Julian Lausch

Resin Infiltration of Fissure Caries with Various Techniques of Pretreatment in vitro

The resin infiltration technique might be used for occlusal caries lesions in order to arrest their progression. This in vitro study evaluated the influence of various modifications of the infiltration technique on the penetration abilities of the infiltrant into occlusal lesions. Extracted human molars and premolars (n = 140) with non-cavitated white spot lesions were randomly allocated to 7 groups. As control, specimens were etched with 15% hydrochloric acid (HCl) gel for 120 s and resin infiltrated for 180 s (Icon; DMG). As modification HCl gel reduced in surface tension and viscosity with and without abrasives was applied using 3 different types of brushes either to oscillate or rub the HCl gel onto the enamel surface. The median maximum lesion depth was 1,232 µm (interquartile range 882-1,513). Compared with the control procedure [23% (16/50)] a higher percentage penetration was observed if the HCl gel was mixed with a small amount of abrasives were rubbed into the fissures using a modified brush with stiff bristles that were adjusted to the fissure relief for either 120 s [100% (64/100)] or 30 s [98% (61/100); p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney test]. All other experimental treatments resulted in penetration results in-between. It can be concluded that the use of an abrasive HCl gel in conjunction with a modified brush mostly enhances resin infiltration into fissure caries lesions.

Penetration of micro-filled infiltrant resins into artificial caries lesions

OBJECTIVES Infiltrants are non-filled low-viscosity resins that have been developed to arrest lesion progression by penetrating into the porosities of non-cavitated lesions where they are hardened and arrest lesion progression. The addition of fillers to infiltrant resin might combine the high penetrativity of the former with the better applicability of composite resins. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the penetration of different experimental micro-filled infiltrant resins (MFIRs) into artificial enamel lesions. METHODS An infiltrant (Icon; DMG) was mixed with either one of three fillers [OF83: organic filler (83μm), OF42: organic filler (42μm) or GF0.7: glass filler (0.7μm)] reaching 35, 45 and 55% filler content, respectively. In each of 180 bovine enamel specimens three artificial lesions were created; two lesions were etched for 5s (37% H3PO4), leaving one lesion as control. Specimens were randomly allocated to 10 groups, in which either one of the MFIRs or the infiltrant was applied onto the two etched lesions for either 5s or 10s (n=18/group). Percentage of penetration (PP) was calculated and analysed. RESULTS For both application times a significant influence of filler size but not of filler concentration on PP could be revealed (p<0.05; two-way ANOVA). PP of MFIRs-OF42 was not significantly different from unfilled infiltrant but significantly higher than those of OF83 and GF0.7 (p<0.05; two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSIONS MFIRs-OF42 showed the ability to penetrate into artificial enamel caries lesions similar to the unfilled infiltrant resin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE MFIRs could provide a new micro-invasive treatment for small-cavitated lesions.

Re- and Demineralization Characteristics of Enamel Depending on Baseline Mineral Loss and Lesion Depth in situ

Objectives: The aim of this double-blinded, randomized, cross-over in situ study was to evaluate the re- and demineralization characteristics of sound enamel as well as lowly and highly demineralized caries-like enamel lesions after the application of different fluoride compounds. Methods: In each of three experimental legs of 4 weeks, 21 participants wore intraoral mandibular appliances containing 4 bovine enamel specimens (2 lowly and 2 highly demineralized). Each specimen included one sound enamel and either one lowly demineralized (7 days, pH 4.95) or one highly demineralized (21 days, pH 4.95) lesion, and was positioned 1 mm below the acrylic under a plastic mesh. The three randomly allocated treatments (application only) included the following dentifrices: (1) 1,100 ppm F as NaF, (2) 1,100 ppm F as SnF2 and (3) 0 ppm F (fluoride-free) as negative control. Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔLD) were calculated between values before and after the in situ period using transversal microradiography. Results: Of the 21 participants, 6 did not complete the study and 2 were excluded due to protocol violation. Irrespectively of the treatment, higher baseline mineral loss and lesion depth led to a less pronounced change in mineral loss and lesion depth. Except for ΔΔZ of the dentifrice with 0 ppm F, sound surfaces showed significantly higher ΔΔZ and ΔLD values compared with lowly and highly demineralized lesions (p < 0.05, t test). Conclusion: Re- and demineralization characteristics of enamel depended directly on baseline mineral loss and lesion depth. Treatment groups should therefore be well balanced with respect to baseline mineral loss and lesion depth.

Caries-Preventive Effect of NaF, NaF plus TCP, NaF plus CPP-ACP, and SDF Varnishes on Sound Dentin and Artificial Dentin Caries in vitro

The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect of different fluoride varnishes on sound dentin as well as on artificial dentin caries-like lesions. Bovine dentin specimens (n = 220) with one sound surface (ST) and one artificial caries lesion (DT) were prepared and randomly allocated to 11 groups. The interventions before pH cycling were as follows: application of a varnish containing NaF (22,600 ppm F^-; Duraphat [NaF₀/NaF₁]), NaF plus tricalcium phosphate (22,600 ppm F^-; Clinpro White Varnish Mint [TCP₀/TCP₁]), NaF plus casein phosphopeptide-stabilized amorphous calcium phosphate complexes (CPP-ACP; 22,600 ppm F^-; MI Varnish [CPP₀/CPP₁]), or silver diamine fluoride (SDF; 35,400 ppm F^-; Cariestop 30% [SDF₀/SDF₁]) and no intervention (N_NB/N₀/N₁). During pH cycling (14 days, 6 × 120 min demineralization/day) half of the specimens in each group were brushed (10 s; 2 times/day) with either fluoride-free (“0”; e.g., TCP₀) or 1,100 ppm F^- (“1”; e.g., TCP₁) dentifrice slurry. In another subgroup, the specimens were pH cycled but not brushed (N_NB). Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ), lesion depth (ΔLD), and colorimetric values (ΔΔE) were calculated between the values after initial demineralization and those after pH cycling, using transversal microradiography and photographic images. After pH cycling, no discoloration could be observed. Furthermore, N_NB, N₀, and N₁ showed significantly increased ΔZ_DT/LD_DT and ΔZ_ST/LD_ST values, indicating further demineralization. In contrast, CPP₀, CPP₁, SDF₀, and SDF₁ showed significantly decreased ΔZ_DT/LD_DT values, indicating remineralization (p ≤ 0.004; paired t test). CPP₀, CPP₁, SDF₀, and SDF₁ showed significantly higher changes in ΔΔZ_DT/ΔLD_DT and ΔΔZ_ST/ΔLD_ST than N_NB, N₀, and N₁ (p < 0.001; Bonferroni post hoc test). In conclusion, under the conditions chosen, all fluoride varnishes prevented further demineralization. However, only NaF plus CPP-ACP and SDF could remineralize artificial dentin caries-like lesions under net-demineralizing conditions, thereby indicating that NaF plus CPP-ACP and SDF may be helpful to high-caries-risk patients.

Effects of Self-Assembling Peptide P11-4, Fluorides, and Caries Infiltration on Artificial Enamel Caries Lesions in vitro

The application of a self-assembling peptide on noncavitated caries lesions is supposed to be a feasible approach to facilitate remineralization and mask their unfavorable appearance. However, demineralizing conditions are common in the oral environment, so the aim of this pH-cycling study was to compare recommended and novel treatment methods regarding their ability to hamper demineralization and as a consequence mask artificial enamel caries lesions. Artificial caries lesions were prepared in bovine enamel and randomly allocated to 11 groups (n = 22). Treatments before pH-cycling were as follows: the application of a self-assembling peptide (Curodont™ Repair [C]), a low-viscosity resin (Icon® [I]), 2 fluoride solutions (10,000 ppm F^-: Elmex fluid [E] and 43,350 ppm F^-: Tiefenfluorid® [T]), and no intervention (N). During pH-cycling (28 days, 6 × 60 min demineralization/day) half of the specimens in each group were brushed (10 s; 2 ×/day) with either fluoride-free (named e.g., C₀) or NaF (1,100 ppm F^-; e.g., C₁) dentifrice slurry. In another subgroup specimens were pH-cycled but not brushed (N_NB). Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ), lesion depth (ΔLD), and colorimetric values (ΔΔE) were calculated between values after pre-demineralization, surface treatment, and pH-cycling. Specimens of C₀, C₁, N_NB, N₀, N₁, T₀, and E₀ showed significantly increased ΔZ and LD values after pH-cycling (p ≤ 0.003; paired t test). C₀, C₁, N_NB, and N₀ showed significantly higher changes in ΔΔZ than E₁, I₀, I₁, and T₁ (p < 0.001; ANOVA). Significantly reduced colorimetric values could only be observed for I₁, I₀, E₁, and E₀ after treatment and after pH-cycling (p ≤ 0.027; paired t test). In conclusion, under the conditions chosen only the application of a low-viscosity resin could mask caries lesions significantly, whereas self-assembling peptides could neither inhibit lesion progression nor mask the lesions considerably.

Micro-filled resin infiltration of fissure caries lesions in vitro

OBJECTIVES The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate three treatment modalities [infiltrant resin (IR), micro-filled infiltrant resin (MFIR), infiltrant-sealant-combination (ISC)] regarding both their abilities to penetrate lesions differing in ICDAS-codes and to fill fissures and cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS Extracted human molars (n=90) showing fissure caries lesions with and without cavitations were etched with 15% hydrochloric acid (HCl) that was mixed with abrasives and a 15% HCl-solution (1:1). The etching gel was rubbed for 30s within the fissure and, if eligible, within the cavity using a brush. After this pretreatment an infiltrant (Icon; DMG; IR) or an infiltrant mixed with microfillers (MFIR) was applied. ISC included the application of an infiltrant followed by a fissure sealant (Helioseal; Ivoclar Vivadent) From each tooth slices showing a non-cavitated (based on ICDAS-2) or cavitated lesion part (based on ICDAS-3/5) were prepared. Lesion (LA) and penetration areas (PA) as well as the completeness of fissure and cavity filling were analyzed using dual staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy. RESULTS Percentage penetration (PP) was calculated as 100×PA/LA. PP [median (25th/75th)] did not differ significantly between IR [95 (86/100)%], MFIR [93 (62/100)%] or ISC [89 (67/97)%] (p>0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). All three materials filled about 90% of the dimensions of fissures and cavities (p>0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSION It can be concluded that MFIR seems to be suitable to fill fissures and cavities like a fissure sealant and that it penetrates fissure caries lesions similarly deep as the conventional infiltrant after an experimental etching regime. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The MFIR seems to combine advantages of the fissure sealing and the caries infiltration procedure.

Modified resin infiltration of non-, micro- and cavitated proximal caries lesions in vitro

OBJECTIVE Infiltrant resin (IR) is currently indicated for non-cavitated caries lesions. However, modifying the technique might expand its indication spectrum to micro-cavitated lesions. The present study aimed to evaluate the penetration/filling ability of a newly developed micro-filled infiltrant resin (MFIR) in non-, micro- and cavitated natural caries lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Proximal lesions in 120 extracted human teeth with ICDAS-2 (n = 30), 3 (n = 45) and 5 (n = 45) lesions were etched with 15% hydrochloric acid gel for 2 min and allocated to one of the following treatments; IR: lesions (ICDAS-2, 3 and 5; each n = 15) were treated with commercial infiltrant resin for 3 min. MFIR: experimental MFIR [55 wt% IR plus 45 wt% organic fillers] was applied to lesions (ICDAS-2, 3 and 5; each n = 15) for 3 min. IR + FC: IR was applied for 3 min, light-cured, and cavities (ICDAS-3 and 5; each n = 15) filled with flowable composite (FC). Percentage infiltration of the demineralized enamel (Inf.%) and percentage filling of the cavity (Fill.%) were analyzed using dual-fluorescence staining and confocal microscopy. RESULTS No significant differences in Inf.% (range of medians: 57%-100%) were observed between different treatments (p > 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis) within each ICDAS-code. Fill.% of cavities was significantly higher in groups MFIR (median in ICDAS-3/-5: 100%/100%) and IR + FC (100%/100%) than IR (25%/38%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION MFIR showed similar penetration into natural lesions as the commercial infiltrant, but better ability to fill cavitated areas. CLINICAL RELEVANCE MFIR and IR + FC might provide a new micro-invasive treatment for small cavitated proximal lesions.

Natural saliva as an adjuvant in a secondary caries model based on Streptococcus mutans

OBJECTIVE Two factors for secondary caries formation were evaluated using an artificial biofilm model, saliva as additive in culture medium and bonding procedures of composite materials for artificial gap creation. DESIGN Standardized cavities were prepared in bovine tooth samples (n = 44), treated with two different bonding pretreatments, restored and after artificial ageing incubated with Streptococcus mutans in a Mueller-Hinton-Broth-Sugar medium with or without human saliva for seven days. Secondary caries formation was analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy and transversal microradiography. RESULTS Lesions were significantly pronounced in groups using saliva, but were not influenced by the bonding pretreatments. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the addition of saliva, but not the type of bonding procedure influences the outcome in the present biofilm-based secondary caries model.

Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2014

Adair, P. Adams, G. Aleksejuniene, J. Alves, L. Amaechi, B. Anderson, P. Armfield, J. Arnold, W. Arthur, R. Ashley, P. Bader, J. Baelum, V. Baumann, T. Bertacci, A. Bhawal, U. Bjorndal, L. Bottenberg, P. Boushell, L. Bowen, W. Bradshaw, D. Braga, M. Breschi, L. Brighenti, F. Broadbent, J. Bronkhorst, E. Buchalla, W. Burnside, G. Burrow, M. Campus, G. Carey, C. Carpenter, G. Carvalho, J. Caufield, P. Charone, S. Chow, L.C. Clarkson, B. Creeth, J. Darvell, B. Dashper, S. Davies, J.