Julia Prusik
Albany Medical College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julia Prusik.
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery | 2016
Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Heather Smith; Vignessh Kumar; Julia Prusik; Sujoy Phookan; Julie G. Pilitsis
Background: Although thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established as an effective therapy for refractory tremor in Parkinsons disease and essential tremor, reports investigating the efficacy of posterior subthalamic area (PSA) DBS for severe, debilitating tremors continue to emerge. However, questions regarding the optimal anatomical target, surgical approach, programming paradigms and effectiveness compared to other targets remain. Objectives: In this report, we aimed to review the current literature to assess different stereotactic techniques, anatomical considerations, adverse effects and stimulation settings in PSA DBS. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed searching for articles discussing tremors and PSA stimulation. We performed a quantitative analysis comparing different DBS tremor targets. Results: Tremor improvement is consistently documented in most reports with an average reduction in tremor of 79% depending on the specific tremor syndrome. Tremor benefit in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) tremor was significantly higher than for other stimulation targets. Transient paresthesias, imbalance, dizziness and dysarthria are the most common side effects with PSA DBS. Conclusions: PSA DBS is an effective and safe treatment for tremor control and should be considered in patients with refractory tremors with associated cerebellar or dystonic features, proximal tremors and MS tremor.
Neuromodulation | 2016
Christopher Fama; Nita Chen; Julia Prusik; Vignessh Kumar; Meghan Wilock; Steven Roth; Julie G. Pilitsis
Pre‐operative psychological assessment is commonly used to assess patients for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Though often times mandated by insurance, its value is frequently questioned.
Neuromodulation | 2017
Olivia Marola; Rasan Cherala; Julia Prusik; Vignessh Kumar; Chris Fama; Meghan Wilock; Jordan Crimmins; Julie G. Pilitsis
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective method of treating chronic pain. Obese patients are overrepresented in chronic pain cases. We examine the effect of body mass index (BMI) on SCS success.
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2017
Abigail Belasen; Khizer Rizvi; Lucy Gee; Philip Yeung; Julia Prusik; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Era Hanspal; Priscilla Paiva; Jennifer Durphy; Charles Argoff; Julie G. Pilitsis
OBJECTIVE Chronic pain is a major distressing symptom of Parkinsons disease (PD) that is often undertreated. Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivers high-frequency stimulation (HFS) to patients with PD and has been effective in pain relief in a subset of these patients. However, up to 74% of patients develop new pain concerns while receiving STN DBS. Here the authors explore whether altering the frequency of STN DBS changes pain perception as measured through quantitative sensory testing (QST). METHODS Using QST, the authors measured thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds in 19 patients undergoing DBS via HFS, low-frequency stimulation (LFS), and off conditions in a randomized order. Testing was performed in the region of the body with the most pain and in the lower back in patients without chronic pain. RESULTS In the patients with chronic pain, LFS significantly reduced heat detection thresholds as compared with thresholds following HFS (p = 0.029) and in the off state (p = 0.010). Moreover, LFS resulted in increased detection thresholds for mechanical pressure (p = 0.020) and vibration (p = 0.040) compared with these thresholds following HFS. Neither LFS nor HFS led to changes in other mechanical thresholds. In patients without chronic pain, LFS significantly increased mechanical pain thresholds in response to the 40-g pinprick compared with thresholds following HFS (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS Recent literature has suggested that STN LFS can be useful in treating nonmotor symptoms of PD. Here the authors demonstrated that LFS modulates thermal and mechanical detection to a greater extent than HFS. Low-frequency stimulation is an innovative means of modulating chronic pain in PD patients receiving STN DBS. The authors suggest that STN LFS may be a future option to consider when treating Parkinsons patients in whom pain remains the predominant complaint.
Neuromodulation | 2017
Julia Prusik; Charles Argoff; Sophia Peng; Julie G. Pilitsis
Ziconotide use in intrathecal drug therapy (IDT) has been limited by dosing related side effects. We examine our experience with ziconotide as a first line IDT monotherapy in patients with chronic pain and present our low and slow dosing algorithm aimed at reducing these patient experienced side effects while adequately managing pain.
Neuromodulation | 2016
Tina Ramineni; Julia Prusik; Samik Patel; Steven Lange; Jessica Haller; Chris Fama; Charles Argoff; Julie G. Pilitsis
Studies of chronic pain show sleep disturbances to be a prevalent symptom in 50–88% of patients and studies show improved pain to correspond with improved sleep. The impact of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on sleep in failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, and neuropathic pain patients has not been studied prospectively.
Neuromodulation | 2016
Abigail Belasen; Youngwon Youn; Lucy Gee; Julia Prusik; Brant Lai; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Khizer Rizvi; Philip Yeung; Damian S. Shin; Charles Argoff; Julie G. Pilitsis
Chronic pain is a major, debilitating symptom of Parkinsons disease (PD). Although, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to improve pain outcomes, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unclear. Microelectrode recording allows us to measure both local field potentials (LFPs) and single neuronal unit activity (SUA).
Neuromodulation | 2018
Hirah Khan; Julie G. Pilitsis; Julia Prusik; Heather Smith; Sarah E. McCallum
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for chronic pain. How often pain remission follows SCS has not been evaluated. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an implantation of spinal cord stimulators for various chronic pain conditions. The objective of the study was to elucidate characteristics and features of patients with pain relief greater than 80% after one year of treatment.
Neuromodulation | 2017
Claire Collison; Julia Prusik; Steven Paniccioli; Michael Briotte; Rachael Grey; Paul J. Feustel; Julie G. Pilitsis
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) through electromyography (EMG) studies has been shown to be a safe, effective way to determine the laterality of the spinal cord and guide electrode placement during spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, the use of IONM to predict post‐operative energy requirements and midline has not been examined and offers a new avenue to streamline programming and device selection. Further, the impact of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness on intraoperative and post‐operative amplitudes is understood but has not been explicitly characterized.
Neuromodulation | 2017
Sameah Haider; Stephane Owusu-Sarpong; Maria Peris Celda; Meghan Wilock; Julia Prusik; Youngwon Youn; Julie G. Pilitsis
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been a valuable resource for the treatment of chronic, nonmalignant pain that persists in the face of maximal medical management. A recent study demonstrated efficacy of cervical SCS in a multicenter registry. Here, in our single center study, we are able to delve into patient specifics, explore outcomes with percutaneous vs. paddle implants, and examine impact of patient symptomatology.