

Objective:To determine the relationship of electrocardiographic rhythm during cardiac arrest with survival outcomes. Design:Prospective, observational study. Setting:Total of 411 hospitals in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Patients:Total of 51,919 adult patients with pulseless cardiac arrests from April 1999 to July 2005. Measurements and Main Results:Registry data collected included first documented rhythm, patient demographics, pre-event data, event data, and survival and neurologic outcome data. Of 51,919 indexed cardiac arrests, first documented pulseless rhythm was ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 3810 (7%), ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 8718 (17%), pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 19,262 (37%) and asystole 20,129 (39%). Subsequent VT/VF (that is, VT or VF occurring during resuscitation for PEA or asystole) occurred in 5154 (27%), with first documented rhythm of PEA and 4988 (25%) with asystole. Survival to hospital discharge rate was not different between those with first documented VF and VT (37% each, adjusted odds ratio [OR]) 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–1.23). Survival to hospital discharge was slightly more likely after PEA than asystole (12% vs. 11%, adjusted OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.00–1.18), Survival to discharge was substantially more likely after first documented VT/VF than PEA/asystole (adjusted OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.55–1.82). Survival to discharge was also more likely after PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF compared with PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF (14% vs. 7% for PEA without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; 12% vs. 8% for asystole without vs. with subsequent VT/VF; adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.44–1.80). Conclusions:Survival to hospital discharge was substantially more likely when the first documented rhythm was shockable rather than nonshockable, and slightly more likely after PEA than asystole. Survival to hospital discharge was less likely following PEA/asystole with subsequent VT/VF compared to PEA/asystole without subsequent VT/VF.

2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Glenn N. Levine, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair [¶][1] Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA[¶][1] Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, MHS, FACC, FAHA Kim K. Birtcher, PharmD, AACC Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC

2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is clearly an effective therapy for selected patients in definable populations. The benefits and risks of ICD therapy are directly impacted by programming and surgical decisions. This flexibility is both a great strength and a weakness, for which there has been no prior official discussion or guidance. It is the consensus of the four continental electrophysiology societies that there are four important clinical issues for which there are sufficient ICD clinical and trial data to provide evidence-based expert guidance. This document systematically describes the >80% (83–100%, mean: 96%) required consensus achieved for each recommendation by official balloting in regard to the programming of (i) bradycardia mode and rate, (ii) tachycardia detection, (iii) tachycardia therapy, and (iv) the intraprocedural testing of defibrillation efficacy. Representatives nominated by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulacion Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE)-Latin American Society of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology participated in the project definition, the literature review, the recommendation development, the writing of the document, and its approval. The 32 recommendations were balloted by the 35 writing committee members and were approved by an …

Antithrombotic management in patients undergoing electrophysiological procedures: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) position document endorsed by the ESC Working Group Thrombosis, Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS).

Since the advent of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) agents, which act as direct thrombin inhibitors or inhibitors of Factor Xa, clinicians are provided with valuable alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). At the same time, electrophysiologists frequently perform more invasive procedures, increasingly involving the left chambers of the heart. Thus, they are constantly faced with the dilemma of balancing the risk for thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. These changes in the rapidly evolving field mandate an update of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) 2008 consensus document on this topic.1 The present document covers the antithrombotic management during different ablation procedures, implantation or exchange of cardiac implantable electronical devices (CIEDs), as well as the management of peri-interventional bleeding complications. The document is not a formal guideline and due to the lack of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for many of the clinical situations encountered, the recommendations are often ‘expert opinion’. The document strives to be practical for which reason we subdivided it in the three main topics: ablation procedure, CIED implantation or generator change, and issues of peri-interventional bleeding complications on concurrent antiplatelet therapy. For quick reference, every subchapter is followed by a short section on consensus recommendations. Many RCTs are ongoing in this field and it is hoped that this document will help to prompt further well-designed studies. ### Ablation of atrial fibrillation, left atrial arrhythmias and right sided atrial flutter In patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or even persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation is indicated when antiarrhythmic drugs have failed in controlling recurrences or even as a first-line therapy in selected patients.2–4 Patients with AF have an increased risk of thromboembolic events, which varies according to the presence of several risk factors.5,6 Apart from their intrinsic thromboembolic risks, ablation in these patients increases thromboembolic risk due to the introduction and manipulation …

Epinephrine improves 24-hour survival in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation demonstrating that early intraosseous is superior to delayed intravenous administration.

BACKGROUND:Vasopressors administered IV late during resuscitation efforts fail to improve survival. Intraosseous (IO) access can provide a route for earlier administration. We hypothesized that IO epinephrine after 1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (an “optimal” IO scenario) after 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest would improve outcome in comparison with either IV epinephrine after 8 minutes of CPR (a “realistic” IV scenario) or placebo controls with no epinephrine. METHODS:Thirty swine were randomized to IO epinephrine, IV epinephrine, or placebo. Important outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-hour survival, and 24-hour survival with good neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 1). RESULTS:ROSC after 10 minutes of untreated VF was uncommon without administration of epinephrine (1 of 10), whereas ROSC was nearly universal with IO epinephrine or delayed IV epinephrine (10 of 10 and 9 of 10, respectively; P = 0.001 for either versus placebo). Twenty-four hour survival was substantially more likely after IO epinephrine than after delayed IV epinephrine (10 of 10 vs. 4 of 10, P = 0.001). None of the placebo group survived at 24 hours. Survival with good neurological outcome was more likely after IO epinephrine than after placebo (6 of 10 vs. 0 of 10, P = 0.011), and only 3 of 10 survived with good neurological outcome in the delayed IV epinephrine group (not significant versus either IO or placebo). CONCLUSION:In this swine model of prolonged VF cardiac arrest, epinephrine administration during CPR improved outcomes. In addition, early IO epinephrine improved outcomes in comparison with delayed IV epinephrine.

2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

Julia H. Indik, MD, PhD, FHRS, FACC, FAHA (Chair), J. Rod Gimbel, MD (Vice-Chair), Haruhiko Abe, MD,* Ricardo Alkmim-Teixeira, MD, PhD, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, MD, FHRS, Geoffrey D. Clarke, PhD, FACR, FAAPM,6,x Timm-Michael L. Dickfeld, MD, PhD, Jerry W. Froelich, MD, FACR,8,{ Jonathan Grant, MD, David L. Hayes, MD, FHRS, Hein Heidbuchel, MD, PhD, FESC,** Salim F. Idriss, MD, PhD, FHRS, FACC, Emanuel Kanal, MD, FACR, FISMRM, MRMD, Rachel Lampert, MD, FHRS, Christian E. Machado, MD, FHRS, CCDS, John M. Mandrola, MD, Saman Nazarian, MD, PhD, FHRS, Kristen K. Patton, MD, Marc A. Rozner, PhD, MD, CCDS, Robert J. Russo, MD, PhD, FACC, Win-Kuang Shen, MD, FHRS,21,xx Jerold S. Shinbane, MD, FHRS, Wee Siong Teo, MBBS (NUS), FRCP (Edin), FHRS,23,{{ William Uribe, MD, FHRS, Atul Verma, MD, FRCPC, FHRS, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD, FHRS, CCDS, Pamela K. Woodard, MD, FACR, FAHA***

The influence of myocardial substrate on ventricular fibrillation waveform: A swine model of acute and postmyocardial infarction

Objective:In cardiac arrest resulting from ventricular fibrillation, the ventricular fibrillation waveform may be a clue to its duration and predict the likelihood of shock success. However, ventricular fibrillation occurs in different myocardial substrates such as ischemia, heart failure, and structurally normal hearts. We hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation is altered by myocardial infarction and varies from the acute to postmyocardial infarction periods. Design:An animal intervention study was conducted with comparison to a control group. Setting:This study took place in a university animal laboratory. Subjects:Study subjects included 37 swine. Interventions:Myocardial infarction was induced by occlusion of the midleft anterior descending artery. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in control swine, acute myocardial infarction swine, and in postmyocardial infarction swine after a 2-wk recovery period. Measurements and Main Results:Ventricular fibrillation was recorded in 11 swine with acute myocardial infarction, ten postmyocardial infarction, and 16 controls. Frequency (mean, median, dominant, and bandwidth) and amplitude-related content (slope, slope-amp [slope divided by amplitude], and amplitude–spectrum area) were analyzed. Frequencies at 5 mins of ventricular fibrillation were altered in both acute myocardial infarction (p < .001 for all frequency characteristics) and postmyocardial infarction swine (p = .015 for mean, .002 for median, .002 for dominant frequency, and <.001 for bandwidth). At 5 mins, median frequency was highest in controls, 10.9 ± .4 Hz; lowest in acute myocardial infarction, 8.4 ± .5 Hz; and intermediate in postmyocardial infarction, 9.7 ± .5 Hz (p < .001 for acute myocardial infarction and p = .002 for postmyocardial infarction compared with control). Slope and amplitude–spectrum area were similar among the three groups with a shallow decline after minute 2, whereas slope-amp remained significantly altered for acute myocardial infarction swine at 5 mins (p = .003). Conclusions:Ventricular fibrillation frequencies depend on myocardial substrate and evolve from the acute through healing phases of myocardial infarction. Amplitude related measures, however, are similar among these groups. It is unknown how defibrillation may be affected by relying on the ventricular fibrillation waveform without considering myocardial substrate.

Utility of the Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform to Predict a Return of Spontaneous Circulation and Distinguish Acute From Post Myocardial Infarction or Normal Swine in Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

Background—In cardiac arrest, the ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform, particularly amplitude spectral area (AMSA) and slope, predicts the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), but it is unknown whether the predictive utility differs in an acute myocardial infarction (MI), prior MI, or normal myocardium and if the waveform can distinguish the underlying myocardial state. We hypothesized that in a swine model of VF cardiac arrest, AMSA and slope predict ROSC after a shock independent of substrate and distinguish an acute from nonacute MI state. Methods and Results—MI was induced by occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. Post MI swine recovered for a 2-week period before induction of VF. VF was untreated for 8 minutes in 10 acute MI, 10 post MI, and 10 control swine. AMSA and slope predicted ROSC after a shock independent of myocardial state. For AMSA >31 mV-Hz, the odds ratio was 62 (P⩽0.001) compared with AMSA <19 mV-Hz. For slope >3.1 mV/s, odds ratio was 52 (P⩽0.001) compared with slope <1.8 mV/s. With chest compressions, AMSA and slope were significantly lower for acute MI swine compared with control swine, whereas in post MI swine the waveform characteristics were similar to control swine. In particular, for an AMSA >33.5 mV-Hz, the sensitivity to identify an acute from nonacute (control or post MI) state was 83%. Conclusions—In a swine model of VF cardiac arrest, AMSA and slope predict ROSC independent of myocardial substrate. Furthermore, with chest compressions, the VF waveform evolves differently and may offer a means to distinguish an acute MI.

Do patients with right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias have a normal right ventricular wall motion? A quantitative analysis compared to normal subjects

Background/Aim: Patients with ventricular ectopy from the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) are often referred for RV angiography to exclude disorders such as arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D). This is usually based on a qualitative assessment of the wall motion. We present a method to quantify the wall motion and to apply this method to compare patients with RVOT ectopy to normal subjects. Methods: RV angiograms were analyzed from 19 normal subjects and 11 subjects with RVOT ventricular arrhythmias (RVOT arrhythmia subjects) who had no other clinical or other evidence for ARVC/D. By a newly developed computer-based method, RV contours were first traced from multiple frames spanning the entire cardiac cycle. The fractional change in area between contours was then calculated as a serial function of time and location to determine both total contour area change and timing of contour movement. Contour area strain, defined as the differential change in area between nearby regions, was also computed. Results: The contour area change was greatest in the tricuspid valve region and least in the RVOT and midanterior regions. The onset of contraction was earliest in the RVOT region and latest in the apical, inferior, inferoapical, and subtricuspid valve regions. The contour strain was largest in superior tricuspid valve and inferior wall and near zero within the lateral tricuspid valve region. There were significant pairwise differences in contraction area, timing, and strain in the various regions. There were no significant differences between normal subjects and RVOT arrhythmia subjects. Conclusions: The RV wall motion is nonuniform in contour area change, strain, and timing of motion. Patients with RVOT ventricular ectopy demonstrate wall motion parameters similar to those of normal subjects. This technique should be applicable in analyzing RV wall motion in patients suspected of having ARVC/D.

Variation and correlation in human fetal umbilical Doppler velocities with fetal breathing: Evidence of the cardiac-placental connection

Doppler velocity waveforms in the human fetal umbilical vein and artery were analyzed during episodes of fetal breathing. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic velocities were measured from the umbilical artery waveform. Diastolic velocity varied the most with a mean (+/- SD) coefficient of variation of 16.0% +/- 5.0%. The coefficient of variation of systolic velocity was 7.8% +/- 2.4% and of heart rate was 5.0% +/- 1.8%. We also found that umbilical arterial flow was related to umbilical venous flow, implying an interdependence between fetal cardiovascular blood flow and placental blood flow. During breathing, venous flow varies because of changes in intrathoracic pressure in the fetus. This variation in umbilical venous velocity may affect the umbilical arterial diastolic velocity through alterations in placental filling, and may affect the umbilical arterial systolic velocity through alterations in ventricular filling, which by the Frank-Starling mechanism changes stroke volume. The interdependency of umbilical venous and umbilical arterial blood flow velocities must be considered in the interpretation of the significance of umbilical artery Doppler velocity measurements.