Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julia Hirst is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julia Hirst.


Culture, Health & Sexuality | 2004

Researching young people's sexuality and learning about sex: experience, need, and sex and relationship education

Julia Hirst

This paper describes findings from an in‐depth case study of young peoples sexuality and learning about sex. Focus groups and unstructured interviews were conducted with young women and young men aged 15–16 years in a school in the north of England. Analysis focused on disjunctions between reported sexual behaviour in a park and in a bedsitting room, and the content of school sex and relationship education. Tensions between the accounts are considered for their impact on learning about sex, sexual negotiation, subjectivity and inter‐generational understanding. Despite some negative experiences in sex education, the young people interviewed desired the affirmation and support of adults, and recommend sex and relationship education as the most appropriate vehicle for providing this. The value added outcomes of participation in the study, including consciousness and awareness raising, and the opportunity for reflection and debate and selves as ‘experts’, enhanced young peoples view that non‐judgemental and meaningful advice and guidance are possible in formal learning contexts. Implications for future forms of sex and relationship education are discussed.


Sex Education | 2008

Developing sexual competence? Exploring strategies for the provision of effective sexualities and relationships education

Julia Hirst

School‐based sexualities and relationships education (SRE) offers one of the most promising means of improving young peoples sexual health through developing ‘sexual competence’. In the absence of evidence on whether the term holds the same meanings for young people and adults (e.g. teachers, researchers, policy‐makers), the paper explores ‘adult’ notions of sexual competence as construed in research data and alluded to in UK Government guidance on SRE, then draws on empirical research with young people on factors that affect the contexts, motivations and outcomes of sexual encounters, and therefore have implications for sexual competence. These data from young people also challenge more traditional approaches to sexualities education in highlighting disjunctions between the content of school‐based input and their reported sexual experience. The paper concludes by considering the implications of these insights for developing a shared notion of what SRE is trying to achieve and suggestions for recognition in the content and approaches to SRE.


Sex Education | 2013

‘It's got to be about enjoying yourself’: young people, sexual pleasure, and sex and relationships education

Julia Hirst

Pleasure as a component of sexualities and relationships education (SRE) has been subject to much recent discussion. Arguably, academic debate has been more prominent than practitioner perspectives, with theoretical articulations and critique superseding pragmatic attention to integrating pleasure into learning about sexualities and relationships. Though there are exceptions, sexuality education that recognises pleasure and desire for young people remains absent in many contexts, despite calls for its inclusion for more than two decades. This paper offers a synthesis of expert opinion to outline the importance of pleasure and positive SRE to sexual health, rights, equality and safeguarding against coercion and harm. The paper acknowledges the often uneasy associations between sexuality, education and youth by identifying key political and academic debates, before offering a rationale on ways forward that may help persuade curriculum gatekeepers of its merits. Analysis focuses mainly on young women with reflections on current knowledge and the need for more empirically based research and theorising on boys and men. Policy developments relate to the UK, though issues raised have direct relevance for contexts where SRE is similarly contested.


Sex Education | 2010

‘Selling it as a holistic health provision and not just about condoms …’ Sexual health services in school settings: current models and their relationship with sex and relationships education policy and provision

Eleanor Formby; Julia Hirst; Jenny Owen; Mark Hayter; Helen Stapleton

In this article we discuss the findings from a recent study of UK policy and practice in relation to sexual health services for young people, based in – or closely linked with – schools. This study formed part of a larger project, completed in 2009, which also included a systematic review of international research. The findings discussed in this paper are based on analyses of interviews with 51 service managers and questionnaire returns from 205 school nurses. Four themes are discussed. First, we found three main service permutations, in a context of very diverse and uneven implementation. Second, we identified factors within the school context that shaped and often constrained service provision; some of these also have implications for sex and relationships education (SRE). Third, we found contrasting approaches to the relationship between SRE input and sexual health provision. Fourth, we identified some specific barriers that need to be addressed in order to develop ‘young people friendly’ services in the school context. The relative autonomy available to school head teachers and governors can represent an obstacle to service provision – and inter-professional collaboration – in a climate where, in many schools, there is still considerable ambivalence about discussing ‘sex’ openly. In conclusion, we identify areas worthy of further research and development, in order to address some obstacles to sexual health service and SRE provision in schools.


Sex Education | 2018

The pleasure imperative? Reflecting on sexual pleasure’s inclusion in sex education and sexual health

Rachel Wood; Julia Hirst; Liz Wilson; Georgina Burns-O'Connell

Abstract This article offers an empirically grounded contribution to scholarship exploring the ways in which pleasure is ‘put to work’ in sex and sexuality education. Such research has cautioned against framing pleasure as a normative requirement of sexual activity and hence reproducing a ‘pleasure imperative’. This paper draws on interviews with sexual health and education practitioners who engaged with Pleasure Project resources and training between 2007 and 2016. Findings suggest that practitioners tend to understand pleasure within critical frameworks that allow them to avoid normalising and (re)enforcing a pleasure imperative. Accounts also show negotiations with, and strategic deployments of, values surrounding sexual pleasure in society and culture. While some accounts suggest that a pleasure imperative does run the risk of being reproduced by practitioners, notably this is when discussing more ‘contentious’ sexual practices. Interviews also demonstrate that practitioners attempting to implement a pleasure agenda are faced with a range of challenges. While some positive, holistic, and inclusive practice has been afforded by a pleasure approach, we argue that the importance of a critical framework needs to be (re)emphasised. The paper concludes by highlighting areas for further empirical research.


The International Journal of Qualitative Methods | 2017

Building Realist Program Theory for Large Complex and Messy Interventions

Katie Shearn; Peter Allmark; Hilary Piercy; Julia Hirst

Program theory, that is, the specific idea about how a program causes the intended or observed outcomes, should be the central aspect of any realist evaluation or synthesis. The methods used for explicating or building initial rough program theories (IRPTs) in realist research are varied and arguably often underreported. In addition, preexisting psychological and sociological theories, at a higher level of abstraction, could be used to a greater extent to inform their development. This article illustrates a method for building IRPTs for use in realist research evaluation and synthesis. This illustration involves showing how the IRPTs were developed in a realist evaluation concerning sexual health services for young people. In this evaluation, a broad framework of abstract theories was constructed early in the process to support IRPT building and frame more specific program theories as they were developed. These abstract theories were selected to support theorizing at macro-, meso-, and microlevels of social structure. This article discusses the benefits of using this method to build initial theories for particular types of interventions that are large, complex, and messy. It also addresses challenges relating to the selection of suitable theories.


Health Technology Assessment | 2010

School-linked sexual health services for young people (SSHYP): a survey and systematic review concerning current models, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and research opportunities

Jenny Owen; Christopher Carroll; Jo Cooke; Eleanor Formby; Mark Hayter; Julia Hirst; M Lloyd Jones; Helen Stapleton; Matt Stevenson; Anthea Sutton


Archive | 2010

Promoting Sexual Health

Roger Ingham; Julia Hirst


British Journal of Sociology of Education | 2001

Sociology as a Moral Discourse: A case study of social theory teaching

Anthony Rosie; Serena Bufton; Julia Hirst


Archive | 2006

Pathways into parenthood: reflections from three generations of teenage mothers and fathers

Julia Hirst; Eleanor Formby; Jenny Owen

Collaboration


Dive into the Julia Hirst's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eleanor Formby

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenny Owen

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hilary Piercy

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katie Shearn

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Allmark

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin Willis

Sheffield Hallam University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge