Julia Shelton
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julia Shelton.
Journal of Surgical Education | 2010
Matthew P. Landman; Julia Shelton; Rondi M. Kauffmann; Jeffery B. Dattilo
OBJECTIVES The use of social networking (SN) sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, has skyrocketed during the past 5 years, with more than 400 million current users. What was once isolated to high schools or college campuses has become increasingly ubiquitous in everyday life and across a multitude of industries. Medical centers and residency programs are not immune to this invasion. These sites present opportunities for the rapid dissemination of information from status updates, to tweets, to medical support groups, and even clinical communication between patients and providers. Although powerful, this technology also opens the door for misuse and policies for use will be necessary. We strive to begin a discourse in the surgical community in regard to maintaining professionalism while using SN sites. RESULTS The use of SN sites among surgical house staff and faculty has not been addressed previously. To that end, we sought to ascertain the use of the SN site Facebook at our residency program. Of 88 residents and 127 faculty, 56 (64%) and 28 (22%), respectively, have pages on Facebook. Of these, 50% are publicly accessible. Thirty-one percent of the publicly accessible pages had work-related comments posted, and of these comments, 14% referenced specific patient situations or were related to patient care. CONCLUSIONS Given the widespread use of SN websites in our surgical community and in society as a whole, every effort should be made to guard against professional truancy. We offer a set of guidelines consistent with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American College of Surgeons professionalism mandates in regard to usage of these websites. By acknowledging this need and by following these guidelines, surgeons will continue to define and uphold ethical boundaries and thus demonstrate a commitment to patient privacy and the highest levels of professionalism.
Journal of Surgical Research | 2012
Kristy L. Kummerow; Julia Shelton; Sharon Phillips; Michael D. Holzman; William H. Nealon; William C. Beck; Kenneth W. Sharp; Benjamin K. Poulose
INTRODUCTION Management of choledocholithiasis and its complications is variable and often requires transfer to a specialty facility. This study links patient-specific characteristics with the outcome measure of complicated choledocholithiasis to identify high-risk patients who may require expedited treatment or transfer to a higher level of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with a discharge diagnosis of choledocholithiasis (CDL) were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patient characteristics were identified associated with the primary outcome measure of complicated choledocholithiasis (cCDL), defined as acute pancreatitis or cholangitis during the admission for CDL. Predictors of mortality were also evaluated. Analysis was performed using complex-sample univariate and adjusted analyses. RESULTS We identified 123,990 discharges with a diagnosis of CDL. The overall incidence of CDL was 314 per 100,000 NIS discharges. Forty-one percent of CDL discharges were for cCDL (acute pancreatitis 31%, cholangitis 12%). Risk factors for cCDL included age (risk increased 0.8% per year), male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.2), alcohol abuse (OR 1.5, CI 1.3-1.8), diabetes (OR 1.1, CI 1.0-1.2), hypertension (OR 1.1, CI 1.0-1.2), obesity (OR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.3), nonelective admission (OR 2.3, CI 2.0-2.6), and Asian/Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (OR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.5). Patients with cCDL had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-2.0). CONCLUSIONS Increased age, nonelective admission, and specific comorbid conditions are associated with cCDL, which has increased mortality. These factors can be used to identify patients needing timely access to treatment or transfer to a higher level of care.
Journal of Surgical Research | 2011
Julia Shelton; Kristy L. Kummerow; Sharon Phillips; Marie R. Griffin; Michael D. Holzman; William H. Nealon; C. Wright Pinson; Benjamin K. Poulose
BACKGROUND Exploration of urban-rural (UR) and regional differences is critical to developing effective healthcare delivery systems. Choledocholithiasis (CDL) remains a common problem with a range of therapeutic options and potentially severe complications. This study evaluated UR and regional differences of CDL presentation and treatment. We hypothesized that UR status contributes to differences in treatment of CDL. METHODS This study examined patients from the 2007 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project dataset. Inpatient discharges and interventions for CDL patients were identified. UR and regional designations were determined from National Center for Health Statistics guidelines. Patients with pancreatitis or cholangitis were designated as complicated CDL (cCDL) patients. Interventions for CDL were classified as endoscopic, surgical, or percutaneous. Complex-sample proportion analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 111,021 patients with CDL were identified; 81% of these patients lived in urban areas compared with 19% in rural areas; 61% had uncomplicated choledocholithiasis (uCDL) and 39% had cCDL. The overall distribution of uCDL and cCDL did not differ by UR status or region. A higher proportion of rural patients did not receive an intervention 45.1% (95%CI 41.8%-48.4%) versus urban patients 30.5% (28.8%-32.2%), P < 0.05. Interventions for urban patients were more likely endoscopic 87.7% (86.8%-88.6%) compared with rural 82.0% (79.3%-84.7%), P < 0.05. Rural patients were more likely to undergo surgery 10.5% (8.6%-12.4%) than urban patients 4.9% (4.4%-5.4%), P < 0.05. Regional variations did not impact the type of intervention received. CONCLUSION Rural patients received CDL interventions less often and had a higher proportion of surgical interventions regardless of severity of presentation.
Journal of Surgical Education | 2014
Julia Shelton; Kristy L. Kummerow; Sharon Phillips; Patrick G. Arbogast; Marie R. Griffin; Michael D. Holzman; William H. Nealon; Benjamin K. Poulose
OBJECTIVE In 2003, duty-hour regulations (DHR) were initially implemented for residents in the United States to improve patient safety and protect residents well-being. The effect of DHR on patient safety remains unclear. The study objective was to evaluate the effect of DHR on patient safety. DESIGN Using an interrupted time series analysis, we analyzed selected patient safety indicators (PSIs) for 376 million discharges in teaching (T) vs nonteaching (NT) hospitals before and after implementation of DHR in 2003 that restricted resident work hours to 80 hours per week. The PSIs evaluated were postoperative pulmonary embolus or deep venous thrombosis (PEDVT), iatrogenic pneumothorax (PTx), accidental puncture or laceration, postoperative wound dehiscence (WD), postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma, and postoperative physiologic or metabolic derangement. Propensity scores were used to adjust for differences in patient comorbidities between T and NT hospitals and between discharge quarters. The primary outcomes were differences in the PSI rates before and after DHR implementation. The PSI differences between T and NT institutions were the secondary outcome. SETTING T and NT hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Participants were 376 million patient discharges from 1998 to 2007 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS Declining rates of PTx in both T and NT hospitals preintervention slowed only in T hospitals postintervention (p = 0.04). Increasing PEDVT rates in both T and NT hospitals increased further only in NT hospitals (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the PSI rates over time for hemorrhage or hematoma, physiologic or metabolic derangement, accidental puncture or laceration, or WD. T hospitals had higher rates than NT hospitals both preintervention and postintervention for all the PSIs except WD. CONCLUSIONS Trends in rates for 2 of the 6 PSIs changed significantly after DHR implementation, with PTx rates worsening in T hospitals and PEDVT rates worsening in NT hospitals. Lack of consistent patterns of change suggests no measurable effect of the policy change on these PSIs.
Surgical Clinics of North America | 2011
Julia Shelton; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Pediatric surgeons can play an important role in offering procedures that may improve the quality of life for terminally ill children. As with all palliative interventions, surgical therapies should be evaluated in the context of explicitly defined treatment goals while weighing the risks and benefits of procedures in the context of a shortened life span. It is essential that pediatric surgeons become active members in the multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care.
Hernia | 2012
Benjamin K. Poulose; Julia Shelton; Sharon Phillips; D. Moore; William H. Nealon; David F. Penson; William C. Beck; Michael D. Holzman
Journal of Surgical Education | 2011
Rondi M. Kauffmann; Matthew P. Landman; Julia Shelton; Roger R. Dmochowski; Sandra H. Bledsoe; Gerald B. Hickson; R. Daniel Beauchamp; Jeffery B. Dattilo
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2016
Rebeccah B. Baucom; Irene D. Feurer; Julia Shelton; Kristy L. Kummerow; Michael D. Holzman; Benjamin K. Poulose
Journal of Surgical Research | 2011
Benjamin K. Poulose; Sharon Phillips; William H. Nealon; Julia Shelton; Kristy L. Kummerow; David F. Penson; Michael D. Holzman
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2010
Rondi M. Kauffmann; Matthew P. Landman; Julia Shelton; Roger R. Dmochowski; Robert D. Beauchamp; Jeffery B. Dattilo