Julia K. Bosdou

Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles

BACKGROUND The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association of progesterone elevation (PE) on the day of hCG administration with the probability of pregnancy in fresh, frozen-thawed and donor/recipient IVF cycles. METHODS A literature search in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, COCHRANE CENTRAL and ISI Web of Science was performed aiming to identify studies comparing the probability of pregnancy in patients with or without PE after ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues. Standard meta-analytic methodology was used for the synthesis of results and meta-regression for exploration of heterogeneity. RESULTS Sixty-three eligible studies were identified evaluating 55 199 fresh IVF cycles, nine studies evaluating 7229 frozen-thawed cycles and eight studies evaluating 1330 donor/recipient cycles. In fresh IVF cycles, a decreased probability of pregnancy achievement was present in women with PE (when PE was defined using a threshold ≥ 0.8 ng/ml) when compared with those without PE. The pooled effect sizes were 0.8-1.1 ng/ml: odds ratio (OR) = 0.79; 1.2-1.4 ng/ml: OR = 0.67; 1.5-1.75 ng/ml: OR = 0.64; 1.9-3.0 ng/ml: OR: 0.68 (P < 0.05 in all cases). No adverse effect of PE on achieving pregnancy was observed in the frozen-thawed and the donor/recipient cycles. CONCLUSIONS Based on the analysis of more than 60 000 cycles, it can be supported that PE on the day of hCG administration is associated with a decreased probability of pregnancy achievement in fresh IVF cycles in women undergoing ovarian stimulation using GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins. On the other hand, an adverse effect of PE does not seem to be present in frozen-thawed and donor/recipient cycles.

The use of androgens or androgen-modulating agents in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of androgens or androgen-modulating agents on the probability of pregnancy achievement in poor responders undergoing IVF. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for the identification of randomized controlled trials evaluating the administration of testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), aromatase inhibitors, recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rhCG) before or during ovarian stimulation of poor responders. RESULTS In two trials involving 163 patients, pretreatment with transdermal testosterone was associated with an increase in clinical pregnancy [risk difference (RD): +15%, 95% confidence interval (CI): +3 to +26%] and live birth rates (RD: +11%, 95% CI: +0.3 to +22%) in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. No significant differences in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were observed between patients who received DHEA and those who did not. Similarly, (i) the use of aromatase inhibitors, (ii) addition of rLH and (iii) addition of rhCG in poor responders stimulated with rFSH for IVF were not associated with increased clinical pregnancy rates. In the only eligible study that provided data, live birth rate was increased in patients who received rLH when compared with those who did not (RD: +19%, 95% CI:+1 to +36%). CONCLUSIONS Based on the limited available evidence, transdermal testosterone pretreatment seems to increase clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. There is insufficient data to support a beneficial role of rLH, hCG, DHEA or letrozole administration in the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Estimating the net effect of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG on live birth rates after IVF: a cohort analysis of 3296 IVF cycles

STUDY QUESTION What is the proper way of assessing the effect of progesterone elevation (PE) on the day of hCG on live birth in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization (IVF) using GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins? SUMMARY ANSWER This study indicates that a multivariable approach, where the effect of the most important confounders is controlled for, can lead to markedly different results regarding the association between PE on the day of hCG and live birth rates after IVF when compared with the bivariate analysis that has been typically used in the relevant literature up to date. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PE on the day of hCG is associated with decreased pregnancy rates in fresh IVF cycles. Evidence for this comes from observational studies that mostly failed to control for potential confounders. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of fresh IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles (n = 3296) performed in a single IVF centre during the period 2001-2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients in whom ovarian stimulation was performed with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues. Natural cycles and cycles where stimulation involved the administration of clomiphene were excluded. In order to reflect routine clinical practice, no other exclusion criteria were imposed on this dataset. The primary outcome measure for this study was live birth defined as the delivery of a live infant after 24 weeks of gestation. We compared the association between PE on the day of hCG (defined as P > 1.5 ng/ml) and live birth rates calculated by simple bivariate analyses with that derived from multivariable logistic regression. The multivariable analysis controlled for female age, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, developmental stage of embryos at transfer (cleavage versus blastocyst), whether at least one good-quality embryo was transferred, the womans body mass index, the total dose of FSH administered during ovarian stimulation and the type of GnRH analogues used (agonists versus antagonists) during ovarian stimulation. In addition, an interaction analysis was performed in order to assess whether the ovarian response (<6, 6-18, >18 oocytes) has a moderating effect on the association of PE on the day of hCG with live birth rates after IVF. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Live birth rates were not significantly different between cycles with and those without PE when a bivariate analysis was performed [odds ratio (OR): 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-1.09]. However, when a multivariable analysis was performed, controlling for the effect of the aforementioned confounders, live birth rates (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.97) were significantly decreased in the group with PE on the day of hCG. The number of oocytes retrieved was the most potent confounder, causing a 29.4% reduction in the OR for live birth between the two groups compared. Furthermore, a moderating effect of ovarian response on the association between PE and live birth rates was not supported in the present analysis since no interaction was detected between PE and the type of ovarian response (<6, 6-18, >18 oocytes). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective analysis of data collected during a 12-year period, and although the effect of the most important confounders was controlled for in the multivariable analysis, the presence of residual bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This analysis highlights the need for a multivariable approach when researchers or clinicians aim to evaluate the impact of PE on pregnancy rates in their own clinical setting. Failure to do so might explain why many past studies have failed to identify the detrimental effect of PE in fresh IVF cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS None.

Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION Does substituting 150 µg corifollitropin alfa for 450 IU follitropin beta during the first 7 days of ovarian stimulation in proven poor responders, result in retrieval of a non-inferior number (<1.5 fewer) of cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER A single s.c. dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa on the first day of ovarian stimulation, followed if necessary, from Day 8 onwards, with 450 IU of follitropin beta/day, is not inferior to daily doses of 450 IU follitropin beta. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1 within the safety margin of 1.5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Recent data from retrospective studies suggest that the use of corifollitropin alfa in poor responders is promising since it could simplify ovarian stimulation without compromising its outcome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Seventy-nine women with previous poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI treatment were enrolled in this open label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Inclusion criteria were: previous poor response to ovarian stimulation (≤4 COCs) after maximal stimulation, age <45 years, regular spontaneous menstrual cycle, body mass index: 18-32 kg/m(2) and basal follicle stimulating hormone ≤20 IU/l. On Day 2 of the menstrual cycle, patients were administered either a single s.c dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa (n = 40) or a fixed daily dose of 450 IU of follitropin beta (n = 39). In the corifollitropin alfa group, 450 IU of follitropin beta were administered from Day 8 of stimulation until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration, if necessary. To inhibit premature luteinizing hormone surge, the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix was used. Triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed using 250 µg of recombinant hCG, when at least two follicles reached 17 mm in mean diameter. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The number of COCs retrieved was not statistically different between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta groups [Median 3 versus 2, 95% CI 2-4, 2-3, respectively, P = 0.26]. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1. A multivariable analysis adjusting for all the potential baseline differences confirmed this finding. No significant difference was observed regarding the probability of live birth between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta group (live birth per patient reaching oocyte retrieval: 7.9 versus 2.6%, respectively, difference +5.3%, 95% CI: -6.8 to +18.3). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present study was not powered to test a smaller difference (e.g. 1 COC) in terms of COCs retrieved as well as to show potential differences in the probability of pregnancy. Moreover, it would be interesting to assess whether the continuation of stimulation in the long acting FSH arm, where necessary, with 200 IU instead of 450 IU of follitropin beta would have altered the direction or the magnitude of the effect of the type of FSH, observed on the number of COCs retrieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Corifollitropin alfa simplifies IVF treatment because it is administered in a GnRH antagonist protocol and replaces seven daily FSH injections with a single one of a long acting FSH without compromising the outcome. It could greatly reduce the burden of treatment for poor responders and this deserves further investigation.

Basal serum progesterone and history of elevated progesterone on the day of hCG administration are significant predictors of late follicular progesterone elevation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles

STUDY QUESTION Are there any baseline predictors of progesterone elevation (PE) on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) which are not associated with the intensity of ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) using follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists? SUMMARY ANSWER Basal (Day 2 of the menstrual cycle) serum progesterone concentration and history of PE are baseline variables that can predict the occurrence of PE on the day of hCG independently of the intensity of ovarian stimulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PE on the day of hCG is associated with the magnitude of the ovarian response to stimulation. For this reason, it has been hypothesized that milder ovarian stimulation might reduce the probability of PE. However, given the fact that the number of oocytes retrieved is associated with the probability of live birth, such a strategy should be considered only in patients that are at high risk of PE on the day of hCG. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of fresh IVF/ICSI cycles (n = 1702) performed in a single IVF centre during the period 2001-2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients in whom ovarian stimulation was performed with FSH and GnRH antagonists and with basal FSH <14.0 mIU/ml, progesterone (P) ≤1.6 ng/ml and estradiol (E2) ≤80 pg/ml on the same day (prior to the initiation of stimulation) were considered eligible. PE was defined as serum progesterone concentration >1.5 ng/ml. Pre-stimulation characteristics of patients and basal hormonal profile were assessed for their ability to predict the occurrence of PE after ovarian stimulation through generalized estimating equation univariable and multivariable regression analyses, controlling for the effect of ovarian stimulation. Furthermore, a secondary analysis in a subset of patients with multiple IVF cycles explored whether the occurrence of PE in one of the previous cycles included in this study is associated with a significantly higher occurrence of PE elevation in subsequent cycles. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Univariable regression analyses showed that female age (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), basal FSH (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.92) and basal P (OR: 4.20; 95% CI: 2.47-7.12) were baseline variables that could significantly predict PE on the day of hCG. When these variables were entered in the same model as covariates, only basal FSH (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94) and basal P (OR: 3.83; 95% CI: 2.24-6.56) could still predict the occurrence of PE. Basal P (OR: 6.30; 95% CI: 3.35-11.82) was the only variable that could significantly predict the occurrence of PE on the day of hCG after adjusting for the intensity of ovarian stimulation. The secondary analysis revealed that history of PE on the day of hCG in a previous cycle was also strongly associated with an increased risk of PE in a subsequent cycle. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective analysis and although the effect of the most important confounders was controlled for in the multivariable analysis, the presence of residual bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings of this study might help clinicians identify patients at high risk for late follicular PE and alter the management of their cycle. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.

Thyroid function and autoimmunity during ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The aim of the present study was to assess changes in thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) throughout ovarian stimulation (OS) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the association of these changes with ICSI outcome. A flexible gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol was used in 42 women and their thyroid function and TAI were assessed at baseline and five times during OS (Days 3 and 5 of the menstrual cycle, the day of hCG administration, the day of ovum pick-up and the day of the pregnancy test). The primary outcome measure was the change in thyroid function throughout OS. No overall change was recorded in thyrotropin-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations throughout OS (P=0.066). In women who became pregnant (n=8), an increase in TSH concentrations was noted on the day of the pregnancy test compared with Day 3 of the menstrual cycle (3.410±1.200 vs 2.014±0.950μIU mL-1, respectively; P=0.001; mean ± s.d.). TAI was present in 11 of 42 women. Biochemical pregnancy was negatively correlated with changes in TSH (r=-0.7, P=0.004). No such association was noted regarding the live birth rate. The present study provides evidence that TSH concentrations could increase during OS, especially in women who become pregnant.

Is the time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval associated with oocyte retrieval rate

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prolongation of the time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval, from 36 h to 38 h, affects oocyte retrieval rate in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins and GnRH antagonists for IVF. One hundred and fifty-six normo-ovulatory women were randomized to have oocyte retrieval performed 36 h (n = 78) or 38 h (n = 78) following HCG administration. Oocyte retrieval rate was defined as number of cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) retrieved/follicle ≥ 11 mm present on day of HCG administration. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding baseline characteristics. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between the groups regarding oocyte retrieval rate (difference: + 1.2%, 95% CI for difference between medians: -4.5 to +12.1). The median (95% CI for the median) was not significantly different between the groups regarding number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) retrieved: 5.5 (5.0-7.0) versus 6.0 (5.0-6.2), respectively, and fertilization rates: 57.7% (50.0-66.7) versus 50.0% (44.8-65.5), respectively. Live birth rates were similar between the groups (20.5% versus 16.7%, RD: + 3.8%, 95% CI: -8.5 to +16.1, respectively). Prolongation of time interval between HCG administration and oocyte retrieval from 36 h to 38 h does not affect oocyte retrieval rate.

Propofol versus thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval: a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical outcomes of IVF cycles using propofol or thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval were compared. The primary outcome measure was fertilization rate per patient. One hundred and eighty patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for IVF were randomized to receive either propofol (n = 90) or thiopental sodium (n = 90). No significant differences in baseline characteristics were present between the two groups. Overall fertilization rates were similar between propofol and thiopental sodium groups, respectively: median (IQR): 54.8 (29.2) versus 54.6 (29.7); fertilization rates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection only: median (IQR): 70 (50) versus 75 (50), respectively. For secondary outcome measures, time under anaesthesia was significantly increased in the thiopental sodium group: median (IQR): 12(5) versus 10 (4.5) min, P = 0.019 compared with the propofol group. Number of cumulus oocyte complexes retrieved [median (IQR): 7.1 (6.3) versus 6.5 (5.6)] did not differ significantly between the two groups. A non-significant difference in live birth rates per randomized patient of +4.4% (95% CI: -5.7 to +14.6) in favour of propofol was observed. Use of propofol compared with thiopental sodium for general anaesthesia during oocyte retrieval results in similar fertilization rates and IVF outcomes.

Testicular versus ejaculated spermatozoa for ICSI in patients without azoospermia: A systematic review

The use of testicular spermatozoa in men without azoospermia has been proposed as a means to increase the chances of pregnancy following assisted reproductive treatment. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess whether clinical outcomes are better when testicular rather than ejaculated spermatozoa are used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with abnormal semen parameters without azoospermia. A literature search identified four eligible studies out of 757 initially found. In a prospective study in men with high DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and oligozoospermia, the probability of live birth was significantly higher with testicular compared to ejaculated spermatozoa (risk ratio [RR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.70). This was not the case in a retrospective study in men with high DFI only (RR: 2.36, 95% CI: 0.98-5.68). Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in a randomized controlled trial in men with asthenozoospermia with or without teratozoospermia (RR: 2.85, 95% CI: 0.76-10.69) and in a retrospective study in men with isolated asthenozoospermia (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.56-2.14). Currently, there is limited, low-quality evidence suggesting that a higher probability of pregnancy might be expected using testicular rather than ejaculated spermatozoa, only in men with high DFI and oligozoospermia.

Oocyte Donation in Perimenopausal and Menopausal Women

Reproductive menopause is recognised as a pause of reproductive ability due to the decline of ovarian reserve with age. The time period preceding menopause, called perimenopause, involves a transition period of variations in the menstrual cycle and endocrine levels. While fertility declines with age, perimenopausal conception remains a challenge regarding the chances of pregnancy achievement. Although IVF is widely used in the management of infertility in women of advanced maternal age, the extremely low pregnancy rates achieved in these patients necessitate to consider alternative options with higher success rates. Oocyte donation represents an efficacious and well-established treatment option in ART, particularly in perimenopausal and menopausal women. Higher pregnancy and delivery rates, as well as lower miscarriage rates have been reported with the use of donated oocytes in older women. However, obstetrical and neonatal complications seem to be increased in pregnancies with oocyte donation, raising ethical and social considerations. In order to minimize the risk of serious complications, appropriate management strategies with regard to oocyte donation should be evaluated after careful selection of patients. Moreover, a detailed medical evaluation and a thorough counselling of patients interested in receiving donated oocytes need to be offered.